These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Do Level 4 missions pay too much compared to 1 through 3?

First post First post
Author
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#1021 - 2013-09-08 21:37:33 UTC
Khanh'rhh wrote:

The point isn't inflation (which I haven't seen argued ITT really) but the acquisition of personal wealth, because it's the latter which acts as personal incentive.

You know Vaerah, you could probably have a hit TV show of building giant [literal] strawmen and angrily attacking them (presumably with confused onlookers, as per this thread) with bats and burning torches, but I suggest you pitch it to a network and stop practising daily on Eve-O.


I don't have neither the English knowledge nor the scholarship to write fabulous rethoric and sound style.

I see money, that's what I do in game and in RL.

I see more and better money with the EvE we got than an EvE with a religion-of-state preaching who is meant to earn and how much.

This is not WoW, where you expect to linearly find scaling up content from level 1 to 90, where what you get at 90 is "obviously" better than lower levels.

I am actually saddened there's any PvE at all, it should all be pure meta but then both 80% of hi seccers and 50% of null seccers would not know how to make a nickel and would rage.

This is a game where people are meant to find profitable niches. If you can't stomach risk why did you go to null sec to begin with? I ALWAYS have done PvE where I lived and ALWAYS made extra-good income, be it in low or null sec, be it null sec trading or missioning.

(now I am not replying to you in particular, but in general)

So what's the problem, that someone are so weak and opportunistic that they need to find the hi sec excuse for their inability to fully live in the location THEY chose to live at?
Then stop coming on the forum and go back to hi sec, where you belong. And stop being bad and showing it so hard on the forum.

Hi seccers got ISK? Who cares, that's all they have got. YOU are playing the real, full game, ISK does not supply a pair of gonads to get out and venture away from mommy's home.

If you can't see the value of that, then please get back to hi sec and go mine or something. You'll have your precious, tight welfare ISK at last.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#1022 - 2013-09-08 21:40:05 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
So if CCP says the money supply isn't damaging the economy, why is there is a question on the matter?

Because people can't grasp the actual problems presented (multiple times on multiple occasions) so they have to replace it with a much more simplistic version that they can get their heads around.


It's like talking to dinosaurs about the Danger of asteroids and hering them reply "but the sky is clear now, so obviouosly it will always be so".
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1023 - 2013-09-08 21:42:00 UTC  |  Edited by: baltec1
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
If CCP says they are happy with the money supply then they must be happy with the amount of money paid into the system via mission rewards and bounties. After all if so much as one tiny aspect of the economy wasn't working to their expectations they would not be 'happy with the economy' and a nerf/rebalancing would be implemented somewhere or other. Wasn't null sec the last place on the map to be nerfed?

I know high sec has been nerfed a number of times in recent years, but so has null. The nerf hammer has fallen and presumably CCP are happy with the results thus there is clearly no need to nerf L4 missions.



Being happy with the total amount of isk flowing into the game is not the same thing as being happy where that isk is flowing into the game.

This is about high sec offering too much reward and null/low/wh not offering enough.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#1024 - 2013-09-08 21:42:03 UTC
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:

I know high sec has been nerfed a number of times in recent years, but so has null. The nerf hammer has fallen and presumably CCP are happy with the results thus there is clearly no need to nerf L4 missions.

It was many many years since highsec last saw an ISK faucet nerf, and they have overall been very rare. The null nerfs have been quite numerous, on the other hand, and always for the same reason: because too much ISK was going into the system. A mission nerf has been on the agenda on many occasions, so presumably the need is there.

Just because the flood gates aren't open at this very instant doesn't mean it's a good idea to over-fill the pond…

…and the fundamental problem of blocking new activities and killing variety has been around since Exodus.
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#1025 - 2013-09-08 21:46:13 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:
If CCP says they are happy with the money supply then they must be happy with the amount of money paid into the system via mission rewards and bounties. After all if so much as one tiny aspect of the economy wasn't working to their expectations they would not be 'happy with the economy' and a nerf/rebalancing would be implemented somewhere or other. Wasn't null sec the last place on the map to be nerfed?

I know high sec has been nerfed a number of times in recent years, but so has null. The nerf hammer has fallen and presumably CCP are happy with the results thus there is clearly no need to nerf L4 missions.



Being happy with the total amount of isk flowing into the game is not the same thing as being happy where that isk is flowing into the game.

This is about high sec offering too much reward and null/low/wh not offering enough.


Hang, don't CCP employ an economist to watch over these things. Are you saying that he's not good enough or that you are somehow privy to information that he doesn't have. Perhaps you have some moral vantage point that he is incapable of seeing. As far as I can tell the economist is the man with the facts, I remind you that I have repeatedly asked for facts in this thread and the nerf high sec crowd of which you are one hasn't been able to provide any.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#1026 - 2013-09-08 21:49:14 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:

Willful ignorance again, you left out totally the nerfs to null sec and didn't read my last post at all.


Why, mad because CCP ran numbers for real (not those blathered on this thread) and found out null was to nerf as well?

Also, I apologize for not sitting all day spamming F5 to pick your last post(s), I have a life. I don't even recall what you have posted as last, and I am sure I'll live through that.


You can use real life or whatever you like for an excuse, but the truth is you're not honest enough to have a real discussion with.


Why, you found someone who's somewhat harder to silence than other guys?

About the "honesty" please feel free to convince people you are more honest than me and take my job as 3rd party and collateral holder.


Your ingame activites don't preclude you from being a liar. You intentionally distort things people say trying to win an argument as if there were some kind of prize. You did it with me as if I didn't suggest any change to null sec isk faucets.

You're not interested in the truth, and in my experience, most of the pro-high sec posters aren't either. I think there is a strong corelation between people who hide behind npc police in a video game and the ability to tell (or even process) the truth.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1027 - 2013-09-08 21:52:34 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
So if CCP says the money supply isn't damaging the economy, why is there is a question on the matter?

Because people can't grasp the actual problems presented (multiple times on multiple occasions) so they have to replace it with a much more simplistic version that they can get their heads around.


It's like talking to dinosaurs about the Danger of asteroids and hering them reply "but the sky is clear now, so obviouosly it will always be so".


So you are saying CCP doesn't understand the danger? Their dev blog seemed to indicate there were no problems with the money supply versus the price index. So far over a year later the prices seem to be even lower.

Instead of making the dinosaur reference (which is silly because the dinosaurs didn't have a space program or a civilization) it would be more like saying your house will burn down if you light too many candles, yet there are no evidence of candles to be found in the house.

You can wave your arms and say it could happen, but if CCP says its not happening and it continues to not happen and the evidence that its not happening continues to increase.

What you are selling is bear repellent for a bear that does not exist.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Pr1ncess Alia
Doomheim
#1028 - 2013-09-08 21:55:57 UTC
Judging by the massive amount of people that play this game just for high sec content, seeking some economic justice by nerfing their pastime seems like the community just shooting themselves in the foot. "hey, here's an idea, lets attack the income of the game we love"

Now, if we excuse for a moment those that farm pve content using several accounts (not a negligible number, but certainly a small minority) I would have to say that those who reside in lower sec/null sec space are usually significantly more organized, knowledgeable and exploitative (no, not that kind of exploit) than those residing in high sec. That is to say usually groups in low/null are working smarter while those in high sec are working harder .. if you can follow my point without trying to read too much into that.

If you want to take simple isk activity and compare it with other simple isk activity then you have to ignore the fact that the context for these activities (the sec space) is basically two different games altogether. The opportunities, goals, typical 'end game' mindsets... they are pretty much completely separate games that rarely interact in any meaningful way.

People in lower sec space cry because they think it's so unfair that high sec dwellers run missions that make any measurable amount of isk. Is it anything more than srs bsns space jealousy...? I'm having trouble seeing what specifically is the problem.

The worlds are so far separated that unless someone can show me where the ability for high sec people to make money somehow negatively impacts those in low/null (beyond some assumption that their mere existence somehow generates an inflation on the game as a whole that) I just can't see how this topic goes anywhere other than "hey that guy makes more isk than i think he should.. I should be richer because my game is the real game and I deserve to be rewarded for playing the way I think this game should be played"

Nothing would come out of trying to balance the apples and oranges here other than upsetting a group of people that constitute a huge part of our subscription base. We would be shooting ourselves in the foot.

As to people in null and low that seem to think they don't have the opportunity or ability to make enough isk for the risk level you're operating at? You're doing it wrong.

And as to the actual topic at hand, do the missions make too much compared to the lower tiers? Maybe. But isn't that the point? No one sets out to make a career out of doing level 2 missions.... the goal is always working up to doing level 4's and it has been since the day they came out (Before that, everyone did level 3's, it was the same thing)
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#1029 - 2013-09-08 21:56:04 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
So if CCP says the money supply isn't damaging the economy, why is there is a question on the matter?

Because people can't grasp the actual problems presented (multiple times on multiple occasions) so they have to replace it with a much more simplistic version that they can get their heads around.


It's like talking to dinosaurs about the Danger of asteroids and hering them reply "but the sky is clear now, so obviouosly it will always be so".


So you are saying CCP doesn't understand the danger? Their dev blog seemed to indicate there were no problems with the money supply versus the price index. So far over a year later the prices seem to be even lower.

Instead of making the dinosaur reference (which is silly because the dinosaurs didn't have a space program or a civilization) it would be more like saying your house will burn down if you light too many candles, yet there are no evidence of candles to be found in the house.

You can wave your arms and say it could happen, but if CCP says its not happening and it continues to not happen and the evidence that its not happening continues to increase.

What you are selling is bear repellent for a bear that does not exist.


You picked the right screen name, as you can't even grasp what's being discussed...almost like every other IT guy I personally know lol.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1030 - 2013-09-08 21:56:29 UTC
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:


Hang, don't CCP employ an economist to watch over these things. Are you saying that he's not good enough or that you are somehow privy to information that he doesn't have. Perhaps you have some moral vantage point that he is incapable of seeing. As far as I can tell the economist is the man with the facts, I remind you that I have repeatedly asked for facts in this thread and the nerf high sec crowd of which you are one hasn't been able to provide any.


You mean you didnt read all of those fact over the last few pages. Funny how you vanished after they all turned up. Its also interesting to see that you have post nothing at all to back up what you are saying while you demand entire scientific papers from us.

Again you have failed to read and you latched onto something someone else said about a totaly different subject and have tried to use it to keep hold of your golden goose that is high sec level 4 income.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1031 - 2013-09-08 22:00:58 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
So if CCP says the money supply isn't damaging the economy, why is there is a question on the matter?

Because people can't grasp the actual problems presented (multiple times on multiple occasions) so they have to replace it with a much more simplistic version that they can get their heads around.


It's like talking to dinosaurs about the Danger of asteroids and hering them reply "but the sky is clear now, so obviouosly it will always be so".


So you are saying CCP doesn't understand the danger? Their dev blog seemed to indicate there were no problems with the money supply versus the price index. So far over a year later the prices seem to be even lower.

Instead of making the dinosaur reference (which is silly because the dinosaurs didn't have a space program or a civilization) it would be more like saying your house will burn down if you light too many candles, yet there are no evidence of candles to be found in the house.

You can wave your arms and say it could happen, but if CCP says its not happening and it continues to not happen and the evidence that its not happening continues to increase.

What you are selling is bear repellent for a bear that does not exist.


You picked the right screen name, as you can't even grasp what's being discussed...almost like every other IT guy I personally know lol.


When you say things like that without explaining yourself properly, it makes me grin because it seems you've run out of things to say and resort to snide comments.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#1032 - 2013-09-08 22:01:02 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:


Hang, don't CCP employ an economist to watch over these things. Are you saying that he's not good enough or that you are somehow privy to information that he doesn't have. Perhaps you have some moral vantage point that he is incapable of seeing. As far as I can tell the economist is the man with the facts, I remind you that I have repeatedly asked for facts in this thread and the nerf high sec crowd of which you are one hasn't been able to provide any.


You mean you didnt read all of those fact over the last few pages. Funny how you vanished after they all turned up. Its also interesting to see that you have post nothing at all to back up what you are saying while you demand entire scientific papers from us.

Again you have failed to read and you latched onto something someone else said about a totaly different subject and have tried to use it to keep hold of your golden goose that is high sec level 4 income.


Yawn, I've provided facts and I've been out today, I cant hang around all day waiting for your next post, I have a family, friends and a real life. Are you honestly telling me you've spent your whole Sunday posting on these forums. If true it's incredibly sad.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#1033 - 2013-09-08 22:01:20 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:

Your ingame activites don't preclude you from being a liar. You intentionally distort things people say trying to win an argument as if there were some kind of prize. You did it with me as if I didn't suggest any change to null sec isk faucets.

You're not interested in the truth, and in my experience, most of the pro-high sec posters aren't either. I think there is a strong corelation between people who hide behind npc police in a video game and the ability to tell (or even process) the truth.


I am not the one having created the umptenth threadnaught about the same trite stuff, who wants to win arguments are those who create these massive cans of hot air.

As for "interested in the truth", there's less interest in truth in this forum than in Dante's "Round of liars".
At the same time most are truly convinced to know or say the truth.

I don't know if I say truth, I am not divinely objective but at least I can say one thing: I am not under anyone's command, driven or just influenced by their agenda or politics. Not many in this forum can say the same.

I am forced to live in the one place where I can trade: Jita.
You can even try and find where I asked informations about Goons own trade hub, because like I went to null sec in the past to trade, I can return there tomorrow and I don't care whose is the hub, I care for markets liquidity.

So, in case you were (also) trying to address me as "hiding behind npc police", you found someone dealing with merc corps, who lived in WHs, low and null sec and also done FW. And not afraid to do it again, RL gaming time being my tyrant.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#1034 - 2013-09-08 22:01:49 UTC
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
Judging by the massive amount of people that play this game just for high sec content, seeking some economic justice by nerfing their pastime seems like the community just shooting themselves in the foot. "hey, here's an idea, lets attack the income of the game we love"

Now, if we excuse for a moment those that farm pve content using several accounts (not a negligible number, but certainly a small minority) I would have to say that those who reside in lower sec/null sec space are usually significantly more organized, knowledgeable and exploitative (no, not that kind of exploit) than those residing in high sec. That is to say usually groups in low/null are working smarter while those in high sec are working harder .. if you can follow my point without trying to read too much into that.

If you want to take simple isk activity and compare it with other simple isk activity then you have to ignore the fact that the context for these activities (the sec space) is basically two different games altogether. The opportunities, goals, typical 'end game' mindsets... they are pretty much completely separate games that rarely interact in any meaningful way.

People in lower sec space cry because they think it's so unfair that high sec dwellers run missions that make any measurable amount of isk. Is it anything more than srs bsns space jealousy...? I'm having trouble seeing what specifically is the problem.

The worlds are so far separated that unless someone can show me where the ability for high sec people to make money somehow negatively impacts those in low/null (beyond some assumption that their mere existence somehow generates an inflation on the game as a whole that) I just can't see how this topic goes anywhere other than "hey that guy makes more isk than i think he should.. I should be richer because my game is the real game and I deserve to be rewarded for playing the way I think this game should be played"

Nothing would come out of trying to balance the apples and oranges here other than upsetting a group of people that constitute a huge part of our subscription base. We would be shooting ourselves in the foot.

As to people in null and low that seem to think they don't have the opportunity or ability to make enough isk for the risk level you're operating at? You're doing it wrong.

And as to the actual topic at hand, do the missions make too much compared to the lower tiers? Maybe. But isn't that the point? No one sets out to make a career out of doing level 2 missions.... the goal is always working up to doing level 4's and it has been since the day they came out (Before that, everyone did level 3's, it was the same thing)


You can tell it's a high sec poster when they are in an npc corp and have to lie about people's motivations.

i mean, it has to be jealousy, with you people, doesn't it, it can't be that some of us want the game to be healthy. It's not liek any of us have any ideas that might prevent bad situations in the future just because.

How is a mission paying less isk and more LP a nerf? If that's so, lvl 5 missions are a HUGE nerf on lvl 4s with their 100k lp pay outs.



Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#1035 - 2013-09-08 22:02:04 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
So if CCP says the money supply isn't damaging the economy, why is there is a question on the matter?

Because people can't grasp the actual problems presented (multiple times on multiple occasions) so they have to replace it with a much more simplistic version that they can get their heads around.


It's like talking to dinosaurs about the Danger of asteroids and hering them reply "but the sky is clear now, so obviouosly it will always be so".


So you are saying CCP doesn't understand the danger? Their dev blog seemed to indicate there were no problems with the money supply versus the price index. So far over a year later the prices seem to be even lower.

Instead of making the dinosaur reference (which is silly because the dinosaurs didn't have a space program or a civilization) it would be more like saying your house will burn down if you light too many candles, yet there are no evidence of candles to be found in the house.

You can wave your arms and say it could happen, but if CCP says its not happening and it continues to not happen and the evidence that its not happening continues to increase.

What you are selling is bear repellent for a bear that does not exist.


You picked the right screen name, as you can't even grasp what's being discussed...almost like every other IT guy I personally know lol.


Why are slagging IT guys, how does this help the discussion?

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1036 - 2013-09-08 22:04:40 UTC
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
words


Level 4 missions in high sec offer the same income as nullsec offers. High sec incursions offers vastly better income.

Tell me why you would make your isk in nullsec.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#1037 - 2013-09-08 22:05:27 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:


When you say things like that without explaining yourself properly, it makes me grin because it seems you've run out of things to say and resort to snide comments.


You deseve nothing beyond snide comments. i've learned that the only way to deal with children is to treat them as such. You argue for the sake of arguing and are not genuine. As i said, you picked the right screen name, and that screen name is the only sincerely truth thing i've seen you say.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#1038 - 2013-09-08 22:07:17 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Pr1ncess Alia wrote:
words


Level 4 missions in high sec offer the same income as nullsec offers. High sec incursions offers vastly better income.

Tell me why you would make your isk in nullsec.


I don't know. Why are there thousands of people renting in null sec?

Certainly not because of the politics.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1039 - 2013-09-08 22:07:39 UTC
Little Dragon Khamez wrote:


Yawn, I've provided facts and I've been out today,


You mean the ones where you failed to list what ship you used, what mission you did what you earned in each of those missions and how long it took you to do them?


Right now we are the only ones to have posted any facts and figures.
Little Dragon Khamez
Guardians of the Underworld
#1040 - 2013-09-08 22:07:58 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:


When you say things like that without explaining yourself properly, it makes me grin because it seems you've run out of things to say and resort to snide comments.


You deseve nothing beyond snide comments. i've learned that the only way to deal with children is to treat them as such. You argue for the sake of arguing and are not genuine. As i said, you picked the right screen name, and that screen name is the only sincerely truth thing i've seen you say.


Wow personal attacks, not cool man. It just further erodes your credibility.

Dumbing down of Eve Online will result in it's destruction...