These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Consequences (?)

Author
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#181 - 2013-09-08 06:59:10 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
see, this is why nobody takes you seriously. we tell you something and you just go "LALALALALA NOT LISTENING LALALALA"


I'm supposed to take it on your good authority that "the exhumer rebalance was ******* terrible"? Given recent investigation into your supposed Fozzie reference and ulterior motives in general, that seems like a pretty bad idea.

I do understand that critical thinking can be frustrating, and I apologize for that, but I think it's a necessary evil in life.
Dave Stark
#182 - 2013-09-08 07:01:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Dave Stark
i made a point, told you where to find the evidence.

if you choose to ignore it after that there's not much i can do for you.
and to be honest, i'm not actually that bothered if i prove anything to you. you're quite frankly just not that important.
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#183 - 2013-09-08 07:08:06 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
i made a point, told you where to find the evidence.


"it's on the internet somewhere" doesn't narrow it down much; a link or title is generally the minimum requirement for a reference.
Dave Stark
#184 - 2013-09-08 07:12:56 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
i made a point, told you where to find the evidence.


"it's on the internet somewhere" doesn't narrow it down much; a link or title is generally the minimum requirement for a reference.


considering the topic has been done to death, if you can't find any record of it it really does say more about you than me.
Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#185 - 2013-09-08 08:17:17 UTC
Anyone here ever play chess? Sometimes to protect a more valuable asset you have to sacrifice a lesser one. Pawn blocks knight to protect queen for example.

Using some teamwork and being willing to expend some assets to do so, you may actually be able to block a gank. Depending on what you're trying to move, sacrificing a small fleet of ewar frigs and cruisers to prevent a gank attempt from happening may still be cost effective. Yeah, it may cut into your profits for the hauling run, but your cargo stands a better chance of getting to the destination intact. Organize, scout, plan? The reason you're falling victim to these peeps is that they are doing just that.

Counter them.

Miners worried about being ganked? A lone ibis who's johnny on the spot with his derpscan can spot those nasty cats before they reach the belt and start tattooing out an SOS on the hull of a neutral barge with his trusty civilian gatling railgun. Sure, he gets to die gloriously, but the dime has been dropped and the pigs are on the way.

Of course it may or may not work, but I most surely guarantee you it wont if you dont actually bother to try.
Only YOU can prevent sudden decompression.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#186 - 2013-09-08 10:13:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Omar Alharazaad wrote:
Of course it may or may not work, but I most surely guarantee you it wont if you dont actually bother to try.
Only YOU can prevent sudden decompression.


All very nice in theorie, but: It's a fact in the EVE universe that you can't even trust the people you think you know 100%, and you should not be dependent on others to be able to follow one of the core gameplay activities in a successful/lucrative way: You don't need help to mission, you don't need help to PvP, so you certainly shouldn't need help to mine... it's a base princinple of the sandbox:

You can choose how you want to play, so if you want to mine solo, you should be able to... to what extent and how securely, well, that's another question, BUT, and that's the important part: If others want to keep you from said activity, it shouldn't be ANY easier for them, then it would be if they want to keep you from any other activity (like running missions or trading)...

...that's how you "balance" the sandbox.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Alara IonStorm
#187 - 2013-09-08 10:20:37 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:

All very nice in theorie, but: It's a fact in the EVE universe that you can't even trust the people you think you know 100%, and you should not be dependent on others to be able to follow one of the core gameplay activities in a successful/lucrative way: You don't need help to mission, you don't need help to PvP, so you certainly shouldn't need help to mine... it's a base princinple of the sandbox:

You can choose how you want to play, so if you want to mine solo, you should be able to... to what extent in how securely, well, that's another question, BUT, and that's the important part: If others want to keep you from said activity, it shouldn't be ANY easier for them, then it would be if they want to keep you from any other activity (like running missions or trading)...

...that's how you "balance" the sandbox.

Yes but you can not expect more safety mining solo then you can expect to win at PvP solo or Mission solo.

More Vulnerable Alone >>>>>>>>>> Safer Group <<<<<<<<<<< Group is a Bigger Target.

And that scale goes on a bigger scale to define what is safe and a target based on what the opposition has.

Just enforces the number two rule of EVE, you can never make yourself completely safe whilst your active in space. Which is why rule one is don't fly what you can afford to lose. Lol I love this game.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#188 - 2013-09-08 10:34:34 UTC
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Just enforces the number two rule of EVE, you can never make yourself completely safe whilst your active in space. Which is why rule one is don't fly what you can afford to lose. Lol I love this game.


True that, but again: Mining solo (mostly talking about highsec here, mind you) shouldn't be any more dangerous then running missions, trading and so on... maybe adding PvP in this calculation isn't very wise. When was the last time you saw a gate camp in highsec space or heard of mission runners beeing scanned down and suicide ganked... yup, me neither.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#189 - 2013-09-08 10:35:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Omar Alharazaad
Mining solo is still very much viable. Staying alert of danger and using the tools available to help protect yourself make it moreso. It's never going to be 'safe', however. The reason I suggested having support is that while you can indulge in many solo activities, it's still a multiplayer game... and oftentimes these nasty violences are a result of groups of people coordinating to do harm. If they can coordinate to cause mayhem, doing so to prevent mayhem isn't a bad idea. I personally operate solo most of the time, but I cannot expect the universe around me to conform to my playstyle. I'm well aware that I'm operating on a battlefield and try to keep aware of what's going on around me. Having helpful friends you can rely on may seem like a luxury, but it seems to me it would be one worth investing in.

Edit: I do recall reading about a very very shiny mission battleship getting ganked just yesterday I believe.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Alara IonStorm
#190 - 2013-09-08 10:46:51 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:

True that, but again: Mining solo (mostly talking about highsec here, mind you) shouldn't be any more dangerous then running missions, trading and so on... maybe adding PvP in this calculation isn't very wise. When was the last time you saw a gate camp in highsec space or heard of mission runners beeing scanned down and suicide ganked... yup, me neither.

I'm more a fan of task fit counters like Mining in a Procurer in a 0.9 system. The amount in which that takes to gank once for a mostly insured lose account for a reasonable amount of safety over someone getting more reward using a faster barge.

Someone who is after you should be able to affect your strategy, how you go about your business and with enough people, time and resources force you into say taking defensive measures, hiding or retaliation.

Someone can stop you from doing something a certain way but with proper strategy they can never knock you out of the game. Hi-Sec's increased security should never be total security at anything. If a certain gank vessel is to powerful or a certain line up of ships like haulers not able to meet the rigors under fire then balance needs to happen, not safety and people will need to make compromises.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#191 - 2013-09-08 10:48:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Shalua Rui
Just to make that clear: I'm not argumenting for mining to become saver here, I'm just argumenting against making mining more dangerous again, just because suicide ganking isn't a viable form of income enymore... the last time I checked, mining was a base gameplay feature (...way of plaing the game ...lack of better expression), SGing was not... Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Dave Stark
#192 - 2013-09-08 10:52:39 UTC
all forms of gameplay are valid unless they break the eula.
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#193 - 2013-09-08 11:03:09 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
all forms of gameplay are valid unless they break the eula.


I didn't say it wasn't, all I'm saying that some forms of gameplay are more valid then others... you can choose to fly L5 missions in an Ibis, that doesn't mean you will succeed, no?

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Alara IonStorm
#194 - 2013-09-08 11:06:49 UTC
Shalua Rui wrote:

I didn't say it wasn't, all I'm saying that some forms of gameplay are more valid then others... you can choose to fly L5 missions in an Ibis, that doesn't mean you will succeed, no?

That is what I am saying, you can choose to fly a yield fit Hulk and you can choose to fly it in 0.6, that doesn't mean you'll succeed, their are options for safer mineral extraction.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#195 - 2013-09-08 11:09:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Shalua Rui wrote:
Alara IonStorm wrote:
Just enforces the number two rule of EVE, you can never make yourself completely safe whilst your active in space. Which is why rule one is don't fly what you can afford to lose. Lol I love this game.


True that, but again: Mining solo (mostly talking about highsec here, mind you) shouldn't be any more dangerous then running missions, trading and so on... maybe adding PvP in this calculation isn't very wise. When was the last time you saw a gate camp in highsec space or heard of mission runners beeing scanned down and suicide ganked... yup, me neither.

Mining in highsec is no more dangerous than running missions, if the miners use appropriate fits, use the standings mechanic to highlight known groups and individual gankers in local, look at the overview occasionally and don't AFK.

Most of the miners that feature on killboards have at best fitted a cursory tank such as a SSB, at worst none at all. A lot of them also seem to think mining consists of warp in, target a roid, hit the strip miners and then tab out or go and do something else until they hear "the asteroid is depleted", and then repeat the process until the ore hold is full.

The ganking of mission runners does happen, Suddenly Ninjas used to specialise in baiting mission runners into fights they couldn't win. The safety catch stopped it to a certain extent, but they still die. Alpha strikes on Tengus at mission hubs etc still happen, and then you get fools like this.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Condordia Apoclypia
Doomheim
#196 - 2013-09-08 11:17:21 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Anyway ignoring the trolls who are apparently incapable of logic in their replies (and who are terrible at math causing them to get fired from their job) the Lofty scam was a scam that involved inviting a gullible pilot to fleet to "help me kill the rats" in missions. The inviting pilot would be at war with an alt or friend outside of fleet. When the newly fleeted helper joined the fleet the alt or friend would now be able to attack that pilot as he now shared the war flag.

This was nerfed. This tactic, at least relied on an action of a pilot to be successful, however it was still nerfed.

The 2 million per pilot ganking that is occurring is in my opinion much worse then the Lofty scam, it does not rely on any choice other then that the freighter undocks, doesn't require the freighter to even have loot in its hold as a balancing factor. It will be nerfed.

I would expect to be seeing an intelligent CCP paying a lot more attention to its PvE and high sec customers over the next year for obvious reasons. I doubt they want to be left only with low brows when Star Citizen comes out.




this will come for sure i think , i think ccp will take the smart road and will cont make WiS. esp when ccp cashflow is going.
we need more ppl in new eden , if it takes that a couple of bitters with isboxing ganking freighters in high sec will leave , lets be it so.

those cry babies ruining the game , dont get me the its a spacegame argument. Its logic ccp wil get eve in that direction
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#197 - 2013-09-08 11:48:06 UTC
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Most of the miners that feature on killboards have at best fitted a cursory tank such as a SSB, at worst none at all. A lot of them also seem to think mining consists of warp in, target a roid, hit the strip miners and then tab out or go and do something else until they hear "the asteroid is depleted", and then repeat the process until the ore hold is full.


You ever mined solo for any extended period of time? Most likely not... it's a fact that the only way one can mine in any meaningful capacity is exactly the way you describe... I also don't concider that afk-mining. It maybe CCPs fault that they never came up with a more engaging mechanic (looking at the new, pinata type archeology/hacking, that's maybe a good thing) but yea, that's the system that is in place, and we have to live with it.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#198 - 2013-09-08 11:53:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Shalua Rui wrote:
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Most of the miners that feature on killboards have at best fitted a cursory tank such as a SSB, at worst none at all. A lot of them also seem to think mining consists of warp in, target a roid, hit the strip miners and then tab out or go and do something else until they hear "the asteroid is depleted", and then repeat the process until the ore hold is full.


You ever mined solo for any extended period of time? Most likely not... it's a fact that the only way one can mine in any meaningful capacity is exactly the way you describe... I also don't concider that afk-mining. It maybe CCPs fault that they never came up with a more engaging mechanic (looking at the new, pinata type archeology/hacking, that's maybe a good thing) but yea, that's the system that is in place, and we have to live with it.
I mine solo all the time, I deliberately do it in a Procurer or a Skiff, so that there's no temptation to AFK. I've made my own minigame out of it, I never take less than a full cycle, which in my miners case is 3000m^3 (4 cycles to fill my Procurer), and rarely pop a roid. I also chat in various channels, including ones full of suicide gankers Twisted.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Omar Alharazaad
New Eden Tech Support
#199 - 2013-09-08 11:58:07 UTC
I have. It's mind numbing, soul crushing boredom incarnate. It was better in a group because at least you had someone to chat with. Now, when I have to mine I try not to chainsmoke as I check out everyone in local in between dscans. Of course I also mine in systems that border on low sec, so it's not paranoia to be checking my six on a regular basis. What I do not do is tab out or walk away regardless of how dull it gets. If I'm going to get popped I want to be there when it happens.

Come hell or high water, this sick world will know I was here.

Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#200 - 2013-09-08 12:07:51 UTC
Tabbing out is not the same as going away (literally being AFK)... just saying. Blink

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)