EVE General Discussion

None of what you said had anything to do with my statement. Aside from perhaps your first sentence.

Again, I advocate for the intended "risk" of highsec to actually be there. Without that, no discussion of economic balance can really be entertained, since an intended feature to introduce risk is not present at it should be.

And again I shall ask, what is unreasonable about fixing wardecs?

Probably because your premise is flawed.

It predicates on an absolute statement.

CCP does not 100% listen to whining, nor do they 100% ignore it. And there you have it.

Well to be fair, they don't seem to be listening to the whining to reverse the exhumer buff.

Also, I like how you can believe calling someone dishonest is non-confrontational.

Anyways, I see the heart of the matter and it looks silly.

You think just because you post on a forums that you will get preferential treatment and that in order to justify your personal world view on the way the game should be played, you decide that you will be above all in consideration.

I doubt I'd ever get you to comprehend to what this exactly means so I won't try.

I've had fun tonight though like it or not. I'm not claiming victory or defeat. I don't post on the forums for the adoration of men, but rather to prod and poke at their id and ego.

And I find it amusing such people exist that are so sure in themselves they are blind the realities of the world.

I'm sure you'll say something back. You can't help yourself and that is the fun part of the forum game. Everyone comes up with something. My goal is to see how far that goes. To make people show their true selves.

And before I go to bed I leave you with this one question...

Are you so beloved by the developers that you need not the love of life and have to spend your entire night creating literary works of text to remind them of that love that must be unconditional.

Again though the opinions of others on the Ships and Modules forum cannot be relied upon due to meta game considerations, likewise it does not present statistical data only opinions, not peer reviewable facts. I suggest that you start ignoring my posts as like the Emperor you have no clothes.

Perhaps if you paid attention to what's going on in this game you would know these things.



Meta game considerations? What has that got to do with people talking about ship fittings?

People work with facts and numbers that anyone can check if they are real or not simply by using one of the two fitting tools. Then we come to the massive flaw in your argument with that there is nothing at all to gain from telling lies in that forum section which will found out almost instantly.

So no, you cant just invalidate an entire subforum dedicated to ships and fittings that's holds all the evidence you could want in seeing what ships get used for what. The very fact that you are trying to say the raven hulls are not popular missions boats alone shows just how clueless you are when it comes to EVEs history and current state.

- When I was in my previous PvP corp, we actively did joint operations with a powerful German based mercs corp called GIS.

- Since then and even now, the second (non trading related) most income I make is by acting as 3rd party at negotiating and organizing merc corps and war logistics corps transactions between them and their clients. Even right today.

For what I see by doing this, wardecs are certainly not at an all time high but they are still going.

I don't know what's the precise best balance between opposite interests ("make high sec a Bronx NAO" vs "plz don't hurt my teddy retriever") but CCP are slowly tweaking this very sensitive topic in baby steps.
This has a corollary: CCP don't want to see an empty high sec. Be it for their revenue or for other more "gamey" factors.

Also, what's a "rebalance wardecs" post has to do in a "nerf L4" thread?

Albeit vaguely influencing each other, hi sec security is a topic, safety is another, L4 are another and wardecs are yet another. Making an huge soup is only going to mud waters and create confusion.

It's not 80%, btw…

…and you're once again barking up the wrong tree.
The Golem used for those tests was not special. it was not an all-V character running über mods. It was a well-skilled character using a reasonable fit on a good mission ship. Even back then, there were better ships, fits, and characters. Since then, we've gotten even better ships, modules, and skills. Hell, he used a Drake for salvaging — we have the Noctis.

The number he presented sounded high to some back in the day; today, they're not nearly as unreasonable since everything is better, faster, easier. The ship was not unrepresentative back then; its many equivalents are not unrepresentative today; the numbers are only unrepresentative in that they don't take into account how much quicker they can be earned today.

All the data we present comes directly from CCP (except for the “how much I earned” stuff Kefira collected, since he's a better source for that than CCP).

I'm sorry but your proposed data is non-inclusive, unverifiable, and wouldn't be worth the paper it was printed on if it was printed.

The last Q.E.N report is several years out of date
and as such you have NO quantifiable evidence that can stand up to scrutiny

you have guestimates
you have cherry picked suppositions