Player Features and Ideas Discussion

alternatively if you have an idea that has already been discussed before, please make another redundant thread about it...

oh, wait...

Dunno if someone else suggest this idea. I'm asking CCP this,

So CCP can this be done?

CCP will you consider todo this in the future?

It is a fair idea to share the love.

But Purge concept is that the entire system shuts down for DT to DT. All Capsuleers are free to do what they please to each other..

I'm not opposed to the idea. Seems like it could be fun. Might provide an interesting difference of PvP for the day without cap drops. Expensive ships and kitchen sink fleets fighting it out randomly on every gate.

That said, I don't see the benefit to CCP for doing this though. No matter how much CCP warns carebears beforehand, there will be vast legions of paying customers who don't see the warnings and file a petition (or simply leave the game), which is bad for business.

What is the purpose of targeting highsec? Is it because of the unique capital restrictions and the heavily seeded markets? Would it accomplish the same thing to set up a single region with no capitals and seeded markets where this free-for-all can happen without risking large revenue losses?

I think what needs to be understood is that removing CONCORD from highsec is like removing sov from nullsec. It's the whole reason people are there. Removing it will cause people to leave the game, not 'go somewhere else'. Of course, since it's only for a day, the effect will be far less serious, though still very disruptive.

I doubt people will leave for a one day event even if they didn't get the memo... CCP has already pushed stuff on players that pissed us off already. We still have players playing a new ones coming..

Purge concept will not damage Eve. if anything it will cause a stur... that some will hate.. and others will like.. Only having it happen will we know for sure the results of this event. It gives everyone a chance to go out and do something crazy... Fun... exciting... yes for some it will be scary.... a new experience... or others it will be a thrill and others will hate or the sake of hating...


But at least we can say.. I was there!

Yes I'm waiting for ccp's answer if its possible. Crossing my toes and fingers.

No reinburstments. When you undock your responsible for you own ships and gear. No Concord or standing hits in low or highsec.

Because system is in place they can get free rookie ships. They can have numbers... They can join a corp.. they can watch and learn... they can yes stay docked up...

Some will be scared.. others will face they're fears. Most? dunno we haven't tried it yet.. can't be sure.. we're only assuming what may or may not happen..

No offense, but it's starting to seem like you don't actually want to throw a fun event where everybody is involved in something new and different. It sounds like you want to shoot people in highsec (presumably carebears) without consequence.

I've yet to see something in your suggestion that cannot already be done elsewhere.

Nor has CCP created an "iron man" mode of play either.

But let's just say CCP allowed this suggestion of having a free-for-all with an iron mode edge (once podded then you are permanently dead). And add a bit of flavor by having every station have a limited amount of hit points so people can not hide in stations and wait it out. Any assets in an exploding station are lost in the destruction. And for kicks, if you logged out from a station that was destroyed while you were offline, upon logging back into the game has you in whatever ship you docked with floating among the rubble.

Might be quite interesting for the numbers...