These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Sarum Family Heir recommends assault on Republic

Author
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#301 - 2013-08-30 14:29:33 UTC
Fredfredbug4 wrote:

The kettle being genocidal, slaver, zealots and the pot helping other civilizations to the stars and treating member states equally.


*cough* But some more equally than others, right?

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Motoko Kasaki
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#302 - 2013-08-30 14:35:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Motoko Kasaki
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:

Finally, if an Amarrian can regularly look down on the rest of the cluster with a false sense of superiority I think someone should be able to paint them as a child once in a while.


Superiority based upon a feeling that one's culture is the best, and that everyone else should follow it...

Pot, kettle.


The kettle being genocidal, slaver, zealots and the pot helping other civilizations to the stars and treating member states equally.

Sure, we have similar desires, but our differing methodologies make it pointless to try and draw any parallels.


Remind me again how "Equally" my people were treated after we seceded. Oh that's right, there was that fun little moment where the Gallenteans were bombarding us from orbit, and shooting down transports attempting to flee. Now let's not forget, the definition of genocide is to attempt to erase a population from existence, and the Gallente made a pretty concerted effort to do just that with the aforementioned shooting of civilian transports and bombarding of Home from orbit. The fact that they failed owes more to the heroism of Yakiya Tovil-Toba than any urge for mercy on the part of the Gallente.

The Federation's zeal to spread thier way of life is almost fanatical as well, look at how they treat the Intaki or for that matter, any population attempting to do things a different way from the Federally approved standard.

Glory to the State.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#303 - 2013-08-30 14:40:42 UTC
Motoko Kasaki wrote:
Remind me again how "Equally" my people were treated before we seceded. Oh that's right, there was that fun little moment where the Gallenteans were bombarding us from orbit, and shooting down transports attempting to flee.


Technically, that was after we seceded.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Motoko Kasaki
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#304 - 2013-08-30 14:43:53 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Motoko Kasaki wrote:
Remind me again how "Equally" my people were treated before we seceded. Oh that's right, there was that fun little moment where the Gallenteans were bombarding us from orbit, and shooting down transports attempting to flee.


Technically, that was after we seceded.


My apologies, the error has been corrected.

Glory to the State.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#305 - 2013-08-30 14:46:33 UTC
Rikaato. Of course, the entire point of the secession was that the Federation's "representative democracy" didn't in fact represent the Caldari at all because the Gallente had, thanks to their larger population, a much larger share of the vote meaning that the Caldari people had effectively zero input into the political process they had been convinced to buy into, so it's not like we were treated equally before the secession either.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#306 - 2013-08-30 15:00:47 UTC
Remember that the government that bombed your planet didn't really represent the vast majority of Gallenteans either.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#307 - 2013-08-30 15:07:55 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Remember that the government that bombed your planet didn't really represent the vast majority of Gallenteans either.


This argument, while true, isn't really that useful. Heth, Shakor, Roden - all put into power with popular approval. The U-nat government responsible for the attacks around the secession were similarly elected. It's very easy to make statements that the activities of the leadership don't represent the will of the people, but those actions nevertheless took place, and were enabled by the people.

Holding people accountable for the actions of a few leaders isn't terribly fair. Judging them for allowing those actions to come to pass... that's another matter. All of us are guilty of that somewhere in our racial memory. It's a lesser crime, but nonetheless one to be considered.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#308 - 2013-08-30 15:08:29 UTC
well, no. it seized emergency powers.

I was talking about the system prior to that point in which minority groups simply didn't have the numbers and votes to compete with, or even meaningfully oppose, the Gallentean majority.

The whole war stemmed from the simple fact that once you were in the Federation, as a minority your options were to either accept the fact that your voice would never be heard over the crowd, or to tell the Senate to go stick its head in a pig and secede.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#309 - 2013-08-30 15:17:36 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
well, no. it seized emergency powers.


My mistake. My knowledge of Federation and State history is not brilliant.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#310 - 2013-08-30 15:25:49 UTC
the "well no, etc." was actually intended for Andreus. you're right, that government was elected. In the sense that all of the senators, the president and everything were originally elected democratically.

When the senators for the Caldari people read the Declaration of Secession however, the Federation Navy was deployed to blockade Home, then the Templis Dragonaurs bombed Nouvelle Rouvenor and killed about half a million people, at which point emergency powers were declared.

Emergency powers are one of the things that a lot of Federation voters forget - when they elect a candidate, they are entrusting that candidate with the responsible use of a power structure that includes within it the mandate and power to go beyond their original remit in times of national emergency.

The whole "checks and balances" thing falls apart rather badly when you realise that every government every elected in the Federation has had that same power to, for a while, completely ignore said checks and balances. It's possible to do a lot of damage in that time.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#311 - 2013-08-30 16:11:37 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:

Finally, if an Amarrian can regularly look down on the rest of the cluster with a false sense of superiority I think someone should be able to paint them as a child once in a while.


Superiority based upon a feeling that one's culture is the best, and that everyone else should follow it...

Pot, kettle.


The kettle being genocidal, slaver, zealots and the pot helping other civilizations to the stars and treating member states equally.

Sure, we have similar desires, but our differing methodologies make it pointless to try and draw any parallels.


The parallel is that the Federation and Empire both firmly believe that they're entirely correct, and are dreadful at listening to any other points of view. You yourself have demonstrated this more than once recently. I actually liked the Federation until you and that Bete idiot came in and started spouting off. Guess my memories of the place when I lived there are a little rose-tinted.


There's a pattern with you. First you try to say "The Amarr aren't so bad, look at the Federation!" and then you are reduced to ad hominem whenever a loyal Federation citizen point out that what you're saying is incorrect. No matter what you say, the truth will not be obscured. The Gallente never took slaves, the Amarr did. The Gallente never exterminated entire races, the Amarr did. The Gallente never used aggression before diplomacy, the Amarr did.

You can try to lessen the crimes of your Empire all you want, you will never succeed.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#312 - 2013-08-30 16:18:29 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
Fredfredbug4 wrote:

The kettle being genocidal, slaver, zealots and the pot helping other civilizations to the stars and treating member states equally.


*cough* But some more equally than others, right?


You could make that argument, yet keep in mind that everyone is equal under the law and discriminatory practices are illegal. While discrimination unfortunately does occur, it is not supported by the government or the majority of the population for that matter.

Curbing racism and discrimination is an on going struggle, however with the right people in power it can be curbed. Unfortunately the magpies will vote for whoever speaks the loudest, which is starting to look like Mentas Blaque.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#313 - 2013-08-30 16:18:57 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:

The parallel is that the Federation and Empire both firmly believe that they're entirely correct, and are dreadful at listening to any other points of view. You yourself have demonstrated this more than once recently. I actually liked the Federation until you and that Bete idiot came in and started spouting off. Guess my memories of the place when I lived there are a little rose-tinted.



You're seriously going to write off an entire nation based upon the IGS posts of two people? That's your prerogative of course but, isn't that the very definition of prejudice? If I were to take your stance I'd go on a murderous rampage in the Empire or Mandate based on the prattle posted by Noh, Blake or Luftschreck.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#314 - 2013-08-30 16:28:23 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:

The parallel is that the Federation and Empire both firmly believe that they're entirely correct, and are dreadful at listening to any other points of view. You yourself have demonstrated this more than once recently. I actually liked the Federation until you and that Bete idiot came in and started spouting off. Guess my memories of the place when I lived there are a little rose-tinted.



You're seriously going to write off an entire nation based upon the IGS posts of two people? That's your prerogative of course but, isn't that the very definition of prejudice? If I were to take your stance I'd go on a murderous rampage in the Empire or Mandate based on the prattle posted by Noh, Blake or Luftschreck.


Not writing off. Just feeling kind of neutral these days. My remarks probably did come across as more imposing than intended.

Quote:
There's a pattern with you. First you try to say "The Amarr aren't so bad, look at the Federation!" and then you are reduced to ad hominem whenever a loyal Federation citizen point out that what you're saying is incorrect. No matter what you say, the truth will not be obscured. The Gallente never took slaves, the Amarr did. The Gallente never exterminated entire races, the Amarr did. The Gallente never used aggression before diplomacy, the Amarr did.

You can try to lessen the crimes of your Empire all you want, you will never succeed.


I've not said a thing in defence of the Empire, actually. And it's not my Empire.

The Empire's moral standing is dubious at best. I just find it mildly irritating when the Federation is cast as this shining beacon of freedom, morality and hope for all mankind.
Motoko Kasaki
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#315 - 2013-08-30 16:28:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Motoko Kasaki
Is Noh even affiliated with the Empire?
I was under the impression she was closer to the Lady of Blades' way of thinking than any proscribed Imperial Theology. Also, in response to Frederik's earlier remarks regarding tantrums... of all the races in the cluster, I would have thought the Empire to be among the least predisposed towards such behaviour. Certainly the Imperials I have met conducted themselves in a most dignified and pleasant fashion.

Glory to the State.

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#316 - 2013-08-31 11:11:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Eran Mintor
Fredfredbug4 wrote:
...They were not assumptions good sir. As this is the first time I believe we've talked, I was unsure of your views and misinterpreted them. You can feel free to think otherwise, but I'm afraid your claims have no support behind them.

If you aren't insecure or trying to make yourself appear morally sound, then why do you feel the need to use the horribly cliche and outright silly "It's because I'm Minmatar" defense? It's as illogical as me claiming you are stereotyping me as a racist, because other Gallenteans are racist. Do you see how rediculous it sounds? Get a grip.

There is a difference between misunderstanding someone and making assumptions. I'm not sure why that concept is so difficult to grasp for you. Again, believe what you want, but the burden of proof lies on you. And yes, that is a challenge for you to find solid evidence that I'm making assumptions based on race. I doubt you can though, considering you just felt like throwing random accusations at me with no facts or logic behind them because you are a race baiter.

Finally, if an Amarrian can regularly look down on the rest of the cluster with a false sense of superiority I think someone should be able to paint them as a child once in a while.



While you may have been unaware of my views and misinterpreted them, it does not change the fact you made assumptions.

You did make an assumption when you felt I was agreeing with you, or, "on the same page." Don't take this as an insult, as assumptions aren't always bad things.

You may assume that your girlfriend will say "yes" when you ask her to marry you because she's given indications she desires such a commitment; or you may assume that you will win a fight because you have Pandemic Legion as your 'batphone,' as a few examples, however your misinterpretation of the facts doesn't change that you also made an assumption.

Perhaps your lady-friend was speaking in general terms and wasn't referring to your specific commitment; perhaps PL is just there for the kills, and should you cyno them in, they will kill you if you fail to produce anything worth their fuel (I'm looking at you, 'Silence'). These examples may not get my point across as I recognize they aren't the best...but bare with me, if you may, as I try to make my point clearer.

Misunderstandings and assumptions are like hawks and birds... Don't laugh, at least not yet, please.

All hawks are birds, but not all birds are hawks.

In this way, all misunderstandings are assumptions, but not all assumptions are misunderstandings.

You can assume many things, and sometimes you're right. But when you are wrong, it doesn't mean you didn't make an assumption.


Anyways, semantics tires me. I hope I have pointed out the difference between assumptions and misunderstandings that you seemed adamant about, and shown you that I do understand such differences. Beyond that though, there is no "burden of proof" for me. This is not a Gallente court of law and I do not have to shove a bloody knife in your face to prove you are the killer. What is clear to me is not something I need to prove to others. I'm neither judge, jury, nor executioner, but just a witness.

In my opinion, you made those misunderstandings mostly based off my race. I understand my words may have caused some confusion, but I truly don't think you would've met the same conclusion had I been Caldari or Amarr.

-Eran
Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#317 - 2013-08-31 16:53:58 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Rikaato. Of course, the entire point of the secession was that the Federation's "representative democracy" didn't in fact represent the Caldari at all because the Gallente had, thanks to their larger population, a much larger share of the vote meaning that the Caldari people had effectively zero input into the political process they had been convinced to buy into, so it's not like we were treated equally before the secession either.



That's unfortunately a very real danger of democracies, that they become the tyranny of the majority. This was especially a problem in our collective early history together, since there was no singular strong government with a charter to "level the playing field". The International Space Cooperative, for instance, is a prime example of how not to do multinational endeavors.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#318 - 2013-08-31 16:55:12 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:


In this way, all misunderstandings are assumptions, but not all assumptions are misunderstandings.


Fair enough

Quote:

Anyways, semantics tires me. I hope I have pointed out the difference between assumptions and misunderstandings that you seemed adamant about, and shown you that I do understand such differences. Beyond that though, there is no "burden of proof" for me. This is not a Gallente court of law and I do not have to shove a bloody knife in your face to prove you are the killer. What is clear to me is not something I need to prove to others. I'm neither judge, jury, nor executioner, but just a witness.

In my opinion, you made those misunderstandings mostly based off my race. I understand my words may have caused some confusion, but I truly don't think you would've met the same conclusion had I been Caldari or Amarr.

-Eran


This isn't a court of law, but this is an official board for (mostly) civilized discussions and debates (in this case, the debate being the difference between an assumption and misunderstanding as well as me making assumptions based on race). If you're going to make a claim, you have to be able to prove that claim. If you can't, you either admit your claim was wrong or become a liar.

You claimed I was making assumptions based on race. You openly admit to not being able to prove that I was. You refuse to modify your claim or drop it completely. You are a liar.

Blatantly lying about a topic is bad enough, but when you lie about something that could tarnish a person's reputation you commit something absolutely despicable.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!

Eran Mintor
Metropolis Commercial Consortium
#319 - 2013-09-01 22:05:44 UTC
Certainly racism can be a bad thing, but it's rooted in bias we have from experience and/or things we were told. I never called you a racist though, it's another misunderstanding.

I don't think you're a racist but do I think you have racial bias' and opinions. Whether grand or small it's only a human reaction and process of learning. The only people who don't have them are infants, and I don't believe you fit in that category.

When I said "It's telling, though very sad, that people make such grand assumptions merely based on race." I wasn't saying you're a racist.

I was saying that these racial bias' are becoming ever increasing in current times. People have always applied ideas and opinions to others they do not know but, perhaps it's the war, or the rise in racial crimes, it seems the polarizations are increasing.

To assume we were on the same page simply because I'm Minmatar was an example of this. Or if you want to say you didn't assume that because of my race, and I am mistaken, then why did you?

-Eran
Fredfredbug4
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#320 - 2013-09-01 22:59:06 UTC
Eran Mintor wrote:


To assume we were on the same page simply because I'm Minmatar was an example of this. Or if you want to say you didn't assume that because of my race, and I am mistaken, then why did you?

-Eran


It appears we have come full circle.

Fredfredbug4 wrote:


When you said:
Eran Mintor wrote:

Using "temper tantrums" to describe the Amarr is a statement much farther from the truth than you could make.

I personally interpreted it as "you didn't describe the Amarr bad enough" rather than "you didn't describe them in a good way". This fault is purely mine and I acknowledged it. As much as you would like to think, race has nothing to do with it.

Watch_ Fred Fred Frederation_ and stop [u]cryptozoologist[/u]! Fight against the brutal genocide of fictional creatures across New Eden! Is that a metaphor? Probably not, but the fru-fru- people will sure love it!