These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Which Ship would you like to see remodelled?

First post First post
Author
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#381 - 2013-08-23 12:21:15 UTC
Did someone already mentioned the Dominix?

Just say'in

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Arcata Steiner
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#382 - 2013-08-23 19:20:50 UTC
Sin Pew wrote:
Arcata Steiner wrote:
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
thanks


Bridges. A ship needs one. I know I'll probably catch flak for being an RPer, but if I was a ship captain I'd want to have windows, and they would need to be forward facing.
As a pod pilot you're in ... wait for it ... a pod. You see the surrounding through camera drones, besides "windows are structural weaknesses".



Not me. I'm looking out my ship windows during the battle. When the klaxon goes off and I start hull tanking I sprint for my pod. LolBlink
Weynard
Hauptberufliche Steuerhinterzieher
#383 - 2013-08-23 19:50:24 UTC
All caps > Moa > Blackbird
Morihei Akachi
Doomheim
#384 - 2013-08-23 20:08:35 UTC
Tormentor. The physics implied by applying force to the top of a curved object and then discovering that it moves in a straight line … really disturb me.

"Enduring", "restrained" and "ample" as designations for starship components are foreign to the genre of high-tech science fiction and don’t belong in Eve Online. (And as for “scoped” …)

Cade Windstalker
#385 - 2013-08-23 21:13:17 UTC
Weynard wrote:
All caps > Moa > Blackbird


Most of the caps look pretty awesome in my opinion, the Chimera and Wyvern especially look pretty awesome.

Morihei Akachi wrote:
Tormentor. The physics implied by applying force to the top of a curved object and then discovering that it moves in a straight line … really disturb me.


Depends on how it's applied and where the actual center of mass for the ship is and how the thrust is angled.
Morihei Akachi
Doomheim
#386 - 2013-08-23 21:46:32 UTC
Sure. But the lower part of the Tormentor would have to be virtually empty for its centre of mass to be as close to the propulsion units as it would have to be in order for it to behave the way it does. Which I suppose it could be. But just looking at it, it seems really counterintuitive.

"Enduring", "restrained" and "ample" as designations for starship components are foreign to the genre of high-tech science fiction and don’t belong in Eve Online. (And as for “scoped” …)

Bendak Starcrusher
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#387 - 2013-08-24 04:52:27 UTC
Haulers in general.. They are slow and boring. We moved to mother ships because they suck to look at. We need some personalization on them.. Just like miners need personalization..i think a cube in another game/ show showed more awesomeness'.
Bendak Starcrusher
Federal Defense Union
Gallente Federation
#388 - 2013-08-24 04:55:49 UTC
The lines that make the ships need to show understanding. Like achievements. Like y
our cargo hauler kills some thing you unlock awesome graphics.
Cade Windstalker
#389 - 2013-08-24 06:38:02 UTC
Morihei Akachi wrote:
Sure. But the lower part of the Tormentor would have to be virtually empty for its centre of mass to be as close to the propulsion units as it would have to be in order for it to behave the way it does. Which I suppose it could be. But just looking at it, it seems really counterintuitive.


If you actually look at the ship it's pretty top-heavy with the way it tapers to a point as it goes along from the engines and the thrusters are set so they can angle downward very easily. I'll grant you it's not a terribly intuitive design going by conventional flight physics but no one ever accused the Amarr of going for function over form.

Also no one ever accused Eve of following conventional physics. Roll
Ubat Batuk
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#390 - 2013-08-24 10:33:46 UTC
All mining barges and transport ships in general are ugly and dated. Make them look cool please.
bassie12bf1
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#391 - 2013-08-24 10:35:36 UTC
A proper detailed Rifter would be nice.
Xevan Templar
7th Batavian Squadron
#392 - 2013-08-24 13:24:48 UTC
Imicus : IMO it must be the ugliest looking ship out there. I would keep it though but remodel it's Tech II variant the Helios.

Phoenix : Nothing wrong with it if it would be a freighter, as a bird of rebirth which is going to unload some massive damage I expect something more impressive though.
Ruby Pyrenne
Doomheim
#393 - 2013-08-24 13:58:08 UTC
I have not been playing this game very long, less than a week at the time I post this, but please save EVE from the monstrosity that is Moa.

Surely this must have been an attempt at humor to release it into the selection of available ships Sad

  http://rubypyrenne.wordpress.com/ part III posted @ 12 sept 2013

Aya Shinomiya
Promethean Ascension
#394 - 2013-08-27 20:29:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Aya Shinomiya
Ships (including their advanced and faction versions):

Bantam
Condor
Griffin
Hawk (What are these rotating things? The antennas look like whether they have thought: “We need antennas. Let’s put them there.”)
Harpy (These weird tube things.)
Kestrel
Manticore (An awesome ship but the two wings are mounted only on very thin connections with the main hull. It looks not very stable and the wings very heavy.)
Crucifier
Imicus
Burst
Probe
Vigil
All Mining Barges and Exhumers
Badger
Hoarder
Mammoth
Wreath
Cormorant
Corax (Looks like a submarine from WWII. And there is a drone hangar with a force field (like in the concept arts) but the ship cannot use drones.)
Algos (The bug part looks like an old propeller plane or the Nautilus of Captain Nemo.)
Talwar (Looks like a tank from WWI.)
Arbitrator
Omen (These thing on the side bother me personally and it looks not nice from behind with these wide engines.)
Blackbird
Caracal (One of the ugliest ships in my eyes.)
Exequror
Bellicose (The stern.)
Rupture (Where is bug and stern by this thing?)
Scythe
Aeon
Chimera, Wyvern, Leviathan (The hull and the engines of all three ships look outdated and box-like. Need more technological SciFi design and details. And what is the bug of the Leviathan? Some kind of cockpit?)
Nyx
Thanatos
Phoenix
Naglfar
Ragnarok (Looks like a crooked branch.)
Armageddon (A little face-lifting.)
Maelstrom
Typhoon (Is this a ship?)
Harbinger (Looks like some animal with a hard belly landing. The wings do not fit to the hull in my eyes.)
Oracle (Only these parts on the side. They looking heavy but are mounted only on a small connection with the hull. I would add a wider connection or put them direct on the main hull like in the original concept arts.)
Drake (Has 8 missile hardpoints but can only use 6 of them. The two others are useless and need to be removed from the model.)
Naga (The stern.)
Cyclone
Hurricane (One of my favorite ships but the hull should be a little bit wider where now are these two braces. The reason is the ship lacks on realistic hardpoints for turrets and some hardpoints are on these thin wings.)
Ashimmu (Need better hardpoints.)
Amarr Shuttle (Does not look like a ship more like a drone.)
Minmatar Shuttle
All Drones (Not the rogue drones. They do not look like I would imagine drones. Some have wings ... in space. Some look like creatures, planes or mechs. The rogue drones look very alien. That is cool. But for the racial drones I could imagine a more compact and technological design with many details like sensors, antennas and so on. And a little bit smaller weapons. They look like from a cartoon and not from SciFi.)

Personally, I do not like these gold-gray color gradient and these red pattern-gray of advanced Caldari ships.


Other things:

Caldari Sentry Guns (It needs more mass. There must be an ammunition storage and an energy core inside.)
Stations (Mostly Caldari.)
Starbase structures (I would like to see different designes (and attributes of armor, shield etc.) for all races and not only these common design. And maybe some unique structures for every race.)
Missions objects (Stations, ruines, wreckages, asteroides etc. etc.. They looking outdated and repeat themself to often from mission to mission. Only the combination changes (Sometimes they push objects together to create "new" objects.). Need more variations, e.g. different types and sizes of mining stations or pirate bases. E.g. Guristas-type small stations, hangars, yards and so on. So the missions becoming more varied from the objects. The wreckages and station ruines are much to big. E.g. "Old Space Shuttle".)
Gatling Pulse Laser (It is too long when it comes out of hulls like the Punisher. The weapon is longer than the hull is broad.)
Thexx Littlechurch
Black Whole Industries
#395 - 2013-08-27 21:24:01 UTC
Iterons I-V. They upset me. Sad
lollerwaffle
Perkone
Caldari State
#396 - 2013-08-28 11:30:49 UTC
If CCP touches the Moa, sexy beast that it is, I will end myself (ingame)
Jhan Niber
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#397 - 2013-08-28 14:14:45 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Maximus Andendare wrote:
Unsuccessful At Everything wrote:
Yazzinra wrote:
I was going to say unfuck the megathron model.....


Im not sure if you have one in your area, but please seek an appointment with an opthamologist ASAP.
Only thing about the Mega I don't like is the lights point down the slope of the front scoops. I wish they pointed forward, and the Mega would be damn-near perfect.

Also, CCP BunnyVirus, where are those drone forcefields for the drone ships we were promised? (Dragoon, Arbitrator, Thorax etc. don't have them, when they clearly have holes for the drone bays. Also, can we get some visible drone bays on the drone ships (Vexor, Ishtar, Tristan, Dominix)?)



Only new remodeled ships will get them


So, why does the Megathron have the drone bay force field and the Tempest doesn't when they have the same size drone bays and both are newly modeled?
Corvus Idolon
Idolon Industries
#398 - 2013-08-28 14:52:38 UTC
Rokh
Alistair Cononach
The Legion of Spoon
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#399 - 2013-08-28 15:02:37 UTC
A number of Caldari Cruiser Hulls really require remodeling to current standards, Moa, Blackbrid and Osprey.

Caldari Frigates could use love too, the Condor and Grffin specificly.

And of course, for the Gallente, the obvious Dominix Space Potato need it, badly. And the Imicus may be the worst looking ship in EVE.

But thats about it really. Everything else is generally quite good. One of these expansions, I'm sure CCP could revise al of these hulls looks at once without that much effort.
Jon Joringer
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#400 - 2013-08-28 15:51:48 UTC
The Scythe. Not only because the Scythe Fleet has always been cool (and is even more cool now), but also because the Scythe no longer has any ties to being a mining vessel. Please make it look like a ship that was actually designed to be in combat scenarios (whether that's performing as logistics or a gun/missile boat).

I remember this runner up in the DeviantArt Teir3 BC contest: http://www.deviantart.com/art/Tsunami-182569146

While I'm not saying use that model, it's got a very Scythe feel to it, with the Mantis like fins in front. Make the Scythe something more like that.