These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Eve Too Nasty

First post First post
Author
Osileon Yoshimeru
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#161 - 2013-08-25 18:12:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Osileon Yoshimeru
Maliandra wrote:
Why are you being such a jerk? I really don't understand people like you. What exactly happened in your life to make you so inconsiderate and disrespectful as an adult?


In real life I have been told I am one of the nicest persons ever met by many individuals. My ingame characters may or may not reflect that. This is one of the main reasons I play EVE.

As for,
“If the community had some dignity”

This game isn't called nights and chivalry online. While some of us who pvp do so as a way to express locked up emotions, most of us do it simply because its fun. PvP isn't always personal in this game and I feel that's what your problem is. No one cares if a freighter loses it cargo or a market trader gets his stock busted. You think that an mmo like EVE were to make it safe for every activity it would still be fun or dynamic? No, it would be just another cookie cutter mmo where people would tire with after they hit level so and so.

In this game you can be the good guy, the bad guy, the thief, the scientist, or whatever. If things don't go your way you can always find ways to fight back. You just have to be smart and except the fact that you will lose many times before you get good at this game, which is how it should be imo.

“The community is just sick, and CCP more or less supports it.”

Again, if this game doesn't make you happy find one that will. If you want censorship you have come to the wrong place.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#162 - 2013-08-25 18:39:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Maliandra wrote:

Anyways...

The problem in EVE is not the violence and potential for death in any situation; it's the flawed personalities that tend to be drawn towards this game. Unfortunately the system that was put in place to create PvP fun is mostly used as a means of griefing, trolling, and having fun at the expense of others.
Are you qualified to diagnose flawed personalities, psychosis, etc?

Quote:
If the community had some dignity they would recognize which players are just there for casual, PvE fun and would not endlessly harass them as a means of enjoyment through their frustrations. Yet they choose to do that. Many, many of them. Why? Probably failed upbringings, but who really knows.
Eve is an open world PvP game, even the PvE is geared towards enabling the PvP. Furthermore with Eve being a single shard universe, somebody doing casual PvE such as mining, exploration, trading etc is actually involved in a basic form of PvP, they are directly competing with other players.

Quote:
The community is just sick, and CCP more or less supports it. The amount of posts I see on this forum alone that should result in an in-game ban of the character. CCP supports griefing and cyberbullying, they need to grow up.
Well it's a good job you're not a moderator then. CCP decide what is and what is not acceptable, griefing is defined by them, bullying in its common forms is not tolerated either. Though some parts of the metagame, such as using rumour and falsehood to damage reputation and friendships, could be considered bullying by people unfamiliar with Eve. If you step over the line they will come down on you like a ton of bricks.

If you feel that our community is toxic, I respectfully suggest you leave our community and find one that is more likely to pander to your obviously sensitive nature.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#163 - 2013-08-25 19:10:08 UTC
Quote:
The problem in EVE is not the violence and potential for death in any situation; it's the flawed personalities that tend to be drawn towards this game. Unfortunately the system that was put in place to create PvP fun is mostly used as a means of griefing, trolling, and having fun at the expense of others.


You must not be familiar with the history of EVE. EVE was created by people who liked to play the older version of Ultima Online. You know, the "ok to kill and loot anyone you come across, rampant killing, ganking, scamming, able to kill the creator of the game" Ultima Online, before they caved in to the whining of carebear scum like you and changed the game to have consensual pvp only. At which point UO died. CCP was founded to make a space version of UO. They've been on record saying this too.

So all this stuff you are wringing your hands over? 100% intended.

Quote:
If the community had some dignity they would recognize which players are just there for casual, PvE fun and would not endlessly harass them as a means of enjoyment through their frustrations. Yet they choose to do that. Many, many of them. Why? Probably failed upbringings, but who really knows.


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP. That'd solve the problem a little better imo. Especially since, even once the freaking casuals manage to ruin a game with their whining, they typically don't stop there. So why give the inch in the first place?

Oh, and attempting to categorize your opposition in the negative in real life, as you have done, typically is one of the last resorts of someone without a salient point to make. So saying things like "failed upbringings" just reveals what a childish position you have taken, although taking up the banner of the freaking casuals had told me that already.
Quote:

The community is just sick, and CCP more or less supports it. The amount of posts I see on this forum alone that should result in an in-game ban of the character. CCP supports griefing and cyberbullying, they need to grow up.


Again, 100% intended. Furthermore, you do not get to define griefing, CCP does. You can try and throw out emotionally charged terms like "cyberbullying" as much as you like, but most of us simply do not care. I myself disagree with even the very concept of cyberbullying intrisically, seeing as online activity is entirely consensual to participate. That being, I don't think such a thing even exists, it's merely the word they use for the overblown reactions of the thin-skinned.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

whysoserios Andrard
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#164 - 2013-08-25 20:11:31 UTC
There is no evil or good in eve they are winners and losers .

What one will you be.

Grab your pvp ship get a group of guys and give them war instead of hiding waiting for pod ejection.

I am the guy camping your gates and killing your renters in your system in your regions. 

Fighting is not mandatory but if you don't it will make me killing you easier.

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#165 - 2013-08-25 20:27:46 UTC
Maliandra wrote:
Osileon Yoshimeru wrote:
If you feel that way then its time to play another game. Nobody wants to hear your sob story “this is what I think eve should be like” moans.

Go watch the simpsons or something
Why are you being such a jerk? I really don't understand people like you. What exactly happened in your life to make you so inconsiderate and disrespectful as an adult?

Anyways...

The problem in EVE is not the violence and potential for death in any situation; it's the flawed personalities that tend to be drawn towards this game. Unfortunately the system that was put in place to create PvP fun is mostly used as a means of griefing, trolling, and having fun at the expense of others.

If the community had some dignity they would recognize which players are just there for casual, PvE fun and would not endlessly harass them as a means of enjoyment through their frustrations. Yet they choose to do that. Many, many of them. Why? Probably failed upbringings, but who really knows.

The community is just sick, and CCP more or less supports it. The amount of posts I see on this forum alone that should result in an in-game ban of the character. CCP supports griefing and cyberbullying, they need to grow up.


1) Lets see metrics of just how many actually have this as a playstyle. I doubt it's honestly over 10% of players.

2) I've played for 3 1/2 years and can't tell good from bad. There is nothing that can ever be inserted into the mechanics to make this possible. Watched, during a mining fleet once where one of the Corps long time players just suddenly blew up the Orca, just for lulz and vanished forever with never another login. That cannot be predicted. Had been in that corp 5 years.

3) No. The community is not sick. Unlikely even the 10% I mentioned do that absolutely all the time.

I'm industrial as all heck, and I've had reason to pop miners myself. And with good reason.

You really should move on to another game since EVE upsets you so much. And do not claim it doesn't.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#166 - 2013-08-25 20:33:55 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP.


Yes, and thank you for not saying "give permission".

When I drive out onto the street in a car, I am consenting to the possibility of a deadly accident. It may happen indeed. But nobody has 'permission' to do so.

There is a distinct difference. And players like this poster can't see the difference.

EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Dave Stark
#167 - 2013-08-25 20:40:23 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.


except concord response times.

i wish the local rozzers responded as fast as concord do.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#168 - 2013-08-25 20:54:23 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP.


Yes, and thank you for not saying "give permission".

When I drive out onto the street in a car, I am consenting to the possibility of a deadly accident. It may happen indeed. But nobody has 'permission' to do so.

There is a distinct difference. And players like this poster can't see the difference.

EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.


They are synonyms.

You might not give me permission to hit you with my car, but if I am inclined to do so, and choose to accept the penalties thereof, then I can do so. If the penalties for doing so fail to dissuade me, then the only thing stopping me is you, and your ability to avoid me.

Just like real life, so in EVE. Except that in real life I don't happen to be an undying demigod, like I am in EVE.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#169 - 2013-08-25 21:07:20 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP.


Yes, and thank you for not saying "give permission".

When I drive out onto the street in a car, I am consenting to the possibility of a deadly accident. It may happen indeed. But nobody has 'permission' to do so.

There is a distinct difference. And players like this poster can't see the difference.

EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.


They are synonyms.

You might not give me permission to hit you with my car, but if I am inclined to do so, and choose to accept the penalties thereof, then I can do so. If the penalties for doing so fail to dissuade me, then the only thing stopping me is you, and your ability to avoid me.

Just like real life, so in EVE. Except that in real life I don't happen to be an undying demigod, like I am in EVE.



Erm....that's called giving yourself permission. Grow a bigger ego.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#170 - 2013-08-25 21:26:17 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP.


Yes, and thank you for not saying "give permission".

When I drive out onto the street in a car, I am consenting to the possibility of a deadly accident. It may happen indeed. But nobody has 'permission' to do so.

There is a distinct difference. And players like this poster can't see the difference.

EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.


They are synonyms.

You might not give me permission to hit you with my car, but if I am inclined to do so, and choose to accept the penalties thereof, then I can do so. If the penalties for doing so fail to dissuade me, then the only thing stopping me is you, and your ability to avoid me.

Just like real life, so in EVE. Except that in real life I don't happen to be an undying demigod, like I am in EVE.



Erm....that's called giving yourself permission. Grow a bigger ego.


I would, but I can't afford a bigger house.

And it doesn't matter which distinction you choose to stand on. The hypothetical person went outside and got in their vehicle. "It's a dangerous thing, Frodo, going outside your front door..." and so forth. I imagine I will now be butchered for misquoting that, but the point stands regardless.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#171 - 2013-08-25 21:38:25 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP.


Yes, and thank you for not saying "give permission".

When I drive out onto the street in a car, I am consenting to the possibility of a deadly accident. It may happen indeed. But nobody has 'permission' to do so.

There is a distinct difference. And players like this poster can't see the difference.

EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.


It's more like a football game. You try like hell to avoid being tackled, but you still shouldn't complain to the police if it happens.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#172 - 2013-08-25 22:03:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Malcanis wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


The freaking casuals need to understand that by undocking, they consent to PvP.


Yes, and thank you for not saying "give permission".

When I drive out onto the street in a car, I am consenting to the possibility of a deadly accident. It may happen indeed. But nobody has 'permission' to do so.

There is a distinct difference. And players like this poster can't see the difference.

EVE is honestly a lot like real life tbh.


It's more like a football game. You try like hell to avoid being tackled, but you still shouldn't complain to the police if it happens.


EVE isn't a game where procedures are known like football. Its an open sandbox.

The rules do not say you must tackle other people in ordert to score a touchdown. You basically chose your own touchdown criteria and proceed accordingly.

The rules of EVE do not specifically say you must blow up other ships. You can if you feel like it, but there is no rules that say kills win you the game. Well it might feel that way for for some, but for others the touchdown criteria is their wallet size or how many EVE friends they have.

That is the wonderful thing about EVE actually. You don't have to play by others rules to win the way you want to win.

In that regard, those who simply chose to win by killing others are playing in a way that is not compatible to how others are playing the game.

In this regard, you are not consenting to be killed everytime you undock because that is not how you are playing the game. It maybe how other people play the game though.

I'm not saying ganking is bad or anything. Personally, I have no problem with killing people who don't consent. It makes it seem more tasty.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#173 - 2013-08-25 23:24:18 UTC
Lady Fatant wrote:
I have met the best of characters, the most generous of strangers, the most friendly of corps. But. I think the game is getting too nasty, evil seems to be reigning.
I love this game. But since the corp I'm in has been targeted for War by other corps for no reason but War.
I have been ganked and pod killed for no reason.
You even find high sec are no longer safe because nutters decide to destroy and die.
Lady Fatant Cry

ha... HAHAHA

EVE has gotten NOTHING BUT SAFER over the years, especially in hghsec.

if you think EVE is "getting too nasty" then i kindly invite you to leave and not return.
Lady Fatant
Omunes Pro Unum
#174 - 2013-08-25 23:30:53 UTC
I wish I hadn't said anything. In some ways I have proved my point by the vicious venom spitted by some people.

I thought it would be good to hear the arguments for and against as a forum should be.

The great thing is that i have met such genuine players from all around the globe since I posted .

Thanks to those people and enjoy the GAME.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#175 - 2013-08-25 23:36:51 UTC
Lady Fatant wrote:
I wish I hadn't said anything. In some ways I have proved my point by the vicious venom spitted by some people.

I thought it would be good to hear the arguments for and against as a forum should be.

The great thing is that i have met such genuine players from all around the globe since I posted .

Thanks to those people and enjoy the GAME.


You haven't proved your point at all. Your OP basically can be compiled into "Wardecs are griefing!!!".

Which is pure, unadulterated nonsense.

The "vicious venom" you are referring to is simply people disagreeing with your ludicrous premise, which if you can pull off some introspective thinking should be easy to understand.

Here's some advice for you. Wardecs are not griefing. Some people play this game to get kills. It's not "no reason", it's to kill you. Which is a perfectly valid reason.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#176 - 2013-08-26 00:06:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Lady Fatant wrote:
I wish I hadn't said anything. In some ways I have proved my point by the vicious venom spitted by some people.

I thought it would be good to hear the arguments for and against as a forum should be.

The great thing is that i have met such genuine players from all around the globe since I posted .

Thanks to those people and enjoy the GAME.


You haven't proved your point at all. Your OP basically can be compiled into "Wardecs are griefing!!!".

Which is pure, unadulterated nonsense.

The "vicious venom" you are referring to is simply people disagreeing with your ludicrous premise, which if you can pull off some introspective thinking should be easy to understand.

Here's some advice for you. Wardecs are not griefing. Some people play this game to get kills. It's not "no reason", it's to kill you. Which is a perfectly valid reason.


Why do people have to be so uptight about calling griefing something other than griefing.

If you aren't doing it for the delicious tears, then why are you doing it?

Are you afraid that if someone calls you a greifer that somehow you have to hang your head in shame?

No I say! If you are going to be a person that ruins other people's days, be damn proud of the fact you caused the other person to feel some sort of grief.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#177 - 2013-08-26 00:14:42 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Lady Fatant wrote:
I wish I hadn't said anything. In some ways I have proved my point by the vicious venom spitted by some people.

I thought it would be good to hear the arguments for and against as a forum should be.

The great thing is that i have met such genuine players from all around the globe since I posted .

Thanks to those people and enjoy the GAME.


You haven't proved your point at all. Your OP basically can be compiled into "Wardecs are griefing!!!".

Which is pure, unadulterated nonsense.

The "vicious venom" you are referring to is simply people disagreeing with your ludicrous premise, which if you can pull off some introspective thinking should be easy to understand.

Here's some advice for you. Wardecs are not griefing. Some people play this game to get kills. It's not "no reason", it's to kill you. Which is a perfectly valid reason.


Why do people have to be so uptight about calling griefing something other than griefing.

If you aren't doing it for the delicious tears, then why are you doing it?

Are you afraid that if someone calls you a greifer that somehow you have to hang your head in shame?

No I say! If you are going to be a person that ruins other people's days, be damn proud of the fact you caused the other person to feel some sort of grief.


Because griefing is defined by CCP, and is actionable. Call a spade a spade, yes, I am out to ruin your day, but I am not "griefing" anyone through legitimate use of pre-existing mechanics. Am I harvesting tears? Yes. Do I enjoy it? Very much so. Am I proud of how I play? Hell yes I am.

But the distinction is there and it's a vital one, considering that for actual griefing you can be justifiably banned.

To turn that question around, why are people so eager to just label anyone who shoots at them "griefers", hmm?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#178 - 2013-08-26 00:25:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Captain Tardbar wrote:

Why do people have to be so uptight about calling griefing something other than griefing.
Griefing is an actionable offence, if CCP say it's OK to do something, it's not griefing.

Quote:
If you aren't doing it for the delicious tears, then why are you doing it?
You got us there Pirate

Quote:
Are you afraid that if someone calls you a greifer that somehow you have to hang your head in shame?
Pirate, Privateer, Thief and Spy are much more glamorous and don't have quite the same negative connotations. NB: I speak for myself here, others may well revel in the title griefer

Quote:
No I say! If you are going to be a person that ruins other people's days, be damn proud of the fact you caused the other person to feel some sort of grief.
They are proud of it, there's a collection of threads in C&P and numerous blogs dedicated to the archiving of tears resulting from nefarious deeds.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#179 - 2013-08-26 00:28:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Because griefing is defined by CCP, and is actionable. Call a spade a spade, yes, I am out to ruin your day, but I am not "griefing" anyone through legitimate use of pre-existing mechanics. Am I harvesting tears? Yes. Do I enjoy it? Very much so. Am I proud of how I play? Hell yes I am.

But the distinction is there and it's a vital one, considering that for actual griefing you can be justifiably banned.

To turn that question around, why are people so eager to just label anyone who shoots at them "griefers", hmm?



Hrm... Have they defined it somewhere else? I thought you might be right actually, but for the life of me I can't find the word "grief" in the EULA. I see the language of "harrassing" and "harrasment".

But I don't see anywhere in the EULA where it is against the rules a player to cause another player grief.

I did a google search and the EVE wiki came up and it said:

https://wiki.eveonline.com/en/wiki/Griefing

Quote:
In general, "griefing" is a term that means action against another player that makes the target feel like being targeted on purpose or for the sake of harassment only.

In EVE, "griefing" refers to various activities, some of which can be argued not to be "griefing" in the classic sense, but parts of valid gameplay.

There are certain forms of griefing that can get you banned from the game. These include (but probably are not limited to) can baiting in rookie systems and certain forms of verbal harassment.


So what I see here is that some forms of griefing is bannable and some are not. This means yes... You can grief in EVE and not be banned.

The article even goes on to give examples of griefing as miner bumping and certain war decs as griefing. One should ask if these things aren't griefing then why have an official article about such activities?

[edit]

There is a mention in the user suspension and ban policy that says:

Quote:
g. Engages in griefplay tactics which may include, but are not limited to, market/courier exploits.


Which means to me that some griefing is not allowed, but this doesn't not mean that all of what griefing is forbidden. This seems to be a blanket statement on people using exploits to grief.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#180 - 2013-08-26 00:34:24 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


To turn that question around, why are people so eager to just label anyone who shoots at them "griefers", hmm?


Probably for the same reason why some people need to call EVERYONE who disagrees with them a "Troll". It's a defense mechanisim and thus evidence of a shallow/weak ego.

Just 10 minutes ago, a dude came into my mission in Dodixie and turned flashy (I guess he took something out of my can). I of course didn't fall for the bait (I even said "oh noes, a flashy guy in my mission" in local lol). I din't for a second wonder why he was there, because at every step I was able to remember that I was playing a video game and that's what people do. But some people would have raged at the "intrusion" even though they lost nothing and would run to the forums begging ccp to make such things imppossible.