EVE General Discussion

I think I touched a nerve there with that "show me on the dolly" reference...interesting. As for game design, leave that to the awesome CCP Devs who can do no wrong. If they say we shall get four indys, we shall get four awesome new indys. I'm guessing you work in something quite isolating, like sewer spelunking for fatbergs or something. You seem to have quite a high value of your own opinion at any rate. I think you just mad because you have to go fishing for fatbergs for a living. I'm gonna call you butty-mcButthurt from now on because I like you.

Hmm now there's an odd comment , some one who might use an industrial ship for the purposes of industrial work is a wierdo.

I would just like to point out that wearing your tee shirt and flying around in a new ship, whilst also wearing a little hat with a propeller on the top and shout freaking awesome may do it for you.

Sadly many production activities require you to ship ORE and Minerals and PI and final produce, changing ship each and every different level of the industrial process is annoying and possibly not very helpful.

Therefore an Industrial ship that had 50k to 100k of general cargo space would be actually more useful instead of gimickey.

Thankyou for the totally vague reply.

Was a little disappointed that at least the rig calibration increase wasn't shared out to all T1 ships and will have to wait to see if that happens anytime soon.

--> Features & Ideas Discussion, please. GD is for real men and great wisdom.

I'm not American. Yeah, words, some stuff. Nobody cares. Your opinions mean nought. Go back to mining fatbergs, scrub.

When will there be enough so it makes sense to stop?
Is the limit the beginning of the ending of going further?
Will Will willfully wilder wild Weasels?
How much wood would Elijah Wood chuck if Chuck would ?

Questions above questions...

1: Pirate ships are Tech 1 ships and will be balanced in turn, they will likely be some of the last to be balanced because of their high position on the EVE food chain.

2: Tech 1 cargo vessels "would" be very amusing if given a monstrous cargo hold. The sheer amount of fury generated by people filling a soap bubble with expensive goods only to get popped by a destroyer would be well worth it. Still, not likely to happen. (Be careful what you wish for).

3: Making Tech 1 cargo vessels tanky enough to protect the value of a huge cargo hold causes all sorts of balance issue.

4: Related point to #3. Ganking is not a problem to be solved, it is an intended (and carefully balanced) game mechanic.

5: The choices were either specialty cargo holds, or removing them from the game completely. The majority of the community opted for specialty cargo holds. Sorry you disagree.

6: If you use your hauler for a wide variety of tasks (instead of specializing in one aspect of industry) each race has a hauler that has a good general cargo hold... in most cases better than it was before.

7: Americans aren't known for making pedophile jokes. Americans are known for making pedophiles prime targets for prison assaults. Take that for what it's worth.

I'll just quote and answer the only part of the OP that made the least bit of sense:



Yes

Mr Epeen

5-7-5

You fail at writing haikus.

Not sure if troll or toxic kid..