These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Anti-Ganker Barge Fits.

First post
Author
Gizznitt Malikite
Agony Unleashed
Agony Empire
#221 - 2013-08-15 17:57:28 UTC
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:


Yes, but half of these are combat ships. The industrial freighters on there contain cargo that is worth while, they have no fittings. So while that type of ganking happens, and it is interesting, it is completely irrelevant to the ships shown on simo's thread. He presented barges. I understand. But then again, no one has any buisness telling someone else how and what to fit on their ships, they can make recommendations but not tell them they should die if they don't. Plus, a few of those combat ships may have been wardecs, not ganks.


Some of those links, upon further inspection, are likely wardecs. Most of those links are suicide ganks, especially the "combat ships", which were blinged out mission runners often killed in 0.8.


EvE Kill's list of Orca Kills this month.
From that list, the following are suicide orca ganks... and that's just in the last couple days...
Orca Gank 1
Orca Gank 2
Orca Gank 3
Orca Gank 4

These Orca's have more EHP than your ship....

Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:

Quote:
Against Blasters, that fit has about 50k EHP. I'll stretch it to 60k to make this point:
A cheap, meta 2 fit catalyst outputs 10k damage in 20 seconds. Six of them WILL destroy your ship unless you have remote reps or jams or something to save your ass. Do you know how much 6 meta 2 fit catalysts cost? Less than 25m isk.

In other words, the fit above is profitable to gank. Compared to say, this fit, which still takes 4-5 catalysts to destroy, has a better yield, has a survey scanner, and has less than 15m in modules to loot.


Some of the fits in this thread would take not only a great deal of people, effort, money, and coordination, but if it was done correctly, it may not even work. I've had 7 catalysts attack my barge I showed in my last post and they didn't even penetrate the shields, however, I did have logistic drones and implants to augment my defenses.

The 7 T2 catalysts and didn't penetrate my shields, it got it down to 11% shields, but then they would have had to deal with 3600 armor and 5600 hull with a great deal of resistance on both. I'm sorry, but what your saying just doesn't match what I have experienced first hand.


The truth is EFT dps never matches the real dps of a vessel, and is an upper-end estimate. If they had a poor warp in, they may be out of range for several volleys. If someone shot early, then concord comes quicker. If they didn't prime concord, it arrives 6s earlier. If they were under skilled, didn't overheat, etc, etc, etc. Implants, Fleet boosts, heat, and logistics drones also improve your tank quite a bit (up to 25%). There are several nuances that allowed you to survive, that aren't always implemented by the average pilot. Without boosts, without logistics drones, without the implants, it would have been much closer. Furthermore, they weren't ganking you for profit if they had 7 t2 fit catalysts, but for another reason.

What are you doing that you need to max tank your ship? There is a reason they sent 7 t2 catalysts to gank you, and truthfully, figuring out why they did that, and taking steps to not be a target, will improve your ship's suitability far more than your fit!

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#222 - 2013-08-15 19:25:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Bugsy VanHalen
I really do not get how some people think that ganking a freighter or a pimped out mission ship is any different than ganking a mining ship. A gank is a Gank. If the potential drop is worth significantly more than the fleet required to gank you, you are a target, no matter what you are flying.

It makes no difference if the value is in your cargo hold or fitted modules, i.e. a freighter, or a pimped out mission ship. If you have 20B worth of faction and officer mods on your mining ship, you can be ganked for profit, regardless of how high your EHP is.

Estamel's Modified Adaptive Invulnerability Field 17 Billion each, Just as an extreme example of officer modules.

Even the Canyon medium shield extender is a 42M isk module. Many would consider that pimped.

Other examples of modules that could be used to Pimp out a mining ship;
Pithum A-type Adaptive invulnerability field 1.7 billion isk each
Medium core defense field extender II 25 million isk each
Setele’s Modified Power diagnostic System 1.7 Billion isk each
Radical Damage Control 650 million isk
Synthetic Hull Conversion reinforced Bulkheads 40M each

The purpose of many of these officer and storyline modules is not just tank, but lower fitting costs, allowing it all to fit.

and don't forget the Genolution implant set giving you CPU and power grid boosts at 50M for the set.


It would be easy to pimp fit a Mackinaw to be worth over 20 billion isk, even up to 50 Billion isk. But it certainly would not be worth doing. All you would be is gank bait.
Sosueme Hapytuedispt
Doomheim
#223 - 2013-08-15 23:44:25 UTC
Quote:
Some of those links, upon further inspection, are likely wardecs. Most of those links are suicide ganks, especially the "combat ships", which were blinged out mission runners often killed in 0.8.


Wardecs should be counted as neutralizing a war target not a gank but I do understand the point. However, not only were those particular Orcas completely untanked, some were fit in such a rediculous manner that the pilots were asking for it. With an appropriate tank, IE resistance amps, damage controls, and hull reinforcements, it would have taken a great deal more. Especially if the pilot had defensive gang links, implants, defensive riggings and anything even resembling a worth while shield fitting. None of which were present.

Killing someone tanked is a great deal more difficult. I haven't really seen any kills presented so far that can't be chawked up to straight overkill and numbers. Nothing special. The pilots got caught slipping because of either inexperience or wardecs, neither of which is an excuse.

Quote:
The truth is EFT dps never matches the real dps of a vessel, and is an upper-end estimate. If they had a poor warp in, they may be out of range for several volleys. If someone shot early, then concord comes quicker. If they didn't prime concord, it arrives 6s earlier. If they were under skilled, didn't overheat, etc, etc, etc. Implants, Fleet boosts, heat, and logistics drones also improve your tank quite a bit (up to 25%). There are several nuances that allowed you to survive, that aren't always implemented by the average pilot.


They were elite, I assure you.

Quote:
Without boosts, without logistics drones, without the implants, it would have been much closer.


Much closer your right, but not neccisarily a kill.

Quote:
Furthermore, they weren't ganking you for profit if they had 7 t2 fit catalysts, but for another reason.


I agree. And I've earned it. Lol
Sosueme Hapytuedispt
Doomheim
#224 - 2013-08-15 23:49:59 UTC
Quote:
I really do not get how some people think that ganking a freighter or a pimped out mission ship is any different than ganking a mining ship.


It requires a great deal more people, coordination, time, effort, money, training, firepower, leadership, vent, haste, and general knowledge of ganking. Killing a barge is the diet coke of ganking, if someone can't do that right they need to stay in the kiddy pool.
Lady Naween
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#225 - 2013-08-16 02:23:47 UTC
Sasha Rama wrote:
Commodore Quaritch wrote:
this thread should now be locked.

It no longer holds relavent conversation or contributions.


Alt of Gizzum, Bugsy, or Lady Newbqueen?


*snort.. snickers*

yay I got a nickname
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#226 - 2013-08-16 13:23:31 UTC
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:
Quote:
I really do not get how some people think that ganking a freighter or a pimped out mission ship is any different than ganking a mining ship.


It requires a great deal more people, coordination, time, effort, money, training, firepower, leadership, vent, haste, and general knowledge of ganking. Killing a barge is the diet coke of ganking, if someone can't do that right they need to stay in the kiddy pool.

I can agree with that. Yet there are people in this thread that think it is mining barges that are harder to gank. Claiming that references to pimped out mission ships, or freighter that have been ganked for profit has no relation to mining ships.

My point was that they are the same, in that no matter if the value is in fitted modules, or sitting in the cargo hold, the chances of them dropping are the same. A pimped fit mining ship is just as likely to get ganked for profit as a freighter with several billion in cargo.

The fact that mining barges are much easier to gank in the first place, means their chances of getting ganked are even higher, not lower as some would have you believe.
Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#227 - 2013-08-16 13:58:23 UTC
Not that expensive rigs make a ship more attractive to gank Blink

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Sasha Rama
Doomheim
#228 - 2013-08-16 15:29:35 UTC
Quote:
Not that expensive rigs make a ship more attractive to gank


Other then to cause more frustration to the ganked pilot, they shoulden't, they are destroyed upon a successful gank.
Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#229 - 2013-08-16 15:33:02 UTC
Medium Rigs for Mining Barges are now considered expensive bling ? What?

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Sosueme Hapytuedispt
Doomheim
#230 - 2013-08-16 15:42:15 UTC
Quote:
I can agree with that. Yet there are people in this thread that think it is mining barges that are harder to gank. Claiming that references to pimped out mission ships, or freighter that have been ganked for profit has no relation to mining ships.

My point was that they are the same, in that no matter if the value is in fitted modules, or sitting in the cargo hold, the chances of them dropping are the same. A pimped fit mining ship is just as likely to get ganked for profit as a freighter with several billion in cargo.

The fact that mining barges are much easier to gank in the first place, means their chances of getting ganked are even higher, not lower as some would have you believe.


I have difficulty understanding the overemphasized exaggeration of his barges containing faction or deadspace.

3/18, that's three out of the first 18 of his fits on the list contain a medium 'canyon' shield, the other 15 are actually really good tanks in my opinion. I can't see anything so expensive or unreasonable with them, that it would raise an eyebrow to anyone. But that is never even brought up. However, I did see 1 in this entire thread that could be considered over the top. And that was his 'Best Mack you will ever own' I woulden't go that far, however, he did. It would be an impressive ship, but I don't think deadspace belongs on a barge. That IS too flashy.

But can someone explain to me why there is such exaggerated claims to all of them being sh*t fits?

Alot of them are great.
Lady Naween
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#231 - 2013-08-16 17:10:34 UTC
Sasha Rama wrote:
Quote:
Not that expensive rigs make a ship more attractive to gank


Other then to cause more frustration to the ganked pilot, they shoulden't, they are destroyed upon a successful gank.


people gank for profit? We never have, if it is gankable we will gank it. And if we make a profit from the salvage then bonus.
Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#232 - 2013-08-18 23:31:02 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Medium Rigs for Mining Barges are now considered expensive bling ? What?

Some people consider T2 rigs bling. I guess some medium T2 rigs can be expensive for players that have trouble replacing a 200M isk ship.
Felicity Love
Doomheim
#233 - 2013-08-19 05:07:15 UTC
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Medium Rigs for Mining Barges are now considered expensive bling ? What?


... sort of makes me nostalgic for the early days when rigs came in one size. Roll

"EVE is dying." -- The Four Forum Trolls of the Apocalypse.   ( Pick four, any four. They all smell.  )

Ersahi Kir
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#234 - 2013-08-19 07:18:28 UTC
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:
Krixtal Icefluxor wrote:
Medium Rigs for Mining Barges are now considered expensive bling ? What?

Some people consider T2 rigs bling. I guess some medium T2 rigs can be expensive for players that have trouble replacing a 200M isk ship.


It depends on what you're flying. If you're rolling around in a exhumer you should have rigs, but if you have a meta tanked procurer they can add a lot to the cost of the ship. I think you can fit a healthy tank on a procurer and still come in under 14m if you don't fit rigs. You're going to die to a gank, but being able to replace a 14m ship is easy, and a cheap fit procurer is the last ship a gank squad wants to hit.

People turn their nose up when the procurer is mentioned, but right now it should be the go too ship for any miner stubbornly squatting in caldari space.
Sosueme Hapytuedispt
Doomheim
#235 - 2013-08-19 22:15:33 UTC
Quote:
But can someone explain to me why there is such exaggerated claims to all of them being sh*t fits?


I guess not.
Ersahi Kir
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#236 - 2013-08-19 22:37:07 UTC
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:
But can someone explain to me why there is such exaggerated claims to all of them being sh*t fits?


You should treat barge fitting as you would treat PvP fitting, because it's been proven time and time again that people will engage miners in non-consensual PvP (ganking).

With that in mind you shouldn't fit anything to a barge if you wouldn't fit to a throw away PvP ship. So to pick at his post:

1. He keeps using the canyon shield extender
2. He often mentions tech II rigs in his suggested fits (they're still expensive, but when this thread was made they were outrageously expensive)
3. He requires faction mods, specifically the canyon shield extender, and expensive implants to make his fits work

Quote:
Genolution Core Augmentation CA-1 (Boosts perception by 3, Provides +1.5% powergrid bonus, Provides +1.5% capacitor amount bonus, Implant set bonus: 50%. (Also great for tengu's, battleships, any ship really.)

Genolution Core Augmentation CA-2 (Boost intelligence by 3, Provides +1.5% CPU bonus, Provides +1.5% capacitor recharge
Implant set bonus: 50%. (Also great for tengu's, battleships, any ship really.)

Zainou 'Gypsy' Electionic EE-604 (4% bonus to the CPU output.)

The Mackinaw fit below, dubbed 'Perfect Mackinaw' requires a 'Squire' Engineering EG-606, for the Harvester upgrade. I woulden't reccomend it, but for those craving perfection in a barge, it is the only way.


So the ultimate problem is that he can EFT warrior away like anyone else, but he makes very bad cost/benefit analyses. Simply getting the largest EHP numbers in EFT doesn't make it a good fit, the fit needs to have good marginal cost benefit or else it's gankbait.
Hypercake Mix
#237 - 2013-08-20 08:39:15 UTC
This thread is full of garbage and I'm tired of seeing it.
- Mackinaws don't belong in high-sec. They're merely tanky enough to survive low/null rats and are not meant to tank a player gank.
- Flying Procurers and Skiffs makes you less attractive for ganks, but being off the beaten path does so much more.
- The better gankers will gank your barge AND your pod. Expensive fitting implants are a TERRIBLE option and clone costs ARE a loss.
- If you cannot avoid AFK mining, I suggest doing your AFK mining on a dumpster alpha clone no impant alt dedicated to mining in a Retriever.
- Lots of people need to tank their mind instead of their ship. Provoking gankers to go out of their way to gank you is not efficient.
- Any Orca fit with a Cargo Expander is a BAD fit. It's just too much of a EHP loss to justify.
- You don't need T2 Rigs on any barge or exhumer unless you're trying to fit a 10MN Digital to your Skiff-racer.
- I wish people would stop misusing EFT.
Ersahi Kir
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#238 - 2013-08-20 15:37:45 UTC
I'll agree with everything Hypercake said except the alpha clone thing. Mining requires too many SP to alpha clone it.
Sosueme Hapytuedispt
Doomheim
#239 - 2013-08-20 15:38:29 UTC
Ersahi Kir wrote:
Sosueme Hapytuedispt wrote:
But can someone explain to me why there is such exaggerated claims to all of them being sh*t fits?


You should treat barge fitting as you would treat PvP fitting, because it's been proven time and time again that people will engage miners in non-consensual PvP (ganking).

With that in mind you shouldn't fit anything to a barge if you wouldn't fit to a throw away PvP ship. So to pick at his post:

1. He keeps using the canyon shield extender
2. He often mentions tech II rigs in his suggested fits (they're still expensive, but when this thread was made they were outrageously expensive)
3. He requires faction mods, specifically the canyon shield extender, and expensive implants to make his fits work

Quote:
Genolution Core Augmentation CA-1 (Boosts perception by 3, Provides +1.5% powergrid bonus, Provides +1.5% capacitor amount bonus, Implant set bonus: 50%. (Also great for tengu's, battleships, any ship really.)

Genolution Core Augmentation CA-2 (Boost intelligence by 3, Provides +1.5% CPU bonus, Provides +1.5% capacitor recharge
Implant set bonus: 50%. (Also great for tengu's, battleships, any ship really.)

Zainou 'Gypsy' Electionic EE-604 (4% bonus to the CPU output.)

The Mackinaw fit below, dubbed 'Perfect Mackinaw' requires a 'Squire' Engineering EG-606, for the Harvester upgrade. I woulden't reccomend it, but for those craving perfection in a barge, it is the only way.


So the ultimate problem is that he can EFT warrior away like anyone else, but he makes very bad cost/benefit analyses. Simply getting the largest EHP numbers in EFT doesn't make it a good fit, the fit needs to have good marginal cost benefit or else it's gankbait.


I have difficulty understanding the overemphasized exaggeration of his barges containing faction or deadspace.

3/18, that's three out of the first 18 of his fits on the first page alone contain a medium 'canyon' shield, the other 15 are actually really good tanks in my opinion. I can't see anything so expensive or unreasonable with them, that it would raise an eyebrow to anyone. But that is never even brought up. However, I did see 1 in this entire thread that could be considered over the top. And that was his 'Best Mack you will ever own' I woulden't go that far, however, he did. It would be an impressive ship, but I don't think deadspace belongs on a barge, but no one understands what optional means apparently, where you can actually scan down the list until you find one that is affordable and suitable for your needs and the cost is suitable, which is most of them.

The implants are not expensive. A mack cost anywhere from 180 to 200mil just for the ship, if you afford that, then making and buying 2 implants at 20 to 25mil each is childs play, furthermore, they not only benefit the barge but any combat ship (any ship at all) that a pilot flys because it augments their perception, intelligence, capcitor, powergrid, and cpu with a bonus if the set is complete, that isen't a waste of money, it helps performance and efficiency for all ships a pilot owns and can make for much tighter fits on all other ships.

A large majority of the fits in this thread do not require those implants, the first 3 fits in the first post do not require implants. Citing 'the perfect mackinaw' as a reason why the entire thread is invalid is autistic. However, once again, this thread was constructed like a menu at a restaurant, you can pick what you want and don't have to order the most expensive thing possible. Only a fool would do that when they can't afford it and only a fool woulden't be able to pick one of similar defense and less value. I like them all, but I picked one that was inexpensive and able to take on a 7 catalyst gank team with T2 gear, the only thing that is garbage, is what i'm being told that they don't work, don't protect anyone against that many, and to just stay in a procuror. The answer is no.

Quote:
1. He keeps using the canyon shield extender
2. He often mentions tech II rigs in his suggested fits (they're still expensive, but when this thread was made they were outrageously expensive)
3. He requires faction mods, specifically the canyon shield extender, and expensive implants to make his fits work


1.) No, he doesen't he used it a hand full of times on a fraction of the fits.
2.) He often mentions T2 rigs as a choice, not a requirement.
3.) No, he doesen't require them, only on certain fits, which you can choose off the menu. See above for implants.

tl:dr? Read more.
Sasha Rama
Doomheim
#240 - 2013-08-20 15:43:08 UTC
Hypercake Mix wrote:
This thread is full of garbage and I'm tired of seeing it.
- Mackinaws don't belong in high-sec. They're merely tanky enough to survive low/null rats and are not meant to tank a player gank.
- Flying Procurers and Skiffs makes you less attractive for ganks, but being off the beaten path does so much more.
- The better gankers will gank your barge AND your pod. Expensive fitting implants are a TERRIBLE option and clone costs ARE a loss.
- If you cannot avoid AFK mining, I suggest doing your AFK mining on a dumpster alpha clone no impant alt dedicated to mining in a Retriever.
- Lots of people need to tank their mind instead of their ship. Provoking gankers to go out of their way to gank you is not efficient.
- Any Orca fit with a Cargo Expander is a BAD fit. It's just too much of a EHP loss to justify.
- You don't need T2 Rigs on any barge or exhumer unless you're trying to fit a 10MN Digital to your Skiff-racer.
- I wish people would stop misusing EFT.


Mackinaws belong anywhere there is ore.
Flying procurers is inefficient for mining profitably.
Fit appropriately, there are many options.
No one afk mines anymore unless they do ice. That is what macks are for.
I tank a ship instead of my mind, it works great for me.
Orca's should fit defense with at least a damage control and shield defense.
T2 Rigs have nothing to do with afterburners or microwarpdrives.
I wish you would stop making **** posts.