These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Sarum Family Heir recommends assault on Republic

Author
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#61 - 2013-08-15 10:07:20 UTC
People may put too much attention to the Amarr Empire of old. After several centuries of Heideran, and past Vak'Atioth, vocal minorities that still fail to learn from History are hardly a representative sample.

Of course, maybe they will prove me wrong.
Vincent Rekmus
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#62 - 2013-08-15 11:00:35 UTC
Could always use more slaves.

A reclaiming would be great fun.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#63 - 2013-08-15 11:22:31 UTC
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:

This comment merely shows that you have quite a twisted understanding of friendship, if you only uphold it if you have a need of your friends.


The goals of an Empire, any Empire, all through history have always been based upon conquest, expansion, and dominion. The State is not allies with the Amarr Empire truly out of friendship -- true friendship is possible only with others who walk the path of Caldari -- but rather mutual advantage, both economic and political. The Amarr are still jaijii just as much as those in the Federation or Republic. And as jaijii there will always exist limits to both trust and friendship due to the simple fact that you are not Caldari.

This does not mean a degree of accord and respect might be afforded to Imperials, it simply does not change the fact that the old rustic proverb of, "Do not trust those who come from over the hills for their hearts are different," still holds true with any and all jaijii for their motivations cannot be trusted to have Caldari self-interest in mind. Attempting to appeal to a Caldari better-nature through saccharine words of friendship and the worthless baubles of permanent alliances is an exercise in futility for a true Caldari is not guided by a better nature but by pragmatism, a pragmatism which leads to the realization that there never exists permanent alliances only permanent interests.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#64 - 2013-08-15 12:41:01 UTC
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Rioghal Morgan wrote:
Honor. Hah.

If the empire somehow overcame the Federation the Empire wouldn't need you anymore. There'd be no friendships, no alliance, no ties that bind.

All the State would be to them is their next meal.


This comment merely shows that you have quite a twisted understanding of friendship, if you only uphold it if you have a need of your friends.

He is a gallentean, Lieutenant. They are individualists. They work only for themselves, and they lack concepts of friendship and honor.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#65 - 2013-08-15 12:43:30 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:

This comment merely shows that you have quite a twisted understanding of friendship, if you only uphold it if you have a need of your friends.


The goals of an Empire, any Empire, all through history have always been based upon conquest, expansion, and dominion. The State is not allies with the Amarr Empire truly out of friendship -- true friendship is possible only with others who walk the path of Caldari -- but rather mutual advantage, both economic and political. The Amarr are still jaijii just as much as those in the Federation or Republic. And as jaijii there will always exist limits to both trust and friendship due to the simple fact that you are not Caldari.

This does not mean a degree of accord and respect might be afforded to Imperials, it simply does not change the fact that the old rustic proverb of, "Do not trust those who come from over the hills for their hearts are different," still holds true with any and all jaijii for their motivations cannot be trusted to have Caldari self-interest in mind. Attempting to appeal to a Caldari better-nature through saccharine words of friendship and the worthless baubles of permanent alliances is an exercise in futility for a true Caldari is not guided by a better nature but by pragmatism, a pragmatism which leads to the realization that there never exists permanent alliances only permanent interests.

Try as much as you want, puny scum, but your empty words are not enough to break our mighty alliance.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#66 - 2013-08-15 13:00:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Katrina Oniseki
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Gwen - you should also take into consideration that the Empire has never, repeat, never experienced a state of total war. It has never, in fact, even fought any type of war against an opponent at technological parity with the exception of the short-lived war of Reclaiming against the Jovians, which ended in such a catastrophic failure it came within sight - albeit distant - of toppling the Empire. When the Empire met the Federation, it immediately recognised that the Federation was, despite controlling a smaller amount of territory and a smaller navy, potentially its military equal, and instead signed a trade agreement without any attempt to dictate terms to the Federation - an event essentially unheard of in prior Amarrian history.


You're not quite wrong, but you're close enough to it that I felt I should point things out to you.

The Federation recognizes the concept of "total war" as a war in which it must commit to a complete mobilization of all available resources to the war. Economic output is dedicated to the war effort, common citizens are drafted into service, and what civilian concept trappings left separate from the war effort are few and far between.

The Amarr never entered a state of "total war", as your culture recognizes the concept, because their former Reclaiming culture already was a perpetual state of the very same by nature. The concept of Reclaiming pitted the entire Empire against whatever enemy was being Reclaimed. Every soul in the Empire from Slave to Emperor worked towards the realization of their divine goal. The Empire was already in a state of "total war".

Until the battle of Vak'Atioth, the Empire had simply never been defeated so decisively by a such a smaller force. The true damage of the defeat was not a military blow, as the lost fleet was quite small. It was a morale blow, as it was such a crushing defeat that even the Admiralty were forced to admit they were sorely outmatched. Imperial records of previous defeats are hard to come by, so I cannot say that Vak'Atioth was their first ever defeat, but it certainly marks a cultural turning point. Until Vak'Atioth, every war the Empire had fought had been against opponents of equal or lesser footing. The Jovians, however, clearly outmatched them by a large margin. Don't mistake their defeat to the Jovians as evidence that the Empire had never fought an equally matched foe.

I realize your passionate disdain for the Amarr Empire, religion, and people is near boundless - but please try to recognize that they are not as inept as you'd like to believe. They do have plenty of experience fighting extended wars. In fact, they have more experience with the concept than the Federation does.

If the Federation had challenged the Jovians instead, they'd have lost just as badly, and some Amarrian doppelganger of yourself would be crowing about how inexperienced the Federation is in war.

Katrina Oniseki

Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#67 - 2013-08-15 13:12:57 UTC
Vincent Rekmus wrote:
A reclaiming would be great fun.


This word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Morwen Lagann
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#68 - 2013-08-15 13:36:51 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Vincent Rekmus wrote:
A reclaiming would be great fun.


This word. I do not think it means what you think it means.


Check his corp.

Then you will Understand.

Morwen Lagann

CEO, Tyrathlion Interstellar

Coordinator, Arataka Research Consortium

Owner, The Golden Masque

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#69 - 2013-08-15 13:36:51 UTC
You're implying that I'm painting the Amarrians as inept. This is not the case - however much disdain I hold for the Empire and its policies, I recognise they had to be at least basically competent to last this long. You miss the point I'm trying to make - the Empire never, until the battle of Vak'Atioth, fought a military power that was comparable to itself. The Covenant may have been technologically comparable to the Empire but are certainly not anywhere near comparable from a military standpoint - they're a highly organised piratical organisation, but not a freestanding national empire such as the Federation, the Republic or the State. The only time the Amarr have fought such an organisation is Vak'Atioth, and the consequences were utterly disastrous.

And incidentally, the Amarrians can talk a good game about "every soul of the Empire" being involved in the effort of a Reclaiming, but like with the vast majority of the things they say, it doesn't make it true. Only a small fraction of the Empire's population would, over the course of its history, have any realistic, traceable involvement in the Reclamation of, say, the Ni-Kunni, the Khanid, the Ealurians or, yes, even the Minmatar. By many Imperials' own admission (often to counter other arguments made against them) only a very small fraction of their population holds slaves. Only a tiny fraction of the combined military might of the Empire would ever have been required to conquer single planets such as the homeworlds of the Ni-Kunni or the Ealur (especially since the Ealur were at an extremely low level of technological development when they were found), and even though the Minmatar had spread out across several star systems and were capable of spaceflight, since they were not (at the time) warlike or violent, they had almost no naval force to speak of since, tragically, they didn't forsee the need for one.

They had, of course, made the perfectly reasonable but tragically misguided assumption that their peaceful empire wouldn't be set upon by a bunch of culturally-destructive religious sociopaths.

To most of the citizens of the Empire, the conquests and annexations would be distant thunder at best, and for most they would barely even hear of it except through grand Imperial procalamations of victory. The Empire never, until the Minmatar Rebellion, experienced a situation in which even a statistically significant fraction, let alone all, of its citizens or holdings were under credible threat from a foreign power. Prior to the Elder Fleet, they had never experienced a situation in which the lives of citizens in its core holdings were placed under credible threat from a foreign military. In fact, you know what, forget credible. It's painfully clear that prior to the Elder Fleet, at least a notable portion Imperial military's leadership didn't even believe that such a thing was possible.

The crux of my point is that I believe a full-on invasion against the Republic would very likely put the Empire in a situation it's simply not psychologically prepared to deal with. Prior to the Elder Invasion, most of the Empire believed that their God will protect them from any serious harm. Sarum may have prevented the Elder Fleet from inflicting as much damage as they were otherwise capable of doing, and perhaps upheld that belief, but the wiser, more pragmatic citizens and potentates of the Empire have realised that faith alone is not enough to shield them. This perhaps explains the investment in the Ammatar Mandate and the warming of relations with the Khanid Kingdom. If God existed, then it would perhaps be within his power to shield the faithful, but belief alone won't protect Imperial citizens from orbital bombardment or terrorist attacks, and it remains to be seen if enough people of note in the Empire realise this.

Katrina, in essence, the Empire can believe that they've experienced a state of total war where every citizen is both involved in the war effort and, more importantly, in direct danger from it, but they sure as hell haven't, and I don't think they're prepared for the consequences of entering one. The only people to have historically experienced a state of total war would, ironically enough, be the Minmatar, during the initial Imperial invasion of their homelands. Believe you me when I say that the Minmatar people remember that time, and they understand what will happen if they lose to the Empire. There is no price so great that they will not gladly pay it to avoid that fate.

What the Empire wants and what the Empire will get are, in this circumstance, two wholy seperate things. The age of the Reclaiming is long past, and there will be no glory, honour or victory for those who attempt to reanimate its corpse - just blood, misery and death.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#70 - 2013-08-15 13:55:47 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
...


Thank you for your detailed reply. I believe that sufficiently answers the commentary I had, and I am satisfied with the outcome of this discourse.

I have no further comment to make.

Katrina Oniseki

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#71 - 2013-08-15 14:30:07 UTC
Diana Kim wrote:

Try as much as you want, puny scum, but your empty words are not enough to break our mighty alliance.


That's very nice, dear.

However.

The fact such a sentiment was expressed by a Gallente Traitor such as yourself is simply another reminder why the Federation must be destroyed.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#72 - 2013-08-15 14:50:45 UTC
The largest fallacy of people posting in this thread is thinking a war is somehow something agreed upon between two parties, contract signed, and we can begin well adjusted trench warfare where non of us take any relevant strategic. points... wait, that's a bit too close to the reality of the militias.
Which brings up the question of 'why are you even fighting', but that's a different can of worms.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Katrina Oniseki
Oniseki-Raata Internal Watch
Ishuk-Raata Enforcement Directive
#73 - 2013-08-15 15:06:37 UTC
Leopold Caine wrote:
The largest fallacy of people posting in this thread is thinking a war is somehow something agreed upon between two parties, contract signed, and we can begin well adjusted trench warfare where non of us take any relevant strategic. points... wait, that's a bit too close to the reality of the militias.
Which brings up the question of 'why are you even fighting', but that's a different can of worms.


... and this applies to every single post in this thread, including yourself? Perhaps you should specify who you refer to.

Katrina Oniseki

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#74 - 2013-08-15 15:35:43 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
The Republic is a shambles and although Shakor is a vicious tyrant he is also an incompetent fool who is dependent upon his Jovian masters for guidance

My personal view is that it's just a matter of time until the Republic falls apart in spectacular fashion, and when that happens the rest of the cluster (including many Minmatars) will be begging the Empire to step in and restore law and order.

Patience is all that is needed.


Well, just so long as you continue to passively believe in the inevitability of that scenario, rather than actually doing anything to bring it about.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#75 - 2013-08-15 16:00:56 UTC
Katrina Oniseki wrote:
Leopold Caine wrote:
The largest fallacy of people posting in this thread is thinking a war is somehow something agreed upon between two parties, contract signed, and we can begin well adjusted trench warfare where non of us take any relevant strategic. points... wait, that's a bit too close to the reality of the militias.
Which brings up the question of 'why are you even fighting', but that's a different can of worms.


... and this applies to every single post in this thread, including yourself? Perhaps you should specify who you refer to.


Touche. Everyone, really. Not that I protest; keep up the good work.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Ava Starfire
Khushakor Clan
#76 - 2013-08-15 16:06:50 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
I disagree with your assessment, Ikiryo-haani.

It's generally my experience that sentimental pilots are the EASIEST to draw into a foolish attack. We could use the Elder Fleet as an example, a loss of men and materiel without parallel except for Vak'Aktioth - itself a yardstick for incompentence and foolish prodigality.

Regardless - the tactics you speak of are available to be used by ANY competent Admiral put in such a situation, not merely Republic ones. The example of Tovil-Toba might be illustrative.


You forget the part where the Starkmanir were successfully rescued, returned home, and now sit at the Tribal table with the rest of their kin, as do the Thukker and Nefantar. Was the incursion into the Home Worlds a mistake? Yes, almost certainly. However, we're united now, as we have not been since long before even the Day of Darkness. That, according to many, myself included, was worth the loss of life.

I am no fan of Shakor, I am no fan of war; however, we are seven tribes once again, and the Elder attack, for well or ill, is the reason why.

If you set aside forces and state "I am willing to risk this to achieve my goal" and then achieve your goal, well... goal achieved, eh? Is it incompetence, or desperation?

"There is no strength in numbers; have no such misconception." -Jayka Vofur, "Warfare in the North"

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#77 - 2013-08-15 16:23:47 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
the old rustic proverb of, "Do not trust those who come from over the hills for their hearts are different," still holds true with any and all jaijii for their motivations cannot be trusted to have Caldari self-interest in mind.


"Look at each other. How do you tell one man from the other? How do you know which man to kill?” - the parable of Cold Wind.

The lesson I always took from that is that once we are stripped of our flags, our uniforms, our badges of rank and the signs of our houses, we're all humans in the end. Forget coming from over the hills, or beyond the border, or flying ships of gold - there's no such thing as a 100% trustworthy human, even inside your own "tribe".

Ascribing the vice of untrustworthiness only to jaijin is a dangerous parochialism, kirjuun. Brother has killed brother in internecine war throughout history. To take recent examples, we've seen quite a lot of blood spilled between two factions who vehemently disagree on what it means to be Caldari, to be State, and to be Loyal.

That's the problem with rustic proverbs - they very often seem wise, and very often are anything but.

Of course, The Empire has made no secret of the fact that the Caldari are on the list to be Reclaimed too. And in point of fact, I do trust them to keep their word on that, if given the opportunity. Which is why I barrack for the Minmatar. We don't really know where we stand with them.

We do know where we stand with the Amarr, and it's somewhere no sane, foresighted person would choose to remain. I'll take an uncertain but potentially benign relationship over certain and honest malevolence any day.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#78 - 2013-08-15 16:37:36 UTC
I've always tried to advocate for peace between the State and the Federation because at heart, nothing fundamental about either of our societies would really have to change fundamentally for us to be friends - only our outlooks on each other. The State wouldn't have to give up meritocratic megacorporate dominion nor the Federation individualistic representative democracy for us to maintain cordial relationships with each other. We'd just need to fix our dented opinions of one another.

For the Amarr Empire to be friends with anyone, their society would have to give up the idea that cultures that are not their own are inherently fundamentally inferior in such a way as neccessitates corrective intervention, which is, unfortunately, an intrinsic element of their culture.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#79 - 2013-08-15 16:39:07 UTC
Ava Starfire wrote:
.. as do the Thukker...


Hah. Apologies. Please, go on.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc

Leopold Caine
Stillwater Corporation
#80 - 2013-08-15 16:44:18 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
I've always tried to advocate for peace between the State and the Federation because at heart, nothing fundamental about either of our societies would really have to change fundamentally for us to be friends.


It would be quite awkward if anyone linked that rant of yours regarding Caldari Militia taking control of all contested space in the last year or so, with your response being 'it shouldn't have happened', as 'Gallente should be righteous and victorious.'.
You know, for the sake of peace and all, Andreus Kim.
  • Leopold Caine, Domination Malakim

Angels are never far...

Stillwater Corporation Recruitment Open - Angel Cartel Bloc