These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Lost 1.5 billion on Margin Trading Scam

Author
Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-08-14 16:05:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Manhim
embrel wrote:
Manhim wrote:
or it should be able to put your wallet into the negatives as you'd have a debt towards the broker, cause I think that not being able to pay for what you owe should be on the shoulders of the seller and not the buyer.


as it was pointed out before, this would be an infinite ISK-generation machine. Creat alt, place uncovered buy order, sell to alt, biomass indebted alt...


Then remove that skill altogether. While I understand the concept beneath it I don't get why a broker would accept to buy something for you while you don't even have the money to pay for it.

I had though about making the rest to cover never higher then the profits that could be made from sell orders, although someone could simply put a sell order for a very high price and it would be circumvented. The alternative would be to use the sell orders average value.

EDIT: The player would get into the negatives, and the sell orders would be "Locked" from being canceled or sold for lower then the average value.
Captain Gingerbeer
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#22 - 2013-08-14 16:11:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Gingerbeer
embrel wrote:
A scam hurts actually no one. It's just an expensive lesson for on side of this special kind of transaction.

I'm fairly sure that was the Enron defence too. Evil

Manhim wrote:
While I understand the concept beneath it I don't get why a broker would accept to buy something for you while you don't even have the money to pay for it.

Because EVE is Real. This is one part of how the world's finance system actually works... or doesn't, depending on which percentage you are. Pirate
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#23 - 2013-08-14 16:16:09 UTC
Manhim wrote:

Then remove that skill altogether. While I understand the concept beneath it I don't get why a broker would accept to buy something for you while you don't even have the money to pay for it.


Even in real stock trading - depending on how you do it - there is the possibility to have orders that are not fully covered. In one tool I used you set up orders and further orders would be cancelled (after some have been executed) should your margin no longer cover them.

Further, I'd assume the skill to be quite important for the Eve economy. If all traders can only set up buy orders in maximum of their current liquidity, there just would be far less of these orders, making it far harder for a seller to sell his stock.

So what you're proposing is to make live harder for many in order to protect some few from a lesson they might be better off learning in Eve than elsewhere.
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#24 - 2013-08-14 16:16:59 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Manhim wrote:
Then remove that skill altogether. While I understand the concept beneath it I don't get why a broker would accept to buy something for you while you don't even have the money to pay for it.


Because that's not what the broker is doing. The broker is placing an offer to buy at a certain price. The broker never buys anything for you until he completes the escrow (otherwise, you'd be out your items when you sold to a margin order).

And, of course, how is anyone trying to sell hurt by a failing buy order? They're left in the exact same position they were before trying to sell to that order.

Quote:
I had though about making the rest to cover never higher then the profits that could be made from sell orders, although someone could simply put a sell order for a very high price and it would be circumvented. The alternative would be to use the sell orders average value.


Wat?

Quote:
EDIT: The player would get into the negatives, and the sell orders would be "Locked" from being canceled or sold for lower then the average value.


Any mechanic by which a player can force another player into the negatives and pocket the resulting ISK is an immediate gamebreaker.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2013-08-14 16:24:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Manhim
embrel wrote:
Manhim wrote:

Then remove that skill altogether. While I understand the concept beneath it I don't get why a broker would accept to buy something for you while you don't even have the money to pay for it.


Even in real stock trading - depending on how you do it - there is the possibility to have orders that are not fully covered. In one tool I used you set up orders and further orders would be cancelled (after some have been executed) should your margin no longer cover them.

Further, I'd assume the skill to be quite important for the Eve economy. If all traders can only set up buy orders in maximum of their current liquidity, there just would be far less of these orders, making it far harder for a seller to sell his stock.

So what you're proposing is to make live harder for many in order to protect some few from a lesson they might be better off learning in Eve than elsewhere.


I don't think that it changes that much in the economy that you place buy orders for higher then you can afford other then pissing off sellers that are trying to sell their stuff. Plus it just inflates the real money value placed in buy orders without any real effects on the economy.

You are also comparing an highly regulated market against one with absolutely no rules or regulations.

I don't think that it would make my life harder to wait to have the money to buy something to actually buy it rather then seeing my buy order disappearing with no notices of it in a bunch of hundreds of buy orders then trying to find which one got cancelled by comparing my inventory to my expected inventory.

Btw, something that I started seeing:

- Place buy order with no margin available at 20% price from sell to buy
- Wait until someone place his sell order at the same price
- Rinse, repeat until you brought the market down
- Buy stuff
- Wait until the market steps back up
- Sell stuff
- ...
- Profits.
Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-08-14 16:28:05 UTC
RubyPorto wrote:

Any mechanic by which a player can force another player into the negatives and pocket the resulting ISK is an immediate gamebreaker.


How are you forcing someone to go in the negatives? You'd put yourself in it and it would be your problem.
Spurty
#27 - 2013-08-14 16:30:26 UTC
Manhim wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

Any mechanic by which a player can force another player into the negatives and pocket the resulting ISK is an immediate gamebreaker.


How are you forcing someone to go in the negatives? You'd put yourself in it and it would be your problem.


because the 'YOU' in this scenario is a burner alt.

There, said it without resorting to sounding like a 5 year old. If I can do it, you can too Peers!

There are good ships,

And wood ships,

And ships that sail the sea

But the best ships are Spaceships

Built by CCP

Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2013-08-14 16:34:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Manhim
Spurty wrote:
Manhim wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

Any mechanic by which a player can force another player into the negatives and pocket the resulting ISK is an immediate gamebreaker.


How are you forcing someone to go in the negatives? You'd put yourself in it and it would be your problem.


because the 'YOU' in this scenario is a burner alt.

There, said it without resorting to sounding like a 5 year old. If I can do it, you can too Peers!


This is a personal attack btw while I never resorted to such nor anyone in this conversation.

Please read what I wrote entirely, I was talking about sell orders obligated to be in place to be able to place a buy order with the sell order's average value serving as margin for the broker. In the case you'd go into the negatives, you'd wouldn't be able to cancel the sell order or change it's sell value for lower then the average.

I know that it's a stupid idea, but it's less stupid then trying to buy stuff with money that doesn't exists.
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#29 - 2013-08-14 16:40:58 UTC
Manhim wrote:
[quote=embrel]
I don't think that it changes that much in the economy that you place buy orders for higher then you can afford

Btw, something that I started seeing:

- Place buy order with no margin available at 20% price from sell to buy
- Wait until someone place his sell order at the same price
- Rinse, repeat until you brought the market down
- Buy stuff
- Wait until the market steps back up
- Sell stuff
- ...
- Profits.


I am not placing orders for something I can not afford. I place just lots of orders and am sure that not all of them will be executed at the same time. All of them at the same time would be higher than my liq, most of them at the same time I could cover. If I place less orders I get less orders executed reducing my trading activity. If all traders place less orders there are far less buy orders meaning you will always have to wait till someone buys your sell order as there will simply not be enough buy orders for you to sell at a reasonable price.

If I understand your proposal you're welcome to try. In general you'll notice that a) you'll be only the highest bidder at 20% from sell order price in very illiquid assets b) you'll hardly ever get an executed buy order. Together this leads to: not enough profits.

I dare to say that your scheme would only work if margin trading skill was removed.
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#30 - 2013-08-14 16:43:06 UTC
Manhim wrote:
RubyPorto wrote:

Any mechanic by which a player can force another player into the negatives and pocket the resulting ISK is an immediate gamebreaker.


How are you forcing someone to go in the negatives? You'd put yourself in it and it would be your problem.


It just would not be a problem but profit.

Just kill the alt with the negative account. You say that alt's with negative accounts can't be biomassed. Well, then have an account with three alt's going negative and cancel the account afterwards.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#31 - 2013-08-14 16:43:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Manhim wrote:

I know that it's a stupid idea, but it's less stupid then trying to buy stuff with money that doesn't exists.
Tell that to banks and stock traders all over the world.

There is no way, that I can see, for CCP to alter the margin trading mechanic without screwing the vast majority of traders who are using it as intended to leverage their money and skills efficiently.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2013-08-14 16:44:29 UTC
embrel wrote:
Manhim wrote:
[quote=embrel]
I don't think that it changes that much in the economy that you place buy orders for higher then you can afford

Btw, something that I started seeing:

- Place buy order with no margin available at 20% price from sell to buy
- Wait until someone place his sell order at the same price
- Rinse, repeat until you brought the market down
- Buy stuff
- Wait until the market steps back up
- Sell stuff
- ...
- Profits.


I am not placing orders for something I can not afford. I place just lots of orders and am sure that not all of them will be executed at the same time. All of them at the same time would be higher than my liq, most of them at the same time I could cover. If I place less orders I get less orders executed reducing my trading activity. If all traders place less orders there are far less buy orders meaning you will always have to wait till someone buys your sell order as there will simply not be enough buy orders for you to sell at a reasonable price.

If I understand your proposal you're welcome to try. In general you'll notice that a) you'll be only the highest bidder at 20% from sell order price in very illiquid assets b) you'll hardly ever get an executed buy order. Together this leads to: not enough profits.

I dare to say that your scheme would only work if margin trading skill was removed.


I wouldn't even care that this scheme would stop working with this skill removed.

And you would be ok with your orders with the idea I had (sell orders covering buy order margins).
Liltha
Lost My Way Enterprises
#33 - 2013-08-14 16:45:06 UTC
embrel wrote:
Manhim wrote:

Then remove that skill altogether. While I understand the concept beneath it I don't get why a broker would accept to buy something for you while you don't even have the money to pay for it.


Even in real stock trading - depending on how you do it - there is the possibility to have orders that are not fully covered. In one tool I used you set up orders and further orders would be cancelled (after some have been executed) should your margin no longer cover them.

Further, I'd assume the skill to be quite important for the Eve economy. If all traders can only set up buy orders in maximum of their current liquidity, there just would be far less of these orders, making it far harder for a seller to sell his stock.

So what you're proposing is to make live harder for many in order to protect some few from a lesson they might be better off learning in Eve than elsewhere.


I was under the impression that with real life margin trading you actually had to cover the bill if your sales didn't end up covering your buys when it came due one way or the other. Either through sales of other stock, often at unfavorable prices, or through loss of other assets.

Seems like that isn't always the case with the eve version, if you lack the isk the buy order just doesn't complete, you don't have to cover it from any sort of other assets. Unless I'm misunderstanding how this whole thing works.

If it worked like the real life version at some point the buy order would be sold to and you would have to own up to the loss, potentially by putting your wallet in the negative. Now obviously there are all sorts of work arounds to this and a whole lot of problems as to why that solution wouldn't work. Namely that there isn't a good way to get your wallet positive again once it goes negative, and that a negative walleted alt could simply be biomassed. Even if you blocked the biomassing of a negative wallet character you could still just not use that alt, or at most dire stop using that account (not like trading alts take much training and by the time you killed 3 alts the account would probably pay for itself.) Sadly there just isn't a way to link accounts so that other assets get seized to pay for the margin trading if it goes bust.
embrel
BamBam Inc.
#34 - 2013-08-14 16:49:47 UTC
Captain Gingerbeer wrote:

I'm fairly sure that was the Enron defence too. Evil



there's a difference between fraud and a scam (at least in my understanding)

The nice nigerian emails from the widow of late Abacha... is a scam. Whoever falls for it learns an important lesson.
Enron was fraud. Far harder to realize.
Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2013-08-14 16:59:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Manhim
Scam = Fraud, it holds a similar meaning. The word scam is more associated with schemes.

So you could say: The ponzi scheme is a scam.
But you would say: That person that did that ponzi scheme committed a fraud.

EDIT: I'm no master of english, but that's what I understood from a quick dictionary search.
EDIT2: Please disregard: Definitions don't seem to be the same across dictionaries. But both seem to be quite related in meaning.
Chris Winter
Bene Gesserit ChapterHouse
The Curatores Veritatis Auxiliary
#36 - 2013-08-14 17:02:39 UTC
IMO, just somehow indicate buy orders that will fail--color them red, or something.
Manhim
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2013-08-14 17:03:37 UTC
Chris Winter wrote:
IMO, just somehow indicate buy orders that will fail--color them red, or something.


That would be the best thing to do and also the easiest one.
Rabid Disconnection
Prism's Keepers
#38 - 2013-08-14 17:04:25 UTC
Azurae wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
Azurae wrote:
btw there are sometimes cheap navy slicers for sale in contracts, just gotta be quick enough to get one. check jita for those


It's funny how the first two sell so quickly, guess that is why the seller was in a hurry to post the third contract and mistyped the number of zeroes.

as i said he has to be fast. obviously the 1 mill slicers are gone within seconds (and no, not by alts... at least not my slicers; can't speak for the copycats though ^^)


LOL Are you the one that uses contracts from 2 years ago for the first two?
RubyPorto
RubysRhymes
#39 - 2013-08-14 17:11:43 UTC  |  Edited by: RubyPorto
Liltha wrote:
I was under the impression that with real life margin trading you actually had to cover the bill if your sales didn't end up covering your buys when it came due one way or the other. Either through sales of other stock, often at unfavorable prices, or through loss of other assets.


RL trading on margin has very little to do with what EVE's Margin Trade skill does.

RL trading on margin is trading (as in actually buying securities) with borrowed money. That's why there are margin calls, because you're reaching the limit of your credit line.
IRL, you can place an order, and the broker doesn't have to check how much money you have in your account* until the order fills, no skill needed.

*A good broker may check as the clearing price approaches your order, so he can give you a heads up if you're short of funds, but that's just customer service. The brokerage house may also cover your shortfall temporarily (as a loan), again as a customer service.

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths." -Abrazzar "the risk of having your day ruined by other people is the cornerstone with which EVE was built" -CCP Solomon

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#40 - 2013-08-14 17:14:18 UTC
Manhim wrote:
Chris Winter wrote:
IMO, just somehow indicate buy orders that will fail--color them red, or something.


That would be the best thing to do and also the easiest one.

The overhead for that would cripple CCP, every buy order would have to be constantly compared to the current wallet balance of the person who placed the order and the appropriate filter applied to the market.

How do you decide which orders will fail and which ones won't? I and many many other people have multiple buy orders that often exceed our ability, in liquid ISK, to complete if they all came in at once, we rely on our sell orders to provide the liquid ISK to complete those buy orders.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack