These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

[Proposal] Microtransactions

Author
Sleepindpro
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2011-11-11 11:56:16 UTC
I would like to say that i will Continue playing EvE in the middle to long term though certain cosmetic restrictions are anoying.

I have played many MMO's and half of them have gone free 2 play with Micro-transactions.

With the world Economy as it is now is a good time to consider the following.

1) Micro-transactions have a wide scope of services

1a) EvE could go free 2 play , Example would mean smaller client download size. install content as required
If you have say only 1 character slot , and only the region of space for your race. Say can only fly around in amarr space since you chose that race. Buy from ingame store other space regions .

1b) Buy other services like character slots. and this could be expanded

1c) in-game store currency could be acquired through selling special loot items to NPC vendor , Real world currency , A 6 or 12 month subscriber would get X amount of in-game store currency per month.

2) The content which you might not want would be to walk around in space stations ,

3) Player owned space stations could have custom design interiors and exteriors based on the content bough from the in-game store through micro-transactions.

4) Going to the planets surface could also be extra content from the store.

Now is the time to work and perfect a micro-transaction system that works for EvE before EvE is just left with the addicts.
Else you end up with the following scenario

1) those who play eve are addicts

1a) the addicts will try and play for free buy exchanging ISK for game time

1b) Even if addicts have 2 out of 10 accounts funded by subscriptions and they do not buy ETC since they have enough ISK
Then who buys the ETC for the addicts to use to keep the other accounts running.

2) If the number of active accounts who are on a subscription fall below Y % of X % then CCP will need to rethink their payment options.


I have one example

Quote:
The Lego Universe MMO shuts up shop on 31st January 2012, The Lego Group has announced
The company explained that despite "a large number of players in the free play zone" it had not converted a satisfactory number of users into paying subscribers.
As a result of the game's closure, Colorado-base developer Play Well Studios is also being shut down along with a marketing team in Denmark, resulting in the loss of 115 jobs. Lego is promising to help those affected find new employment.


Now you might not be interested in this MMO , but they failled to create the free 2 play properly and just limited it to a zone.
A better solution like Champions Online , DC Universe Online , Star Trek Online , Age of Conan online , Lord of the Rings online

Quote:
Lord of the Rings Online Executive Producer Kate Paiz announced during a panel at GDC Online 2010 today that Turbine has done it again: Lord of the Rings Online has doubled its revenue and created over a million new accounts since going free-to-play early last month.


Although LOTRO went F2P in Late Q3 / start of Q4 in 2010 .... you have to wonder what Free 2 play with a correct
Quote:
paid subscription to a hybrid microtransactions-based business model

that works for EvE would do not only to the number of unique players (not those with multiple characters and accounts) but also the revenue for CCP.

Final example is World of Tanks MMO from Wargaming.net and is doing very well for its self since it is completely free 2 play but has a prestiege "elite" mode which is only unlocked through gold currency which you can buy for real world money or by winning events.

This is all pure speculation but as i said above now is the time to develop a business subscription hybrid model using micro-transactions for EvE and do i need to remind everyone about the Italian and Greek Debt the countries have. The global finacial Pain will not go away for a few years maybe with us for the rest of this decade.






Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#2 - 2011-11-11 12:34:15 UTC
Everything about your proposal is an abomination. No.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Sepheir Sepheron
State War Academy
Caldari State
#3 - 2011-11-11 13:33:18 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Everything about your proposal is an abomination. No.

Velicitia
XS Tech
#4 - 2011-11-11 13:56:12 UTC
OP,
Please get in the biomass queue.
Just follow the arrows, it will all be over soon.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Sleepindpro
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2011-11-11 15:20:04 UTC
Firstly I find those replies to my OP and proposal very narrow minded. My opinion on those who reply without even picking apart the OP's original post is even lower. To just say its wrong , "abomination" and fail to have any proper criticism is really poor.
To me you are like a politician with high levels of national debt and you just want to put you head in the sand ignore any problems and hope it goes away. The other view is that you are just rich and pay €131.40 per account and you have 10 accounts , well in that case you are just trying to escape life spend your money as you see fit and ignore the world around you.

To download the client is 4GB . With limited Free 2 Play and micro-transactions this could be a ~1 to 1.5 GB download then content and systems could be installed in a few 500MB packs.

Even with highspeed broadband 4Gb for some can take a while and now both Traffic management and shaping profiles via ISP's to prevent bit torrent hogs and the heavy filesharing.

The modular client works well with micro-transactions

Yes i know my proposal is a double edged sword and I doubt if everyone will like it. I know former players of EvE may return and anything which would increase the number players all connected at the same time can only be a good thing for CCP.

You have to remember than CCP though privately owned still had to employ people and pay salaries. Even if CCP may or may not be for profit anything that increases market share of the MMO industry , Increase revenue would never be ignored by CCP.

The fact is no one not even I can say that my proposal will never happen but why wait and then not be happy with the result when we could try and be part of the development of the system to one that will work for the future benefit of EvE and CCP.

Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2011-11-11 15:27:13 UTC
Get Lost
Get Out
Get Biomassed

I will not fall prey to the bull#### that is microtransaction [not]free to play bull####

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152

True Sight
Deep Freeze Industries
#7 - 2011-11-11 15:39:40 UTC
There's a single simple fix needed to drastically improve this service and none of your stuff is it:

Microtransactions - They should be micro.

Items on a micro-transaction store should not cost more than a couple of euros/dollars/etc each, right now we have a "mega-transactions" store.
Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#8 - 2011-11-11 19:59:58 UTC
Sepheir Sepheron wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Everything about your proposal is an abomination. No.



Not empty quoting this.
Lord Zim
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2011-11-11 20:27:27 UTC
Destination SkillQueue wrote:
Sepheir Sepheron wrote:
Malcanis wrote:
Everything about your proposal is an abomination. No.



Not empty quoting this.

The quote. It is not empty.

Cyno's lit, bridge is up, but one pilot won't be jumping home.

RIP Vile Rat

Sepheir Sepheron
State War Academy
Caldari State
#10 - 2011-11-11 20:30:29 UTC
Sorry I don't want to tell my friends to play EVE then tell them they have to buy access to the system I'm in and buy access to the skills they need and oh wait they're gonna have to buy more access to use contracts then right? Screw the whole thing let's just make this Mabinogi.

:l
Sephiroth Clone VII
Brothers of Tyr
Goonswarm Federation
#11 - 2011-11-11 21:11:31 UTC
free to play is for B-team games.

Having to pay bunch of money for every single upgrade to get all the content is bullshit. All in one and even playing field is better. CCP better keep it cosmetic junk. I don't want none of this other junk.

Anyway if you want to play for free, plex.

Not plexing you can play free with trial accounts anyway, just keep remaking them. They have lots of restrictions in amount of skills and what can be trained. So if you poor and don't know how to make isk, do that. Thats your heavily restricted gameplay with no cost for you on the house.

Anyway, why have download slower for trial accounts, they want to get people in to the game not out. Its not like DLing the client will happen every day for each player. It costs them to have servers doing that, but its a investment that returns itself.
Sephiroth Clone VII
Brothers of Tyr
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2011-11-11 21:16:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephiroth Clone VII
Sepheir Sepheron wrote:
Sorry I don't want to tell my friends to play EVE then tell them they have to buy access to the system I'm in and buy access to the skills they need and oh wait they're gonna have to buy more access to use contracts then right? Screw the whole thing let's just make this Mabinogi.

:l


z
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2011-11-11 21:20:29 UTC
Sleepindpro wrote:
I would like to say that i will Continue playing EvE in the middle to long term though certain cosmetic restrictions are anoying.

I have played many MMO's and half of them have gone free 2 play with Micro-transactions.

With the world Economy as it is now is a good time to consider the following.

1) Micro-transactions have a wide scope of services

1a) EvE could go free 2 play , Example would mean smaller client download size. install content as required
If you have say only 1 character slot , and only the region of space for your race. Say can only fly around in amarr space since you chose that race. Buy from ingame store other space regions .

1b) Buy other services like character slots. and this could be expanded

1c) in-game store currency could be acquired through selling special loot items to NPC vendor , Real world currency , A 6 or 12 month subscriber would get X amount of in-game store currency per month.

2) The content which you might not want would be to walk around in space stations ,

3) Player owned space stations could have custom design interiors and exteriors based on the content bough from the in-game store through micro-transactions.

4) Going to the planets surface could also be extra content from the store.

Now is the time to work and perfect a micro-transaction system that works for EvE before EvE is just left with the addicts.
Else you end up with the following scenario

1) those who play eve are addicts

1a) the addicts will try and play for free buy exchanging ISK for game time

1b) Even if addicts have 2 out of 10 accounts funded by subscriptions and they do not buy ETC since they have enough ISK
Then who buys the ETC for the addicts to use to keep the other accounts running.

2) If the number of active accounts who are on a subscription fall below Y % of X % then CCP will need to rethink their payment options.


I have one example

Quote:
The Lego Universe MMO shuts up shop on 31st January 2012, The Lego Group has announced
The company explained that despite "a large number of players in the free play zone" it had not converted a satisfactory number of users into paying subscribers.
As a result of the game's closure, Colorado-base developer Play Well Studios is also being shut down along with a marketing team in Denmark, resulting in the loss of 115 jobs. Lego is promising to help those affected find new employment.


Now you might not be interested in this MMO , but they failled to create the free 2 play properly and just limited it to a zone.
A better solution like Champions Online , DC Universe Online , Star Trek Online , Age of Conan online , Lord of the Rings online

Quote:
Lord of the Rings Online Executive Producer Kate Paiz announced during a panel at GDC Online 2010 today that Turbine has done it again: Lord of the Rings Online has doubled its revenue and created over a million new accounts since going free-to-play early last month.


Although LOTRO went F2P in Late Q3 / start of Q4 in 2010 .... you have to wonder what Free 2 play with a correct
Quote:
paid subscription to a hybrid microtransactions-based business model

that works for EvE would do not only to the number of unique players (not those with multiple characters and accounts) but also the revenue for CCP.

Final example is World of Tanks MMO from Wargaming.net and is doing very well for its self since it is completely free 2 play but has a prestiege "elite" mode which is only unlocked through gold currency which you can buy for real world money or by winning events.

This is all pure speculation but as i said above now is the time to develop a business subscription hybrid model using micro-transactions for EvE and do i need to remind everyone about the Italian and Greek Debt the countries have. The global finacial Pain will not go away for a few years maybe with us for the rest of this decade.







since it seems SO important to soem people you get actual "criticism".

this model is not meant for EvE, its meant for 2 kinds of people...

The first kind is devoted enough to the game to spend 15 USD or equivalent a month to play the game

The second is deovted enough to the game to devote weekends and weeknights in the game to accumulating money to pay for their next month with a PLEX put on the market by some kid from a country with a better economy and more money.


as long as both of these people are the oens that truly dominate EvE's active playerbase, then the subscription style will be the preffered and more efficient median for game access. Allowing those that are truly devoted and into the game to play with little issue, and those that arent too impressed or dont play seriously enough to decide whether this game is really for them. the latter group will eventually either realize the game is not for them and move on, or come to the forums and whine about how the game needs to change to be like every other MMO out there because apparenlty bandwagons are good.

Please realize that the only way to get EvE a larger subscription abse is to make it even more DIFFERENT from currently existing MMOs, and not to make it more similar. making EvE like other MMOs puts it in a market that it cannot compete in, as EvE is a game centered around difficulty and gradual progression, and between this and a casual-gamers MMO, if both play similar, they will always choose the casual.
Rer Eirikr
The Scope
#14 - 2011-11-11 22:26:42 UTC
Just go die already, I've no spare empathy for those who want such ******** ideas.
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2011-11-11 23:57:27 UTC
Supported and liked for the following reasons...

Eventually EvE will have to move towards F2P as this is the general trend of MMO's if CCP wishes to grow the population of EvE further. As more and more MMO's are released that are F2P, fewer and fewer people are going to take a risk playing EvE when they can go do something else for free. The reason current MMO's are going F2P is because they can make more money off of Microtransactions with a higher number of free subscribers playing the game than they did with a lower number of paid subscribers at $15 a month. It is as simple as that. These MMO's aren't going F2P because they failed like some people seem to think. That makes no sense at all. "Our game is failing and we can't afford to keep the servers up...so lets make it free.". Sorry...swing and a miss. They are going F2P because there is more money to be made in Microtransactions than in pure subscriptions.

If CCP wants to take EvE into a sort of F2P model like LotRO where you still have to pay a sub to do certain things and swing more heavily on cosmetic Microtransactions then Ifor one fully support them in that decision.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2011-11-12 00:12:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Drake Draconis
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
Supported and liked for the following reasons...

Eventually EvE will have to move towards F2P as this is the general trend of MMO's if CCP wishes to grow the population of EvE further. As more and more MMO's are released that are F2P, fewer and fewer people are going to take a risk playing EvE when they can go do something else for free. The reason current MMO's are going F2P is because they can make more money off of Microtransactions with a higher number of free subscribers playing the game than they did with a lower number of paid subscribers at $15 a month. It is as simple as that. These MMO's aren't going F2P because they failed like some people seem to think. That makes no sense at all. "Our game is failing and we can't afford to keep the servers up...so lets make it free.". Sorry...swing and a miss. They are going F2P because there is more money to be made in Microtransactions than in pure subscriptions.

If CCP wants to take EvE into a sort of F2P model like LotRO where you still have to pay a sub to do certain things and swing more heavily on cosmetic Microtransactions then Ifor one fully support them in that decision.


comparing EVE Online to a generic "F2P" game is an insult and shows just how little you know about this game when it comes to the uniqueness of this game.

F2P is a sham and a total rip off.

You read the fine-print and only find out its just a bloody P2P game flaovred to look like a "its free".

There are catches...conditions...limitations.

It's never free....you end up paying for something to even enjoy the game to its fullest or end up with its cheap rip off smaller cousin.

F2P might as well be called a trial/demo at that rate....

I find it digusting as far as the current trrends are concerned.

F2P would kill thsi game in a heart beat...or make it a cheap rip off of the original thing.

Some of us are not made of money...and I refuse to be nickled and dimed to death for simple things.

You want to see a ton of subscribers pack their bags? Make EVE Online F2P.
Gaurenteed.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152

Solo Player
#17 - 2011-11-12 00:36:04 UTC
Around 20 million MMO players have grown up seeing nothing wrong with monthly subscriptions. They will not refuse to subscribe to another MMO in the future, so I don't see the danger of this market being too small for EVE's growth plans.

10 years or so, subscription-based models were all the rage, and we were told that pay once, play forever games were doomed and that we were to see playing games as a service forever more. It didn't happen. Even now, a major MMO like GW2 is poised to go the conventional way.
New models just open new (niche) markets, they will not replace everything else just because they are a current trend.

MT seriously hurt the integrity of EVE's virtual world. As such, they'll have to go.
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#18 - 2011-11-12 01:02:14 UTC
Solo Player wrote:
Around 20 million MMO players have grown up seeing nothing wrong with monthly subscriptions. They will not refuse to subscribe to another MMO in the future, so I don't see the danger of this market being too small for EVE's growth plans.

10 years or so, subscription-based models were all the rage, and we were told that pay once, play forever games were doomed and that we were to see playing games as a service forever more. It didn't happen. Even now, a major MMO like GW2 is poised to go the conventional way.
New models just open new (niche) markets, they will not replace everything else just because they are a current trend.

MT seriously hurt the integrity of EVE's virtual world. As such, they'll have to go.



Exactly...when the NEX stuff came out...the AUR snafu was a serious blow to the reputation of EVE Online.

Vanity items or not...the message they gave intitally (albeit uninteded) really rubbed people the wrong way.

CCP contniues to this day to backpeddal that message while carefully weighing options.

They already know that even theratening to play the MT game is a dangerous one...and ought to be avoided all-together.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152

Endovior
PFU Consortium
#19 - 2011-11-12 01:27:48 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Everything about your proposal is an abomination. No.


This. Just, this.
Smiling Menace
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2011-11-12 03:39:29 UTC
As previously stated, no, just no.

I will never play any game that requires MT's as 9/10 they suck.

Do this to EVE and I stop playing permanently.

No way in hell I will support this proposal.
12Next page