These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

War on ISBoxers

Author
Solutio Letum
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2013-08-10 16:00:13 UTC
Its been a subject for a while that people cant do anything about someone having 12 accounts with 4 guards, well i multibox mainly because i have triple screen and i logi often enough with 3 T1 amarr logistics in FW, so maybe i see something differently?....

Tactic:

Use modules to make different problems in different screens that he does not see (probable)
ECM:
-cycle and jam different logistics ship, creating the problem of him having to re lock
Damps:
-cycle ships again with allot of damps, when you see hes chain broken you can instead of range damp sensor damp

You can combine ECM and Damps for greater effect

Neuts:
-When jammed if you are in range of hes logistic team its a good dea to have single neuts on every ship, because most logis can still rep with 2-3 RR module even without a chain.(if setup for cap ether then EW resistance)

Webs:
They will need to move no matter what subcap warefare does not come static, if they are meant to kite bringing a webbing ship to leave one behind is important, just make sure they cant kill you so pick something like a frigate to web. Or a T2 recon

And there you go, thats why you dont see allot of them in PvP, i know people said its IMPOSSIBLE to beat them when they get that much, but here you have some tips and tricks that enables you do kill a few of them with only 1-2 ships even.

The idea came to me when i saw people using ISBoxer on test server, i saw he had 4 guards on grid with like 10 BS's, so i though well lets take a Falcon on grid an annoy them, Multiboxers or not. He finish a few minutes after leaving grid giving up by how hard keeping up with the chain was.
Then he came back in hes regular setup, 10 Moros's... well something like that i dont remember the exact numbers

But multiboxing is not easy, its just easy when you make it easy on him and try to fight what hes trying to resist, instead use things rats dont do and that hes not trying to resist. And make sure you cycle around, thats my biggest problem when multiboxing even when seeing whats happening, i cant keep up with the change of DPS + Neuts + Damps Cycle or ECM. Dont just try to perma jam a single ship and perma neut another.

Toy him a bit.

Any how that's just logic to me but hopefully it helps someone out.
PhatController
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-08-11 04:58:04 UTC
What?
Eli Kzanti
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2013-08-11 07:24:34 UTC
PhatController wrote:
What?

Seconded.
Matt Emery
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-08-11 13:03:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Matt Emery
Eli Kzanti wrote:
PhatController wrote:
What?

Seconded.


The op is providing tactics for dealing with people who run multiple accounts, and everything he says sounds tactically alright :)
you might not have seen them, but recently ive seen people who run 2 accounts when attempting(failing) to solo pvp... And I know there are people who run alot more :)

P.s ISboxxer makes running multiple eve accounts abit easy'er but I am not sure if it is still aloud?
Job Valador
Professional Amateurs
#5 - 2013-08-11 13:19:25 UTC
Matt Emery wrote:
Eli Kzanti wrote:
PhatController wrote:
What?

Seconded.


The op is providing tactics for dealing with people who run multiple accounts, and everything he says sounds tactically alright :)
you might not have seen them, but recently ive seen people who run 2 accounts when attempting(failing) to solo pvp... And I know there are people who run alot more :)

P.s ISboxxer makes running multiple eve accounts abit easy'er but I am not sure if it is still aloud?



It's allowed. Ever get hit by an isboxed tornado camp? Dont even get too see your ship uncloak all the way

"The stone exhibited a profound lack of movement."

IbanezLaney
The Church of Awesome
#6 - 2013-08-12 00:57:47 UTC  |  Edited by: IbanezLaney
Matt Emery wrote:
Eli Kzanti wrote:
PhatController wrote:
What?

Seconded.


The op is providing tactics for dealing with people who run multiple accounts, and everything he says sounds tactically alright :)
you might not have seen them, but recently ive seen people who run 2 accounts when attempting(failing) to solo pvp... And I know there are people who run alot more :)

P.s ISboxxer makes running multiple eve accounts abit easy'er but I am not sure if it is still aloud?




If they are failing then why worry? It means 2 kills instead of one for you.

Dual boxing isn't that easy. Try it and see.

I was bad at it for ages until I learnt what works and doesn't work ship wise. (never run 2 fast ships is really the key or the speed of the fight will cause epic derping)

If they are paying for and manually controlling 2 accounts - there is no issue here.

ISBoxer is a different issue. If a G510 macro key isn't allowed then neither should ISBoxer be allowed as not manually operating a client for an advantage is against the EULA.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#7 - 2013-08-12 04:52:56 UTC
Zhek Kromtar, legend that he is, and may you ever google his awesomeness, typifies what ISBOXers say they are doing. That is utter rubbish; they are skirting the borders of exploits, in my opinion, for the reasons Comrade laney has outlined. it's a device which allows simultenous actions across many clients, without going down the Kromtar route.

The Zhek Kromtar experience (tm) shows that it is a one-way street. You don't get to make mistakes. If you make mistakes, you suffer horribly. His killboard shows this amply; he would easily win with no losses...or lose everything.

The key to running ISBOXer accounts, speaking as someone who hates them, is to ensure all your toons have the same skills trained so they can carry out the same action, with the same chances of success or speed, at the same time. This is particularly true for navigation skills, which dictate warping, jumping gate, moving towards a target, realigning, etc.

When one of these mouthbreathers has the toons in the same ship with the same skills, they are very overpowered. The problem isn't that each individual toon is OP, but that even when faced with equal numbers of enemies they are going to win because they are going to be locally superior in numbers.

For example, and ISBOXer with 6 Merlins vs a kitchen sink of 6 kitey/brawly fits, the Merlins will overpower their foes one by one, virtually alpha'ing them, until the enemy is gone/dispersed. The ISBOXer concentrates, essentially, 6 Merlin's worth of DPS into a ball of ships that act as one, and chases down one foe at a time. 6 guys on the other team react at different times, with different skills and ranges and modules, and attack at different times.

The key to defeating them (assuming hey don't stick to brawly gank setups or nado gank squads) is to jam one of them or damp one of them out. The moment a lock is broken, the ISBOXer cannot re-lock because that requires key and mouse commands which all toons will perform.

It also goes for multiboxers; in a brawl against a multiboxer, the key is to ECM their logi and make them pay attention to as many of their screens at once.

ISBOXer is crap. Just repeating it again.
Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#8 - 2013-08-12 14:52:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6638
I just put 10 gila/vexor/nexor/ishtar/domi pilots in the oven. guess what for.

I've had a few long-standing contacts stop talking to me over my use of multiple clients. I think it's due to the simple fact that it shatters the notion of having a god toon that can do everything.

to that, i don't know what to say except stop being spacepoor/i realized in the first week of playing EVE that the easiest way to scale DPS and utility is not in skilling/spec'ing one character, but to have multiple characters. there is simply no better way to increase the effectiveness of your consciousness using one character.

with a gang, you are centralized command and control.

also, scouting with alts seems to be a generally accepted tactic. so i don't see why applying the logic to DPS/ewar/logi/boosts is any different. oh, and mining. basically, imo, if you skill and manage the character, you deserve to have it--whether it's one or 20.

after 3 weeks from birth my 10 sentry pilots will be carrying the DPS of a Nyx. until this point, I have not used ISboxer, but after considering the instantaneous drone assist assignment switches and high slot dps that can be activated, I may start.

if ISBoxer is banned, and the drone assist function is nerfed, that's ok too. at worst, drone dps is independent of targeting and you can jam/neut the hull all you want until it's popped, but drones will continue to function; good luck.

even without ISboxer, it's only a matter of clicking on the client window and pressing a hotkey.

lastly, you can baww about trends that work, or you can get with them. when i hear arguments to ban multiboxers, i have to wonder what the true reason is; are you unable to sub them, do you lack the brain cpu to manage them, or do you think EVE should be pure due to RP reasons?

btw, it's good that you are thinking tactically, but you are underestimating your opponent/their chess pieces move as fast as yours; I have recons too.

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

Solutio Letum
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-08-12 16:17:58 UTC
Rain6638 wrote:
I just put 10 gila/vexor/nexor/ishtar/domi pilots in the oven. guess what for.

I've had a few long-standing contacts stop talking to me over my use of multiple clients. I think it's due to the simple fact that it shatters the notion of having a god toon that can do everything.

to that, i don't know what to say except stop being spacepoor/i realized in the first week of playing EVE that the easiest way to scale DPS and utility is not in skilling/spec'ing one character, but to have multiple characters. there is simply no better way to increase the effectiveness of your consciousness using one character.

with a gang, you are centralized command and control.

also, scouting with alts seems to be a generally accepted tactic. so i don't see why applying the logic to DPS/ewar/logi/boosts is any different. oh, and mining. basically, imo, if you skill and manage the character, you deserve to have it--whether it's one or 20.

after 3 weeks from birth my 10 sentry pilots will be carrying the DPS of a Nyx. until this point, I have not used ISboxer, but after considering the instantaneous drone assist assignment switches and high slot dps that can be activated, I may start.

if ISBoxer is banned, and the drone assist function is nerfed, that's ok too. at worst, drone dps is independent of targeting and you can jam/neut the hull all you want until it's popped, but drones will continue to function; good luck.

even without ISboxer, it's only a matter of clicking on the client window and pressing a hotkey.

lastly, you can baww about trends that work, or you can get with them. when i hear arguments to ban multiboxers, i have to wonder what the true reason is; are you unable to sub them, do you lack the brain cpu to manage them, or do you think EVE should be pure due to RP reasons?

btw, it's good that you are thinking tactically, but you are underestimating your opponent/their chess pieces move as fast as yours; I have recons too.


Ya sure like if you are going to fly 10 BS's without getting noticed by any fleets, a simple pimp bomb would pretty much kill you right there. (a few BS's with smartbombs getting dropped by a Titan bridge)

All you need is anything to get close to you at all, simple ceptors go to ups of 6000m/s, just drop a dead bait run a frig your way drop cyno or warp in BS's. You don't even really need a titan... it does make you look cooler tho.
Deen Wispa
Sheriff.
Caldari Tactical Operations Command
#10 - 2013-08-12 20:12:11 UTC
Some of the people who ISOBox probably don't have friends and play in isolation. I feel sorry for them.

High Five. Yeah! C'est La Eve .

Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#11 - 2013-08-12 21:43:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6638
multiboxing is not a function of irl friends. some people live with their friends who all play eve and multibox.

Solutio Letum wrote:

Ya sure like if you are going to fly 10 BS's without getting noticed by any fleets, a simple pimp bomb would pretty much kill you right there. (a few BS's with smartbombs getting dropped by a Titan bridge)

All you need is anything to get close to you at all, simple ceptors go to ups of 6000m/s, just drop a dead bait run a frig your way drop cyno or warp in BS's. You don't even really need a titan... it does make you look cooler tho.


battleships are played out. but in some predictable, low-risk situations where a hp tank is required such as incursions, a domi gang might happen.

otherwise, a bloated sig res and radius combined with slow speeds is not the best option for multiboxing.

battleships. Roll most likely hacs. you underestimate your opponent.

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2013-08-13 06:44:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6638
OP, pop quiz (quick!)

you see a gang of 10 Ishtars, 2 Scimis, a Claymore, a Vulture, a Damnation, an Onyx, and a Harpy.

what do you do.

I ask because there's still onnneee thing you haven't considered yet.

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

Machiavelli's Nemesis
Angry Mustellid
#13 - 2013-08-13 10:29:11 UTC
Rain6638 wrote:
OP, pop quiz (quick!)

you see a gang of 10 Ishtars, 2 Scimis, a Claymore, a Vulture, a Damnation, an Onyx, and a Harpy.

what do you do.


Hotdrop it :3

Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#14 - 2013-08-13 13:38:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6638
bingo.

...promise?

at any point do you think OP considered bait.

anyway. the topic might be 'how to anti-multibox' but that doesn't mean it's the question OP should be concerned with. it's more like... how often does OP think a fleet or gatecamp is not just two people with 5/6/7 toons each.

consider how difficult it is to 'herd the cats', compared to the consistency of just one player waiting for their target. when the player is ready to camp, the fleet is ready to camp. when it's time to pack up, they pack up.

my main point is... instead of trying to be some kind of EVE purist, the correct way to anti-multibox is to multibox.

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

Solutio Letum
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2013-08-13 18:47:30 UTC
Rain6638 wrote:
bingo.

...promise?

at any point do you think OP considered bait.

anyway. the topic might be 'how to anti-multibox' but that doesn't mean it's the question OP should be concerned with. it's more like... how often does OP think a fleet or gatecamp is not just two people with 5/6/7 toons each.

consider how difficult it is to 'herd the cats', compared to the consistency of just one player waiting for their target. when the player is ready to camp, the fleet is ready to camp. when it's time to pack up, they pack up.

my main point is... instead of trying to be some kind of EVE purist, the correct way to anti-multibox is to multibox.


This is a Post to people who think Its OP, its far from being.
The counter to multiboxer's is more simple then getting another account.
ECM might be a counter for ECM, but ECCM, damps & sensor booster's all truly help you counter it better.
Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#16 - 2013-08-13 19:06:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Rain6638
EVE is designed to promote multiplayer, and I say this based on the fact that remote assistance is more efficient than local modules. every slot you use for reps, cap, sensor strength, tackle... detracts from the potential of your ship, and is better accomplished with another ship that has the related role bonus(es).

You use this to your advantage by having those extra ships.

When you consider faction vs T2 vs T3 with this in mind, you begin to see that increased hull cost is a premium you pay for trying to do so much with 1 character/hull.

I still don't think you understand. I use recons, too, and they're boosted.

//have you seen this? http://i.imgur.com/Bq0ITNW.jpg

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

Doc Severide
Doomheim
#17 - 2013-08-14 23:09:26 UTC
Deen Wispa wrote:
Some of the people who ISOBox probably don't have friends and play in isolation. I feel sorry for them.

I don't IS Box but I have 0 friends and play in isolation. But I also don't have to deal with the melodrama, games, backstabbing, politics and general crapism of corps and alliances... Everyone is always repeating the mantra "Don't Trust Anyone" ad nauseum... If I can't trust the guys I play with, why bother playing with them at all?

Everyone is always repeating the mantra "Don't Trust Anyone" ad nauseum... If I can't trust the guys I play with, why bother playing with them at all? Fly Solo...

Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#18 - 2013-08-14 23:30:12 UTC
that's a fresh take, suddenly i see that my roommates and myself are alone... together. ?

or something.

really though, I don't see them for days on end.

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

GreenSeed
#19 - 2013-08-15 05:42:39 UTC
are you people dense? "counter to multibox"? what the hell are you talking about? how about we change that to "counter to small fleet flying xxxx doctrine"?

10 caracals with 4 ospreys as support? how about you drop 10 mallers with augoros as support?

anything else is you being ******** and trying to come up with some idiotic and over complicated solution to a very simple problem...

the problem is: a **** gang will die horribly to even the most basic doctrine.

people in this thread remind me of the minnie FW weirdos... raging over the maller and oracle gangs J4LP swarmed them with "huh, we should go muninn gangs, with vagas, and logi, and triage. and...." jesus, if you drop 3billon isk on top of 200m to kill it, you already lost.

stop being cowards and fly t1 and win the slugfest, and you don't like the slugfest, then don't engage.
Rain6638
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#20 - 2013-08-15 22:09:09 UTC
the most effective war on isboxing would be finding a way to get CCP to ban it.

[ 2013.06.21 09:52:05 ] (notify) For initiating combat your security status has been adjusted by -0.1337

123Next pageLast page