These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Fleet Member Lockon

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#161 - 2013-08-10 12:19:03 UTC
Templar Knightsbane wrote:
Oooohhh now i understand this thread!!!

Harry doesn't want you to not be able to lock onto people in the fleet, he wants you to be able to not lock onto people NOT in the fleet!!!

I'm glad i cleared that up. Harry is genius!


you guys are all the same, if you are lacking some arguments, you just start to be silly... funny

b.

Harry Forever vs. Goonswarm
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#162 - 2013-08-10 12:21:34 UTC
Gawain Edmond wrote:
wow terrible idea got to 8 pages and still in the wrong forum! i'ma go see if someone will move it


wow, terrible comment without content... I goo see if there is still free spots on my b. list...

yea... you are lucky o/

Harry Forever vs. Goonswarm
Gawain Edmond
Khanid Bureau of Industry
#163 - 2013-08-10 12:28:00 UTC
hmm being on the ban list didn't make the thread vanish... :(

if someone could quote me so harry can see that i'm upset by this that'd be a great help
Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#164 - 2013-08-10 12:30:16 UTC
Gawain Edmond wrote:
hmm being on the ban list didn't make the thread vanish... :(

if someone could quote me so harry can see that i'm upset by this that'd be a great help



It is important that this duty is carried out.

However, I feel this epic quest will fail due to there being less than 10 people on the forum not currently blocked

Fluffy Bunny Pic!

Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#165 - 2013-08-10 12:33:20 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
Gawain Edmond wrote:
hmm being on the ban list didn't make the thread vanish... :(

if someone could quote me so harry can see that i'm upset by this that'd be a great help



It is important that this duty is carried out.

However, I feel this epic quest will fail due to there being less than 10 people on the forum not currently blocked
Hey Rhivre, how're you doing ? :D
Dave stark
#166 - 2013-08-10 12:33:49 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:
lockon to fleet members should be removable by the fleetcommander

after leaving fleet there should be a 1-5 minute timer, where you are not able to lockon to old fleetmembers either

at the moment there are too many douchebags who do not get kills and just try to fleetup with others and then start shooting them...

this would assure more random people team up, good for the game, bad for douchebags... win win



so basically you just want an option to turn logi off?

sounds like the most ******** idea i've seen all week.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#167 - 2013-08-10 12:43:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Andski
Harry Forever wrote:
just get over it, I can demand what i want... not everybody likes your playstyle, that is supported by CCP at the moment... those changes would bring lots of other people, because its easier to get into the game

they can decide, want to grow, some changes have to be made to attract the randoms, good for you as well, more fleets out there who fight... not sure why you guys are so eagerly against that

you as well see the game way too static, this is a developing thing and things will change, its not chess... just adapt to the changes and get flexible, I do not have anything about the advantages big alliances have in the game, they just need to focus on some other stuff as well


This game isn't about "playstyles", it's a sandbox, doubly so outside of highsec. Exceptions are highly antithetical to the sandbox design.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Harry Forever
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#168 - 2013-08-10 12:57:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Harry Forever
Andski wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
just get over it, I can demand what i want... not everybody likes your playstyle, that is supported by CCP at the moment... those changes would bring lots of other people, because its easier to get into the game

they can decide, want to grow, some changes have to be made to attract the randoms, good for you as well, more fleets out there who fight... not sure why you guys are so eagerly against that

you as well see the game way too static, this is a developing thing and things will change, its not chess... just adapt to the changes and get flexible, I do not have anything about the advantages big alliances have in the game, they just need to focus on some other stuff as well


This game isn't about "playstyles", it's a sandbox, doubly so outside of highsec. Exceptions are highly antithetical to the sandbox design.


when you talk about this game it feels more like a cage vs. a sandbox... you are just resistant to changes that make sense because it does not favour your playstyle

fleeting up is a team option, therefore should be restricted to that

you can not shoot ships with mining lazers, although its a "sandbox"

there are tools that should be restricted to be used the right way

do you think a developed species like in eve would not restrict fleetmembers from shooting eachother?

we are not living in caves out here anymore you know

Harry Forever vs. Goonswarm
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#169 - 2013-08-10 13:09:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Solstice Project
Based on analysis i can finally conclude that we all have been trolled by Hairy Forever.

It's not a shame to admit it, he simply is that good. Everyone has at least *one* talent
and this one is his. I admit that i have been successfully trolled by Hairy Forever,
that he is definitely a top dog and that nobody beats him at this.

Ladies and Gentlemen, give it up for the king of all trolls, Hairy Forever !

Applause Applause !


(seriously, no one human being can be that much of a bad person. i feel sad for everybody
who has to share reallife with him ... and i'm serious. Please stop feeding him. Thanks.)
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#170 - 2013-08-10 13:14:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
Harry Forever wrote:
Andski wrote:
Harry Forever wrote:
just get over it, I can demand what i want... not everybody likes your playstyle, that is supported by CCP at the moment... those changes would bring lots of other people, because its easier to get into the game

they can decide, want to grow, some changes have to be made to attract the randoms, good for you as well, more fleets out there who fight... not sure why you guys are so eagerly against that

you as well see the game way too static, this is a developing thing and things will change, its not chess... just adapt to the changes and get flexible, I do not have anything about the advantages big alliances have in the game, they just need to focus on some other stuff as well


This game isn't about "playstyles", it's a sandbox, doubly so outside of highsec. Exceptions are highly antithetical to the sandbox design.


when you talk about this game it feels more like a cage vs. a sandbox... you are just resistant to changes that make sense because it does not favour your playstyle

fleeting up is a team option, therefore should be restricted to that

you can not shoot ships with mining lazers, although its a "sandbox"

there are tools that should be restricted to be used the right way

do you think a developed species like in eve would not restrict fleetmembers from shooting eachother?

we are not living in caves out here anymore you know

If you are going to try to boil this down to what they would and wouldn't allow, then you have to think how would they restrict this? The answer = CONCORD. So in high sec, you should get concorded for targeting a fleet member and everywhere else is fair game right?

EDIT: oh and just to add. you DO get concorded for shooting a teammate in high sec. So no, they dont allow shooting of teammates.

The point is, the game is for players who want to play together. you just want a single player game. So go play something else. You coming on here repeating idiotic idea after idiotic idea will not change EVE. At the very least, learn to play EVE before complaining about it.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#171 - 2013-08-10 13:45:30 UTC
Our favorite whiner is in EC-P8R if anyone wants to go take a pot shot.

I can't promise that no one will shoot at your from the CFC though Lol
SmokinDank
Horizon Research Group
#172 - 2013-08-10 14:00:26 UTC
OP is the sort who rages for free speech then gets pissed when someone says something he doesn't like Lol

...
Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#173 - 2013-08-10 14:01:20 UTC
Harry Forever wrote:

when you talk about this game it feels more like a cage vs. a sandbox... you are just resistant to changes that make sense because it does not favour your playstyle

fleeting up is a team option, therefore should be restricted to that

you can not shoot ships with mining lazers, although its a "sandbox"

there are tools that should be restricted to be used the right way

do you think a developed species like in eve would not restrict fleetmembers from shooting eachother?

we are not living in caves out here anymore you know


Do developed fleets in humanity (Aka groups of friends) have a mechanic to stop people in the "fleet" punching each other?

If you dont want to get shot in a fleet, go to highsec :)

You are the king of highsec after all, and, as stated before, enjoy taking advantage of the options available in null, such as "I shoot anyone I like with no consequence", and yet, you do not like when others enjoy the same options.

Fluffy Bunny Pic!

Lugia3
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#174 - 2013-08-10 15:02:52 UTC
This guy is legendary. We need a Jita statue in his name... one that we can shoot at 23/7.

"CCP Dolan is full of shit." - CCP Bettik
Dave stark
#175 - 2013-08-10 15:08:36 UTC
Lugia3 wrote:
This guy is legendary. We need a Jita statue in his name... one that we can shoot at 23/7.


can't ccp just eject him from 4-4 and give him a suspect flag? surely that's easier than making a new statue.
Mallak Azaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#176 - 2013-08-10 15:13:32 UTC
Highsec mentality; They think there should be built in mechanics to prevent any unwanted action.



Nerf Highsec.

This post was lovingly crafted by a member of the Goonwaffe Posting Cabal, proud member of the popular gay hookup site somethingawful.com, Spelling Bee, Grammar Gestapo & #1 Official Gevlon Goblin Fanclub member.
Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
#177 - 2013-08-10 15:28:32 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Based on analysis i can finally conclude that we all have been trolled by Hairy Forever.

This.^

You're right - he's a brilliant troll.
:: hats off ::
Rhivre
TarNec
Invisible Exchequer
#178 - 2013-08-10 15:30:50 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Lugia3 wrote:
This guy is legendary. We need a Jita statue in his name... one that we can shoot at 23/7.


can't ccp just eject him from 4-4 and give him a suspect flag? surely that's easier than making a new statue.


I support and/or endorse this proposal.

Dave for CSM! :p

Fluffy Bunny Pic!

Dave stark
#179 - 2013-08-10 15:33:05 UTC
Rhivre wrote:
Dave for CSM! :p


no.

**** no.

i don't want that, ccp wouldn't want that and, the players wouldn't want that.
no. just, no.

god damn rhiv, no.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#180 - 2013-08-10 15:43:54 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Rhivre wrote:
Dave for CSM! :p


no.

**** no.

i don't want that, ccp wouldn't want that and, the players wouldn't want that.
no. just, no.

god damn rhiv, no.
You'd have my vote. :)