Wormholes

Chitsa I think we'd like to hear, based on the ideas so far, what you have shortlisted.

There's a LOT of info come through here and just reposting it over again would just create a threadnaught. Bullet point what you believe are valid things to take to CCP from info gathered so far in this thread into a new thread and we'll start over.

Kast

I still don't get it ( "I did stuff in that prot" is just TMI really) but what? You wanna fly another ship type in a WH? Fly another ship type. Are you talking PvE/PvP are you moaning because a T3 cloaky prot is boring? In which case don't fly one.

There's just doesn't seem anything coherent or of substance here. What exactly is wrong with T3's and how does it relate to WH's and how would you fix it?

Personal hangers - Great idea, but they are a nightmare. Can't remove items from them left by players. Impossible to transfer items between multiple characters, or between players, all needs to be done in space. Also, far too small for anyone actually wanting to deal in amounts of materials, mining / PI / Industry is out of the question. Most are forced to use the old system. IMO, Allow CEO/directors to be able to see and remove items. Allow players to transfer items between players using it. Increase its storage size.

• Effect? Increased corporation security, allowing more people to move to wormhole space.

SMA - Still completely unsecure. Need a version similar to the Personal Hanger, but without all its flaws.

• Effect? Same as above.

Corporation roles - Needed some love forever now. There definately needs to be a way to allow people to manufacture / research without compromising corporation security. Making it more user-friendly too wouldn't hurt.

• Effect? Same again.

I have not shortlisted anything yet. Gonna get to work on it today after i finish scanning the chain :)

How is that any way related to anything that was said? :D

Why is it a carebear paradise, because you can't get your caps into it to hulk smash with your alliance what are typically 5 man corps?

Is that why it's a carebear paradise?

I've lived in a C4 before.....got booted out when we SB'd an alliances noctis full of sleeper loot something like 600mil worth. They weren't happy. And they came back a week later to exact revenge. Maybe you shouldn't be so lazy?

http://eve-kill.net/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=18699537

Less than two hours old Proty. 800mill. I wasn't doing it wrong, we just got a bit outnumbered. Not that op without numbers.

T3's are not your problem as you've defined it.

I'm guessing you were sitting cloaked in your proteus, right?

I know I troll and joke a lot but in all seriousness I think I know the problem. It's the lack of viable cloaky combat ships. See, in null & lo, they have this thing. It's called a cyno/bridge. They can project onto their targets an unknown fleet. In w-space, we don't have that. Instead, we maintain our dps fleets either one or two hops away if they aren't cloaky or we have a cloaky T3 fleet in the same systems where the action is to take place. We don't want our composition to be intelled away from dscan.

In terms of tactics, a cloaky T3 fleet in w-space is equivalent to a fleet in null/lo that is about to cyno in. If CCP could address this issue adequately so that our w-space fleets aren't at a disadvantage to outsiders who come into us, a T3 nerf is not going to be as painful as it might sound, economics issues withstanding.

To offer the variety that you're looking for would require a new mod or new class of ships that are affected by an effect ubiquitous to w-space which would allow them to cloak. If it's a new mod then we're going to have to give up a slot that would otherwise put us at a disadvantage to a similarly fit ship of the same hull but without cloakiness. If it's a new class of ships then it probably won't resolve the lack of variety.

Personally, it's not the ship I fly from which I gain enjoyment. It's the hunt, it's the uncertainty, the jousting, the local trash talk and of course the tears. For me, the ship has little to do with it.

Bookmark roles.
CEO assigns roles to players to add BMs, and there should be a special role to remove BMs.
If we can't have that, at least give us a PROPER bookmark log.
Right now, we can see who added which bookmark, where the bookmark is located (region, constellation and system), distance in jumps, as well as the date and exact time of addition.

So overhaul this into a separate window where who and when added would be placed alongside of who removed and when.
The rest (location, name, distance) is fine as it is.

Too many cores in W-Space... we use "core" to talk about ladars

Core Garrison and Core Stronghold = Anom cause they're not that different when just doing the escalations.
Core = Vital Core/Instrumental core

And with 10 dreads (with no effects) it takes about 5 minutes to clear a full escelation, when they all warp in at once.
But by all means, please add more escalations