These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

walk in stations

First post
Author
Sura Sadiva
Entropic Tactical Crew
#81 - 2013-08-09 10:04:54 UTC
Ivy greene wrote:
I'd be nice if we could interact with other people's avatars in a bar or something.

Is this still be worked on or was it dropped? Straight



Not only WIS but any relevant EVE development is dropped.

The game is currently in life support / mantainence. This is not going to change till they will not be able to find an escape from the Dust trap.

flakeys
Doomheim
#82 - 2013-08-09 10:22:29 UTC
Lipbite wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
We are more interested in spaceships in this internet spaceship game.


My sub expires tomorrow (after I reactivated it to check "expansion") - that's how excited I am about spaceship game. Yet decent WiS functionality (MassEffect2-style combat in anomalies and in POSes) could make me re-subscribe easily - instead of playing APB: Reloaded for example.


So you're saying you'd enjoy eve if there was non-eve content added .

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid.

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#83 - 2013-08-09 10:26:21 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
We are more interested in spaceships in this internet spaceship game.

"you" already have spaceship game, space and ships.

next

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Iskander Phoenix
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#84 - 2013-08-09 10:32:37 UTC
jujumagumboo wrote:
Stitcher wrote:
Real EVE players also run gambling, radio station, lottery and poker websites, and have been known to roleplay, write stories, invent languages and just trade without giving a damn about fighting or being fought.


All those things can be done outside of the game and don't force CCP to waste resources on things a tiny fraction of the playerbase wants. Besides, roleplayers are disgusting people...we shouldn't be encouraging them to infest our game.


really? honestly.... and there was i thinking that the eve community were a group of liked minded people trying to have fun and be inclusive of anyone that wanted to come join.
Iskander Phoenix
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#85 - 2013-08-09 10:37:27 UTC
Inokuma Yawara wrote:
[quote=Zimmy Zeta]... but after that I'd actually like to see a well implemented WIS that adds meaningful gameplay.

And with meaningful gameplay I mean stuff like:

- breaking into the quarters of known scammers that never undock, so that they are no longer 100% immune to player retaliation

- infiltrating medical facilities to compromise an enemy's clone

- stealing from other players ships and hangars

- bribing or intimidating brokers to modify other player's market orders

etc




maybe not hiring dust mercs for raids on facilities in faction high sec space but POS in null and low sec... now that would be something! dust mercs fighting corridor to corridor in a POS fighting whatever npc defences and troops the player hired to defend it in a kind of siege horde mode setting? that would be epic!
Sarah McKnobbo
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#86 - 2013-08-09 11:28:40 UTC
Sura Sadiva wrote:
Not only WIS but anyrelevant EVE development is dropped.


EvE is dying!!!11!!1!!!!!!

Oh no wait, except the not so small changes in the last few expansions.........
Shedemei Silfar
Miskatonic Mercantile
#87 - 2013-08-09 11:39:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Shedemei Silfar
If we had WiS we could have pub brawls instead of board wars. You know all those people here you want to punch in the face? It could happen.....
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#88 - 2013-08-09 12:42:41 UTC
Guttripper wrote:

History - learn it so you do not repeat it.


Hi, you might want to take your own advice.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf

Eraza
Fuzzyness Enterprizes
#89 - 2013-08-09 12:52:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Eraza
if scale is the problem, then do it in small scale, let me invite other people into my hangar,
give us a poker table somewhere, we could have plenty of fun with that,
and it would not require massive hardware to run.

for example, to be honest, jita 4-4 would probably be laggy as **** for everyone

i was amongst those who were furious over WiS, it was not because i did not want WiS,
but it was because it had been advertised as a HUGE new thing,
and when it arrived, something like 10% of the things promised had been implemented.

balance fixes dont require the same developers as making new content does, you should see new innovative content, AND fixes for existing content, at the same time, not one or the other

as an analogy, think of cars, some people design cars, OTHER people maintain cars.
noone stops designing new cars because engines need oil changed :)
Anna Karhunen
Inoue INEXP
#90 - 2013-08-09 12:58:39 UTC
Regarding Jita and lag, well, they would not have to put Jita station's insides in same server, now would the local chat have to be handled by either server.

As my old maths teacher used to say: "Statistics are like bikinis: It's what they don't show that's interesting". -CCP Aporia

Mycool Jahksn
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#91 - 2013-08-09 13:28:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Mycool Jahksn
Domer Pyle wrote:
most eve players are generally pretty autistic. thus they don't like change. so they complained and now WiS has been put on a back burner :\


This is actually true.

Source:

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/808727 and
http://www.clinicaladvisor.com/video-game-addiction-common-in-autistic-boys/article/305070/#

for example.

And yes, they don't like change but why should the game suffer because of that?

I think WIS should have been released looooong ago and I don't understand why it's taking so long.

CCP is supposed to be a pretty large company and to fail to deliver WIS is just incredible. It's almost a Duke Nukem Forever case.

WIS isn't even a complicated thing to do, CCP just likes to set sail for fail a little bit too often.

My interests include but are not limited to throwing rocks at bee hives.

There are more stars in the universe than all of the grains of sand on earth.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#92 - 2013-08-09 13:41:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Mycool Jahksn wrote:
Domer Pyle wrote:
most eve players are generally pretty autistic. thus they don't like change. so they complained and now WiS has been put on a back burner :\


This is actually true.

Source:

http://www.clinicaladvisor.com/video-game-addiction-common-in-autistic-boys/article/305070/#


It's not even remotely true. "video game addiction is common in autistic boys" is a very long way from being the same thing as "most EVE players are autistic."

Allow me to illustrate.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Dimaloun Vyreen
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#93 - 2013-08-09 13:42:59 UTC
Eraza wrote:
if scale is the problem, then do it in small scale, let me invite other people into my hangar,
give us a poker table somewhere, we could have plenty of fun with that,
and it would not require massive hardware to run.

for example, to be honest, jita 4-4 would probably be laggy as **** for everyone

i was amongst those who were furious over WiS, it was not because i did not want WiS,
but it was because it had been advertised as a HUGE new thing,
and when it arrived, something like 10% of the things promised had been implemented.

balance fixes dont require the same developers as making new content does, you should see new innovative content, AND fixes for existing content, at the same time, not one or the other

as an analogy, think of cars, some people design cars, OTHER people maintain cars.
noone stops designing new cars because engines need oil changed :)


How can scale be a problem on a game that supports 4000 player space battles? Sure, it'd lag with that many players, but there are so many ways of reducing lag. And you're right, it isn't always the same developers who fix things and make new content(for example, 3D modelers don't fix glitches, neither do texture designers)

There are three things you say to the police. "Yes, sir", "No, sir" and "I want a lawyer". There is one thing you say to Concord, "Wait, it wasn-"

Ivy greene
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#94 - 2013-08-09 13:47:00 UTC
I'd appreciate more constructive criticism on how WiS could be more appealing to the general masses please.

Also, try to at least provide sources on claims such as "this game is dying" and etc...

Thanks Blink

I've been told I'm somewhat famous, no idea why...

http://themittani.com/features/alod-you-cannot-jump-here

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#95 - 2013-08-09 13:49:36 UTC
Ivy greene wrote:
I'd appreciate more constructive criticism on how WiS could be more appealing to the general masses please.

Also, try to at least provide sources on claims such as "this game is dying" and etc...

Thanks Blink


Two questions.

1. Why should it appeal to "the masses"?

2. Why should we want it to appeal to "the masses"?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#96 - 2013-08-09 13:52:01 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
1: More mass appeal = more players = more money for CCP = more money invested in EVE and DUST = more new stuff, more little things, more improvements = a better game.

2: see 1.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Iskander Phoenix
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#97 - 2013-08-09 13:56:10 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Ivy greene wrote:
I'd appreciate more constructive criticism on how WiS could be more appealing to the general masses please.

Also, try to at least provide sources on claims such as "this game is dying" and etc...

Thanks Blink


Two questions.

1. Why should it appeal to "the masses"?

2. Why should we want it to appeal to "the masses"?


Eve should "attract" the masses. But we all know its a niche game that will be suitably for only some people. But just because of it doesn't mean we need to be elitist. As the player base grows so does the experience for all of us.
Mycool Jahksn
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#98 - 2013-08-09 14:16:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Mycool Jahksn
Stitcher wrote:
Mycool Jahksn wrote:
Domer Pyle wrote:
most eve players are generally pretty autistic. thus they don't like change. so they complained and now WiS has been put on a back burner :\


This is actually true.

Source:

http://www.clinicaladvisor.com/video-game-addiction-common-in-autistic-boys/article/305070/#


It's not even remotely true. "video game addiction is common in autistic boys" is a very long way from being the same thing as "most EVE players are autistic."

Allow me to illustrate.


Did it hurt that much that you got called autistic? :P

I've spent many years in EVE and I'd say there's more autistic people in this game than in any other.

If you even cared about reading that article you'd know that 43% of people with autism have a game console at home, computers are probably included in that.

Knowing that, your picture is incorrect.

My interests include but are not limited to throwing rocks at bee hives.

There are more stars in the universe than all of the grains of sand on earth.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#99 - 2013-08-09 14:27:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
You keep saying "autistic" like it's an insult, as opposed to a diagnosis. Which is nonsense. It's like trying to insult a community by saying "most WoW players have generally had a Basal Cell Carcinoma".

Even if that were true, how is it insulting? And where exactly are you getting this information anyway? I'm pretty sure you don't have access to all our medical records.

After four Fanfests and I-forget-how-many player meetups, and pushing eight years of just hanging out on TS or whatever, the conclusion I draw is that EVE players are a varied, generally friendly, generally well-adjusted group of individuals from a variety of walks of life. I'm sure that our community includes persons who are on the autistic spectrum. I have no idea whether that percentage is greater or lesser than that found in, say, Battlefield, CoD, LoL, DotA, WoT or.... I don't know, Barbie Horse Adventures. But I certainly don't think it's "most" or "a majority".

Pulling statistics out of your arse, leaping to logically inept conclusions and then acting all smug when somebody says "smells like bull chit to me" doesn't make you King of the Internet, dude.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

embrel
BamBam Inc.
#100 - 2013-08-09 14:40:22 UTC  |  Edited by: embrel
Mycool Jahksn wrote:

If you even cared about reading that article you'd know that 43% of people with autism have a game console at home, computers are probably included in that.


I do not really trust this site's info: http://www.grabstats.com/statcategorymain.aspx?StatCatID=13

but found another too: http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/26267-stats-claim-56-percent-of-us-households-have-modern-game-consoles

okay, 56% of US households have modern game consoles is stated there. Which would mean that it's actually less likely that an autist plays than an average (won't call it normal).