These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Multiboxing softwares ruining pvp

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Doc Severide
Doomheim
#161 - 2013-08-04 12:42:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Severide
TKL HUN wrote:
Guys just try to be serious with this, I think this is a serious problem.

LOL, at least one of you does...


Inokuma Yawara wrote:
I've been reading through many of the replies in this thread. It made me think this: Isn't being able to multi-box a form of pay to win? What if the other player can't buy multi-boxes or afford the software solution either. Some can't even afford a second EVE account. So, isn't that the same as play to win items for sale in the NEX?
It's not my problem if people are broke, it's theirs. And no one "wins" EVE, it's an open ended game that goes on and on...

No one has the "right" to play, you pay up or **** off...

Everyone is always repeating the mantra "Don't Trust Anyone" ad nauseum... If I can't trust the guys I play with, why bother playing with them at all? Fly Solo...
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#162 - 2013-08-04 15:32:38 UTC
Quote:
I've been reading through many of the replies in this thread. It made me think this: Isn't being able to multi-box a form of pay to win? What if the other player can't buy multi-boxes or afford the software solution either. Some can't even afford a second EVE account.


If you cant afford a second account you are either new or bad at eve. In either case you can read the forums for advice and become good at eve. And then you can PLEX as many accounts as you want.

I have a newborn baby and a full time job and still have the time to do it, and haven't spent a penny of my own money on this game in years, literally. I chose to quit using MB software and still can do it.

Zero excuses.

If you really need ISK and have 2 accounts I hear Darth Nefarious' Armor fleet is hiring.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it
Dave stark
#163 - 2013-08-04 15:34:27 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
If you really need ISK and have 2 accounts I hear Darth Nefarious' Armor fleet is hiring.

i heard it's only hiring because it's not making any isk because he's too busy whining about it on the forums.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#164 - 2013-08-04 20:02:28 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Cipher Jones wrote:
If you really need ISK and have 2 accounts I hear Darth Nefarious' Armor fleet is hiring.

i heard it's only hiring because it's not making any isk because he's too busy whining about it on the forums.

Dave, the home of witty banter, and 3rd degree burns.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#165 - 2013-08-04 20:06:18 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Pohbis wrote:
ITT dual-boxing PvPer complains other PvPers box more than him Roll


I'm dualboxing, not using 20-25 clients.


Hmmm .... and what is the difference ... what is allowed? One client? Two clients 20 clients? For a player with one account playing one character you are doing exactly the same thing you complain about. And I remember you from our encounters in and near Rahadalon when you and ALL your team mates used the same tactics. Blegh.

You are outnumbered. Suck on it!



I don't care if hes using 20 clients, but think he should operate all of them, not a 3rd party software


Your lack of understanding of what human control is, I find disturbing. Are you by any chance an android?
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#166 - 2013-08-04 20:32:04 UTC
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Pohbis wrote:
ITT dual-boxing PvPer complains other PvPers box more than him Roll


I'm dualboxing, not using 20-25 clients.


Hmmm .... and what is the difference ... what is allowed? One client? Two clients 20 clients? For a player with one account playing one character you are doing exactly the same thing you complain about. And I remember you from our encounters in and near Rahadalon when you and ALL your team mates used the same tactics. Blegh.

You are outnumbered. Suck on it!



I don't care if hes using 20 clients, but think he should operate all of them, not a 3rd party software


Your lack of understanding of what human control is, I find disturbing. Are you by any chance an android?


I fully understand what human control is.
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
#167 - 2013-08-04 20:34:37 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Before you start trolling:


I have heard The Mittani uses ISBoxer to control all of Goonswarm.

Can someone please confirm?


IDK about that, but I did hear that Goonswarm is really just a little over 300 guys who each multibox ~40 accounts.
Dave stark
#168 - 2013-08-04 20:35:37 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
I fully understand what human control is.


that doesn't come across in your posts.
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#169 - 2013-08-04 20:43:06 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I fully understand what human control is.


that doesn't come across in your posts.


Human control is, when a human controls all hes accounts, in this case, this is not true.
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#170 - 2013-08-04 20:44:49 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I fully understand what human control is.


that doesn't come across in your posts.


Human control is, when a human controls all hes accounts, in this case, this is not true.

oh? so you mean that there are bots controlling the accounts?

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right
Dave stark
#171 - 2013-08-04 20:49:43 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I fully understand what human control is.


that doesn't come across in your posts.


Human control is, when a human controls all hes accounts, in this case, this is not true.


except, he is. so it is true.

try again.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#172 - 2013-08-04 22:12:38 UTC
Grimpak wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I fully understand what human control is.


that doesn't come across in your posts.


Human control is, when a human controls all hes accounts, in this case, this is not true.

oh? so you mean that there are bots controlling the accounts?

If there's bots, you should report it.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
mechtech
Ice Liberation Army
#173 - 2013-08-04 23:01:22 UTC
I know the current EULA allows ISBoxer under the click duplication label (which was originally just protecting keyboard/mouse macros that didn't make a major impact on gameplay), but honestly, the current state of things is pretty ridiculous.

ISBoxer w/ 5+ accounts is such a huge advantage over alt tabbing and manual control, it's pretty silly.

It's just going to get worse as ISBoxer adds more and more features.

Luckily I'm a trader so I don't have to deal with this BS (although we traders have to deal with tools of a different sort).
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#174 - 2013-08-04 23:42:46 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Before you start trolling:


I have heard The Mittani uses ISBoxer to control all of Goonswarm.

Can someone please confirm?


No, simple stuff may be controlled with simple ALT-TAB Twisted

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#175 - 2013-08-04 23:51:12 UTC
mechtech wrote:
I know the current EULA allows ISBoxer under the click duplication label (which was originally just protecting keyboard/mouse macros that didn't make a major impact on gameplay), but honestly, the current state of things is pretty ridiculous.

ISBoxer w/ 5+ accounts is such a huge advantage over alt tabbing and manual control, it's pretty silly.

It's just going to get worse as ISBoxer adds more and more features.

Luckily I'm a trader so I don't have to deal with this BS (although we traders have to deal with tools of a different sort).


Macro =/= duplicator.

Keyboard and mouse macros are allowed as long as they don't automate play. Explained seperately from ISBoxer by CCP.

Neither Macros nor duplication software is banned if it does not cause you to get higher up on the foodchain quicker.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
#176 - 2013-08-05 00:01:58 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:
mechtech wrote:
I know the current EULA allows ISBoxer under the click duplication label (which was originally just protecting keyboard/mouse macros that didn't make a major impact on gameplay), but honestly, the current state of things is pretty ridiculous.

ISBoxer w/ 5+ accounts is such a huge advantage over alt tabbing and manual control, it's pretty silly.

It's just going to get worse as ISBoxer adds more and more features.

Luckily I'm a trader so I don't have to deal with this BS (although we traders have to deal with tools of a different sort).


Macro =/= duplicator.

Keyboard and mouse macros are allowed as long as they don't automate play. Explained seperately from ISBoxer by CCP.

Neither Macros nor duplication software is banned if it does not cause you to get higher up on the foodchain quicker.


Just curious,

Aside from the larger initial investment, how does it not allow you to get higher up the foodchain quicker?

If I start 5 new accounts and use them to blitz missions while skilling up, won't I unlock higher level missions earlier? Once all are properly skilled, won't I be able to alpha nearly anything subcap in the time it takes for me to skill up once (assuming they are all running the same attributes and mirrored queues)?

How is that not getting up the foodchain quicker?
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#177 - 2013-08-05 00:12:52 UTC
Quote:
Just curious,

Aside from the larger initial investment, how does it not allow you to get higher up the foodchain quicker?

If I start 5 new accounts and use them to blitz missions while skilling up, won't I unlock higher level missions earlier? Once all are properly skilled, won't I be able to alpha nearly anything subcap in the time it takes for me to skill up once (assuming they are all running the same attributes and mirrored queues)?

How is that not getting up the foodchain quicker?


You pay 15 bucks a month (or whatever option you choose) per account. You are subject to be alpha'd while in your noob ships. You have to fit each ship so while making the money so you will be spending 5 x the money. you don't get 5x the rewards for completing a mission with 5 characters. Once you get to end game for missioning (in this case) you don't compete the mission 5x faster. You can kill anything in 5 volleys with 1 ship, so you cant just take 5 ships and all shoot the same target.

Again, diminishing returns aren't just an in game issue.




internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it
Grimpak
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#178 - 2013-08-05 00:42:22 UTC
Alavaria Fera wrote:
Grimpak wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Dave Stark wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
I fully understand what human control is.


that doesn't come across in your posts.


Human control is, when a human controls all hes accounts, in this case, this is not true.

oh? so you mean that there are bots controlling the accounts?

If there's bots, you should report it.

indeed, in case of bots use the report button

[img]http://eve-files.com/sig/grimpak[/img]

[quote]The more I know about humans, the more I love animals.[/quote] ain't that right
Alaekessa
Matari Combat Research and Manufacture Inc.
#179 - 2013-08-05 00:43:21 UTC
Cipher Jones wrote:


You pay 15 bucks a month (or whatever option you choose) per account. You are subject to be alpha'd while in your noob ships. You have to fit each ship so while making the money so you will be spending 5 x the money. you don't get 5x the rewards for completing a mission with 5 characters. Once you get to end game for missioning (in this case) you don't compete the mission 5x faster. You can kill anything in 5 volleys with 1 ship, so you cant just take 5 ships and all shoot the same target.

Again, diminishing returns aren't just an in game issue.






Anyone is subject to be alpha'd in their noob ships.

Initial investment of PLEX will solve spending 5x as much on 5x fits initially. Assuming that my losses are minimal and I treat 4 of the 5 accounts as parasitic twins, I am gathering money faster on the 1 "primary" character than I would if they didn't have the parasitic twins. I could just be running the missions while waiting for all 5 to be trained appropriately for Alpha Tornadoes.

Once I get the Alpha Tornadoes, I stop running missions and start PvPing. It takes me the amount of time to train for the Alpha Tornadoes once, to have a small gang of 5 Alpha Tornadoes with which to "solo" any unsuspecting sucker I can find.

I fail to see what $15/month has to do with my question unless you're saying that I am allowed to have my 4 parasitic twins because I am paying cash for each account. If this is the case, why isn't it ok for a botter to pay cash for each bot they want to run?

Another qualm this raises in my mind is how does this not make Eve Pay2Win?
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#180 - 2013-08-05 01:36:37 UTC
In this thread the OP confuses coherent fleet doctrine and good fleet command for software.