These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Multiboxing softwares ruining pvp

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#61 - 2013-08-02 15:44:59 UTC
Multiple players are ruining PVP too.


Sorry, couldn't help it.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#62 - 2013-08-02 15:46:53 UTC
GreenSeed wrote:
with 22 characters in total, i can gank your crap in t1 rifters.

don't **** me off, because im bored enough.

Slashers are the new T1 frigate king, really.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
GreenSeed
#63 - 2013-08-02 16:04:24 UTC
i don't acknowledge advice from people that kill my stuff on TEST space.

goons are mean, and im not good at picking sides.
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#64 - 2013-08-02 16:11:58 UTC
Doc Severide wrote:
OP

Just stop already...

Adapt or play something else....

This is NOT going to change...


I am sure someone said this the day before they made CONCORD OMGWTFSUPERPWNBBQ everything too. If there is one thing I have learned playing this game for nearly five years, it's that eventually CCP follows the money, just like every other for profit enterprise.

If enough of their customers ***** long enough, and loudly enough, they will do something about it. The only questions are what and when.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#65 - 2013-08-02 16:23:06 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
Doc Severide wrote:
OP

Just stop already...

Adapt or play something else....

This is NOT going to change...


I am sure someone said this the day before they made CONCORD OMGWTFSUPERPWNBBQ everything too. If there is one thing I have learned playing this game for nearly five years, it's that eventually CCP follows the money, just like every other for profit enterprise.

If enough of their customers ***** long enough, and loudly enough, they will do something about it. The only questions are what and when.

Yep.

Also, nerf ganking more, I saw a jump freighter gank killmail not too long ago.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
Beekeeper Bob
Beekeepers Anonymous
#66 - 2013-08-02 16:45:17 UTC
How will people ever have 2000 man fleets without ISBoxer? Shocked



Signature removed - CCP Eterne
ISD Cura Ursus
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#67 - 2013-08-02 17:07:43 UTC
Deleted spam post.

ISD Cura Ursus

Lieutenant Commander

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#68 - 2013-08-02 18:27:31 UTC
Guys just try to be serious with this, I think this is a serious problem.
Whitehound
#69 - 2013-08-02 20:12:00 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Guys just try to be serious with this, I think this is a serious problem.

Someone has got one over you. Big deal.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#70 - 2013-08-02 20:13:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Cipher Jones
TKL HUN wrote:
Hi!

I know there are some topics about these softwares on the forums, but in those topics the player's problems was related to pve, as far as I saw.

My problem is related to pvp and multiboxing softwares.

Let me tell you an example:

I was trying to do a sansha 6/10 with my alt, but the guy who uses one of these softwares was on local, tried to probe me down a few times, and a bit later he probed down the complex, and started to do it with a vigilant, a loki, and 2 guardians, all alone.

Now tell me, what the hell can I do about that, with my main, and with my combat alt?? What if he brings more dps, or more guardians, because he can, he has like 15-20 accs, and he can control all at the same time.

On the other hand, I wouldn't care if a 10 man gang would steal the complex I'm doing, because they can, it can happen.



Before you start trolling:

I know this is crying and I should do the same, because CCP allows it, and I know I should quit eve and bla bla bla.

I don't care about all of this.

I'm plaiying EVE for almost 3 years now, for me EVE is about pvp (and for many other players), my priority is pvp, I don't care if someone can make money alone with 20 accs, or 50 accs, or 100 accs, I really don't give a damn.

But CCP, don't give someone a huge advantage by allowing him to control a full fleet of combat ships with a few clicks, because IT IS RUINING THE GAME.

And really, don't tell me to do the same. What if I don't have the hardware for this, or I don't have the money to buy the hardware? Will I be discriminated?

And of course I know, I should take it as it was a gang of players, not one player... But it was one player.


I know you want to kill solo, and small gang pvp, but come on... Should I have to organise a 50 man gang to kill 1 guy???

And I know CCP, you allow multiboxing softwares, because more multiboxers = more accounts = more money for you. This is how most companies think, but hey... I think you should think it twice what worth more...


I know plenty of people that quad box with no software, your argument is completely irrelevant. One of my good friends triple boxes effectively with the use of only 7 fingers.

We actively hunt "PvPers" using MB software because they are no where near as efficient.

In short, you should be ashamed of yourself, this post, and the replies you've harvested from people who had better things to do.

No offense.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#71 - 2013-08-02 20:21:17 UTC  |  Edited by: TKL HUN
Cipher Jones wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Hi!

I know there are some topics about these softwares on the forums, but in those topics the player's problems was related to pve, as far as I saw.

My problem is related to pvp and multiboxing softwares.

Let me tell you an example:

I was trying to do a sansha 6/10 with my alt, but the guy who uses one of these softwares was on local, tried to probe me down a few times, and a bit later he probed down the complex, and started to do it with a vigilant, a loki, and 2 guardians, all alone.

Now tell me, what the hell can I do about that, with my main, and with my combat alt?? What if he brings more dps, or more guardians, because he can, he has like 15-20 accs, and he can control all at the same time.

On the other hand, I wouldn't care if a 10 man gang would steal the complex I'm doing, because they can, it can happen.



Before you start trolling:

I know this is crying and I should do the same, because CCP allows it, and I know I should quit eve and bla bla bla.

I don't care about all of this.

I'm plaiying EVE for almost 3 years now, for me EVE is about pvp (and for many other players), my priority is pvp, I don't care if someone can make money alone with 20 accs, or 50 accs, or 100 accs, I really don't give a damn.

But CCP, don't give someone a huge advantage by allowing him to control a full fleet of combat ships with a few clicks, because IT IS RUINING THE GAME.

And really, don't tell me to do the same. What if I don't have the hardware for this, or I don't have the money to buy the hardware? Will I be discriminated?

And of course I know, I should take it as it was a gang of players, not one player... But it was one player.


I know you want to kill solo, and small gang pvp, but come on... Should I have to organise a 50 man gang to kill 1 guy???

And I know CCP, you allow multiboxing softwares, because more multiboxers = more accounts = more money for you. This is how most companies think, but hey... I think you should think it twice what worth more...


I know plenty of people that quad box with no software, your argument is completely irrelevant. One of my good friends triple boxes effectively with the use of only 7 fingers.

We actively hunt "PvPers" using MB software because they are no where near as efficient.

In short, you should be ashamed of yourself, this post, and the replies you've harvested from people who had better things to do.

No offense.



I think you should be ashamed, because of not reading and understanding everything , and barking.

That 4 account "fleet" was just an example, hes usually using 15-20 accounts at the same time.

And ofc if you have better things to do, do your better things instead of insulting me.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#72 - 2013-08-02 20:54:42 UTC
Beekeeper Bob wrote:
How will people ever have 2000 man fleets without ISBoxer? Shocked

One wonders, it would have a lot of players Shocked

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
E-2C Hawkeye
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#73 - 2013-08-02 21:01:53 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
War Kitten wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:

Do you know how I know hes using a multiboxing software? Logging in at the same time, and camping a station at the same time with 20 tornadoes is a proof enough. Anyway, everyone knows that hes multiboxing.

The problem is, that hes not forced to control 20 clients at the same time, a software does it for him, that's the problem.


Guess what 20 Tornadoes all doing the same thing in the same spot can't do:

Hit a frigate at close range.

L2Eve and exploit his weaknesses.


Hes also outside with a machariel and a loki on other accounts, so...


So....you're going to keep finding excuse as to why you can't deal with your own problems? Why is it so many other people can defeat multiboxers yet you're having a hard time even accepting the idea?



Your solution to every problem is always the same copy paste reply which really is not a valid answer only one you think is valid in your own limited mind.
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#74 - 2013-08-02 21:04:13 UTC
TKL HUN wrote:
Pohbis wrote:
ITT dual-boxing PvPer complains other PvPers box more than him Roll


I'm dualboxing, not using 20-25 clients.


Hmmm .... and what is the difference ... what is allowed? One client? Two clients 20 clients? For a player with one account playing one character you are doing exactly the same thing you complain about. And I remember you from our encounters in and near Rahadalon when you and ALL your team mates used the same tactics. Blegh.

You are outnumbered. Suck on it!
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#75 - 2013-08-02 21:05:23 UTC
You should add a falcon alt to make your pvp complete. Or a booster alt if you were using the falcon.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?
TKL HUN
Jugis Modo Utopia
#76 - 2013-08-02 21:17:11 UTC
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
Pohbis wrote:
ITT dual-boxing PvPer complains other PvPers box more than him Roll


I'm dualboxing, not using 20-25 clients.


Hmmm .... and what is the difference ... what is allowed? One client? Two clients 20 clients? For a player with one account playing one character you are doing exactly the same thing you complain about. And I remember you from our encounters in and near Rahadalon when you and ALL your team mates used the same tactics. Blegh.

You are outnumbered. Suck on it!



I don't care if hes using 20 clients, but think he should operate all of them, not a 3rd party software
ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#77 - 2013-08-02 21:33:20 UTC
Post removed that supported questionable activities relative to real world issues.

ISD Tyrozan

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

@ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL
CompleteFailure
DAWGS Corp.
Negative Feedback
#78 - 2013-08-02 21:38:26 UTC  |  Edited by: CompleteFailure
TKL HUN wrote:

Yes, you can look after 4 clients if you have 4 monitor.


You could look after four clients with one monitor if you really wanted to. I have a corp mate who routinely triple-boxes "solo" on a single monitor, no multi-boxing software, and he destroys people all day long (I've actually been to his house and watched him do it, it's a bit insane TBH). In your mind, does this make it OK because he doesn't use ISBoxer?

If this guy you're complaining about weren't using ISBoxer, and just had a bunch of clients running, then what? Ban running multiple accounts at once? Ban people who are really good at multitasking? Good luck with that.
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#79 - 2013-08-02 23:00:15 UTC
OP is a serious problem.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#80 - 2013-08-03 00:53:55 UTC
E-2C Hawkeye wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:
War Kitten wrote:
TKL HUN wrote:

Do you know how I know hes using a multiboxing software? Logging in at the same time, and camping a station at the same time with 20 tornadoes is a proof enough. Anyway, everyone knows that hes multiboxing.

The problem is, that hes not forced to control 20 clients at the same time, a software does it for him, that's the problem.


Guess what 20 Tornadoes all doing the same thing in the same spot can't do:

Hit a frigate at close range.

L2Eve and exploit his weaknesses.


Hes also outside with a machariel and a loki on other accounts, so...


So....you're going to keep finding excuse as to why you can't deal with your own problems? Why is it so many other people can defeat multiboxers yet you're having a hard time even accepting the idea?



Your solution to every problem is always the same copy paste reply which really is not a valid answer only one you think is valid in your own limited mind.


It just shows that self reliance, creativity and personal responsiblity are foriegn concepts to you. I always say the same things because those things are always right. A player should 1st try to rely on themselves, then their friends and only after that should they consider asking for changes to the game.

But that's not what they do, they encounter a problem which usually isn't a problem and the FIRST thing they do is run to the powers that be and ask for self serving changes (like in this guys, case, HE multiboxes but it's ok because his computer can only handle 2 clients lol). Not to put too much real life into it, but that behavior is no different that people who run straight to the government when they can't cope rather than find personal, familial, local and community based ways to deal with their problem.

Well in real life of here, it's the wrong way to think. This is a GAME that demands thinking, people should stop asking for changes to OTHER folks gameplay because they refuse to think and be innovative.