These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Idea: System Rotation, Planet Rotation and ect

Author
ArchAngel Corvin
312th Sovereignty Mining inc
#1 - 2013-07-31 22:44:09 UTC
Dear Friends,

My idea / suggestion would be to have the Planets Rotate round the their sun and the planets themselves Rotate, also could we see Asteroid belts on the dark side of moon or planet. Also would it be possible to have a Asteroid belt covered in darkness and have to use the Mining Vessels / Barges and other ships lights to see?. This could add new level of realism to eve and make mining even more enjoyable.
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#2 - 2013-07-31 22:46:54 UTC
This thread again.

No is still the answer, AFAIK.
Jessica Danikov
Network Danikov
#3 - 2013-07-31 23:00:48 UTC
It is a beautiful idea, but one fraught with significant technical challenges, least of all being- what happens to bookmarks?

It's also a very old idea that's been beaten to death in other threads.
Alphea Abbra
Project Promethion
#4 - 2013-07-31 23:49:41 UTC
My immersion gene is saying yes - but.
I can see a lot of negatives, to be honest. And if they aren't negatives, then they are issues that needs to be addressed as well.
The questions of, what happens to bookmarks?, what happens to POS's?, what happens to stargates?, what happens to ships in-warp to a place that has moved?, and several more, are relevant and should be answered if the idea is meant seriously, but I think they are secondary questions to this:
What are the benefits for CCP and players to invest the time/resources to implement it?

Personally, I think it would be very cool - if it works.
If I have to calculate where that planet is in 10 hours when I am gonna bash that POCO, it's a bad move.

Fundamentally, added immersion should not be adding to "boring" or "job-ish" tasks.
Aliventi
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#5 - 2013-08-01 00:05:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Aliventi
The planets themselves used to rotate. This was changed because the beacon points for FW Dust bombardments would have to shift using a rather complex equation.

Edit I am assuming that if you could implement that equation and just apply it to all the BMs around the celestial then it may work. The issue is safe spot may be caught. Or you have a BM 200km off a POS, which is orbiting a moon, which is orbiting a planet, which is orbiting the Sun. That is a lot of math to keep things consistent and correct.
Rowells
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2013-08-01 00:25:58 UTC
agreed with jessica. while the idea itself has nothing wrong and would be pretty cool, but the actual implementation would require too many resources for what would mostly be an aesthetic feature. is this feature possible? yes. is it practical? not really.
Ronny Hugo
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#7 - 2013-08-01 01:20:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Ronny Hugo
I must agree, the technical difficulties make it unviable for the next decade or two. I'd instead want more actual game-play features that add to the things that a capsuleer can do in this universe. Station walking, planet walking, planet surfing, planet monstertrucking, planet mining like in a certain 2009 movie about a pointy eared person, ship walking, more PVE, more PVP roles, new SOV mechanics, more stuff (dwarf planets, micro-moons, comets, neutron stars (pretty much deadly up-close), pulsars (deadly in the direction the poles point, like 9 trillion doomsday weapons going off every second from each pole), forming solar-systems (still lots of asteroids and dangerous debris, followed by the eventual ignition of the star(s), heck let people know when the stars ignite so people can watch and get downloaded into a new clone as they get turned into dust by the shockwave of extreme brightness before the star settles in a brightness), all the dangerous stuff immortals can visit). To mention a few.
Aglais
Ice-Storm
#8 - 2013-08-01 03:01:19 UTC
"What happens to bookmarks?"

Have bookmarks for things that are

A) Reasonably close to large celestial objects (Planets, star) remain in that spot relative to the object.

B ) POSes and other such objects 'locked' to the position of the POS- your bookmarked location for the thing would always take you to the thing.

At the same time, this would only be relevant for a select few planets- who is going to notice the movement of the outermost worlds in say, Oipo, with their near 100 AU orbital radii?
Kalanaja
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2013-08-01 04:48:32 UTC
It would be nice to have single asteroid belts for the systems. And having orbital mechanics where the planets rotate and revolve around their suns would be cool too. I don't see any MMO having the ability to do it anytime soon until about another decade or so goes by. The games that do have it are basically single player games and even hardy computers scream bloody murder having to deal with that many calculations.
Ronny Hugo
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#10 - 2013-08-01 10:08:54 UTC
Aglais wrote:
"What happens to bookmarks?"
A) Reasonably close to large celestial objects (Planets, star) remain in that spot relative to the object.

If only you knew the difficulty in calculating the new position for all bookmarks for all players several times a day... Straight
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#11 - 2013-08-01 10:41:07 UTC
Planets do rotate if you look via the Planetary Interface view AFAIK. Either it's that or the atmosphere is moving Lol
Jessica Danikov
Network Danikov
#12 - 2013-08-01 15:12:46 UTC
Does the motion happen in real time, or is it simulated every day at downtime? Is the motion exaggerated or realistic (taking decades to complete a single orbit)? What about alignment? Do the grids themselves rotate? Do they rotate with their celestial? With the solar system? What happens to aligned bookmarks when they do? What is the center of rotation? Does the center of rotation stay constant? What about non-celestial grids with no obvious center? Can rotation mechanics allow people to make progressively deeper and deeper bookmarks? Do ships on grid move with the grid? The celestial? Do bookmarks need a new format and can the old bookmarks be translated into it? What sort of processing and bandwith may be associated with the new bookmarks? How does this change the game for the better? Does the value justify the effort to implement it? What are the risks? Is there any way you can mitigate those risks?

Now, once you have to answer to all those questions and more, sit down with CCP Veritas and tell him how he's going to program that in a weekend without him going into a techno-filled daze.
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
#13 - 2013-08-01 15:19:51 UTC
Just one word..... WHY?

If the planets and moons orbited the sun, what would it actually change to the gameplay that we currently have?

Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

Silent Rambo
Orion Positronics
#14 - 2013-08-01 15:57:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Silent Rambo
Jint Hikaru wrote:
Just one word..... WHY?

If the planets and moons orbited the sun, what would it actually change to the gameplay that we currently have?



This is a poor argument because you could use this about anything. Why do we even play a game, what actual benefit does this specific game have to society? Immersive functionality doesn't add to direct game play, what it does is make the overall game experience a better and more complete one.

For this suggestion to work, you'd need to overhaul a lot of the mechanics of the game, but I don't think that isn't something they should aim for. Things need to be overhauled eventually anyway when you want to continue development on software built 10 years ago.

Anchored objects, things that can be warped to now, would still show up on the overview. All that stuff would still work, you would just have to make the bookmark system work a little differently. Being able to bookmark specific objects would basically solve the whole issue of POS's and other anchor-able objects in space. Dynamic bookmarks would basically be the solution to every problem this creates. If you saved a static bookmark, this would just saving your coordinates in space, then you'll warp to that point in space, regardless of where everything else is. A dynamic bookmark would be able to warp to the objects current location, regardless of actual insystem coordinates. The notion that this idea is in anyway impossible is simply ridiculous.

Something like this however, should be a long term goal for CCP. It isn't something they just can throw in to the game easily, but I think it should absolutely be done eventually just to complete the whole SPACE part of the game. This is internet SPACE ships, not internet static 3D environment ships, and neglecting this aspect makes the entire game weaker.

You really think someone would do that? Just log into EvE and tell lies?

Zatar Sharisa
New Eden Heavy Industries Incorporated
#15 - 2013-08-01 16:23:14 UTC
As an astronomer, I can say that as long as you don't care to get too realistic (planet-planet perturbations, orbital resonance, etc.) it's not that big of a factor to add. As for bookmarks, why would they even need to change? The navcom simply works in the rotating reference frame of the stellar orbital frame, and make assumptions that the orbits are circularized. (See above ridiculous levels of complication if you decide not to go with this assumption.) The navcom then is simply working with coordinates of the rotating reference frame, and...who cares? Again, this is assuming you just want the planets and other objects to revolve around the star, planets to rotate, and moons and starbases to revolve around the moons, planets, and star.

It would be cool. Honestly, I'd assumed that it was already going on, but had never sat down and marked positions over the course of hours/days/weeks to observe the changes. So again, it'd be a cool, cosmetic change to things if this was included.

That said, it's a cosmetic change that would be noticed by next to noone because the changes would be slow in the case of planets. Only for starbases and moons in orbit around planets would it be noticeable on anything less than a scale of days, unless there's a budding group of "EvE astronomers" out there that I don't know about, and if there is, could one of you please contact me, as I'd love to join that group. Smile

I understand about indecision, but I don't care if I get behind.  People livin' in competition.  All I want is to have my peace of mind.

"Peace of Mind"  --  Boston