These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Mass-test feedback - November 10

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
CCP Habakuk
C C P
C C P Alliance
#1 - 2011-11-10 19:56:47 UTC
Hi! If you participated in the mass-test on the 10th November, please reply in this thread to give your feedback, based on following template:

Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version:
  • CPU:
  • GPU:
  • RAM:
  • How many clients were you running at the same time?
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high):

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out:
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in:
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome)
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

CCP Habakuk | EVE Quality Assurance | Team Five 0 | (Team Gridlock)

Bug reporting | Mass Testing
Seamus Donohue
EVE University
Ivy League
#2 - 2011-11-10 20:51:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Seamus Donohue
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Mac OS 10.6.8
  • CPU: 2.66 GHZ Quad-Core Intel Xeon
  • GPU: ATI Radeon 4870
  • RAM: 6 GB 1066 MHz DDR3
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? Three clients
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): 1920*1200 resolution; all other graphics settings were minimum possible

User Experience

  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 2 frames per second
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: Near zero. It was literally a slideshow. Not figuratively a slideshow, it was literally a slideshow.
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) - 1, way worse, completely unplayable
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No crashes or disconnects.
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: The framerate was so sluggish that the interface was failing to detect mouseclicks. Locking targets from fleet broadcasts was extremely problematic. It got bad enough that I just docked up and then looked for the feedback thread.


On another note, it would be a good idea to have Aura speak a phrase of some sort to explain why warping isn't possible. One of my clients was being prevented from warping, and I couldn't tell by what. "You are being warp disrupted." "You are being warp scrambled." "You are inside a warp interdiction field." A text notification is useless in such a situation, it has to be spoken by Aura.

[edit] I was docked in FD-MLJ for the node remapping. After the system came back up, I logged back in, undocked, and ran my resistance modules and launched drones. I then recalled drones, and warped to the other station and docked. Everything seemed fine. [/edit]

Survivor of Teskanen.  Fan of John Rourke.

I have video tutorials for EVE Online on my YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/SeamusDonohueEVE
Immortal DeathKnight
Bring Da Fire
#3 - 2011-11-10 21:09:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Immortal DeathKnight
Machine Info and Settings

  • OS version: Win 7
  • CPU: T4200
  • GPU: nVidia 9600
  • RAM: 3 GB
  • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
  • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

    • User Experience
  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 4-5 ?
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 3
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 , dilatation is a step foward :), still laggy
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? yes, server crash :D
    • [*] Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: how i can get the 2M SP ? :D
    Jacob Straven
    Deep Core Mining Inc.
    Caldari State
    #4 - 2011-11-10 21:12:48 UTC

    OS version: Vista SP2 x86
    CPU: Intel core 2 duo T6600 2.2ghz
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD 4570
    RAM: 4GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 50-60
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 4-7
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 2 (one was planned though)
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Good times!
    Kiki LeBoutier
    Stimulus
    Rote Kapelle
    #5 - 2011-11-10 21:13:48 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Windows 7
    CPU: AMD 1055T x6 @ 4.2ghz
    GPU: ATI 5850
    RAM: 6 GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 40
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 30
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 7, although it has been a while since i was in such a large engagement so hard to say
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? None but the sheduled one
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Overall, was fine, nothing really to say. Everything went smoothly as i expected.
    rufeno
    Black Frog Logistics
    Red-Frog
    #6 - 2011-11-10 21:14:31 UTC

    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: win7 64bit
    • CPU: intel core i7 CPU 920 2.67ghz
    • GPU: 2x GTX275 (nvidia)
    • RAM: 6 gb
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 sisi, 1 TQ
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 1 while CPU at 160%, 4-5 at 100%
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2 while CPU at 160, 6-7 at 100%
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) N/A
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 disconnect
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: pretty good compare to previous test a while ago.

    SXYGeeK
    Aliastra
    Gallente Federation
    #7 - 2011-11-10 21:15:18 UTC  |  Edited by: SXYGeeK
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: win7 64bit
    CPU: intel core i7 CPU 950 3.07ghz
    GPU: GTS250 (nvidia)
    RAM: 12 gb
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 2 sisi
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: almost unplayable < 1fps while cpu at 160%, around 5 with cpu at 100
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: didn't note numbers here.
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? 1 crash
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

    FPS seemed to be worse than I am usually accustomed, but I just rebuilt my computer so it could be something else.

    I crashed once during the tower shoot.

    The remap in FD- didn't seem to go entirely well, when I reconnected I found my fighter bombers missing.
    this is concerning :(
    Ryan Lyu
    Deep Core Mining Inc.
    Caldari State
    #8 - 2011-11-10 21:15:38 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Win-7 32bit
    CPU:Intel Celeron
    RAM: 1024mb
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): Low

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8fps
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1-3fps
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 8
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: Disconnected during the mass jump to Planet One
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Mainly a good run, worked a lot better than a lot of my larger missions (Worlds Collide), I run on a laptop, not an expensive gaming laptop, a rubbist £250 laptop that is 3-4 years old. I congratulate you, you got almost 600 people in one area and I only crashed one, while fully zoomed in and trying to warp. Congratz!
    Gheyna
    Hoover Inc.
    #9 - 2011-11-10 21:16:10 UTC
    OS version: w 7
    CPU: Intel Core# i5 Quad Processor i5-760
    GPU: Gainward GeForce GTX 460 1GB PhysX
    RAM: 4GB
    Were you running more than one EVE client? How many? Only one
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 27
    Average FPS - Zoomed in:13

    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8

    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?
    only at p1 late in the fight

    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    there are still some bugs with the new ships in station
    a good test not any lag at all even with 500 people
    PT109
    Ministry of War
    Amarr Empire
    #10 - 2011-11-10 21:16:32 UTC  |  Edited by: PT109
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Win 7 Ultimate
    CPU: Intel Core i7 Q820
    GPU: nVidia Quadro FX880M - 4GB RAM
    RAM: 12GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High/Medium

    User Experience
    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 1.5
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) no real reference tbh , dilatation is a good idea but needs more work/testing
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No disconnects
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: After I jumped into my clone in Renyn, my client was running just as slowly as it was in the fight.
    Enyap Xam
    UK Corp
    Goonswarm Federation
    #11 - 2011-11-10 21:17:15 UTC

    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows 7
    • CPU: intel quad CPU q8300 @2.5Ghz
    • GPU: ATI Radeon HD 5700
    • RAM: 4Gb
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience
    [list]
  • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10
  • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2-3
  • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
  • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? One crash on the FD gate dueing the main fight
  • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Pretty good, time dilation was really fluid kicking in and helped ease the lag


    • Me ofcourse
    KarmaFleet
    Goonswarm Federation
    #12 - 2011-11-10 21:17:19 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

      Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 860 @ 2.80GHz (8 CPUs), ~2.8GHz
      Memory: 16GB RAM
      Video Card: ATI Radeon HD 5770 XFX XXX
      Operating System: Windows 7 Professional 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.110408-1631)
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): high

    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10-30
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in:3-5
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 5
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no
    [/quote]
    Shirley C
    Guardians Incorporated
    Cynosural Field Theory.
    #13 - 2011-11-10 21:17:28 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    • OS version: Windows 7 Ultimate - 64bit
    • CPU: intel Core 2 Quad Q8200
    • GPU: GeForce GTX 590
    • RAM: 8GB
    • How many clients were you running at the same time? 1
    • Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High on all options


    User Experience

    • Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 49
    • Average FPS - Zoomed in: 37
    • On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): ~7
    • Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: No
    • Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: During TiDi acceleration I was unable to hold a lock. This issue persisted after TiDi was returned to normal. All in all, good test. Will mail some bugreports in!

    Alteran Nyo
    Stargate Universe SGU
    #14 - 2011-11-10 21:17:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Alteran Nyo
    Machine Info and Settings

    Os Version:Windows7 x64 Home Premium
    CPU:Amd Athlon X2 6400+ 3.2GHZ
    GPU:Nvidia Geforce 9600GT
    How many Clients where you running same time? 2
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low

    user Experience
    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 22
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 6
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 8 , still laggy 1 worse
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Captain Bevier
    Federal Navy Academy
    Gallente Federation
    #15 - 2011-11-10 21:17:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Bevier
    Machine Info and Settings


    * OS version: Win 7
    * CPU: intel i5 dual core 3.2ghz
    * GPU: nvidia gt 340 1GB DDR5
    * RAM: 6BG
    * How many clients were you running at the same time?: 1
    * Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium


    User Experience


    * Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8
    * Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2
    * On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome): 7
    * Did you experience any disconnects or crashes?: nope
    * Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: Probably the best big pvp fight i've been in, and good to know my new comp is upto it :)
    TIA RUIANMIN
    Brutor Tribe
    Minmatar Republic
    #16 - 2011-11-10 21:17:47 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: WINDOWS 7
    CPU: 2.40 GHZ
    GPU:
    RAM: 4 GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 2
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): LOW

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 12 FPS
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 5 FPS
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 6
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? NO, none
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:

    Good exprience overall, but the lag still needs alot of work.
    Seleia O'Sinnor
    Drop of Honey
    #17 - 2011-11-10 21:18:46 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Windows 7 / 64bit / SP1
    CPU: Intel Core i7 860 @ 2.8 ghz
    GPU: ATI Radeon HD6990
    RAM: 8GB
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 3
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): low


    User Experience
    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 4
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 2
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 1
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? Before the test started, one client crashed two times, during the test not.
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.:
    Name the fleets 1 and 2 or one and two, x and w lead to many questions in the chat :)
    This was a stutterfest, I didn't notice any time dilation.

    Odyssey: Repacking in POS hangars for modules +1,  but please for other stuff too, especially containers. Make containers openable in POS hangars.
    InsomniaHUN
    Stargate Universe SGU
    #18 - 2011-11-10 21:19:10 UTC
    Machine Info and Settings

    OS version: Win7 Ultimate 64bit
    CPU: Intel i5 M430 2.27GHz
    GPU: AMD 5470 1GB
    RAM: 2*2 1066Mhz
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 1 Client
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): High

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 10-12
    Average FPS - Zoomed in: 4-5
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 10 - I expected a slideshow :D
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? No
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: May the jump drive, jump, smartbomb and sensor booster effects can radically decrease FPS, we should make a test for it ;)
    Chowdercannon
    Imperial Academy
    Amarr Empire
    #19 - 2011-11-10 21:19:26 UTC
    OS version: Vista 64 ultimate
    CPU: Core2Duo E8400 @ 3.0GHz
    GPU: nVidia GTX 460 1GB
    RAM: 4GB ddr2 800
    Just one client.
    Graphics settings: tried high and low.

    Average FPS barely increased when I went from high to low. About 6fps on high and about 10fps on low. I checked Task Manager, CPU usage was about 50% and EVE was using 1.3GB of RAM.
    No disconnects or crashes, but seemed like graphics performance was a bit slower than TQ, but less lag for sure. I would have to give this test a 4 on FPS performance compared to TQ.
    Overall was a fun experience, first mass test. Can't complain much except for the few people that can't follow directions, but what can you do.
    Cristalen
    Aliastra
    Gallente Federation
    #20 - 2011-11-10 21:19:29 UTC
    OS version: Windows 7 SP1
    CPU: Intel i3 550 running 3.2Ghz
    GPU:Nvidia GTX 460
    RAM: 6gb
    How many clients were you running at the same time? 3
    Graphic setting of the client (low / medium / high): medium

    User Experience

    Average FPS during fight at the gate in FD-MLJ, with brackets disabled - Zoomed out: 8-9fps
    Average FPS - Zoomed in:4-5
    On a scale of 1-10, how would you compare FPS and performance between this test and TQ? (1=way worse, 5=same, 10=OMG this is awesome) 3
    Did you experience any disconnects or crashes? no disconnects or crashes
    Describe your experience, make comments, suggestions, etc.: there were some issues with the brackets turning them selfs back on after turning them off. also when new people would jump in to the system it also appeared that the "backs off" wouldn't work with them as they'd appear with brackets around them. The new Cyno effect is awesome looking however extreamly random in which direction it goes in, I don't know if that's normal or not.
    123Next pageLast page