These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

CCP Why do nothing about ISBoxer

Author
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#81 - 2013-07-28 23:28:45 UTC  |  Edited by: S Byerley
Goldiiee wrote:
He doesn't know


By all means then, explain it.
Zeb DaMadMan2
Duckling System
#82 - 2013-07-29 00:19:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Zeb DaMadMan2
Goldiiee wrote:
[quote=S Byerley]
But I will leave you this, IF CCP's primary Motivation was making money, then they would have ended this game 5 years ago and built a new game with more current coding, and less weight; they could have reduced staff by 75% easily and raked in the money for five years then spit out another game, you might consider that their efforts to give free expansions, in game payments, annual conferences, and a player seated board are not conducive to a strong business model, those things are indicative more of a small family owned business than a corporate giant. Be happy CCP is not in this just for the money, you would notice the difference.

Thank you. <3, this is the only reason why I play eve. It feels like it has the only long term investment and as if the devs actually care for the game.

"As soon as we stop asking about the launcher design, CCP will assume we already love it.

We won't." - Eve Community

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#83 - 2013-07-29 19:57:52 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
Colonel Hans Landa wrote:
What, you mean like World of Warcraft?

No. You are wrong. There is a an infamous player (and a handful like him exist) who multiboxes 40+ accounts at a time and completely locks down PvP areas for the opposite faction. I can't be bothered finding you a twitch link but trust me he exists and also used to stream his activites on the regular. Blizzard are completely happy to allow this, who, like CCP, also have a very strict and no tolerance policy when it comes to "hacks", exploits, bots and all other sorts of illegitimate activities against the TOS.


WoW is a terrible example and it doesn't even support your point. ISBoxer falls under the "we can ban you for 3rd party software if we feel like it" bit of their EULA. Similarly, Blizzard's official stance is:

"some behavior of multiboxers can be reported"

Which translates to: "We'll ban you for it if you're pissing people off"

There are numerous instances, for example, of people ISBoxing most of a group and getting banned for pissing people off (by virtue of ISBoxer because it's fairly inefficient) in the auto-group-thingy-queue.

Colonel Hans Landa wrote:
I personally see no problem with it, as long as nothing is automated. It takes a bit of research and practice to get your Isboxer setup running efficiently and well, and there is no automation whatsoever.



You're stretching the definition of automation preeeeeeeetty darn thin. Is it not botting if I restrict the program up to only send a batch of actions to the server when I hit a key/move the mouse? I wouldn't mind making some ISK while I write a paper/browse the intraweb/play another game/ect. Heck, I'm at the keyboard almost 23/7 anyway.

Cipher Jones wrote:
Whats the advantage?

10 way split with 10x the loot is 1x rate of gain.

It gives CCP 9 extra subs.


Obviously, 10x manpower doesn't equate to 10x loot. I mean, the posted video is of soloing incursions. I'm all ears if you can't teach me to run incursions efficiently in a solo apoc.

He's also presumably buying PLEX with all the incursion money. I don't feel like having a bad economics discussion, but buying 9x PLEX does NOT directly equate to paying CCP 9x subscriptions.

(to reiterate: I have no problem with ISBoxer in Eve, but these arguments are terribad)


In what way is buying PLEX not the same as paying a sub. In actuallity a PLEX cost more than a normal sub, So paying with PLEX puts more cash in CCP's pocket.

It is completely irrelevant if the PLEX was paid for by the person or account it was used on. It was paid for either way. Now there are far more ways to spend a PLEX than just on game time, but every PLEX in game was paid for with real money. That PLEX represents 1 month of paid game time, no matter who paid for it, who used it, or what they used it for. if you use PLEX to sub your account, CCP was still paid for that month of game time. As I said, whether or not it was bought by the player that used it is irrelevant.

That being said, as far as I am concerned isboxer is as close to botting as you can get without completely removing the human element. You basically have an automated program than is watching your actions, and copying them onto multiple other clients. What is stoping you from pluging a keyboard emulator into isboxer and automating the whole thing. If they can detect botting programs than they can detect isboxer, but they can not see past isboxer to see if it is actually a human or a bot at the controls.

The big issue is this is a very slippery slope. They can not just blanket ban all third party programs. EVE wouyld be near unplayable with zero tolerance for 3rd party programs, hence the API and third party tools. Not to mention that would include things like fraps and mumble or teamspeak. It can be argued that groups that use third party voice coms had an unfair advantage just as much as isboxer users, over those who do not have access to such. But really voice coms programs do nothing to hurt the game, but infact encourage the social interaction the game designers want to see.

there are as many reasons to support isboxer as there are to ban it. We could argue about it for years and reach no agreement. In fact I believe its use has been argued about for years already. Regardless what anyone believes, CCP has decided they do not object to its use. It is there decision to make. We are playing their game. I you do not like how they decide to run the game, feel free to leave. Personally I believe they would lose far more subs if they banned isboxer than they would if every one that hates it left.
Enthropic
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#84 - 2013-07-29 21:01:02 UTC
I think what this forum needs, more than anything, are more whines about ISBoxer users.. Roll
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#85 - 2013-07-29 21:40:59 UTC
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:
It is completely irrelevant if the PLEX was paid for by the person or account it was used on. It was paid for either way. Now there are far more ways to spend a PLEX than just on game time, but every PLEX in game was paid for with real money. That PLEX represents 1 month of paid game time, no matter who paid for it, who used it, or what they used it for. if you use PLEX to sub your account, CCP was still paid for that month of game time. As I said, whether or not it was bought by the player that used it is irrelevant.


You're assuming that

A. The person paid CCP for the PLEX with the sole intention of selling it to you (not anyone else, you).

or

B. The person will turn around and buy another PLEX from CCP because you paid him ISK for the first.

You have no basis for that assumption and these are the only ways you'd get direct equivalence. In reality, your in-game purchase has some net effect on the real-money PLEX market as well as the subscription market. It could equate to more than $20 for CCP, it could equate to less than $20 for CCP, it could equate to nothing at all for CCP. I'd wager that it equates to less than $20 for CCP, but obviously we don't have enough information to judge.
Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#86 - 2013-07-29 23:59:03 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
You're assuming that

A. The person paid CCP for the PLEX with the sole intention of selling it to you (not anyone else, you).

I see your back; All PLEX are sold by CCP, this can be verified simply by the fact that it (The PLEX) can’t get in the game unless it’s made or authorised by CCP. Who the person is selling it to is obvious, a player interested in turning their hard earned ISK into Game-time.
S Byerley wrote:

B. The person will turn around and buy another PLEX from CCP because you paid him ISK for the first.

This doesn’t make any sense at all? If you’re in need of more ISK and not really good at making it in-game then I imagine another PLEX is the simple way to go. Still doesn’t affect anyone in game or in the real world.

S Byerley wrote:

You have no basis for that assumption and these are the only ways you'd get direct equivalence. In reality, your in-game purchase has some net effect on the real-money PLEX market as well as the subscription market. It could equate to more than $20 for CCP, it could equate to less than $20 for CCP, it could equate to nothing at all for CCP. I'd wager that it equates to less than $20 for CCP, but obviously we don't have enough information to judge.

‘The real money PLEX market’? How else do you think you can get a PLEX if not with real money? And the value of the PLEX is one month of game time or whatever ISK you can get on the ‘in-game market ‘(currently cheapest is 550mil). None of this changes the amount CCP gets for a PLEX, at this time it’s about $17 each unless you buy it from somewhere other than Account Management then the old adage ‘a fool and his money are soon parted’ applies.

I was implying that you should loosen the Tinfoil Hat not tighten it.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#87 - 2013-07-30 00:19:20 UTC  |  Edited by: S Byerley
Goldiiee wrote:
Who the person is selling it to is obvious, a player interested in turning their hard earned ISK into Game-time.


Exactly, and since the exchange would go on unhindered if you hadn't personally bought the PLEX, you can't assume a one-to-one correspondence.

Quote:
This doesn’t make any sense at all?


I agree. Unfortunately, your argument hinges on it.

Quote:
‘The real money PLEX market’? How else do you think you can get a PLEX if not with real money? And the value of the PLEX is one month of game time or whatever ISK you can get on the ‘in-game market ‘(currently cheapest is 550mil).


Are you trying to be cute with the air-quotes? It's ambiguous whether you mean buying the PLEX from CCP or on the in-game market if you don't specify.

Quote:
at this time it’s about $17 each unless you buy it from somewhere other than Account Management then the old adage ‘a fool and his money are soon parted’ applies.


I was obviously rounding; if you're just going to nit-pick in lieu of a coherent argument, I'd appreciate if you made good on your promise to leave.
Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#88 - 2013-07-30 01:21:34 UTC
Byerley, there is no great conspiracy going on here all the transactions are transparent PLEX are bought from CCP and honoured by CCP to be used as either game time for the buyer or sold for ISK and then used as either game time or ISK for that buyer.

You're not making any sense, and I have really tried to make sense of what it is you're on about but like I said it is just not making any sense. Can you be a little more clear of how you believe PLEX has anything to do with ISBoxer?

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Nadia Gallen
Dark-Rising
Wrecking Machine.
#89 - 2013-07-30 01:47:11 UTC
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:


In what way is buying PLEX not the same as paying a sub. In actuallity a PLEX cost more than a normal sub, So paying with PLEX puts more cash in CCP's pocket.

It is completely irrelevant if the PLEX was paid for by the person or account it was used on. It was paid for either way. Now there are far more ways to spend a PLEX than just on game time, but every PLEX in game was paid for with real money. That PLEX represents 1 month of paid game time, no matter who paid for it, who used it, or what they used it for. if you use PLEX to sub your account, CCP was still paid for that month of game time. As I said, whether or not it was bought by the player that used it is irrelevant.


I am finding it hard to start here.. so here goes.

I dont have problem with PLEX, I use to sell quite a few of them, when I could afford it, just for the fast ISK infusion, which allowed me to do more fun stuff.

Thankfully this topic isn't about PLEX's.

I dont have a problem with Alts or multiboxing either, I know quite alot of people there is multiboxing, and doing it quite well. Either with two screens or tabbing between two or more windows.

Thankfully this topic isn't about multiboxing.

Bugsy VanHalen wrote:

That being said, as far as I am concerned isboxer is as close to botting as you can get without completely removing the human element. You basically have an automated program than is watching your actions, and copying them onto multiple other clients. What is stoping you from pluging a keyboard emulator into isboxer and automating the whole thing. If they can detect botting programs than they can detect isboxer, but they can not see past isboxer to see if it is actually a human or a bot at the controls.


This I do agree with, what ISBoxing is, is an automated program, there is copying mouseclicks and keystrokes, to dublicate them to other clients to mimic your ship.

Bugsy VanHalen wrote:

The big issue is this is a very slippery slope. They can not just blanket ban all third party programs. EVE wouyld be near unplayable with zero tolerance for 3rd party programs, hence the API and third party tools. Not to mention that would include things like fraps and mumble or teamspeak. It can be argued that groups that use third party voice coms had an unfair advantage just as much as isboxer users, over those who do not have access to such. But really voice coms programs do nothing to hurt the game, but infact encourage the social interaction the game designers want to see.


You are right, they can't just ban ALL 3rd party programs. But they really should look very closely into this one when they get around to it, because it is so far into making a program play your game that it isn't even a grey area anymore.
You bring up some examples, so lets give them some context.

You are sitting in a site blowing up red dots, and Fraps stops working, can you still continue to play your game with your multibox's as efficient as you did before ?

You are sitting in a site blowing up red dots, and Mumble stops working, can you still continue to play your game with your multibox's as efficient as you did before ?

You are sitting in a site blowing up red dots, and Teamspeak stops working, can you still continue to play your game with your multibox's as efficient as you did before ?

You are sitting in a site blowing up red dots, and ISBox stops working, can you still continue to play your game with your multibox's as efficient as you did before ?

Can you spot which of the above examples, got a program playing their game for them ?

Bugsy VanHalen wrote:

there are as many reasons to support isboxer as there are to ban it. We could argue about it for years and reach no agreement. In fact I believe its use has been argued about for years already. Regardless what anyone believes, CCP has decided they do not object to its use. It is there decision to make. We are playing their game. I you do not like how they decide to run the game, feel free to leave. Personally I believe they would lose far more subs if they banned isboxer than they would if every one that hates it left.


Actually I dont think it will hurt EVE a whole lot if all their subs were banned, the minerals prices would go up a bit for a while, but that would be about it.



S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#90 - 2013-07-30 01:49:51 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:
Byerley, there is no great conspiracy going on here


You're the only one ranting about conspiracies. Honestly, I have no idea why.

Quote:
all the transactions are transparent PLEX are bought from CCP and honoured by CCP to be used as either game time for the buyer or sold for ISK and then used as either game time or ISK for that buyer.


OK?

Quote:
Can you be a little more clear of how you believe PLEX has anything to do with ISBoxer?


Can I just quote you instead? -

Goldiiee wrote:
Yes PLEX promotes ISBoxer, if this mechanic didn’t exist then there would be few people willing to spend $300, £200 or whatever your currency is to ‘Play’ what is essentially a second job.


How much revenue those in-game PLEX sales end up generating for CCP in the long run is another important (and obviously connected) topic.
Tauranon
Weeesearch
CAStabouts
#91 - 2013-07-30 02:47:17 UTC
S Byerley wrote:


Goldiiee wrote:
Yes PLEX promotes ISBoxer, if this mechanic didn’t exist then there would be few people willing to spend $300, £200 or whatever your currency is to ‘Play’ what is essentially a second job.


How much revenue those in-game PLEX sales end up generating for CCP in the long run is another important (and obviously connected) topic.


ISBoxer is not *that* important topic in plex sales. ie there are more people who will buy plex with isk if plex price drops due to less support from heavy iskboxers - ie having 500 isboxer accounts from 20 players stop subbing, will not cause 500 less plexes to be bought from CCP and sold for isk to other players in a month. The actual sensitivity is much smaller.

Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#92 - 2013-07-30 04:05:14 UTC
If ISBoxer could be applied to forum posting somehow it would be absolutely delicious.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Ge Hucel-Ge
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#93 - 2013-07-30 05:23:03 UTC
so what about the logitech and razer (eve sponsor?) macro keyboards/mouses? you can do the same stuff as with isboxer with them.

the real advantage of isboxer is, that its way more easy to setup and getting started. but the possibilities are almost the same (except the gamewindow formations, but you can do that with other tools).


so the reason to ban isboxer would be that it is easier to setup?




Zor'katar
Matari Recreation
#94 - 2013-07-30 12:50:58 UTC
S Byerley wrote:
How much revenue those in-game PLEX sales end up generating for CCP in the long run is another important (and obviously connected) topic.

I'm a bit puzzled by your comments, so I went back over your posts in this thread. The point you seem to be trying to make is that using PLEX to fund your account doesn't count as income for CCP because the money was potentially paid in the past. Why is it relevant when the money was actually paid?
JonnyRandom
#95 - 2013-07-30 13:10:59 UTC
Oh gosh, no way... I didn't think there'd be an ******* like this that does it in Eve.
This thing falls in the gray area that nobody seems to want to tackle, neither Blizzard, nor CCP, nor any other MMO developer.
But eventually somebody HAS to. And I'd rather it were CCP that did.
suid0
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#96 - 2013-07-30 13:25:19 UTC
Don't really see what the big deal is, the dude still has to actively play the game.

Your energy would probably be better spent crying about bots tbh.

the entire enemy support fleet is dead except for one interdictor a titan could easily finish off with drones  - Commander Ted

Bugsy VanHalen
Society of lost Souls
#97 - 2013-07-30 18:20:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Bugsy VanHalen
S Byerley wrote:
Bugsy VanHalen wrote:
It is completely irrelevant if the PLEX was paid for by the person or account it was used on. It was paid for either way. Now there are far more ways to spend a PLEX than just on game time, but every PLEX in game was paid for with real money. That PLEX represents 1 month of paid game time, no matter who paid for it, who used it, or what they used it for. if you use PLEX to sub your account, CCP was still paid for that month of game time. As I said, whether or not it was bought by the player that used it is irrelevant.


You're assuming that

A. The person paid CCP for the PLEX with the sole intention of selling it to you (not anyone else, you).

or

B. The person will turn around and buy another PLEX from CCP because you paid him ISK for the first.

You have no basis for that assumption and these are the only ways you'd get direct equivalence. In reality, your in-game purchase has some net effect on the real-money PLEX market as well as the subscription market. It could equate to more than $20 for CCP, it could equate to less than $20 for CCP, it could equate to nothing at all for CCP. I'd wager that it equates to less than $20 for CCP, but obviously we don't have enough information to judge.

You are missing the point.

Every PLEX in Game regardless of who owns it, bought it, sold it, used it for game time, used it for other account services or offers, every one was paid for with real money before it was generated in game. Every single PLEX represents a month of paid game time. Whether CCP got the money for that PLEX yesterday or 3 years ago is irrelivent. It is still one month of paid game time. Evey PLEX in game was paid for with real money. whether it is used for game time, horded, or destroyed, CCP was paid for that month of game time. It does not matter who i buy the PLEX from, CCP was paid cash for it when it was created.

And the price? WTF are you talking about? A PLEX costs about $20 to buy. I occasionally get them through a sale for $17. If you buy a large volume they can be even a little cheaper. I currently pay $39.95 for 3 months game time with auto payments, that works out to less than $14 per month. I think full price is around $15 per month.

So no matter how you look at it CCP gets paid more for a months game time purchased through PLEX then they do through a normal subscription. I expect this is to offset the fact that that PLEX could go months or years before the game time is claimed. But the value in real money is still there. The price fluctuations in game as to how much isk a PLEX is worth have no impact on the actual value of PLEX in real money. the Price of PLEX when bought with real money does not change, aside from special sales and discounts CCP occasionally offers. The in game market fluctuations do not change the value of PLEX in real money. If anything it is the opposite, The isk value of PLEX in game can be used to determine the actual value in game isk through conversion of PLEX. it is the value of isk that changes, not the value of PLEX.

The point is a month of game time is a month of game time. trying to say that someone who pays for game time through PLEX is less valuable to CCP than someone who pays a normal subscription is just wrong. A month of payed game time is a month of payed game time, CCP does not care where the money comes from, as long as the game time is paid. If the PLEX was bought 5 years ago, it was still payed for with real money, and still holds the same value when it is used.
Cipher Jones
The Thomas Edwards Taco Tuesday All Stars
#98 - 2013-07-31 06:59:40 UTC
JonnyRandom wrote:
Oh gosh, no way... I didn't think there'd be an ******* like this that does it in Eve.
This thing falls in the gray area that nobody seems to want to tackle, neither Blizzard, nor CCP, nor any other MMO developer.
But eventually somebody HAS to. And I'd rather it were CCP that did.


They ******* did, they allowed it.

internet spaceships

are serious business sir.

and don't forget it

Abyss Azizora
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#99 - 2013-07-31 07:51:05 UTC
This is all very simple.

CCP allows ISboxer because it makes them more money, and money is ALL a company cares about. (Every company does.) So they allowed it. Same with the old moniclegate and CEO letter leak, they flat out said they didn't give a sh*t what players wanted, till they lost 30% of the companies income because of it, then they did almost a 180 turn.

Till ISboxer and such causes them to LOSE money, they will continue to allow it, because it generates them more money.