These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

wormhole future ideas
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Justice Angel
Themis Argonauts
#1 - 2013-07-26 17:46:00 UTC
where is the best place to post for wormhole future ideas, I have found that the wormholes part of the forums is not the place to do it.
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#2 - 2013-07-26 17:57:04 UTC
Features & Ideas Discussion


Please don't get too upset if they don't respond well to your idea(s) either. There are a lot of people who dislike bad ideas.


Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Rek Seven
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2013-07-26 18:23:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Rek Seven
I prefer people to post wormhole related idea here, you just have to be careful to avoid subjects like:-

* Turning W-space into K-space
* Blobbing
* Too many blues

The wishlist is pretty much complete...
Justice Angel
Themis Argonauts
#4 - 2013-07-26 18:52:00 UTC
Well for starters they can bring back Deep Space probes, and put in comets like they said years ago for ice mining in WH's Pirate
Phoenix Jones
Small-Arms Fire
#5 - 2013-07-26 19:15:15 UTC
Justice Angel wrote:
Well for starters they can bring back Deep Space probes, and put in comets like they said years ago for ice mining in WH's Pirate


I don't see them coming back. There are quite a few who would like wormhole ice mining (well except the nullsec/lowsec/highsec people). Its been brought up... ALLOT. Most we got was a vague comment from Fozzie regarding it, and that they may explore it at a later date (I estimate year 2017).

I'll expand on your thread though (as I was just thinking it).

There has also been comments from Fozzie regarding the possibility of expanding wormhole space, making more wormholes that have no moons in it, making it not possible to anchor a pos in there and "stake a territorial claim".

Yaay!!!!
Ronix Aideron
Zymurgy Corp.
#6 - 2013-07-26 21:29:20 UTC
Phoenix Jones wrote:

I don't see them coming back. There are quite a few who would like wormhole ice mining (well except the nullsec/lowsec/highsec people). Its been brought up... A LOT. Most we got was a vague comment from Fozzie regarding it, and that they may explore it at a later date (I estimate year 2017).

I'll expand on your thread though (as I was just thinking it).

There has also been comments from Fozzie regarding the possibility of expanding wormhole space, making more wormholes that have no moons in it, making it not possible to anchor a pos in there and "stake a territorial claim".




There fixed it for you. Lol

Start the day off slow and taper off from there.

http://eveboard.com/pilot/Ronix_Aideron
Justice Angel
Themis Argonauts
#7 - 2013-07-26 22:08:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Justice Angel
That was just an example I have other idea's that are a bit more evil, and I know if it happen to me in my wh I would hate it, but A war of Attrition, would be a sick strategy, like a bomb that kills wh's in one or X number of shoots. Cutting off supply lines back to normal space no way out and no escape.
Messoroz
AQUILA INC
#8 - 2013-07-26 23:57:47 UTC
Basically, consider all your ideas pointless because CCP will just ignore it anyway and implement something else 5 years later.
Trinkets friend
Sudden Buggery
Sending Thots And Players
#9 - 2013-07-27 02:27:50 UTC
Why not have a system with no celestials at all? Just a black hole, and statics to fight on and a bunch of random gas sites. This would stop people making ISK off PI and setting up structures, which we all agree, are boring to grind. Indeed, a celestial-free system which is full of ladars would be awesome. Oh, oh, and special wormholes which you can take 20 supers through from nullsec, so all the mega-alliances can come be hardcore in w-space with their supers and titans.

~~ Localectomy Blog ~~
Paikis
Vapour Holdings
#10 - 2013-07-27 05:35:11 UTC
c7 wormholes. (Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems)
- No moons (no POSs)
- No Planets (no PI)
- Standard c6 sites, spawn as normal.

c7 Wormhole connections.
- All c7 holes have 1 Nullsec static, 1 c6 static and 1 c5 static.
- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass)
- Wormholes to/from c7 systems cannot support capital jumps.

Trolling may now commence, and you may call me bad.
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-07-27 06:03:32 UTC
Paikis wrote:
- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass)

>_<

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Angsty Teenager
Broski North
#12 - 2013-07-27 07:04:55 UTC
Quote:
- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass)


Except via thermal collapsing, amirite? Blink
Tul Breetai
Impromptu Asset Requisition
#13 - 2013-07-27 11:39:57 UTC
Angsty Teenager wrote:
Quote:
- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass)


Except via thermal collapsing, amirite? Blink


Bombs only add 1 billion Gg mass, wouldn't work on an infinite mass wh. I suggest you read the thread on it.

There's nothing worse than an EVE player, generally considered to be top of the food chain in the MMO world, that cannot smacktalk with wit and coherency.
Sorany
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2013-07-27 17:21:32 UTC
still waiting on modular POSs and the ability to change my sub-systems.

come to think about it, my subs will likely no longer be an issue soon due to this impending, not so impending, maybe, sometime, possible t3 nerf so scrap that. At this pace it looks like that feature will be obsolete long after we stop using t3s.....

right? lololol
Proclus Diadochu
Mar Sarrim
Red Coat Conspiracy
#15 - 2013-07-27 17:50:47 UTC
Paikis wrote:
(Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems)



Did I miss something?

Minister of High Society | Twitter: @autoritare

E-mail: diogenes.proc@gmail.com

My Blog: http://diogenes-club.blogspot.com/

The Diogenes Club | Join W-Space | Down The Pipe
Sorany
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#16 - 2013-07-27 19:40:33 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Paikis wrote:
(Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems)



Did I miss something?


clearly, we all have.
Asayanami Dei
Adhocracy Incorporated
Adhocracy
#17 - 2013-07-27 19:45:01 UTC
Class naming convention is originaly designating a wormhole TYPE not a system type. Wormholes leading to C5 systems are the actual C5's etc, highsec holes are C7's or something like that, basically that's what it originaly was back when CCP implemented it.

I'm a leaf on the wind, watch how I--THE CAPACITOR IS EMPTY

Youtube: /asayanami

Twitter: @asayanami

wormholefundamentals.com
Nix Anteris
The Dark Space Initiative
Scary Wormhole People
#18 - 2013-07-29 13:43:45 UTC
In terms of how system classes are stored in the database:
Highsec is class 7
Lowsec is class 8
Nullsec is class 9
Chester Floyd
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#19 - 2013-07-29 14:40:29 UTC
Paikis wrote:
c7 wormholes. (Change the name if c7 is an issue w/ existing c7 systems)
- No moons (no POSs)
- No Planets (no PI)
- Standard c6 sites, spawn as normal.

c7 Wormhole connections.
- All c7 holes have 1 Nullsec static, 1 c6 static and 1 c5 static.
- All wormholes to and from a c7 hole last for 4 hours and cannot be closed. (unlimited mass)
- Wormholes to/from c7 systems cannot support capital jumps.

Trolling may now commence, and you may call me bad.


Nothing new. You still want that bannana? Try again you little orge
Justice Angel
Themis Argonauts
#20 - 2013-07-29 17:45:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Justice Angel
Messoroz wrote:
Basically, consider all your ideas pointless because CCP will just ignore it anyway and implement something else 5 years later.


They don't always ignore there income lol, I mean fan base.

I really think they do try and put in what is asked for, if they get to it right away may be another question. It's fine if they don't from where I stand. I have been playing eve for 9yrs if this game has taught me anything, it would be that patience is a virtue, and all good things come to those who wait!
12Next page