These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[DUTY] AAR 19 JULY YC 115 -- Unprovoked attacks on PFDC by Diana Kim of State Protectorate

Author
Laria Raven
The Scope
#61 - 2013-07-23 19:14:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Laria Raven
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:


As a former Angel, I have to ask... do you seriously want a rabid dog under that banner?


I'm not sure I can see "serious" with a telescope on a nice clear night.

Fallen from grace. And as night comes, may flights of Angels visit your sleep... shoot your ships and steal all of your stuff.

Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#62 - 2013-07-23 23:38:18 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Noh, Desiderya you can take a long walk from a short pier into very deep water.


There's always a risk when you have an idiot on the line that the idiot will figure out things have gone bad and swim off. It's a small risk with an idiot as big as Rella, but there nonetheless. Fortunately, the risk did not materialize.

Let's review:

Electus Whatever attacked an ally in response to political drama. The ally fought off the attack and declined to go further, suggesting instead that the distressed calm down.

Ms. Kim attacked an ally in response to political drama. The ally fought off the attack and declined to go further, suggesting instead that the distressed calm down.

It should be apparent to anyone who is not an idiot, which is to say, not a member of Electus Whatever, that the band of halfwits in question stands in the same position as Ms. Kim, thereby making it *particularly* delicious that the band of halfwits' quarter wit decided to inject her dumb ass in this more recent development. Hers is an organization so devoid of insight that it cannot even recognize the parallel between its own actions and the actions of those it chooses to project its remarkable social and intellectual failures upon.
Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#63 - 2013-07-24 01:20:21 UTC
Every time Lady Noh speaks I like her more and more. Hopefully she will be spared in the future when society ends its current phase.
Rinai Vero
Blades of Liberty
#64 - 2013-07-24 04:12:57 UTC
Gosakumori Noh wrote:


Let's review:

Electus Whatever attacked an ally in response to political drama. The ally fought off the attack and declined to go further, suggesting instead that the distressed calm down.

Ms. Kim attacked an ally in response to political drama. The ally fought off the attack and declined to go further, suggesting instead that the distressed calm down.

It should be apparent to anyone who is not an idiot, which is to say, not a member of Electus Whatever, that the band of halfwits in question stands in the same position as Ms. Kim, thereby making it *particularly* delicious that the band of halfwits' quarter wit decided to inject her dumb ass in this more recent development. Hers is an organization so devoid of insight that it cannot even recognize the parallel between its own actions and the actions of those it chooses to project its remarkable social and intellectual failures upon.


Your "review" is purposefully reductive and your perspective obviously biased. Electus Matari didn't start the engagement in Colelie, the RSS fleet did, despite pleas from numerous parties including Electus Matari to stand down. True, in the heat of a battle they did not start, an Electus Matari fleet engaged Federation naval forces along with the RSS. This was done under direct orders from high ranking Republic commanders.

They later proceeded to make those orders public, and denounce them. But first they did their duty on the battlefield.

From where I stand, those are allies I'm proud to keep.

As for your comparison to Kim, it is almost as nonsensical as the woman herself. Kim's actions are part of no larger narrative than the fevered imaginings that feed her ego. Where the Matari have painfully begun to heal from their trauma, Kim has rejected every offered opportunity to do so.
Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#65 - 2013-07-24 13:27:45 UTC
Rinai Vero wrote:
From where I stand, those are allies I'm proud to keep.


Halfwits of a feather flocking together. Yes, doll, the Matari have done a *fabulous* job "healing" - oh, how long has it been now?

In truth, few can pull blankies woven from the hair of their dead grandmothers up over their heads and scream "no, you can't come to the funeral, she's our beloved leader now that she's dead at least" with more, what is the word - oh yes, "inbred hypocritical superficiality" - than they.

In fairness, I should give them some credit for using "jurisdiction" in complete sentences, however poorly.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#66 - 2013-07-24 14:13:32 UTC
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
Yes, doll, the Matari have done a *fabulous* job "healing"


Rehabilitation from an injury is not an easy process, nor without its setbacks. Even in the age of modern cellular regeneration therapy and cloned tissue transplants, learning to walk on a lost-and-replaced limb is not easy. I speak from personal experience. You have good days and bad days, moments when you go further and better than you managed before, days where you can barely stand up and stagger.

Is injury done to a culture expected to be any less traumatic or difficult to repair? The Amarr did metaphorically rip a few limbs off the Minmatar way of life, and went to great lengths to destroy their cultural heritage. Rehabilitation after such collective trauma should not be expected to be straightforward.

Every word you said in that sentence I quoted is correct. Your ironic tone is thoroughly inaccurate.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#67 - 2013-07-24 14:16:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Andrea Okazon
There is no greater tonic for Federation-Minmatar relations than the vicious racial supremacism and inbred sense of entitlement of the Imperialists.

Really, on a scale of one to many Diana Kims, Electus Matari barely rates a single ear. The constant, stunningly vicious comparison of the Minmatar to animals and idiots on the other hand is remarkably familiar.
Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#68 - 2013-07-24 15:10:45 UTC
I'm not sure how this turned from a discussion of Diana Kim into a discussion of the untrustworthiness of the Republic/Electus Matari, but I'll roll with it.

Rinai Vero wrote:
Electus Matari didn't start the engagement in Colelie, the RSS fleet did, despite pleas from numerous parties including Electus Matari to stand down. True, in the heat of a battle they did not start, an Electus Matari fleet engaged Federation naval forces along with the RSS. This was done under direct orders from high ranking Republic commanders.

They later proceeded to make those orders public, and denounce them. But first they did their duty on the battlefield.


There is a major difference between saying something and doing something, pilot Vero. While Electus Matari members stated that they were reluctant to fire, and that they were later regretful (and sometimes even sorrowful), that didn't stop them from actually pulling the trigger. Which, at the end of the day, is really all that matters. The Republic invaded the Federation (no matter how small the scale in comparison to the other things going on in the cluster). They fired upon Federation Naval vessels, and killed Federation citizens numbering in the tens of thousands. Electus Matari participated in this, and afterwards stated that they would continue to do their duty in supporting the Republic should it invade the Federation again.

I really don't see how that's any different than what pilot Kim did here, and I feel that Pyre's response is entirely appropriate.

Andrea Okazon wrote:
There is no greater tonic for Federation-Minmatar relations than the vicious racial supremacism and inbred sense of entitlement of the Imperialists.

Really, on a scale of one to many Diana Kims, Electus Matari barely rates a single ear. The constant, stunningly vicious comparison of the Minmatar to animals and idiots on the other hand is remarkably familiar.


Now this is an interesting driblette. I've heard the argument that the Federation should forgive the attack because the Amarr Empire is the greater threat, but I haven't heard the argument that the Federation should forgive the attack because the Amarr Empire constantly insult the Minmatar.

In all fairness, they don't really seem to throw these sorts of insults at the Amattar. Nor do they particularly go out of their way to insult Federation Matari. Sounds like what they're really doing is insulting the Republic, which is a different barnyard animal entirely.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Andrea Okazon
Laurentson INC
#69 - 2013-07-24 15:52:00 UTC
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
I'm not sure how this turned from a discussion of Diana Kim into a discussion of the untrustworthiness of the Republic/Electus Matari, but I'll roll with it.


I'm sure you will.

Quote:
Quote:
Electus Matari didn't start the engagement in Colelie, the RSS fleet did, despite pleas from numerous parties including Electus Matari to stand down. True, in the heat of a battle they did not start, an Electus Matari fleet engaged Federation naval forces along with the RSS. This was done under direct orders from high ranking Republic commanders.

They later proceeded to make those orders public, and denounce them. But first they did their duty on the battlefield.


There is a major difference between saying something and doing something, pilot Vero. While Electus Matari members stated that they were reluctant to fire, and that they were later regretful (and sometimes even sorrowful), that didn't stop them from actually pulling the trigger.


And how many times did you pull the trigger on your own people, let alone their allies, as a member of Pyre? And did you do so for any principle at all other than a thick wallet?

I don't mean to sound high and mighty; I'm not saying I'm better than you, ethically, or anyone else. I'm just baffled as to how you manage to sustain the feeling of moral outrage yourself. I strongly suspect you are responsible for the death of more Gallente navy crew than any member of Electus Matari.

Quote:
Now this is an interesting driblette. I've heard the argument that the Federation should forgive the attack because the Amarr Empire is the greater threat, but I haven't heard the argument that the Federation should forgive the attack because the Amarr Empire constantly insult the Minmatar.


Federals who value freedom will be reminded of their commitment to the Republic by the daily, unremitting taunts and jibes about how Minmatar are animals fit only for slavery. That these are primarily directed towards Minmatar actively defending their Republic is perhaps due to the fact that it is the Republic that most directly threatens the Amarr slaver fleets and the lucre they extract from the labour of their captives.

The war is not about insults, Shintoko. The insults remind us of the reasons for the war; the petty, self-regarding, greedy reasons.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#70 - 2013-07-24 16:17:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Shintoko Akahoshi wrote:
IThere is a major difference between saying something and doing something[...] While Electus Matari members stated that they were reluctant to fire, and that they were later regretful (and sometimes even sorrowful), that didn't stop them from actually pulling the trigger. Which, at the end of the day, is really all that matters. The Republic invaded the Federation (no matter how small the scale in comparison to the other things going on in the cluster). They fired upon Federation Naval vessels, and killed Federation citizens numbering in the tens of thousands. Electus Matari participated in this, and afterwards stated that they would continue to do their duty in supporting the Republic should it invade the Federation again.

I really don't see how that's any different than what pilot Kim did here, and I feel that Pyre's response is entirely appropriate.


The difference is that EM have expressed remorse, reluctance, and the hope never to find themselves in such a situation ever again.

Kim meanwhile has continued to lie, belittle, and decline to accept responsibility for her actions.

Your point seems to be that deed is more important than motive. But deeds are only the realisation of a motive, not somehow distinct and separate from them. If we are to look at two effectively identical actions, then the deciding factor about how we respond to each must be the motives which inspired them.

Duty is a motive which commands respect. Hatred is not.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#71 - 2013-07-24 16:31:28 UTC
Duty to a broken ideal is to be at best pitied, at worst eradicated. Not respected.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#72 - 2013-07-24 16:35:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
When are you quitting, then?

Lest I be accused of taking a cheap shot (which I did, but that's neither here nor there), I do have a serious point: Who am I to call your ideal broken, right?

Well, who are you to call theirs broken?

And why destroy what is broken that can be repaired?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Shintoko Akahoshi
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#73 - 2013-07-24 17:51:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Shintoko Akahoshi
Stitcher wrote:
The difference is that EM have expressed remorse, reluctance, and the hope never to find themselves in such a situation ever again.


For the sake of my old comrades in arms, I'm taking this particular argument to a different thread. Let's talk about Colelie there, leave this for Pyre and Kim.

Bio and writing

(Nothing I say is indicative of corporate policy unless otherwise stated)

Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#74 - 2013-07-24 18:33:22 UTC
I regret (nearly) every single life I have been forced to take in defence of the State. Despite my relative newness to the Militia and to space in general (stlll less t han a year) it is a heartbreakingly large number.

Nontheless I am judged on my actions more than my feellings regarding them.

Shintoko Akahoshi was only a sometime member of Pyre Falcon (although a valued colleague during her service.) I would be surprised if she was responsible for the deaths of more than a hundred FDU Militia crew while she was with us. I suspect the actual number to be much lower than that.

An Electus Matari pilot who took part in the destruction of even a single Moros class Dreadnought is responsible for the deaths of a hundred times that number of people. I'm not judging them for what they did, beyond saying that it was their duty and that I've been in the same place myself. There is a reason why I never tabulated the full number of Federation Navy crew whose deaths I participated directly in at the Third Battle of Caldari Prime. Nontheless, to apply some sort of equivalence in this case is foolish and for more than the reasons Shintoko herself lists in her thread.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Evi Polevhia
Phoenix Naval Operations
Phoenix Naval Systems
#75 - 2013-07-24 18:48:14 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
When are you quitting, then?

Lest I be accused of taking a cheap shot (which I did, but that's neither here nor there), I do have a serious point: Who am I to call your ideal broken, right?

Well, who are you to call theirs broken?

And why destroy what is broken that can be repaired?


I wasn't necissarily calling theirs broken. It was more of a general statement that just because someone has unwavering duty and conviction doesn't mean it is good. And while I do prefer to mend when possible, some things simply need replacement. CEO's and Presidents are replaced, why not sense of duty and ideals?
Diana Kim
State Protectorate
Caldari State
#76 - 2013-07-24 21:13:49 UTC
Stitcher wrote:

Kim meanwhile has continued to lie, belittle, and decline to accept responsibility for her actions.

Lie? Point where. Well, fun thing to say about in a thread, full of lies of others about me. Even your own. In this exact line. Because, unlike you, I can accept what does it take to kill someone. I can kill others, but on other hand, I am prepared to take the responsibility and be killed for what I do.

And, my dear enemies. You can hide yourself in your precious Federation space. You can send your spies into our militia. You can disguise yourself among our ranks. You can run away looking for empty systems to live. But know this: while I am alive, there will be no safe place for you.

All enemies of the State will die.

Honored are the dead, for their legacy guides us.

In memory of Tibus Heth, Caldari State Executor YC110-115, Hero and Patriot.

Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#77 - 2013-07-24 23:38:34 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Gosakumori Noh wrote:
Yes, doll, the Matari have done a *fabulous* job "healing"


Every word you said in that sentence I quoted is correct. Your ironic tone is thoroughly inaccurate.


There is irony *somewhere* in the above, yes....
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#78 - 2013-07-25 01:02:48 UTC
I believe at this stage, the fact that Kim-guri suffers from mental illness is evident. Whether the emotions the woman elicits is pity, scorn, anger or revulsion it should be noted that she does not speak with their wits or senses. Kim-guri suffers from the delusions that she is not in fact a criminal terrorist for their support of Tibus Heth and the Templis Dragonaurs in addition to the paranoia that enemies exist under every rock when in fact they exist only in the fevers of their own imagination. There can be no negotiating with political extremists and terrorists like Kim-guri for in knowing only hatred, intolerance and violence they become incapable of introspection or compromise.

There is no difference between Diana Kim and the Templis Dragonaurs; Matari insurgent terror cells; or Gallentean eco-warriors. They believe only in the advancement of their political agendas through violence and intimidation. The most effective method to disabuse such thinking is simply to remain resolute to ones own convictions in the face of it.

I believe this communique has served its purpose in making it clear that myself and the Pyre Falcon Defence Combine shall remain steadfast in armed service to the Caldari State through principled and measured actions against its enemies. Even if those enemies are nothing more than Provists who believe the tin-pot ranks of a militia will grant legitimacy and credence to their ignorant violence, or whom just like their Dear Leader Tibus Heth believe that their present irrelevancy is due to the majority of Caldari citizens having betrayed them when in fact it was they who rejected everything that it means to be a citizen of the State in the first instance.

Nothing further needs to be said.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Arkady Vachon
The Gold Angels
Sixth Empire
#79 - 2013-07-25 02:10:26 UTC
Pieter Tuulinen wrote:
There is a reason why I never tabulated the full number of Federation Navy crew whose deaths I participated directly in at the Third Battle of Caldari Prime.


I've never kept track,of the ships crews that go up and go with the ship when it blows. At the same time it's too easy for a pilot to only think that they are shooting at a piece of metal, another ship, or, at best, another capsuleer. Crews die as part of space warfare, subjected to a horrible death in the dark, but I would never take pride in it, or keep track of a statistic like that.

Before I was tested to be capsule compatible I was a Federal Marine. I've killed men and women up close, pirates, even Caldari ground forces. It's different, seeing the look in their eyes when you shoot them down or have to kill them in hand to hand, and you remember that. You don't forget that these were people with hopes, dreams, family, and lives just like you, thrown into this circumstance by war. It's regrettable having to kill someone else like that - Pirates are one thing, because of some of the stuff they do, but a soldier, even a Caldari, is quite another.

I may be blind now, but I can still see those people in my mind's eye.

You do not forget these are people, because the moment that you do, you lose just a little more of your humanity.

The same goes with pod pilots, we walk a tightrope at times, our immortal status threatening to slip us from human to unfeeling, uncaring monster.

I guess that is why I mostly fly cargo ships - I've seen enough killing in my lifetime. Sometimes it is necessary, but never a thing to enjoy.

Nothing Personal - Just Business...

Chaos Creates Content

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#80 - 2013-07-25 12:57:23 UTC
There's nothing "monstrous" about being able to kill and not care. On the contrary, to do so is very, very human We're internecine predators by our very nature. The fact that we're even capable of killing our own at all is testament to that.

You have to remember that for all we plug it into giant warships nowadays and send copies of it zipping about the place on quantum wings, the human brain presumably evolved in the unrelenting dirt and death of a planetary ecosystem, long ago. We're well attuned for chaos and slaughter. We thrive on them.

So no, there's nothing monstrous about callousness, unless you believe that humanity is monstrous. If we hold ourselves to a higher standard, then that's good, but let's not get all melancholy over our nature. Accept what you are, and strive to be something more. I'm not saying that callousness is good, just that it's a part of our psyche and needs to be recognised for what it is: integral to the human brain, rather than some leeching alien impulse.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders