These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why nerf high sec?

First post First post
Author
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#381 - 2013-07-22 19:21:48 UTC  |  Edited by: ISD Flidais Asagiri
Well I'm not butthurt if you are providing my entertainment for the day. My goal is get you to get mad and post more for my sole entertainment. So fare it seems I am achieving that goal. I'm just pointing out how bad everyone looks as they keep trying to justify their world view to other people.

I'm not doing that. I don't give a damn what other people think because I know it does not matter because no matter what we say its not going to change anything major. Again, I'm just trying to get entertainment at this point.

Thank you.

POST EDITED: Be careful as you have advertised that you are blatantly trolling a thread. This is against forum rule# 26,22,5. Please post constructively

ISD Flidais Asagiri

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#382 - 2013-07-22 19:24:27 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Oh lordy. People are still uppity and all mad that people have contrary opinions.

I should remind and point out that if you haven't noticed that CCP never comments in these types of threads about the subject directly and never take a side. (Although this sentence could be construed as a troll to get them to post to force them to state their real opinion on the matter which would be massively entertaining and cause a poop storm in itself)

This probably means that CCP is being diplomatic which means they aren't throwing hi-sec under the bus anytime soon.

You can whine and moan and mash on the keyboard all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that hi-sec is here to stay and probably won't get any major nerfs to your satisfaction. The fact you have made this thread to 19 pages is sadly hilarious. I can just imagine how frustrated you are to have to keep posting and posting to justify your worldview.

Sure CCP might down the road balance hi-sec and null-sec and make some changes but I don't really think they are going to change the game completely just because you make another thread about it.

You people seriously think that CCP is going to listen to one side in a massively heated debate that must be handled with tact. You can't simply **** a large section of your player base to please another section. You have to please both which means they aren't going to implement all the changes you want. They might implement a small tiny few, but I keep pointing out the exhumer buff happened despite your massive threadnaughts. Why do you think that you threadnaughts now will make a difference?


Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*
Matokin Lemant
#383 - 2013-07-22 19:27:31 UTC
In my humble opinion...and it’s just that an opinion.

All ccp needs to do do in order to make hi-sec harder is give the NPC’s (in belts and missions) is to buff there damage and tank. And put larger ships in the belts, instead of just frigates. That way the industry guys can’t just sit there and perma tank, they will NEED to have protection in the way of someone to dispose of the NPC’s.

Second with a harder (more dps + tank) smarter lvl 4 and 5 mission NPC’s the later become much harder combine this with more ewar thrown in. Then they will take longer to do (solo) and the risk vs reward will be more...in line with what it should be. Because of this more people will run in groups which will line up with CCP’s initiative to have more people doing things together.

Before someone tries to turn this around...Yes I do missions and I will be the first to admit that they are way to easy right now specially in a marauder or pirate BS granted you can’t afk them like you once could with drones but its pretty darn close.

I think some of you are just auguring about the rebalance because you can...or are one of the people who enjoy an easy game like WOW *ducks* this is eve and I was under the impression it was supposed to be harder?
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#384 - 2013-07-22 19:30:00 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*


Lol. Thanks.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#385 - 2013-07-22 19:35:26 UTC
Quote:
Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*


Considering, thanks to that feminism thread, that I KNOW you are black and southern (and a cop), this just made me laugh so hard that I bit my tongue. You sir, win the thread.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#386 - 2013-07-22 19:37:42 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*


Considering, thanks to that feminism thread, that I KNOW you are black and southern (and a cop), this just made me laugh so hard that I bit my tongue. You sir, win the thread.


I really do like Banjo music though. Don't tell my family Big smile
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#387 - 2013-07-22 20:15:08 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*


Considering, thanks to that feminism thread, that I KNOW you are black and southern (and a cop), this just made me laugh so hard that I bit my tongue. You sir, win the thread.


I really do like Banjo music though. Don't tell my family Big smile


Lol. Well you gave me a good laugh. You aren't all bad. Even though I disagree with your world view.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Uma D
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#388 - 2013-07-22 20:54:38 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*


Considering, thanks to that feminism thread, that I KNOW you are black and southern (and a cop), this just made me laugh so hard that I bit my tongue. You sir, win the thread.


I really do like Banjo music though. Don't tell my family Big smile


Lol. Well you gave me a good laugh. You aren't all bad. Even though I disagree with your world view.


Shush now, or I will have to take out the electroshock collar!
Bill Overbeck
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#389 - 2013-07-23 00:51:32 UTC
Uma D wrote:
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Quite you, I sold you already and the new master dislikes uppity Amarrian slaves. Behave yourself or it's off to the shed with you.

*banjo music plays in background*


Considering, thanks to that feminism thread, that I KNOW you are black and southern (and a cop), this just made me laugh so hard that I bit my tongue. You sir, win the thread.


I really do like Banjo music though. Don't tell my family Big smile


Lol. Well you gave me a good laugh. You aren't all bad. Even though I disagree with your world view.


Shush now, or I will have to take out the electroshock collar!


That makes me so moist.
CanI haveyourstuff
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#390 - 2013-07-23 06:19:42 UTC
Matokin Lemant wrote:
I think some of you are just auguring about the rebalance because you can...or are one of the people who enjoy an easy game like WOW *ducks* this is eve and I was under the impression it was supposed to be harder?


stupid ideas.. not even going to comment on them.

but that wow part, well well well.... wow is alot harder than eve. Maybe you havent seen endgame.

losing ship and fit in eve pvp does not make eve hard Big smile
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#391 - 2013-07-23 07:24:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
I will try out some escalations in my next jaunt to 0.0 in Sansha space to check how much I make, though this depends on how busy the space is. I have noted that I took the comment from others that the escalations were better in other regions and used my own experience in alliance fleets doing Blood Raiders 10/10's as indicative of the drops, which you pointed out was the error in my assumptions which I accept. From what you said its as low as 150m and as high as 3bn. The conclusion I have drawn from what you have said is that the players who said that the other escalations were better, were talking about more attractive loot than a large amount of T2 Salvage, such as pirate faction BS BPC's. But whatever the value it can at times be a massive increase to the value of 0.0 ratting, surely you cannot deny that.

Back to your Incusrion point, you said that you were dual or triple boxing incursions, you must have a very high concentration level, and must be working with multiple monitors. The speed at which the rats go down in a good fleet means that you have a hell of a click fest if you are triple boxing without Iboxer (I think that is what its called.) How many normal players do what you are doing, I have done quite a few incrusions but mainly with corp/alliance mates and none of them triple or even dual boxed. This may be the behaviour of a certain tier of incursion runner, but is that the way that most people do incursions, mostly they pimp out one toon for it.

So what are you comparing based on a single toon, 80m to 100m an hour for an incursion vs someone carrier ratting in 0.0 which can be 80m an hour as a reasonable average, taking into account interruptions etc. On top of that there will be faction drops and of course escalations, which can be 150m to 3bn in most regions and 400m to 1.2bn in drone space.

As you are in a 0.0 alliance you should be happy that people can make ISK in HS so that they can chance their arm in 0.0 or low sec, just because some people earn massive amounts of ISK and use that as a measure of their success or failure makes no odds to me and a significant proportion of the HS player base, why should our fun be attacked because some people can triple box incusuions for hours at a time. Many of us use HS to make ISK because in the main 0.0 is controlled by people that we do not want to be part of, often I go to 0.0 to have fun and accept a much lower ISK per hour based on safety, but at times I have been in 0.0 and been able to milk it for real ISK and made billions.

And the issue is how many people can stand doing incursions, I do them quite rarely now, because I found them so damn boring before the nerf, which gets to the next point, if you nerf earning in HS to match some sort of risk/reward touchy feeling type thing then you make people have to grind a lot more and some players might look at it and say, damn that they are attacking my game play I will try that new game and off they go.

This nerf HS chant of soldier ants from 0.0 is very tedious and stupid, its a sandbox to have fun in, not a sandbox based on 0.0 players assessment of risk and reward, they should HTFU and play the game.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#392 - 2013-07-23 07:40:06 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


And the issue is how many people can stand doing incursions, I do them quite rarely now, because I found them so damn boring before the nerf, which gets to the next point, if you nerf earning in HS to match some sort of risk/reward touchy feeling type thing then you make people have to grind a lot more and some players might look at it and say, damn that they are attacking my game play I will try that new game and off they go.



So why do you think it is fine for null sec income to be nerfed year on year while high sec stays unchanged or even buffed?

We have taken our hits and its only fair for the sake of risk vs reward balance that high sec also be altered in the same way.
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#393 - 2013-07-23 07:42:44 UTC
I disagree with all of you, therefore I'm right and you guys are all wrong.

Because I'm better than you all.

Because my mom told me I was special.

Because I'm an anonymous internet nerd and I can .I. U

Lol

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

duglas Luven
Hell Forge Industries
#394 - 2013-07-23 07:48:13 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


And the issue is how many people can stand doing incursions, I do them quite rarely now, because I found them so damn boring before the nerf, which gets to the next point, if you nerf earning in HS to match some sort of risk/reward touchy feeling type thing then you make people have to grind a lot more and some players might look at it and say, damn that they are attacking my game play I will try that new game and off they go.



So why do you think it is fine for null sec income to be nerfed year on year while high sec stays unchanged or even buffed?

We have taken our hits and its only fair for the sake of risk vs reward balance that high sec also be altered in the same way.

High sec is why alot of people keep playing eve. Ever troll a belt and see 3 ships mining away that is 3 accounts paid by 1 person. that person is off making lunch, taking a dump, at work, cleaning house, you get the point. CCP wants that it's money in their pockets. Either that guy Plexs those accounts or it get hit with a $45 charge to his credit card. Money Money Money.
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#395 - 2013-07-23 08:16:05 UTC
duglas Luven wrote:

High sec is why alot of people keep playing eve. Ever troll a belt and see 3 ships mining away that is 3 accounts paid by 1 person. that person is off making lunch, taking a dump, at work, cleaning house, you get the point. CCP wants that it's money in their pockets. Either that guy Plexs those accounts or it get hit with a $45 charge to his credit card. Money Money Money.


The same was said when they nerfed incursions, and when they changed ice, and when they changed exploration and every single time the ban hammer has landed on bots and when FW income was nerfed.

People wont quit because level 4 mission income is nerfed to a more balanced level.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#396 - 2013-07-23 08:16:50 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:


And the issue is how many people can stand doing incursions, I do them quite rarely now, because I found them so damn boring before the nerf, which gets to the next point, if you nerf earning in HS to match some sort of risk/reward touchy feeling type thing then you make people have to grind a lot more and some players might look at it and say, damn that they are attacking my game play I will try that new game and off they go.



So why do you think it is fine for null sec income to be nerfed year on year while high sec stays unchanged or even buffed?

We have taken our hits and its only fair for the sake of risk vs reward balance that high sec also be altered in the same way.


Quite frankly the most stupid decision I saw by CCP was the nerfing of 0.0 ratting by making true sec status so important and reduce the benefit of upgrades, at a single stroke they removed many small and medium sized alliances out of 0.0. So what you are saying is that because CCP made a stupid decision in 0.0 they should make another stupid one in HS based on your feeling about risk and reward.

I know how badly this impacted 0.0, because at one point I was using a low level 0.0 system or two to rat in and saw the catastrophic change up close and personal.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#397 - 2013-07-23 08:22:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Dracvlad
baltec1 wrote:
duglas Luven wrote:

High sec is why alot of people keep playing eve. Ever troll a belt and see 3 ships mining away that is 3 accounts paid by 1 person. that person is off making lunch, taking a dump, at work, cleaning house, you get the point. CCP wants that it's money in their pockets. Either that guy Plexs those accounts or it get hit with a $45 charge to his credit card. Money Money Money.


The same was said when they nerfed incursions, and when they changed ice, and when they changed exploration and every single time the ban hammer has landed on bots and when FW income was nerfed.

People wont quit because level 4 mission income is nerfed to a more balanced level.


They over nerfed incursions and adjusted them back up.

The ice changes have not impacted yet as there are huge stockpiles, however the first issue will be Liquid Ozone in High Sec.

Exploration, can't comment on that too much, I just did the odd one.

Bans on bots, damn right.

FW income nerfed, are you talking about the Goon manipulation or something else, as far as I can see FW income is still pretty good.

And what the hell is nerfing level 4's to a balanced level, they are as boring as hell and not that great in terms of ISK generation, balanced against what, belt ratting in 0.0, I much prefer belt ratting to missions.

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Josef Djugashvilis
#398 - 2013-07-23 08:31:42 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
duglas Luven wrote:

High sec is why alot of people keep playing eve. Ever troll a belt and see 3 ships mining away that is 3 accounts paid by 1 person. that person is off making lunch, taking a dump, at work, cleaning house, you get the point. CCP wants that it's money in their pockets. Either that guy Plexs those accounts or it get hit with a $45 charge to his credit card. Money Money Money.


The same was said when they nerfed incursions, and when they changed ice, and when they changed exploration and every single time the ban hammer has landed on bots and when FW income was nerfed.

People wont quit because level 4 mission income is nerfed to a more balanced level.


Stop whinging.

This is not a signature.

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#399 - 2013-07-23 08:38:21 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:


They over nerfed incursions and adjusted them back up.



They just nerfed them again

Dracvlad wrote:

The ice changes have not impacted yet as there are huge stockpiles, however the first issue will be Liquid Ozone in High Sec.


They have made it worth doing in null/low and ended infinate ice in high sec.

Dracvlad wrote:

Exploration, can't comment on that too much, I just did the odd one.


The stopped t3s from the better high sec sites and made it so that you are better rewarded for doing them in low and null.

Dracvlad wrote:

FW income nerfed, are you talking about the Goon manipulation or something else, as far as I can see FW income is still pretty good.

We spotted a way to make heaps of isk but CCP ignored us untill we went and did it (we got disgustingly rich) and CCP nerfed it hard. Its still good isk but nothing on what it was.

[quote=Dracvlad]
And what the hell is nerfing level 4's to a balanced level, they are as boring as hell and not that great in terms of ISK generation, balanced against what, belt ratting in 0.0, I much prefer belt ratting to missions.


You will make a lot more in level 4s than with belt ratting. Infact level 4s are not far off anoms in terms of income for your average line member.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#400 - 2013-07-23 08:52:57 UTC
The only real reason to shoot belt rats is to grind sec status.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016