These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So why do people hate cloaking?

First post
Author
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#541 - 2013-07-22 18:53:25 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#542 - 2013-07-22 18:55:09 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:


There is no ability to WIN or LOSE an opinion based thread.


You're proving the above wrong every time you post lol.

You're losing the argument, as evidenced by the fact that ONLY YOU talk about winning or losing. Hint, people who are winning don't spend time telling you they are winning, they just keep on winnning.

Besides, CCP give a free plex for the best forum warrior every day. I know, I once like 6 times last month, I guess Tippia and malcanis were both on vacation or something.... Twisted
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#543 - 2013-07-22 18:55:21 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Again though, this is opinion. You can't say you are right and everyone against you is wrong, that's arrogance plain and simple. There are people with opinions on both sides, neither is right or wrong.
You can;t say because it is change it is wrong because there have been thousands and thousands of changes made to EVE since it's beginning to change the way things work. In this case it would be in my opinion changing it for the better. In your opinion its a bad change. That's how thing stand, 2 opinions, no rights and wrongs.

There is a different between standing up for your opinions and being opinionated. Being opinionated is being arrogant about the worth of your opinions over others.


Nope. What you are trying to do, is just handwave it all and say "Oh well, difference of opinion!". You are trying to create some kind of equivalency between the two, as if you can prop up the wrong argument by saying that everything is just everyone's opinion.

Nevermind that all opinions are not created equal (an opinion not based in facts is properly called a delusion), but in this case it simply does not apply.

No, what I'm trying to say is your opinions are not automatically greater than anyone else's. Undoubtedly here is where you say your opinions are more important, because you hide behind an alt while you troll all day.
Oh yeah cos free speech and all that. As long as you don't have to have any conviction behind your words.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#544 - 2013-07-22 18:56:48 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


There is no ability to WIN or LOSE an opinion based thread.


You're proving the above wrong every time you post lol.

You're losing the argument, as evidenced by the fact that ONLY YOU talk about winning or losing. Hint, people who are winning don't spend time telling you they are winning, they just keep on winnning.

Besides, CCP give a free plex for the best forum warrior every day. I know, I once like 6 times last month, I guess Tippia and malcanis were both on vacation or something.... Twisted

IN YOUR OPINION, I am losing. Just because the majority of people that post on the forums are trolls doesn't change anything.
Just spewing the arrogance into every post. *slow clap*

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Plastic Psycho
Necro-Economics
#545 - 2013-07-22 18:57:01 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Plastic Psycho wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Ah yes. The afk cloaker assumes zero risk...that is until he is not afk and decides to uncloak on what he thinks, assumes, or hopes is an unsuspecting victim....funny thing is, that endeaver is not a 100% guarantee...there is indeed a risk.

But while he is afk he assumes no risk. You admit it. And that's the only bit we want to see changed. Once he's no longer AFK, his risk should remain unchanged.

And how, pray tell, shall CCP determin he's AFK?

When I monitor a chokepoint, I don't monkey with the client. I just sit and watch. How will you know if *I* am AFK or not..? You can't know, one way or another. Neither can CCP.

Give over. Your cause is not only pointless, it's lost, too.

Erm... no?
The suggestion was simple. Make a way to decloak and warp to a cloaker, but make it take time and be easily avoidable by an active cloaking player... Please read the thread before commenting with no clue.

There is no ability to WIN or LOSE an opinion based thread.

Apparently, you're the one who hasn't read the thread - I've been here all along:

Your percieved need has been categorically rejected; repeatedly, and with evidence.
There are existing ways to cope with a cloaker.
There is no need to change the game.
If you cannot handle someone making spooky noises in the attic, play another game, or upgrade your thinking.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#546 - 2013-07-22 18:58:26 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?

I can think of way, but there's risk and reward. It's more of a risk to engage and offers little to no reward, so it's a pointless endeavour. Bearing in mind we were a industry heavy corp so our PvP wing was small.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#547 - 2013-07-22 18:59:52 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?


Here you start to see the mental barriers the guy has to prevents him from being rational.

I've caught nullfied T3s before, with a Dramiel and drone swarm. It works the same way with any cloaky, it's rare and not easy, but you can ruin their day because they thought they were "invulnerable" lol.

I've also intentionally baited hotdroppers, Ratting Domis have LOTS of high slots, and cynos only take one of them lol. We killed 2 panthers doing this, BLOPS no likey Carriers.

That this kell guy is so uncreative as to not even consider different tactical options is no surprise. Many of us have suggested counters.

But like i said, they don't want solutions, they want hand holding.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#548 - 2013-07-22 19:01:11 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?

I can think of way, but there's risk and reward. It's more of a risk to engage and offers little to no reward, so it's a pointless endeavour. Bearing in mind we were a industry heavy corp so our PvP wing was small.


Mercenaries?

Friends?

Multiboxing pvp alts?

Your corps limitations were self imposed, like all such limitations in EVE.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#549 - 2013-07-22 19:01:31 UTC
Quote:
But like i said, they don't want solutions, they want hand holding.


Reposting for emphasis. People need to quit with the welfare state, entitlement-minded nonsense, and just play the damn game.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#550 - 2013-07-22 19:01:37 UTC
Plastic Psycho wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Plastic Psycho wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Ah yes. The afk cloaker assumes zero risk...that is until he is not afk and decides to uncloak on what he thinks, assumes, or hopes is an unsuspecting victim....funny thing is, that endeaver is not a 100% guarantee...there is indeed a risk.

But while he is afk he assumes no risk. You admit it. And that's the only bit we want to see changed. Once he's no longer AFK, his risk should remain unchanged.

And how, pray tell, shall CCP determin he's AFK?

When I monitor a chokepoint, I don't monkey with the client. I just sit and watch. How will you know if *I* am AFK or not..? You can't know, one way or another. Neither can CCP.

Give over. Your cause is not only pointless, it's lost, too.

Erm... no?
The suggestion was simple. Make a way to decloak and warp to a cloaker, but make it take time and be easily avoidable by an active cloaking player... Please read the thread before commenting with no clue.

There is no ability to WIN or LOSE an opinion based thread.

Apparently, you're the one who hasn't read the thread - I've been here all along:

Your percieved need has been categorically rejected; repeatedly, and with evidence.
There are existing ways to cope with a cloaker.
There is no need to change the game.
If you cannot handle someone making spooky noises in the attic, play another game, or upgrade your thinking.

With evidence? Someone saying "YOU ARE WRONG, DO IT THIS WAY" isn't evidence.
And still you don't read the thread. If you did you'd know that I do two things in EVE. Trading and PvP. Neither of those two things are affected by afk cloakers. I'm simply backing the other guys that believe this is an issue (and there are a LOT of them, hence the weekly thread on the matter).

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#551 - 2013-07-22 19:04:52 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?


I can think of way, but there's risk and reward. It's more of a risk to engage and offers little to no reward, so it's a pointless endeavour. Bearing in mind we were a industry heavy corp so our PvP wing was small.


You've got to be kidding me. ...oh, ok so I made it down to the bottom and see that your pvp wing is small. Fair enough.

You are paying a local alliance for space, right? Maybe try convoing one of those guys and say, look. I got a cyno bait ship waiting to set a counter-drop trap, and this player, "player x", has hotdropped on us in the last month. They like to bring in shiny supercarriers to pick on our ratting ships.

If your alliance has any pvp players worth their salt, their response should be something along the lines of, ok....ok....we're on our titan, lets go fishing, and their comms will be lulzy with anticipation.

And assuming they dont bring in shiny ships, Im sure the alliance, assuming they're not knee deep in a war, will be willing to supply an appropriate counter to what the expected drop is. Those guys are usually looking for stuff like this because quite franklly, counter-drop kills are epic. Smile

Also depending on what subcaps they might bring in, even a small pvp gang can mess them up with a handful of bombers and one brave interdictor soul who will bubble their hotdrop fleet.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#552 - 2013-07-22 19:05:21 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?

I can think of way, but there's risk and reward. It's more of a risk to engage and offers little to no reward, so it's a pointless endeavour. Bearing in mind we were a industry heavy corp so our PvP wing was small.


Mercenaries?

Friends?

Multiboxing pvp alts?

Your corps limitations were self imposed, like all such limitations in EVE.

Did I say there were no other ways of it being dealt with? No
Did I say there was no problem with the way the corp handled PvP? No

Yes there are many ways to deal with the situation. One of them is move to an alternate system. That was the fastest, easiest and most rewarding choice, so we would take it.

Now you are nto only trying to explain that you opinion on cloaking is right and mine is wrong, but now you are trying to tell me how an old corp of mine should have conducted it's affairs... And who are you? Nobody, that's who.

Take your arrogance and condescending tone and shove it up your ass.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#553 - 2013-07-22 19:05:45 UTC
Quote:
With evidence? Someone saying "YOU ARE WRONG, DO IT THIS WAY" isn't evidence.
And still you don't read the thread. If you did you'd know that I do two things in EVE. Trading and PvP. Neither of those two things are affected by afk cloakers. I'm simply backing the other guys that believe this is an issue (and there are a LOT of them, hence the weekly thread on the matter).


So, you have no personal experience in the matter, which somehow gives you the intellectual authority to disqualify arguments by fiat that are being made by people who actually have a clue what they are talking about?

Is that about right?

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#554 - 2013-07-22 19:06:16 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


There is no ability to WIN or LOSE an opinion based thread.


You're proving the above wrong every time you post lol.

You're losing the argument, as evidenced by the fact that ONLY YOU talk about winning or losing. Hint, people who are winning don't spend time telling you they are winning, they just keep on winnning.

Besides, CCP give a free plex for the best forum warrior every day. I know, I once like 6 times last month, I guess Tippia and malcanis were both on vacation or something.... Twisted

IN YOUR OPINION, I am losing. Just because the majority of people that post on the forums are trolls doesn't change anything.
Just spewing the arrogance into every post. *slow clap*


I am speaking of facts, not opinion. Fact is CCP says it's ok. Fact is I and many others have demonstrated counters. Fact is you haven't put forth one concrete in-game reason against cloaking. Changes to the game need real reason, otherwise the game should be left alone.

What is the pressing need for new tools when people can't be arsed to use the existing ones?

Also, Why is it when people start losing they claim arrogance on the part of others? Insecurity perhaps?
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#555 - 2013-07-22 19:12:11 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?

I can think of way, but there's risk and reward. It's more of a risk to engage and offers little to no reward, so it's a pointless endeavour. Bearing in mind we were a industry heavy corp so our PvP wing was small.


Mercenaries?

Friends?

Multiboxing pvp alts?

Your corps limitations were self imposed, like all such limitations in EVE.


Forgot mercenaries. Lucas, you have heard about the massive PL supercarrier kill, right?Smile That was a trap, and mercenaries (BL) were brought in to do the killing. PL is one of the most feared in all of EvE for hotdropping, and they fell prey to a trap.

Granted, that trap was sprung from the inside, but that only shows just how many ways there are to skin a cat in this game. And if you listened to the PL soundcloud afterwards, it should give you an insight into how deep this game really is. Grath was angry because the supercap pilots were careless, they didnt check their spy network, they didnt check if their jumprange put them in jumprange of enemy caps, they didnt even ask where they were going.

Pretty much tells me hot dropping is serious business, an caps are extremely vulnerable. A little intel goes a long way, and getting temporary friends who will gladly kill others for you just for lulz is easy.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#556 - 2013-07-22 19:13:54 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:


There is no ability to WIN or LOSE an opinion based thread.


You're proving the above wrong every time you post lol.

You're losing the argument, as evidenced by the fact that ONLY YOU talk about winning or losing. Hint, people who are winning don't spend time telling you they are winning, they just keep on winnning.

Besides, CCP give a free plex for the best forum warrior every day. I know, I once like 6 times last month, I guess Tippia and malcanis were both on vacation or something.... Twisted

IN YOUR OPINION, I am losing. Just because the majority of people that post on the forums are trolls doesn't change anything.
Just spewing the arrogance into every post. *slow clap*


I am speaking of facts, not opinion. Fact is CCP says it's ok. Fact is I and many others have demonstrated counters. Fact is you haven't put forth one concrete in-game reason against cloaking. Changes to the game need real reason, otherwise the game should be left alone.

What is the pressing need for new tools when people can't be arsed to use the existing ones?

Also, Why is it when people start losing they claim arrogance on the part of others? Insecurity perhaps?

No, you are speaking a mixture of pure opinion and facts with spin. For example yes, CCP said cloaking is not broken, however they never said that it was not going to be looked at. Probes were working as intended, yet they changed those. I;v never said that your counters don't work, but you simply won't be able to change all null players, so its a completely useless alternative.

I've given my reasons, you've disregarded them all as you disagree. Yet you disagree with everything and provide nothing beyond opinion to counter it.
I can solve the problem though. I can simply hide your posts, since I don't care what arrogant, self-important nobodies like you have to say and it will seem like you aren't even part of the thread. That way you can spew what you want.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#557 - 2013-07-22 19:13:57 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
With evidence? Someone saying "YOU ARE WRONG, DO IT THIS WAY" isn't evidence.
And still you don't read the thread. If you did you'd know that I do two things in EVE. Trading and PvP. Neither of those two things are affected by afk cloakers. I'm simply backing the other guys that believe this is an issue (and there are a LOT of them, hence the weekly thread on the matter).


So, you have no personal experience in the matter, which somehow gives you the intellectual authority to disqualify arguments by fiat that are being made by people who actually have a clue what they are talking about?

Is that about right?


Looks right to me lol.

That poster doesn't bother to look at his own posting or critique his own ideas. if he did he'd know that he was his own problem rather than the half dozen or so people he's argued with in this thread (a thread that is so unimportant that he doesn't even post in it, except that he keeps posting LOL).

He's typical of the "gimmie gimmmie" crowd, he doesn't understand that what he wants would hurt the game (in that it would help establish alliances entrench even further and remove a useful economic warfare tool from Alliances tool boxes).

Basically asking ccp to screw up a game that is working fine as is because he thinks it's unfair that people can cloak and go take a dump or something is very selfish IMO.

I choose to adapt myself to the situation (with STABS! lol) than expect the game to adapt to me.
Victoria Sin
Doomheim
#558 - 2013-07-22 19:15:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Victoria Sin
I see you all continue to argue that black is white. Someone gave the game away earlier in the thread. Said they were paid to sit cloaked in a system to reduce the industry level. People don't generally want to use the facilities with reds in the system.

So there you have it. This is considered a legitimate tactic, even though it's completely ******** in game-play terms. CCP must know it's ******** and they will only do something about it if you continue to complain about just how stupid it is. Apparently the other method of reducing the industry level, that of sending in a fleet and taking it by force, is too hard.
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#559 - 2013-07-22 19:15:12 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:

1. AFK
2. Nullified T3s
3. Hot Droppers

All 3 cases didn't give us any benefit to engage, so why bother?


Wait, you had no benefit to engage a hotdropper? You can't think of a single way to counter a hot dropper? Not one?

I can think of way, but there's risk and reward. It's more of a risk to engage and offers little to no reward, so it's a pointless endeavour. Bearing in mind we were a industry heavy corp so our PvP wing was small.


Mercenaries?

Friends?

Multiboxing pvp alts?

Your corps limitations were self imposed, like all such limitations in EVE.


Forgot mercenaries. Lucas, you have heard about the massive PL supercarrier kill, right?Smile That was a trap, and mercenaries (BL) were brought in to do the killing. PL is one of the most feared in all of EvE for hotdropping, and they fell prey to a trap.

Granted, that trap was sprung from the inside, but that only shows just how many ways there are to skin a cat in this game. And if you listened to the PL soundcloud afterwards, it should give you an insight into how deep this game really is. Grath was angry because the supercap pilots were careless, they didnt check their spy network, they didnt check if their jumprange put them in jumprange of enemy caps, they didnt even ask where they were going.

Pretty much tells me hot dropping is serious business, an caps are extremely vulnerable. A little intel goes a long way, and getting temporary friends who will gladly kill others for you just for lulz is easy.


I didn't forget them lol. Why would an industry corp pay mercenaries when we were already set up with multiple systems on standby? Besides, all that would do is encourage them to come more often.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#560 - 2013-07-22 19:16:50 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
With evidence? Someone saying "YOU ARE WRONG, DO IT THIS WAY" isn't evidence.
And still you don't read the thread. If you did you'd know that I do two things in EVE. Trading and PvP. Neither of those two things are affected by afk cloakers. I'm simply backing the other guys that believe this is an issue (and there are a LOT of them, hence the weekly thread on the matter).


So, you have no personal experience in the matter, which somehow gives you the intellectual authority to disqualify arguments by fiat that are being made by people who actually have a clue what they are talking about?

Is that about right?


Looks right to me lol.

That poster doesn't bother to look at his own posting or critique his own ideas. if he did he'd know that he was his own problem rather than the half dozen or so people he's argued with in this thread (a thread that is so unimportant that he doesn't even post in it, except that he keeps posting LOL).

He's typical of the "gimmie gimmmie" crowd, he doesn't understand that what he wants would hurt the game (in that it would help establish alliances entrench even further and remove a useful economic warfare tool from Alliances tool boxes).

Basically asking ccp to screw up a game that is working fine as is because he thinks it's unfair that people can cloak and go take a dump or something is very selfish IMO.

I choose to adapt myself to the situation (with STABS! lol) than expect the game to adapt to me.

Here we go with more exaggeration. BREAKING THE GAME ZOMG ITS A HUGE CHANGE. It's a tiny tiny change that would affect AFK cloakers and nothing more. Get over it.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.