These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why nerf high sec?

First post First post
Author
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#281 - 2013-07-21 22:55:47 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
It's like in real life. Some people don't want "equality of oppurtunity", they want "equality of OUTCOME" ie they want to be able to make any decision they want and not suffer for it.

Screw that, IRL and in EVE.


I... did you ever attend UNLV?

I said the same thing at a student body presidential debate years ago. I thought I had come up with the term.


No, I went to Texas A&M lol. And Equailty of Outcome is an old old economic term, I think their is a Milton Friedman speech somewhere where he said it.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#282 - 2013-07-21 22:58:24 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
It's like in real life. Some people don't want "equality of oppurtunity", they want "equality of OUTCOME" ie they want to be able to make any decision they want and not suffer for it.

Screw that, IRL and in EVE.


I... did you ever attend UNLV?

I said the same thing at a student body presidential debate years ago. I thought I had come up with the term.


No, I went to Texas A&M lol. And Equailty of Outcome is an old old economic term, I think their is a Milton Friedman speech somewhere where he said it.


Hmm. I shall have to make it a point to peruse his works in the future for this quote. Btw, peruse's proper meaning, is not "skim over", as it used in the vernacular. It actually means "intensely study".

Library card for the win.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#283 - 2013-07-21 23:01:07 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Look if the forums were that important CCP wouldn't have the need to send out the surveys now would they?

Because you play forum warrior doesn't mean that you are going to get preferential treatment.

If CCP listened to the forums they would have gotten rid of hi-sec ages ago and added hundreds of terrible changes from all those random people blabbing away about how CCP should listen to them.


Who exactly is looking for preferential treatment?

i and others are simply using the forum as a way to have our voices heard , least the game makers think we're all the same type of crying lazy type that wants I win buttons or some such.

Your post smacks of butt hurt, if you really think posting to the forums is useless, why do you post so much? You wouldn't think it was useless if you ever actually won an argument lol.
Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#284 - 2013-07-21 23:30:32 UTC
I don't know.

There seems to be quite a bit of cognitive dissonance going on here.

If you are posting on the forums to get your voice heard and you believe only your voice is heard and you believe that a majority of people feel the way you feel without actually using tools to scientifically prove that your opinion is in the majority then perhaps you might not realize your own situation.

In this you are asking that you receive preferential treatment without realizing it. You simply believe your view is the most popular and therefore must be right. That and you have come up with reasons with yourself to make yourself believe you are right.

I know for one my opinion is not the majority of opinions because I know I don't really believe in the majority opinion so I have a hunch that I could be leading you on somewhat and forcing you to post more and derive joy out of getting you to mash away on your keyboards. Yet, I realize that perhaps in my own views have no right or wrong. I am simply stating that you do not realize that you could very well be somewhat wrong and never admit that.

There is no doubt in my mind that I would never persuade you to see the error in your thinking.

If you did, I would be amazed at your position as a human being.

That said, I would like to point out that only a fraction of people that play EVE post on the forums. If a game developer only listed to the forums, the would be missing out on the majority of the player's voice. Which is why they do things like surveys and of course the CSM and of course have exit polls when people quit the game.

What I am really trying to point out and I really doubt you would comprehend is that your mashing of the keyboard in this thread will not achieve anything.

Neither will my punching of the keys, but at least I am doing this to entice you to post more.

Let's make wager... If you read this far and want to prove me wrong let's say if I am wrong that you will no longer make any further posts to this thread. If I am right, then please continue to post in this thread and thereby admitting that I was right all along.

I am willing to say this is my last post as long as you do not post any further.

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#285 - 2013-07-21 23:41:32 UTC
Quote:
If you are posting on the forums to get your voice heard and you believe only your voice is heard and you believe that a majority of people feel the way you feel without actually using tools to scientifically prove that your opinion is in the majority then perhaps you might not realize your own situation.


The classic blunder of the emotional "thinker". The first part is right, I do post to get my voice heard. But then you make the mistake of assuming I follow the same processes as you do.

Whether I am in the majority or not is irrelevant to me. It does not enter into my thinking, I do not hold with that kind of rabbit groupthink. In fact, I have found that the more people are upset at me, the more likely it is that I'm right.

I feel no need to prove that I am in the majority. I do not care. If the entire forums suddenly split apart at the seams with hatred for afk cloaking, for example, they are still wrong, no matter how many of them there are.

You are mistakenly associating numbers with being correct.

Quote:
Let's make wager... If you read this far and want to prove me wrong let's say if I am wrong that you will no longer make any further posts to this thread. If I am right, then please continue to post in this thread and thereby admitting that I was right all along.


Aaaaand there's the false dichotomy. Will he claim victory based on my rejection of his false dichotomy? We shall see!

Oh, and I just can't leave this alone.

Quote:
If a game developer only listed to the forums, the would be missing out on the majority of the player's voice.


What voice? If they don't use the forums, what makes you think they will even answer the survey? (hint, they won't. Less than 5% of all surveys are ever sent back filled out with something besides an obscenity)

I love how the emotional thinkers always appeal to this so called "silent majority" to give more weight to their arguments. Because their emotional well being is tied into their argument, and in being right in general, it is a blow to their self esteem if they admit defeat. Thus, they conjure up the assumption that everyone but the one jerk they are arguing with agrees with them anyway, so it doesn't matter.

So cute.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Captain Tardbar
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#286 - 2013-07-21 23:55:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Captain Tardbar
Oh well. It seems that you read what I said and could not resist the urge to keep posting.

If what I said was wrong I promised I would concede defeat and admit I was wrong if you no longer posted to this thread.

I guess that gives me a win.

Anyways, to keep you posting let us think for a moment...

CCP doesn't listen to the forums because if they did they would have removed hi-sec by now.

QED

Looking to talk on VOIP with other EVE players? Are you new and need help with EVE (welfare) or looking for advice? Looking for adversarial debate with angry people?

Captain Tardbar's Voice Discord Server

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#287 - 2013-07-21 23:56:33 UTC
Quote:
Will he claim victory based on my rejection of his false dichotomy? We shall see!


Called it. :P

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#288 - 2013-07-21 23:56:38 UTC
Captain Tardbar wrote:
Oh well. It seems that you read what I said and could not resist the urge to keep posting.

If what I said was wrong I promised I would concede defeat and admit I was wrong if you no longer posted to this thread.

I guess that gives me a win.

Anyways, to keep you posting let us think for a moment...

CCP doesn't listen to the forums because if they did we would have removed hi-sec by now.

QED


I for one would be perfectly happy with low sec rules extending up to +0.7 sec space.
Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#289 - 2013-07-21 23:57:18 UTC
DON'T EVER TALK IN CASE SOMEONE HEARS YOU TALKING
Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#290 - 2013-07-22 00:46:59 UTC
Hey,

I've been reading a lot of these posts. Some of it goes over my head - not enough experience to understand what's being discussed, but I've noticed a few people advocate an "Incursion" for null sec instead of high sec. I think, and I could be wrong, the reason it's called "Incursions" is because the Empire is being invaded by insurgents attempting to wrest control of systems from the Empire.

Null sec is not the territory of any Empire, and so, no incursions occur there. However, if "incursions" were to occur in null sec, it would happen in corporation and allied controlled systems. That would mean that NPC's are attempting to wrest sovereignty from said corporations and allies.

Are you sure that's what you want?

Watch this space.  New exciting signature in development.

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#291 - 2013-07-22 01:16:00 UTC
right now there's a sansha incursion in lowsec, one in npc null and one in sov null

incursions outside highsec aren't done often because highsec incursion rewards are so good why bother?

when horrible forum posters talk about an incursion into nullsec they mean a bunch of highseccers teaming up to fly into sov null, which will be detrimental to null gameplay and topple the GOON SYSTEM because ???
Onictus
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#292 - 2013-07-22 01:21:15 UTC
Inokuma Yawara wrote:
Hey,

I've been reading a lot of these posts. Some of it goes over my head - not enough experience to understand what's being discussed, but I've noticed a few people advocate an "Incursion" for null sec instead of high sec. I think, and I could be wrong, the reason it's called "Incursions" is because the Empire is being invaded by insurgents attempting to wrest control of systems from the Empire.

Null sec is not the territory of any Empire, and so, no incursions occur there. However, if "incursions" were to occur in null sec, it would happen in corporation and allied controlled systems. That would mean that NPC's are attempting to wrest sovereignty from said corporations and allies.

Are you sure that's what you want?



Incrusions happen in null all the time. Usually somewhere you are either trying to get to, or some system where you MUST have a mid to get a fleet moved.

...and they very rarely get ran because putting that much shiny in one place means that you are making yourself a target for anyone that has a titan in range.
Inokuma Yawara
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#293 - 2013-07-22 01:34:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Inokuma Yawara
Benny Ohu wrote:
right now there's a sansha incursion in lowsec, one in npc null and one in sov null

incursions outside highsec aren't done often because highsec incursion rewards are so good why bother?

when horrible forum posters talk about an incursion into nullsec they mean a bunch of highseccers teaming up to fly into sov null, which will be detrimental to null gameplay and topple the GOON SYSTEM because ???


Wait a minute. You're saying that Incursions do occur in null sec space? And it doesn't negatively affect the corp or alliance that hold sway in those systems? If that's the case, wouldn't that be like being handed a freebee? All the corps and allies can farm Sansha insurgents from the comfort of their own POS, and make bank..... So, where's the disadvantage? How is high sec incursions better?

I guess I'm missing something here, cause I don't see the reason for complaint?

EDIT:

Onictus wrote:


Incrusions happen in null all the time. Usually somewhere you are either trying to get to, or some system where you MUST have a mid to get a fleet moved.

...and they very rarely get ran because putting that much shiny in one place means that you are making yourself a target for anyone that has a titan in range.


That clears up part of it for me. I can see the problem, now. However, doesn't that mean that a Titan, and it''s attendant escort have just become available targets too?

Oh, wait! Your ships will have the wrong fit for PvP....

I think I see part of the problem, now.

EDIT:

It just means you'll have to have a very large operation with two or more fleets. One to do the incursion jobs, and the other fleets as overwatch, to protect against enemy corps and allies.

Watch this space.  New exciting signature in development.

Benny Ohu
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#294 - 2013-07-22 02:37:38 UTC
it's difficult to get a big fleet up. 'hopefully nothing will happen, just watch these miners' is not a good way to get people to bother logging on. also, a big fleet is an invitation for everyone else to get a big fleet up in the knowledge there's a fleet fight to be had if only they run up and start throwing punches. which shuts down the isk-making

an 'overwatch fleet' is going to have a boring job of it, sitting on a titan somewhere waiting for a 'go'. and you have to account that more pilots not working means less shared isk for everyone, and all that manpower could be running elsewhere making isk instead of only half making isk while the other half watches

i think if it was viable to run incursions in low or nullsec, you'd be seeing a lot more of them being run than there are. eve players, all trying different things, as a whole move towards the easiest and most profitable ways of making money. when that most profitable way is in highsec or in npc services, i feel there's a whole lot of potential gameplay that's been robbed of everyone involved

i mean, look at the fountain war - from what i understand of it, the war is driven by a combination of a desire for r64 resources and old alliance grudges. the desire for resources started a war that has hundreds of people logging in and having some fun

instead of having industry all done (bar caps/supers) in highsec npc stations, i'd wish that there was a reason to build where your assets are at risk, a reason to attack someone else's assets, a reason to defend your assets or have someone defend them, but that people were still able to make isk using npc services. and i'd wish it was entertaining to do all those things. but right now? there is no reason to do any of those things but build in highsec npc stations. i feel there's potential for gameplay drivers here, but that potential is being wasted :(
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#295 - 2013-07-22 03:27:58 UTC
Do hisec rewards need a nerf?

Or is it more that hisec risks need a buff?

Discuss.

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

CanI haveyourstuff
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#296 - 2013-07-22 05:37:39 UTC  |  Edited by: CanI haveyourstuff
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
or learn to play the game the right way.


there is no right way you **********
ego much?


hisec is all ok as it is. risk vs. reward is in balance... you see ridiculously expensive nm, machariels, vindis, golems, rni, tengus being blown up in highsec all the time. In null it's worth celebrating for a year and shoot fireworks if something that expensive gets blown up. (not talking about capitals ofc)

how many exhumers go *pop* per day? have you even bothered to learn about it? hisec is ridiculous isk sink.. while also being so called "risk free isk faucet"


In null you can make ridiculous easy money just by mining (is boring but then again profitable) and dont come talk about getting ore into jita blaablaaa blaaaa - its bs.

if your corp does not have jumpfreighters and cyno network then you just suck ass and obviously you whine here because you'd want things to get handed to you even more easily because you cant do it right.

you could make very good money just by ratting... easy, just go and shoot em in face - see isk being printed to your account every tick. And alot of it if you do it right.

while random lvl4 runner has to deal with gankers and griefers all the time, stealing loot, stealing salvage, stealing mission objective and get it contracted you for 1bil.

in null you can run missions for pirates and make ******** amount of isk + shiny pirate ships you get from there - without any risk at all.


Also go take a look how much pods/ships have been destroyed in what regions of space? Do you notice something weird??
80% of all deaths have ocurred in hi/lo sec.... aint that weird?! losec is ofc FW area but thats only place in eve where you could have some fun pvp atm.

Loook at deep null, JUST LOOK AT IT FOR CRHIST SAKE Big smile it's the safest palce in whole eve.......
Katran Luftschreck
Royal Ammatar Engineering Corps
#297 - 2013-07-22 06:00:58 UTC
People who want to nerf hisec are hereby cordially invited to relocate themselves into some of the wonderful cheap real estate located right on Cass Avenue in downtown Detroit. I'm sure they'll love living the dream of a real-life ganker's paradise every night.

Big smile

http://youtu.be/t0q2F8NsYQ0

Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#298 - 2013-07-22 07:20:14 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Do hisec rewards need a nerf?

Or is it more that hisec risks need a buff?

Discuss.


Nailed it

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#299 - 2013-07-22 07:41:52 UTC
Inokuma Yawara wrote:
Benny Ohu wrote:
right now there's a sansha incursion in lowsec, one in npc null and one in sov null

incursions outside highsec aren't done often because highsec incursion rewards are so good why bother?

when horrible forum posters talk about an incursion into nullsec they mean a bunch of highseccers teaming up to fly into sov null, which will be detrimental to null gameplay and topple the GOON SYSTEM because ???


Wait a minute. You're saying that Incursions do occur in null sec space? And it doesn't negatively affect the corp or alliance that hold sway in those systems? If that's the case, wouldn't that be like being handed a freebee? All the corps and allies can farm Sansha insurgents from the comfort of their own POS, and make bank..... So, where's the disadvantage? How is high sec incursions better?

I guess I'm missing something here, cause I don't see the reason for complaint?


incursions happen in 0.0 but they're usually a nuisance that we clear as fast as possible rather than something we run to make some isk, and if you're dumb enough to throw shiny fleets into nullsec incursions that draw roaming gangs like flies whenever there is a tinge of blue in the progress bar, have fun

Inokuma Yawara wrote:
That clears up part of it for me. I can see the problem, now. However, doesn't that mean that a Titan, and it''s attendant escort have just become available targets too?

Oh, wait! Your ships will have the wrong fit for PvP....

I think I see part of the problem, now.

EDIT:

It just means you'll have to have a very large operation with two or more fleets. One to do the incursion jobs, and the other fleets as overwatch, to protect against enemy corps and allies.


titans bridge from inside pos forcefields, so no, it's not a target

also nobody anywhere runs "overwatch" fleets because it's a waste of time, instead of having 20 pilots running the sites and another 20 pilots on standby in case there's trouble you're better off having those 40 dudes run incursions risk-free in highsec with their alts

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#300 - 2013-07-22 07:43:25 UTC
CanI haveyourstuff wrote:



hisec is all ok as it is. risk vs. reward is in balance... you see ridiculously expensive nm, machariels, vindis, golems, rni, tengus being blown up in highsec all the time. In null it's worth celebrating for a year and shoot fireworks if something that expensive gets blown up. (not talking about capitals ofc)



Only reward is not in balance due to the fact that much of the rewards has not been nerfed at all and even buffed while rewards in null have had year on year nerfs.

CanI haveyourstuff wrote:


how many exhumers go *pop* per day? have you even bothered to learn about it? hisec is ridiculous isk sink.. while also being so called "risk free isk faucet"



We have bothered to learn about it. Exhumers and barge kills are at record lows and are statistically the safest ships in high sec to own

CanI haveyourstuff wrote:

In null you can make ridiculous easy money just by mining (is boring but then again profitable) and dont come talk about getting ore into jita blaablaaa blaaaa - its bs.

Given the lack of industrial capability in null the ore has nowhere else to go other than to high sec where the industry happens and where the markets are.

CanI haveyourstuff wrote:

you could make very good money just by ratting... easy, just go and shoot em in face - see isk being printed to your account every tick. And alot of it if you do it right.

while random lvl4 runner has to deal with gankers and griefers all the time, stealing loot, stealing salvage, stealing mission objective and get it contracted you for 1bil.


In the six or seven years I have been playing I have never even been scanned in my mission ship and I know of nobody in any of the corps I have been in that has been ganked. It is a very rare even that only happens to people who slap billions onto the ships. T2 fit ships get the job done and are not a gank target.

CanI haveyourstuff wrote:

Also go take a look how much pods/ships have been destroyed in what regions of space? Do you notice something weird??
80% of all deaths have ocurred in hi/lo sec.... aint that weird?! losec is ofc FW area but thats only place in eve where you could have some fun pvp atm.


Numbers show that Null sec is where the vast bulk of PVP deaths have happened on the order of 7 to 1 against high sec. Of high sec losses 8 die to pve for every 1 pvp death and most of those pve deaths are from the likes of condors in tutorial missions.