These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Recruitment channel and scamming - Clarification

First post
Author
Xutech
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2011-11-09 23:23:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Xutech
I have recently read this letter and would like to pass it on as a relevant issue for the CSM.

I am certain that this letter raises several questions of interest to EVE players.

Are we playing in a sandbox and do we have the freedom to raise issues we feel strongly about with CCP?

DurrHurrDurr wrote:

It has come to my attention that a Game Master known as "GM Thunder" has recently altered the topic text of the public channel "recruitment" to reflect a change of policy disallowing scamming and fraudulent activities to occur within the channel, or to be used as a channel with which to find targets for such activities.


It is my opinion, and the opinion of many other EVE Online players, that this is an encroachment upon the activities of players that use the recruitment channel.


Scamming has long been part of the EVE culture and has long been a promotional tool by CCP to draw new players to the game. The permission of such activities is a display of the truly sandbox nature of the harsh, hypercapitalistic EVE universe and the recent rule change in the recruitment channel encroaches on the true sandbox that the game provides for its players.


From TenTonHammer to PCGamer, the proliferation of EVE Online scams in gaming media has been a powerful driving force for EVE's current popularity. The draw of a true sandbox where your actions have legitimate consequences is a very powerful niche that isn't filled by any other game, and that includes the dangers of interacting with players on a regular basis. From the fall of BoB at the hands of a disgruntled director to the massive thefts of iterations of large EVE banks and investments to supercapital holding scams, the scamming culture is very deep-rooted and an important part of EVE Online.


Additionally, this change of rules presents a considerable workload increase on GMs as well as issues with burden of proof; cases where recruitment is used as a "hunting ground" will be exceptionally difficult to prove and even more difficult to enforce punishment for the use of such channels.


I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.


The full text for the recruitment channel's topic will be pasted below for easy reference.






[18:16:37] EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted.No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporation’s recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums.
Faife
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#2 - 2011-11-09 23:35:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Faife
Xutech wrote:
stuff


they let you into goonswarm?

also, for full effect you should start 1000 threads with this copy pasted inside
SmilingVagrant
Doomheim
#3 - 2011-11-09 23:59:19 UTC  |  Edited by: SmilingVagrant
What in the hell.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGplrpWvz0I

"You decide to take it.... then a GM returns it"
Goose99
#4 - 2011-11-10 00:00:58 UTC
God, I feel unclean somehow by responding to a goon... But here we go:

"Recruitment" channel is started by CCP, so they can determine what's allowed in their channel. If you make your own channel, you can determine what's allowed in your channel. Scamming is not banned in the game, just banned in their channel.
Tomytronic
Perkone
Caldari State
#5 - 2011-11-10 00:06:32 UTC
You miss the point. From any point now any one scammed can just say "I was in the recruitment channel and they scammed me, waa waa waa" and the player who scammed elsewhere gets banned.

Scamming is now completely dead according to the new customer service team.

How long until Causality is also banned?

"Boo hoo hoo, my corp only hangs out in the recruitment channel and now someone has scammed us out of everything! We're only recruiters! Waa waa waa."
Goose99
#6 - 2011-11-10 00:22:14 UTC
Tomytronic wrote:
whine & butthurtCry


Wrong. What they do is checking chat logs in their channel. Their channel, their rules.Bear
Tomytronic
Perkone
Caldari State
#7 - 2011-11-10 00:28:06 UTC
Goose99 wrote:
Tomytronic wrote:
whine & butthurtCry


Wrong. What they do is checking chat logs in their channel. Their channel, their rules.Bear

So you obviously don't know what you're talking about. Okay, fair enough. We're all glad you've laid your cards out on the table.
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2011-11-10 00:29:30 UTC
Scamming in the recruitment channel is seriously stupid and an all time low.

I have nothing agianst the scamming "profession" but when you get a potentail gaggle of new pilots/noobs/guys seriously looking for a new Corporation/Alliance.... this place should be free of such things.

This is just 1 Channel.

You guys have local...and every other bloody channel.

somehow I feel this isn't going to hurt your devilish profession a whole heck of alot.

So in short.... dont like it? Sucks to be you.... go cry somewhere else.

"Cry some moar"

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152

SmilingVagrant
Doomheim
#9 - 2011-11-10 00:30:13 UTC
haha did he indicate they would actually bother to check logs? They never have before...
Goose99
#10 - 2011-11-10 00:34:40 UTC
Cry me a river...Cry

CCP is running a business. You know, mouths to feed and bills to pay? You're driving away noobs - their customers. Any other company would have deleted your accounts ages ago. Instead of giving CCP credit for tolerating you tards for this long, you whine about it.Roll

Btw, u mad bro?Bear
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#11 - 2011-11-10 00:37:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Drake Draconis wrote:


somehow I feel this isn't going to hurt your devilish profession a whole heck of alot.



Thats not the point, the point is that in CCPs rush to make the game safe for new players by removing concord insurance payouts, and 'no scamming basically anywhere because now the person just says you did it in the recruitment channel' they're just going to drive away the current player base.

Thats been CCP's constant problem, pissing off what they have in hopes they get something more, and the something more never materializes, and for a company that just had to lay off 20% of its staff, losing more customers isn't really that great of an idea.

And you can say boo hoo all you want, but there will be a tipping point where the loss becomes unsustainable for a small company like them and they just have to close the game out.

At some point its time to stop reaching for the sky and take care of what you have at home.

This might as well be a blanket ban on scamming in a game made famous by scams, because its so easy to work around its ********.

Goose99 wrote:
Cry me a river...Cry

CCP is running a business. You know, mouths to feed and bills to pay? You're driving away noobs - their customers. Any other company would have deleted your accounts ages ago. Instead of giving CCP credit for tolerating you tards for this long, you whine about it.Roll

Btw, u mad bro?Bear


And you are a ******, high line scams have resulted in more EVE subs then any advertising they've ever done. The scams made EVE.

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2011-11-10 00:40:52 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:

Thats not the point, the point is that in CCPs rush to make the game safe for new players by removing concord insurance payouts, and 'no scamming basically anywhere because now the person just says you did it in the recruitment channel' they're just going to drive away the current player base.



"No scamming anywhere..."

Really?

Proof or GTFO


Seriously..that has to be the most pathetic excuse I've seen yet.

Maybe you should take a step back and realize that CCP want's to make sure pilots have some semblience of confidence that when they join a corporation and not worry about getting ####ed over out the door.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152

Goose99
#13 - 2011-11-10 00:41:47 UTC
Grath Telkin wrote:
Drake Draconis wrote:


somehow I feel this isn't going to hurt your devilish profession a whole heck of alot.



Thats not the point, the point is that in CCPs rush to make the game safe for new players by removing concord insurance payouts, and 'no scamming basically anywhere because now the person just says you did it in the recruitment channel' they're just going to drive away the current player base.

Thats been CCP's constant problem, pissing off what they have in hopes they get something more, and the something more never materializes, and for a company that just had to lay off 20% of its staff, losing more customers isn't really that great of an idea.

And you can say boo hoo all you want, but there will be a tipping point where the loss becomes unsustainable for a small company like them and they just have to close the game out.

At some point its time to stop reaching for the sky and take care of what you have at home.

This might as well be a blanket ban on scamming in a game made famous by scams, because its so easy to work around its ********.

Goose99 wrote:
Cry me a river...Cry

CCP is running a business. You know, mouths to feed and bills to pay? You're driving away noobs - their customers. Any other company would have deleted your accounts ages ago. Instead of giving CCP credit for tolerating you tards for this long, you whine about it.Roll

Btw, u mad bro?Bear


And you are a ******, high line scams have resulted in more EVE subs then any advertising they've ever done. The scams made EVE.


Silly tard, goons =/= Eve.Lol

Btw, your stuff and sov, can I haz?Cool
Grath Telkin
Amok.
Goonswarm Federation
#14 - 2011-11-10 00:43:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Grath Telkin
Drake Draconis wrote:


Maybe you should take a step back and realize that CCP want's to make sure pilots have some semblience of confidence that when they join a corporation and not worry about getting ####ed over out the door.


The game managed for 8 years without this type of safeguard, why is it needed all of the sudden?


Its one of the dangers of EVE and it weeds out the retards with no common sense.

Goose99 wrote:


Silly tard, goons =/= Eve.Lol

Btw, your stuff and sov, can I haz?Cool


Did you even read that before you hit enter?

Malcanis - Without drone assign, the slowcat doctrine will wither and die.

Rer Eirikr
The Scope
#15 - 2011-11-10 00:46:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Rer Eirikr
All I want to know is how does CCP plan to implement and regulate this?

It just seems like a bit of a weird thing to put into a Sandbox game. Can we get some clarification on how this is going to work out? Is it a simple "No scams in that chat" or are there grey areas like if you pull someone from that chat and scam them afterwards thats okay? (With the current thought being they could just reference that they were in recruitment chat and suddenly you've broken a rule)

I don't even scam often but either way, it couldn't hurt to at least clarify how this is going to work out.
NGTM1R
Schrodinger's Labs
#16 - 2011-11-10 00:46:30 UTC
It's called a sandbox, people. The means you can do sandboxy things like scam.

More to the point "no scamming in this particular nonphysical place" makes it difficult or impossible to say that a scam did not in fact take place there in whole or in part. CCP's notorious inability to log things means I doubt they really even know who is IN the recruitment channel at any one time if they don't talk, so people could claim to have been scammed starting in recruitment and moving to private convo or local somewhere or some other channel and there would be no way to verify the truthfulness of it.

The position on scams that occurred only partially in recruitment needs to be clarified, at the very least.

Night

Goose99
#17 - 2011-11-10 00:50:56 UTC
CCP is safeguarding its own bottom line. There should be no explanation, none is needed.

More importantly, U MAD BRO?Cool
Rer Eirikr
The Scope
#18 - 2011-11-10 00:54:12 UTC
Goose99 wrote:
CCP is safeguarding its own bottom line. There should be no explanation, none is needed.

More importantly, U MAD BRO?Cool


You sound like an old friend of mine named T'Elk, needless to say literally everyone stopped listening to him after about 3 sentences.

Explain how there is no bottom line needed in a Sandbox game? I have nothing wrong with protecting noobs, I doubt even Goons has a problem with that, but this current idea has a lot of grey areas that at the very least should be explained.

That or at least refine the idea to something more clearcut, like scamming a character of a certain date or SP total.

But seriously every time you post U mad a kitten dies.
Xutech
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#19 - 2011-11-10 01:00:06 UTC
The original letter is very clear about its purpose.


Quote:
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.


In other words, if the change in wording on the recruitment channel is not a sanctioned change by CCP please revert it. If it is an official change in policy, please explain it.

In addition, I would like to know why such a change occurred without public scrutiny and feedback.

I don't think that list of requests is unreasonable and I do not think it should occur without comment and scrutiny.

It should not simply appear out of the blue and we should not accept such large changes to the game when they occur on a day to day basis out of the blue.
Goose99
#20 - 2011-11-10 01:01:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Goose99
Rer Eirikr wrote:
Goose99 wrote:
CCP is safeguarding its own bottom line. There should be no explanation, none is needed.

More importantly, U MAD BRO?Cool


You sound like an old friend of mine named T'Elk, needless to say literally everyone stopped listening to him after about 3 sentences.

Explain how there is no bottom line needed in a Sandbox game? I have nothing wrong with protecting noobs, I doubt even Goons has a problem with that, but this current idea has a lot of grey areas that at the very least should be explained.

That or at least refine the idea to something more clearcut, like scamming a character of a certain date or SP total.

But seriously every time you post U mad a kitten dies.


Oh noez, think of the poor kittens...Cry

Grey area intimidates some of the tards out of scamming even outside of channel, which means more noob retention, which means adding to CCP's bottom line, while retaining concept of sandbox in theory. It also creates tears, rage and butthurt in vets who have it not, thus entertaining me. Working as intended.Cool

Xutech wrote:
The original letter is very clear about its purpose.


Quote:
I would like this petition to be escalated to a senior GM who can reverse this recent change and, if the change is not reverted, respond to this petition with a clarification and justification as to why this new rule has been placed.


In other words, if the change in wording on the recruitment channel is not a sanctioned change by CCP please revert it. If it is an official change in policy, please explain it.

In addition, I would like to know why such a change occurred without public scrutiny and feedback.

I don't think that list of requests is unreasonable and I do not think it should occur without comment and scrutiny.

It should not simply appear out of the blue and we should not accept such large changes to the game when they occur on a day to day basis out of the blue.


Ah, the epitome of goon intellect. If I were you, I'd keep quiet. There's only one way this can end. Enjoy the grey area while it still exist.Roll
123Next pageLast page