Missions & Complexes

I like your overview setup

I like the improvement in commenting and explaining about how and why you do it your way, compared to your older videos. I think in this format it will be a lot more helpful to newer players, that might be interested in the topic.

As for mission speed, yes it is not max speed but since you hardly make the vids for people playing L4 since years, I don't think it is a big issue. It might even be a bit more realistic to watch something like that doing L4 instead of a pimped out max dps setup, especially for younger players.

Well it takes him a long time and it will certainly take a long time for people starting with L4 missions that are interested in the videos and the topic. Since the topic is not, "How to run L4 Vengeance the quickest way possible." I don't really see a issue. I would even like to add that this might be a lot more interesting for newer players, getting a bit explained why he fits his ship that way, why and how he uses drones and how the mission will look like when they do it instead of watching a Mach F1ing everything into the ground.

I don't have issues with a little bit of advertising, it is not aggressive or disturbing in any way, and making this videos takes a bit of time, so fair enough.

I for myself did little commenting or explaining about the fitting in the L4 videos I made(mostly because I just made them as prove of concept for people calling me a eft warrior). I think there is a solid demand for material like this and even if it is not perfect, the intend behind it might be not showing how it is done in the best way but how it is done with a ship a lot of new players fly for L4 and there are quite a few videos out there where people try to show off time runs for a few missions. I for myself would not mind if you would start your own video series and I think it would be a lot more productive than nitpicking the videos of the OP.

Edit: Before I forget, "Lets Play" is mostly watching another person playing something, what is entertaining by good commenting, being funny and just seeing how other people do it. It is not in particular stuff like Krib or other hardcore gamers do, but a more casual take on the topic.

Well it is exactly like you sound when you record voice with a normal headset or cheaper microphone, I can understand him and a lot of "lets play" stuff only sounds so crystal clear because the people what make them have a separate recording room for the voice acting and add this after the video or fairly expensive audio equipment, like professional desk mounted microphones.

I see more advertising on the eve launcher than in his videos so I don't see the big deal. It is not like you get commercial breaks in it or something ridiculous like that. If he tries to get some more views and subs on this channel I have no problem with it, because this videos record, edit and upload herself not without any effort. It takes me around 3-6h per hour of footage when I do something like that and he enjoys doing them and uploads them for free.

Comparing this video with some of his older ones I can see a fair bit in improvement in the commenting, adding some background music and explaining what he does, so you can hardly say he didn't change anything.

it's not the fact that you're using light drones it's the methodology behind it

why are you using TECH ONE hobgoblins when you clearly have access to t2 warriors which are MUCH better in this scenario?

My gardes have no trouble tracking battleships orbiting at 2km, you've either got skill issues or you never tried.

And one more thing: what's stopping you from using heavies instead? 2km is an easy distance to recall them should they get aggro.

So you're talking about something completely different to what I was.

I said: "He uses t1 hobgoblins to attack angel battleships at close range for gods sake"

Go to 7:13 on your own video, learn to read.

I will say this though: you finally took some advice and first recorded the footage and then commentated over it. You didn't deviate as much as you did in your previous videos and it was overall better than most of them.

There may be hope for you yet.

But for the love of god, learn how to fit your ships properly and start getting your facts straight.

Sounds like you know what you are talking about, have you uploaded a video on youtube ? because I would love to see how you do your sites.
And if you can explain your ship setup and tatics it would be rather neat too.

My mission runner is doing level 4's in a Nighthawk, it isn't extremely fast way to do it, you see I am speedtanking my sites, but it can run everything capstable, and I enjoy the missiles.
But I always look forward to new exteriences, and see if I can pick up some new methods.

PS. I dont like the flying turd, per principle, but it is a nice video never the less.

My question:

Why do you not use heavy drones (berserkers) on the battleships while moving (as per 7:13 on your video)?

Your answer:

Blah blah blah frigates, blah blah blah cruisers target t2 scouts

Utterly irrelevant to my question.

Report me all you want, I don't think I'm breaking any forum guidelines in any of my posts.

I've basically explain in text and a video on why I was Using t1 drones. Anyways, I wouldn't say it is harassment when someone is only helping. I will say it's harassment when someone refuses to watch and listen to the parts that they are crying about. Then Picks parts out of a post to cry. Even more so when they have to attached lies to their parts (which is stupid since everyone can read or watch what I said) .

As far as my ship and fit. My ship can withstand several (9) bs hitting it at the same time. It's also omi tanked. So I can jump in almost any mission (giving there is no EM). Anyways, anyone that used a domi can tell you it's a very slow ship.

I found gunning ships tend to be faster, but there is a trade off. Gun ships cost more at the end of the day,while drones are a 1 time cost. You have to be there with a gunship, while you can afk a mission with a drone boat. I actually afk a few parts of this mission.



Thanks. What did you see wrong with the overview?