These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Moon goo

First post
Author
El 1974
Green Visstick High
#1 - 2013-07-18 07:35:50 UTC
In recent history a number of alliances have been trying to manipulate the moon goo market. They stocked up large quantities of moon goo in an attempt to raise the price. In a response CCP changed the rules of the game and now those alliances are strapped for cash and sitting on huge amounts of moon goo that they can sell for only a fraction of the value of what they hoped it would be worth.

So instead of learning from their recent history those alliances are now involved in a war about another type of moongoo. All hoping to gain control over this hopefully valuable resource.

It seems that CCP learned from their earlier design flaw and made it a lot harder for alliances to gain control over the production of the 'new tech'. Control over Fountain will not allow one producer to control the market. I also think that this stuff is not going to be the same kind of isk printing machine that tech once was. CFC sources state that prices are not yet where they think they should settle. They expect prices to settle at much higher levels. I personally think they misguessed the impact of the Odyssey changes.
Also if alliances find the isk to stock up enough moon goo again to seriously manipulate the market, CCP is just going to change the rules of the game again.

What do you think about future prices for R64? Will the CFC be able to manipulate the prices once they finally take Fountain? Do you expect alliances to run out of cash and start selling their tech, thus crashing the market?
Adunh Slavy
#2 - 2013-07-18 07:49:29 UTC
If the changed moons are spread far and wide, then it will be very difficult for anyone group to set the price for very long. They may attempt to form cartels, but someone always cheats (which tends to start disagreements, and in Eve, usually resolved with guns.) Also there is alchemy, if the price gets high enough, the substitution effect will kick in and mitigate prices.

If it turns out that it is too easy to control, will CCP change it? They left the Tech situation to fester for a very long time, so don't think that can be counted upon.

Prices like tech saw at its peak as a result of supply control, are gone forever, I suspect.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Aliventi
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#3 - 2013-07-18 07:52:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Aliventi
The reason the prices haven't hit where they should end up is people had tens of millions of units of these previously useless R64 goo stocked up. They gambled that CCP would make R64s worth it eventually and won. The R64 bottleneck is there. However, enough time hasn't passed to absorb the stockpiles. Prices will rise in time.

You can't really manipulate R64 materials like you could Tech. Tech was predominately in Venal. R64 moons are scattered and intemixed across all the regions. Taking Fountain won't allow you superior control over a specific R64 goo. Instead it will allow you more of all 4 types of R64 goo. To get the effects of OTEC you would need to control all the space in New Eden. If you hold back R64 goo your enemies will enjoy higher prices at your expense. So there will never be an effective manipulation like OTEC again.

Also, CCP is more than likely to change up the mechanics behind acquiring moon goo. They have stated that they do not like passive income, and they they don't really like the top down isk model that nullsec alliances use that is funded by moon goo. Expect something like Ring Mining that CCP has prototyped to step up and take this over in the next few expansions. This will remove the passive and allow for a bottom up income model.

Also, Tech crashed a while ago. Tech is dead. And good riddance.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-07-18 12:41:50 UTC  |  Edited by: mynnna
I think three things.



  • You don't know **** about our stockpiles. We were, in fact, selling almost all of our Tech at a slight discount to internal membership for them to use in reactions, so Tech stockpiles are actually rather small.
  • You don't know **** about moon goo, otherwise you'd realize how silly it is to say "Welp I guess everyone was wrong" only a month and a half after the patch.
  • You basically don't know ****.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

SencneS
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#5 - 2013-07-18 15:09:12 UTC
I kind of doubt there is massive stock piles of R64 goo, for a start the supply was limited even though it was not as popular as Tech. Also why milk moon for R64's when it was bearly worth the fuel to maintain it for an extended period.

Years ago someone posts on the old forums the basic theory of moon goo. It went something like - If you can't produce moon goo over the space of a year to cover 25% of the cost of POS fuel, it's not worth mining.

The logistics behind moon goo back when this was posted was significant, something that isn't the case today, however a little bit of the theory is still valid. While you could easily make a marginal profit on those R64s that were not expensive due to saturation and lack of consumption.

If the market for your product is saturated, you often stop producing it with a medium sized stockpile for personal consumption and maybe a quick sell if the market spikes. This general theory is valid for all items in EVE, R64's had this situation for years, so expect stock piles to not be as large as you would think.
sackofwine
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#6 - 2013-07-18 15:31:49 UTC
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#7 - 2013-07-18 18:41:24 UTC
sackofwine wrote:
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.


There are more than enough caesium moons to ensure that 114 of them is not "the majority".

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#8 - 2013-07-18 19:08:46 UTC
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.


There are more than enough caesium moons to ensure that 114 of them is not "the majority".


The real question about moons is will they still be an incentive for more conflicts once Fountains is over?
Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-07-18 20:11:29 UTC
In other news, monkeys fling poo

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

sackofwine
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#10 - 2013-07-18 23:06:29 UTC
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.


There are more than enough caesium moons to ensure that 114 of them is not "the majority".

You are right, its not the majority. However it will be a little less than half in those two areas alone. Fountain and aridia have 114 caesium moons and the rest of the game has 148.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-07-19 01:10:37 UTC
sackofwine wrote:
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.


There are more than enough caesium moons to ensure that 114 of them is not "the majority".

You are right, its not the majority. However it will be a little less than half in those two areas alone. Fountain and aridia have 114 caesium moons and the rest of the game has 148.


If Dotlan is accurate and has accounted for every moon. You'll excuse me if I decline to buy that.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

sackofwine
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#12 - 2013-07-19 02:01:41 UTC
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.


There are more than enough caesium moons to ensure that 114 of them is not "the majority".

You are right, its not the majority. However it will be a little less than half in those two areas alone. Fountain and aridia have 114 caesium moons and the rest of the game has 148.


If Dotlan is accurate and has accounted for every moon. You'll excuse me if I decline to buy that.

Im sure its not 100 percent accurate but moon goo has been out for 5+ years im sure it has decent level of accuracy. Im sure dotlan isn't off by hundreds of moons.
Aliventi
Rattini Tribe
Minmatar Fleet Alliance
#13 - 2013-07-19 02:19:08 UTC
It is off by a ton of moons. Several hundred or even thousands of moons off.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#14 - 2013-07-19 02:44:02 UTC
sackofwine wrote:
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
mynnna wrote:
sackofwine wrote:
If CFC takes fountain, sure they will get those r64 but they will have the majority of the caesium in the game. Between fountain and aridia theres 114 caesium moons.


There are more than enough caesium moons to ensure that 114 of them is not "the majority".

You are right, its not the majority. However it will be a little less than half in those two areas alone. Fountain and aridia have 114 caesium moons and the rest of the game has 148.


If Dotlan is accurate and has accounted for every moon. You'll excuse me if I decline to buy that.

Im sure its not 100 percent accurate but moon goo has been out for 5+ years im sure it has decent level of accuracy. Im sure dotlan isn't off by hundreds of moons.


Believe what you want, but speaking as someone with access to what is probably one of the most complete moon scan databases in the game, you're wrong.

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

arabella blood
Keyboard Jihad
#15 - 2013-07-19 04:32:43 UTC
I love how Goon's only porpuse on this forum is to scream "We are not as transparent as you think" & "we have secret plans you can't even imagine" & "you have no idea whats the reasons behind what we do"...
Same goes to the burn jita analyze thread, and same here...

Sweet little manic bees...

Troll for hire. Cheap prices.

Professional Forum Alt
Doomheim
#16 - 2013-07-19 05:38:44 UTC
Wow - long time since I seen so many butthurt goon comments in one thread Lol

Surely goons must be doing well Roll

This is Angelica Everstar's alt

sackofwine
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-07-19 13:57:15 UTC  |  Edited by: sackofwine
Believe what you want, but speaking as someone with access to what is probably one of the most complete moon scan databases in the game, you're wrong.[/quote]

I'll correct. I'm actually right, maybe the information provided to me is wrong. Last comment ill make, I have moon mined for years. I have scanned hundreds of moons over the years and I have yet to find a moon that was not already accounted for on dotlan.
SencneS
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2013-07-19 15:04:15 UTC
There are better database for what moons have then dotlan...

dotlan is ok, but believe me, personal checking of one region I personally scanned down all the moon, it was about only about 70-80% accurate. I should clear this up a little.. The moons that dotlan had was almost completely accurate, it is what it didn't have which made it in-accurate.

A pretty decent amount of pretty nice moons was missing. However, this was a few years ago, so my information may be out-dated.
mynnna
State War Academy
Caldari State
#19 - 2013-07-19 17:50:59 UTC
sackofwine wrote:
Believe what you want, but speaking as someone with access to what is probably one of the most complete moon scan databases in the game, you're wrong.


I'll correct. I'm actually right, maybe the information provided to me is wrong. Last comment ill make, I have moon mined for years. I have scanned hundreds of moons over the years and I have yet to find a moon that was not already accounted for on dotlan.[/quote]
There are tens of thousands of moons in the game, assuming dotlan is correct because of your anecdotal experience involving a small fraction of that is foolish. Lol

Member of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal

Dunka Panala
Iskender Kebap Corp
#20 - 2013-07-19 17:54:53 UTC
sackofwine wrote:


[...] I have scanned hundreds of moons over the years [...]


- no comment -
12Next page