These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Some math on jamming the Basi's in the Mom Griefer fleets

Author
Liltha
Lost My Way Enterprises
#21 - 2013-07-13 11:37:32 UTC
Tobias Hareka wrote:
Liltha wrote:
Tobias Hareka wrote:
Vince Snetterton wrote:
I just don't know if there are enough people angry enough to stop the griefers.


Angry about what? Someone running incursions the way they were meant to be run?


Ah an arguement as old as online gaming. I remember an event back in EQ where most people wanted to farm special mobs that would pop up but it went completely counter to the spirit of the event, they would scream and holler and promise vile horrific death to anyone that dared do the event as intended.

Only difference is that in eve you have to power to enforce your view on how the incursions should work like this fellow seems to be trying to.


If you want to farm isk, go to nullsec.


Not sure where you got that out of my response so my first suggestion is to keep leveling reading comprehension, only leveling it to 1 might not be enough for reading message boards.

I wasn't supporting or condemning either side as I don't run incursions myself, just noting that it's an age old argument between "I want to farm" and "I want to run the event as intended," and how wonderful it was that in EVE you can actually do something about it instead of whining in local chat or bitching on the message boards.
ShipToaster
#22 - 2013-07-14 16:41:23 UTC
Infiltrate their fleets with some logi. These are guaranteed jams as they just turn off their reps. Lets say it is a ten logi mom fleet, if you use a mere eight blackbirds and five infiltrator logi then you have cut their rep power in half by your infiltrators and should be able to almost eliminate it with the jams.

The infiltrator logi have plausible deniability and are likely to be covered by some form of ship replace policy if they are destroyed. So this should be zero cost and their cover remains intact. Eight blackbirds should be less cost than one tornado for much more effect.

If you had the numbers you would probably be better harassing them with a destroyer fleet by sitting at their dock up station and ganking them as they undocked then telling them in no uncertain terms that the reason they got ganked was whatever issue you have with them.

I have never been sure how it worked but could you not neut out an off grid booster? Doing this should change the numbers more in your favour too.

.

Vince Snetterton
#23 - 2013-07-14 17:11:06 UTC
ShipToaster wrote:
Infiltrate their fleets with some logi. These are guaranteed jams as they just turn off their reps. Lets say it is a ten logi mom fleet, if you use a mere eight blackbirds and five infiltrator logi then you have cut their rep power in half by your infiltrators and should be able to almost eliminate it with the jams.

The infiltrator logi have plausible deniability and are likely to be covered by some form of ship replace policy if they are destroyed. So this should be zero cost and their cover remains intact. Eight blackbirds should be less cost than one tornado for much more effect.

If you had the numbers you would probably be better harassing them with a destroyer fleet by sitting at their dock up station and ganking them as they undocked then telling them in no uncertain terms that the reason they got ganked was whatever issue you have with them.

I have never been sure how it worked but could you not neut out an off grid booster? Doing this should change the numbers more in your favour too.


The form of awoking you are discussing is indeed an option.

But the problem with that is the skill training time, and the ship cost.
You have to commit a lot of time to get a perfectly skilled logi pilot (the only type that any self-respecting crew takes, or trusts), plus the ship cost is pretty substantial, though not quite as much as a BS.

What you are describing would be a tremendous intelligence operation, and one quite worthy.
But once again, I just don't know if the commitment level for such a thing matches the anger level in the community, at least yet.

ShipToaster
#24 - 2013-07-14 19:19:17 UTC
Wanted to add that if you did use infiltrators then make sure to get your jammers to throw a cycle on them in case they get killed by sansha as this will generate a killmail and keep their cover.

You are talking about people whose income is in the billions each week. The time may be a problem but the isk is not. With the addition of multiple character training on an account it should be fairly painless to train an alt for this purpose. Especially when the pleasure of sticking it to your enemies really hard, and maybe even repeatedly, far outweighs any isk cost.

Perhaps this is more suited to crime and punishment people as they are likely to have more rep alts readily available.

.

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#25 - 2013-07-14 19:27:56 UTC
ShipToaster wrote:
Wanted to add that if you did use infiltrators then make sure to get your jammers to throw a cycle on them in case they get killed by sansha as this will generate a killmail and keep their cover.

You are talking about people whose income is in the billions each week. The time may be a problem but the isk is not. With the addition of multiple character training on an account it should be fairly painless to train an alt for this purpose. Especially when the pleasure of sticking it to your enemies really hard, and maybe even repeatedly, far outweighs any isk cost.

Perhaps this is more suited to crime and punishment people as they are likely to have more rep alts readily available.

Failures in the plan.
A. An acceptable Logi pilot takes a few months to train.
B. No good fleet allows anyone to run more than one Logi'
C. All logis must be on coms. failure to respond to coms results in getting Kicked from fleet.
D. Nobody get to logi in a good fleet without having spent a couple months getting checked out.
E. Average EVE players don't dedicate that much time for a single 'chance' to see a fleet die in one possible site.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Swidgen
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#26 - 2013-07-14 22:20:55 UTC
Vince Snetterton wrote:
Time will tell if players are motivated enough to try to stop them.

Time has spoken. They're not.
Miles Bennet Dyson
Doomheim
#27 - 2013-07-16 08:36:19 UTC
Dear op,

If you are interested, i could let our team of scientists look into some efficient ways of dealing with your .. Competition?
Contact me, this might be an oppertunity to link our research for a more practical use.

Dr.Miles Bennet Dyson
jDuncety
Doomheim
#28 - 2013-07-16 21:11:32 UTC
I would imagine this would be more effective in a preloaded TCRC
Iella Wesirri
Dead Rats Tell No Tales
#29 - 2013-07-16 23:54:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Iella Wesirri
Goldiiee wrote:
ShipToaster wrote:
Wanted to add that if you did use infiltrators then make sure to get your jammers to throw a cycle on them in case they get killed by sansha as this will generate a killmail and keep their cover.

You are talking about people whose income is in the billions each week. The time may be a problem but the isk is not. With the addition of multiple character training on an account it should be fairly painless to train an alt for this purpose. Especially when the pleasure of sticking it to your enemies really hard, and maybe even repeatedly, far outweighs any isk cost.

Perhaps this is more suited to crime and punishment people as they are likely to have more rep alts readily available.

Failures in the plan.
A. An acceptable Logi pilot takes a few months to train.
B. No good fleet allows anyone to run more than one Logi'
C. All logis must be on coms. failure to respond to coms results in getting Kicked from fleet.
D. Nobody get to logi in a good fleet without having spent a couple months getting checked out.
E. Average EVE players don't dedicate that much time for a single 'chance' to see a fleet die in one possible site.



Not to argue with your point D Goldiiee, but I'd just like to mention that I ran one time with a major incursion comunity as a logi for about 2 hours before I was invited into the big boy channel. Someone in the fleet even loaned me their basi with no collateral since mine didn't quite fit the bill at the time. I ended up upgrading his basi to t2 hackers since I could use them. Hee hee.
Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#30 - 2013-07-17 00:22:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Goldiiee
Iella Wesirri wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:
ShipToaster wrote:
Wanted to add that if you did use infiltrators then make sure to get your jammers to throw a cycle on them in case they get killed by sansha as this will generate a killmail and keep their cover.

You are talking about people whose income is in the billions each week. The time may be a problem but the isk is not. With the addition of multiple character training on an account it should be fairly painless to train an alt for this purpose. Especially when the pleasure of sticking it to your enemies really hard, and maybe even repeatedly, far outweighs any isk cost.

Perhaps this is more suited to crime and punishment people as they are likely to have more rep alts readily available.

Failures in the plan.
A. An acceptable Logi pilot takes a few months to train.
B. No good fleet allows anyone to run more than one Logi'
C. All logis must be on coms. failure to respond to coms results in getting Kicked from fleet.
D. Nobody get to logi in a good fleet without having spent a couple months getting checked out.
E. Average EVE players don't dedicate that much time for a single 'chance' to see a fleet die in one possible site.



Not to argue with your point D Goldiiee, but I'd just like to mention that I ran one time with a major incursion comunity as a logi for about 2 hours before I was invited into the big boy channel. Someone in the fleet even loaned me their basi with no collateral since mine didn't quite fit the bill at the time. I ended up upgrading his basi to t2 hackers since I could use them. Hee hee.

Was it me that loaned you the Basi? I have loaned my Basi and a Scimi out so many times I expected the odds to have caught up and have one stolen by now.

But if it was me, the other Logi in the fleet was most likely an long time member, we have tested it out a VG can be done with one Logi, and can even be done with no Logi's as long as the rest of the fleet is Pro.

Edit: Ah I understand now, (Little slow tonight) VG fleets are where you test out new Logi's 'no history required' HQ's will require at least 6 of the ten logis to be 'Known Logi'.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

Iella Wesirri
Dead Rats Tell No Tales
#31 - 2013-07-17 02:11:24 UTC
I'm not sure if it was you or not. I'm pretty sure you were in the fleet, if not the FC. It was about 2 years ago, so memory fades a bit. lol
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#32 - 2013-07-17 03:11:20 UTC
Liltha wrote:
Tobias Hareka wrote:
Vince Snetterton wrote:
I just don't know if there are enough people angry enough to stop the griefers.


Angry about what? Someone running incursions the way they were meant to be run?


Ah an arguement as old as online gaming. I remember an event back in EQ where most people wanted to farm special mobs that would pop up but it went completely counter to the spirit of the event, they would scream and holler and promise vile horrific death to anyone that dared do the event as intended.

Only difference is that in eve you have to power to enforce your view on how the incursions should work like this fellow seems to be trying to.


It was generally a lot easier to disrupt something in EQ than it is in Eve... before instancing anyway.
Johnny Aurilen
Ethereal Productions
#33 - 2013-07-17 04:53:03 UTC
When will the ganker theorist understand that we keep alts on gates for a reason. We see you land on gate with a gank fleet. We will sacrifice that alt to preload concord on the grid and laugh as you burn.
ShipToaster
#34 - 2013-07-17 19:52:48 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:

A. An acceptable Logi pilot takes a few months to train.
B. No good fleet allows anyone to run more than one Logi'
C. All logis must be on coms. failure to respond to coms results in getting Kicked from fleet.
D. Nobody get to logi in a good fleet without having spent a couple months getting checked out.
E. Average EVE players don't dedicate that much time for a single 'chance' to see a fleet die in one possible site.


A. Waiting is a problem for EVE players now? When did that happen? Two characters on an account makes this a lot less painful now.
B. You imagined the word multiboxing was present here? It was not.
C. See above, no multiboxing was mentioned, one pilot per logi with nothing to indicate they have hostile intent.
D. EVE players have no problem with waiting to smash their enemies and many hold grudges forever.
E. Incursion runners are not average EVE players and a large number of them have a mental illness that allows them to do the same repetitive content over and over and over and over. Not sure about the one chance aspect either as this seems like wishful thinking on your part.

No real hostile entity has taken an interest in incursion runners. You need someone like goons, organisation and will aplenty, to take a dislike to you. I meant incursion runners here but how are relations between goons and 401k who you see a lot in ISN fleets?

Johnny Aurilen wrote:
When will the ganker theorist understand that we keep alts on gates for a reason. We see you land on gate with a gank fleet. We will sacrifice that alt to preload concord on the grid and laugh as you burn.


Have CCP changed CONCORD so alpha and jamming for the cycle no longer works?

.

Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#35 - 2013-07-17 20:25:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Goldiiee
ShipToaster wrote:
Edited for brevity

The OP was calling on incursion runners to stop Incursion runners by using the Ganking mechanic. Incursion runners tend to be a group of Instant Gratification, Whiny, Prima Dona's with very limited foresight or patience. Hence why they run incursions rather than the plethora of other things to do in EVE to make ISK.

So the boxing seemed to be the primary tool suggested for ganking or jamming a fleet intent on removing the Incursion and therefore the ISK everyone is making so I was using a Boxing group of logi as an example. If you think there are 10 people out there willing to train Logi 5, get in ship, get the trust of a community, and then get one chance to see the fleet go down in flames then you are right there is a 20 page long public ban list full of their names, they haven't slowed down a group yet and I don't see them doing any better in the near future.

Several fairly large organizations Goons included have attempted to harass Incursion fleets to little or no effect in high sec. That's probably why we have a couple Goons, 401k, Test'ers and few others I can't remember flying incursions right now.

EVE players do wait patiently (Sometimes) months and years to rain death and destruction on their enemies, Incursion runners wait hours to make enough ISK to bury the patient player in bureaucracy with annoying troll comments in local while docked up in a 20billion isk ship and dual boxing on their PVP toon in nul.

But as many of the Incursion runners are friends of mine and I also find a bit of pleasure in making absurd amounts of ISK for/with friends that have nothing better to do while waiting for a CTA, Gate camp victim, or Production of the latest Industry item.

And really? how is running sites over and over any less repetitive than, ganking the same mining barge, ganking misc low sec runner, or the massive alliance Blob fight (TiDi so much fun). Really? hit F1 and then chest pump, or Hit F1 and throw a stale beer at the monitor as you watch isk go down in pixel flames. Repetition is the name of the game with the occasional moment of F2, Alt F1, click click click _________ <- insert Expletive Deleted here

The intellectual part of this game disappears one expansion at a time.

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

jDuncety
Doomheim
#36 - 2013-07-17 21:34:38 UTC
Goldiiee wrote:

EVE players do wait patiently (Sometimes) months and years to rain death and destruction on their enemies, Incursion runners wait hours to make enough ISK to bury the patient player in bureaucracy with annoying troll comments in local while docked up in a 20billion isk ship and dual boxing on their PVP toon in nul.


You have fleets of 20 billion isk ships.

I think that when the general eve population knows this you will be flying pods rather rapidly.


Goldiiee
Bureau of Astronomical Anomalies
#37 - 2013-07-17 21:57:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Goldiiee
jDuncety wrote:
Goldiiee wrote:

EVE players do wait patiently (Sometimes) months and years to rain death and destruction on their enemies, Incursion runners wait hours to make enough ISK to bury the patient player in bureaucracy with annoying troll comments in local while docked up in a 20billion isk ship and dual boxing on their PVP toon in nul.


You have fleets of 20 billion isk ships.

I think that when the general eve population knows this you will be flying pods rather rapidly.



NO we have fleets worth of over 200bill, the value of the ship is inconsequential when the requirement for attempting to gank one is far in excess of the loot drop possible. This has been tried, I believe Shadow Cartel (Might be wrong) was the last ones I saw, 20 Nados dead and one Mach in half Armor.

It's not that it can't be done, I am sure the numbers can be figured out and a gank fleet could do it. But they need to get into local without the 40 to 50 scouts and alts noticing, land on a fleet without the 40 fleet members noticing, and then call a primary and hit it before the counter reps from 10 expert trained logi's kick in. But yeah It can be done, I imagine the real frustration would come from the fact that the incursion runner (Gank Target) would probably be without a ship for 20 or 30 minutes before he replaced it and was making ISK again.

Incursions are popular for a reason.

Edit; Sorry it was 401k and they actually succeeded recently, I think Chadarass was without a ship and pod for 3 or 4 minutes

Things that keep me up at night;  Why do we use a voice communication device to send telegraphs? Moore's Law should state, Once you have paid off the last PC upgrade you will need another.

grrlet
Leper Outcast Unclean
#38 - 2013-07-18 21:39:02 UTC
I'm sorry, but I couldn't get past the hypocrisy of the title. Killing the Mom is not griefing just because sad pandas don't want the incursion to end yet. The Mom is fair game once she shows up. Jamming those killing the Mom, to get them to stop because you're a sad panda IS griefing.
Previous page12