Player Features and Ideas Discussion

I'm curious, what is the relation to your article and this proposal?

As far as I can tell, your article is against removing wardec. The proposal has no plans to remove it either, but merely to allow the defender the right to use isk to nullify the war. How is that not fair?

I like how you say "It's indisputable that the wardec mechanics, strictly speaking, do not favor the attacker" and "At their best, the criticisms [against wardecs] are flawed, and at worst, they're completely nonsensical").