These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Welcome Hard Knocks!
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
dark dreamur
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#81 - 2013-07-15 11:31:33 UTC
no tears mate, like i said this will be pretty amusing in 6 months time, but any way carry on
Hidden Fremen
Lazerhawks
L A Z E R H A W K S
#82 - 2013-07-15 13:15:57 UTC
dark dreamur wrote:
no tears mate, like i said this will be pretty amusing in 6 months time, but any way carry on


Less than six months, methinks...
Rengas
AQUILA INC
#83 - 2013-07-15 13:58:21 UTC
dark dreamur wrote:
Craggus wrote:
dark dreamur wrote:
good luck finding fights from R.E.P.O., the single largest concentration of collective cowardice in w-space, who tuck tail & run at the first sign of connection to any member of the KILL "blob"


Hey now, they don't ALWAYS run. Just sometimes put mass on the hole and fight smart, then we are dumb and they shoot us with dreads, which we totally wouldnt do if we were in the same situation.


FTFU

So in conclusion, "fight smart" = risk-averse.

The only way to bring conflict back will be when people start placing a higher value on having fun than on winning.

Bumrush
The Excommunicated
#84 - 2013-07-15 14:08:29 UTC
Congrats HK and Kill
dark dreamur
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#85 - 2013-07-15 15:25:33 UTC

So in conclusion, "fight smart" = risk-averse.

The only way to bring conflict back will be when people start placing a higher value on having fun than on winning.

[/quote]

not entierly aposed to your view point here, maybe your right, in cases where its an obvious whooping im not sure it would be risk adverse, just smart, but certainly those situations where its either a toss of the coin who would come out on tops or a partial win yes sure i could agree with you.
maybe we have got so focused on the total wins ppl (including myself) have forgotten the fun of a close fight
Zackgar
Lead Farmers
#86 - 2013-07-15 17:12:21 UTC
dark dreamur wrote:

not entierly aposed to your view point here, maybe your right, in cases where its an obvious whooping im not sure it would be risk adverse, just smart, but certainly those situations where its either a toss of the coin who would come out on tops or a partial win yes sure i could agree with you.
maybe we have got so focused on the total wins ppl (including myself) have forgotten the fun of a close fight


I forgot English isn't REPO's first language.
Dani Sobaan
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#87 - 2013-07-15 18:17:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Dani Sobaan
Zackgar wrote:
dark dreamur wrote:

not entierly aposed to your view point here, maybe your right, in cases where its an obvious whooping im not sure it would be risk adverse, just smart, but certainly those situations where its either a toss of the coin who would come out on tops or a partial win yes sure i could agree with you.
maybe we have got so focused on the total wins ppl (including myself) have forgotten the fun of a close fight


I forgot English isn't REPO's first language.

What because of 2 spelling mistakes? Roll
Zackgar
Lead Farmers
#88 - 2013-07-15 18:29:16 UTC
Dani Sobaan wrote:
Zackgar wrote:
dark dreamur wrote:

not entierly aposed to your view point here, maybe your right, in cases where its an obvious whooping im not sure it would be risk adverse, just smart, but certainly those situations where its either a toss of the coin who would come out on tops or a partial win yes sure i could agree with you.
maybe we have got so focused on the total wins ppl (including myself) have forgotten the fun of a close fight


I forgot English isn't REPO's first language.

What because of 2 spelling mistakes? Roll


No, because they're so practiced at running away or giving up, I figured it was french
Ayeson
State War Academy
Caldari State
#89 - 2013-07-15 18:53:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Ayeson
Misspost...Delete meh

I ♥ the orthrus