These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Politics and Feuds in Running Incursions.

Author
Zappity
New Eden Tank Testing Services
#21 - 2013-07-14 11:37:09 UTC
600b a month? Why not declare war on each other and, um, fight?

Zappity's Adventures for a taste of lowsec and nullsec.

Letzlin Schaneger
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#22 - 2013-07-14 13:21:25 UTC
Zappity wrote:
600b a month? Why not declare war on each other and, um, fight?


Few of these people are in the same corp or are just in NPC corps.

Also highsec bears.
Vince Snetterton
#23 - 2013-07-14 14:53:23 UTC
People here have phrased the wiping out of incursion mom's as the "nuclear option" perpetrated by one shield group upset that they can't compete with iSN.

That is of course, a lie.

I have parked chars off the mom acc gate and seem oh so many ISN ships heading into to wipe out mom's.
The standard practice that has evolved seems to be for a euro-TZ based group to farm it hard for a day, and when their prime time is done, they kill the mom wiping out any income generation for any other TZ heavy group.

This denial of potential income is no different than an ice interdiction, or Hulkageddon, or freighter ganking, where one group effectively wipes out another group (or groups), ability to make ISK. It is griefing. The only difference in this case is there is no commodity to speculate on prior to the griefing campaign starting.

I created a thread in the mission sub forums detailing the math on what is required to stop the griefers. Frankly, I don't think the anger and frustration level is high enough amongst the groups being attacked to mount a counter to the griefers. But as time goes on, I am hopeful that it reaches that threshold.
Falin Whalen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2013-07-14 15:51:13 UTC
Emma Yobibit wrote:
Falin Whalen wrote:


YOU MADE ME US BING!Evil

NNNNNNNNNNNNOOOOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooo!!Cry

HE HE HE! [/evil laughter]Twisted


Sorry was on work PC, and ment to post the link to this.

"it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves." The Trial - Franz Kafka 

Ginger Barbarella
#25 - 2013-07-14 15:59:00 UTC
Sam Ruger wrote:
Could someone either explain to me the exact nature of the hostility between the 2 main fleets of Shield Tanked incursion groups. I know one got the word shiny in their name and I cant remember the others name. Does this same animosity exist in the armor tanked fleets?


You ask that like anyone outside those two fleets give a flying fig...

"Blow it all on Quafe and strippers." --- Sorlac

Falin Whalen
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-07-14 16:05:53 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Sam Ruger wrote:
Could someone either explain to me the exact nature of the hostility between the 2 main fleets of Shield Tanked incursion groups. I know one got the word shiny in their name and I cant remember the others name. Does this same animosity exist in the armor tanked fleets?


You ask that like anyone outside those two fleets give a flying fig...

He wants to know which one is the shiniest, so he can join it with his bling boat and make mad ISKies for his toonies. [Shh! Don't tell anyone.]Big smile

"it's only because of their stupidity that they're able to be so sure of themselves." The Trial - Franz Kafka 

Lipbite
Express Hauler
#27 - 2013-07-14 17:38:22 UTC
Letzlin Schaneger wrote:
[quote=Zappity]Also highsec bears.


Just few minutes ago I had conversation with one of the "highsec bears" whos alt (more like main) pilot is in Wildly Inappropriate / Goonswarm. Couple days ago I met old TVP logi commander - he's in Nulli Secunda now. I believe at least half of pilots use incursions to sponsor their low/null PvP activities.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#28 - 2013-07-14 17:41:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
I've not done Incursions, I thought that when the mom was killed another Incursion area started up.

Is the problem that this occurs after downtime and other groups have to wait?

Also, what do the locals think of Incursion groups farming the Incursions and keeping the local space screwed up for extended periods of time so they can be milked for the Incursion fleets profit?

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#29 - 2013-07-14 18:19:46 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Also, what do the locals think of Incursion groups farming the Incursions and keeping the local space screwed up for extended periods of time so they can be milked for the Incursion fleets profit?


No different than the PvPers gatecamping in high-sec....at least it has a purpose, and looks 10x better!

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#30 - 2013-07-14 18:27:57 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Also, what do the locals think of Incursion groups farming the Incursions and keeping the local space screwed up for extended periods of time so they can be milked for the Incursion fleets profit?


No different than the PvPers gatecamping in high-sec....at least it has a purpose, and looks 10x better!

But PVP players camping a gate in High sec are there for one of two reasons.

1: They are at war, so their impact on other inhabitants is nil.
2: They are looking for high value targets to suicide gank, which only impacts those with foolishly high value cargo on board.

In neither case is virtually every aspect of the system disrupted as it is when an Incursion is present.

It would seem to me that Incursion fleets milk these Incursions at the expense of the local inhabitants.

Perhaps that's why the bulk of this activity is in high sec, as the inhabitants are less likely to remove the capitalistic blight that an Incursion Fleet actually is. Smile

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

baltec1
Bat Country
The Initiative.
#31 - 2013-07-14 18:52:14 UTC
Lipbite wrote:


Just few minutes ago I had conversation with one of the "highsec bears" whos alt (more like main) pilot is in Wildly Inappropriate / Goonswarm. Couple days ago I met old TVP logi commander - he's in Nulli Secunda now. I believe at least half of pilots use incursions to sponsor their low/null PvP activities.


Its better money than out in 0.0 so its not much of a shocker.
Vince Snetterton
#32 - 2013-07-14 20:17:32 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Lipbite wrote:


Just few minutes ago I had conversation with one of the "highsec bears" whos alt (more like main) pilot is in Wildly Inappropriate / Goonswarm. Couple days ago I met old TVP logi commander - he's in Nulli Secunda now. I believe at least half of pilots use incursions to sponsor their low/null PvP activities.


Its better money than out in 0.0 so its not much of a shocker.


Another lie.

Incursions are not better than null ISK, per hour. Not by a long shot, even in the top end ISN HQ fleets.

But :

1. It is somewhat easier, because you climb into a fleet without getting a ton of your own corp/ alliance all committed at the same time.
2. While running incursions in high sec means you have to run the gauntlet of high sec gate camps constantly, that is easier than running all over null sec with high end ships. Unless your entire territory is covered with jump bridges, and you are guaranteed an incursion in a deep null sec enclave at all times, and so far, CCP has not given any null sec group that luxury.

Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#33 - 2013-07-14 22:02:58 UTC
Vince Snetterton wrote:
Incursions are not better than null ISK, per hour. Not by a long shot, even in the top end ISN HQ fleets.


They are, by leaps and bounds.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Sam Ruger
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2013-07-14 22:22:57 UTC
Ginger Barbarella wrote:
Sam Ruger wrote:
Could someone either explain to me the exact nature of the hostility between the 2 main fleets of Shield Tanked incursion groups. I know one got the word shiny in their name and I cant remember the others name. Does this same animosity exist in the armor tanked fleets?


You ask that like anyone outside those two fleets give a flying fig...





You cared enough to be snotty.
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#35 - 2013-07-15 00:56:34 UTC
Joan Greywind wrote:
There are a couple of main groups that run HQ with shield ships:

Disclaimer: I am a little biased towards 1 of these groups, but I will try to be as objective as possible (lies already :P)

ISN or Incursion Shiny network: They currently have the highest standards for ship fittings, and are generally the best at doing incrusions (winning most contests and fastest sites with minimal losses). Although they do have higher standards than other communities they aren't elitist, and will accept any pilot with the right fittings and skills and teach them how to do incursions.

Policy: Contest whenever they can (more iskies and fun) and never kill the last mom in highsec.

TVP: They have the largest numbers of pilots, due mainly to their low fitting standards. They are a good starting ground if you are just starting incursion and dont have the skills, iskies to fly a more expensive ship. They fly shiny ships but it mostly gets watered down by the other less than optimal ships they fly with. All in all a healthy community, albeit bloated leadership and sometimes loss in the sense of direction. They also suffer from false "propaganda' in their channels.

Policy: Depends on the FC currently running really, so can range from contesting a fleet they have a chance of beating, to outright killing the mom when they lose one.

DIN Flotten: A german multiboxer community, where a fleet of 40 ships is usually piloted with less than 20 people. They usually fly shiny, but most of the members multibox so they are now regarded as the worst Incursion community (efficiency wise) losing almost all of their contests. Some pilots having 10 pilots in a fleet of 40 ships at any one time. They fit the "angry german" stereotype, at least at the the leader ship level. Sadly they have the worst form of false "propaganda" relying on outright (albeit hilarious) lies to save face, and that is made that much easier with the language barrier (mostly German speaking community).

Policy: Multiboxers get in fleet before real pilot on the queue, and kill every mom in highsec if we get contested even once.

Extra Quotes by DIN Flotten: "ISN made them do the mom", "this is our incrusion", "It's ok that I lost my 5b mach, I have 78 others"

WTM: it's a relatively new incursion community that to my limited knowledge is an offshoot of either TVP or DIN, (or both). Efficiency wise they aren't that bad and run relatively shiny fleets.

Policies: Unknown to me

There are other notable incursion communities, armor (they mostly keep to themselves and don't run as much the shield fleet (less efficient especially in hqs). You also have some form of a Russian community that sporadically shows up, but they also keep mostly to themselves.

Now in Incursions you can contest sites, where a fleet is a winner and the other the loser, one gets the iskies and the other gets none. Now since ISN is the best, they win most to all of their contests. ISN are aggressive with their contesting as the "good sites" (best isk efficiency) gets done by all fleets as they spawn. Now the other communities hold the belief that sites shouldn't be contested, and call it "unfair" and "there is enough for everyone". Of course ISN likes contesting and sees no reason it shouldn't do it (more iskies, more fun). Now that might sound elitist, but ISN pays for it by being better organized and having better ships and skills. After all it asks its members for higher investments than the other communities, why should the members invest so much if they see no return? The other communities respond to that by killing the mom sites which kills the incursion, and noone can do sites anymore (no more iskies). Now this of course hurts all incursion communities and is really the "nuclear option". Of course it hurts the incursion communities invoking the nuclear option as they are usually the "poorer" communities and need the iskies the most. This of course is not sustainable and soon, will have accept the fact, that either they need to step up their game (better ships) or do the cheaper sites. Don't get me wrong ISN does get damaged from the moms popping, but they get hurt the least, as they have the richest base and are generally more tightly knitted and organized. It is now really a battle of wills, who can hold out longer.

So there it is, your drama, and I know it is a long post. Whoever said you cant have spais and drama in highsec, well here you go. And for people that are going to call this carebear acting tough, remember an average fleet of 40 pilots can make 4b an hour in incursions, that is (conservatively) 20b a day and 600b a month for each community. The big war in null sec is being fought for 200b/month worth of moons, by tens of thousands of players.





Thank you for taking the time to write that. Very informative.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Estella Osoka
Cranky Bitches Who PMS
#36 - 2013-07-15 01:39:19 UTC
Vince Snetterton wrote:
People here have phrased the wiping out of incursion mom's as the "nuclear option" perpetrated by one shield group upset that they can't compete with iSN.

That is of course, a lie.

I have parked chars off the mom acc gate and seem oh so many ISN ships heading into to wipe out mom's.
The standard practice that has evolved seems to be for a euro-TZ based group to farm it hard for a day, and when their prime time is done, they kill the mom wiping out any income generation for any other TZ heavy group.


Pics or it didn't happen. DIN alt detected.
Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2013-07-15 03:02:41 UTC

Why are you even flying with shields? Armor groups (TDF) are far better.

But to answer you questions, ISN wanted to be the ******** child in the group and always popped the MOM to end incursions just to get their way. Then other shield fleets decided to be ******** and both groups went batshit and started to destroy the MOM like two socially inept, pathetically ******** kids. Meanwhile, armor groups pointed and laughed. Because in the end, the shield fleets are hurting themselves.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#38 - 2013-07-15 03:24:55 UTC
killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing

keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand...

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Nyancat Audeles
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2013-07-15 03:27:23 UTC
Andski wrote:
killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing

keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand...

Finished for whom? For ISN? Lately, many shield fleets have been killing unfinished incursions just to assert the length of their e-peen in a giant neckbeardery contest.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#40 - 2013-07-15 03:33:33 UTC
Nyancat Audeles wrote:
Andski wrote:
killing a mothership to complete a finished incursion isn't griefing

keeping an incursion open and preventing other people from using that constellation, on the other hand...

Finished for whom? For ISN? Lately, many shield fleets have been killing unfinished incursions just to assert the length of their e-peen in a giant neckbeardery contest.


you can't kill an unfinished incursion; an incursion is for all intents and purposes finished when the mothership spawns

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar