These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Incursion griefing getting kicked into high gear

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Andrei Taganov
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#241 - 2011-11-09 05:13:48 UTC
carmelos53 wrote:
It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---

You guys are just a bunch of kids. Maybe some ice cream will cheer slimy worm and his friends up. The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group. If you didn't like the opinions of others hurting your "good name" maybe being dochebags in the first place wasn't the best option.

Please go tell your parents maybe they will care.


Once again, if the Incursion bears don't like the opinions of others hurting their "good name" (by wardecing us and banning us), then maybe they should find another thing to do.

I'm not feeling hurt, I'm feeling rich and smug. It's to the point that we're whatever about killing faction battleships that don't have shiny fits... We're like jaded by the easy ISK, just like you bears are!

~Andrei.
Moustached Slimy Worm
Go Petition Blizzard
Safety.
#242 - 2011-11-09 05:57:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Moustached Slimy Worm
The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people when in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun.
Tah'ris Khlador
Space Ghosts.
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#243 - 2011-11-09 06:25:52 UTC
carmelos53 wrote:
It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---

You guys are just a bunch of kids. Maybe some ice cream will cheer slimy worm and his friends up. The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group. If you didn't like the opinions of others hurting your "good name" maybe being dochebags in the first place wasn't the best option.

Please go tell your parents maybe they will care.


This is funny because you put emphasis on "channel banned" like it means something. Also, I'm pretty sure you misunderstand the tears coming out of this thread. You may have missed how this story originated and I'm not going to recap for you. Suffice to say, I'm pretty sure The Skunkworks crew and associates are having a blast in this facet of total destruction. I'm quite jealous.

Member of the Pink Pony Killboard Padding Alliance
TheMcNaughty
RUCIHIIII
Invidia Gloriae Comes
#244 - 2011-11-09 14:48:37 UTC
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:
The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun.


^This. A thousand times over...
Gazmin VanBurin
Boma Bull Corp
#245 - 2011-11-09 14:57:27 UTC
carmelos53 wrote:
It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---



I think your misinterpreting an excuse to ruin our good incursioning names and getting amazing kills, for heart filled sorrow.

Trust me, no one in Skunkworks is sad over our faction ship slaughter.
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#246 - 2011-11-09 23:23:26 UTC
carmelos53 wrote:
It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---


Carebear doesn't know what tears are.

You paid for a war with the Skunkworks. We're giving you what you paid for. Spin it however you need so that you can feel like a big boy, it was the actions of incursioners that got things to this point.

carmelos53 wrote:
The actions of your Corp members dictate how the people see the group..

Because you can judge an entire group of people by the actions of one. That mentality works so well in real life, let's extend it to Eve!

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.
Aqriue
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#247 - 2011-11-10 00:19:28 UTC
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:
The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun.

Odd, so what your saying is that your shooting NPC characters? Who is carebear now? If it can't fight back on even terms, its an easy win and no challenge for you, amirite? You cannot loose, therefore you paint yourself with your own logical brush but use the excuse "But it has a PC nametag instead of NPC Gist Saint, therefore it has better value for a pointless argument and I am right your wrong so just die to my guns."

PVP > PVE > NPC when it comes to the food chain and how ships are fit, though sometimes the NPC might win to the PVE but the PVE will never win to the PVP. Its because of different fitting that a PVP ship will always win, incursion fit ships might be able to counter a proper fit PVP ship all you got to do is blowup/off/rimjob the logi ship and it cascade fails from there cause Sansha ships have more DPS then your gang.

Would be awesomely funny if CCP made incursions more risk free like turning them into instances so you couldn't touch the vaulable pinata's you want to bag. The rage and bitter tears that flood the forums is just intoxicating how so many people think its unfair at the amount of isk it prints, when its obviously a good idea.

1. CCP makes incursions in highsec very "risk free"
2. Carebear those wallets into heaven
3. Nobody really wants to sell a plex for 300m
4. ???
5. PROFIT!!!! Carebears have excess isk to burn, more demand for PLEX, PLEX market shrinks from high demand (Elmo dolls way back come to mind) instead of high volumes low demand dropping the price of plex, sellers are happy they are making better isk themselves from plex cause they don't want to earn it themselves and CCP of all things is seeing more PLEX being bought from their website.

Still cannot figure out why they didn't turn those sanctums back on yet Straight
Zions Child
Higashikata Industries
#248 - 2011-11-10 01:02:49 UTC
What the **** is the poster above me talking about? Did you actually think that through? What, is that Soraya person from the God Squad giving lessons in poor posting?
PlayerName
Dirty Vagrants
Intergalactic Space Hobos
#249 - 2011-11-10 02:48:17 UTC
Moustached Slimy Worm wrote:
The problem with incursionbears, and actually all carebears, is that they think that they're people in reality they're not. They're essentially NPC's: They exist solely for others' enjoyment and have no identity whatsoever outside of us using them for fun.


Quoted for truth.

Aqriue wrote:
Would be awesomely funny if CCP made incursions more risk free like turning them into instances so you couldn't touch the vaulable pinata's you want to bag. The rage and bitter tears that flood the forums is just intoxicating how so many people think its unfair at the amount of isk it prints, when its obviously a good idea.


Not sure if trolling or just stupid. My guess is just stupid.

I have some advice you should heed: It's better to remain silent and appear stupid than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

Please try to remember this next time you decide to waste our time (and yours) with such a terrible, incoherent post.
Moustached Slimy Worm
Go Petition Blizzard
Safety.
#250 - 2011-11-10 04:42:36 UTC
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
First a short time line

Slimy worm griefed incursions > Skunkworks was banned from incursion channels > Skunkworks unhappy about this > Skunkworks band together to grief incursions > we found it to be extremely easy, lulzy fun > we declare 60bil challenge > we have hit well over 100bil

Now a list of likely reasons individuals in Skunkworks are doing this, from the biggest reason to the smallest.

Its fun!
Its funny!
Its actually making us a bunch of isk and getting us free ships!
We like finding game mechanics not often used
Revenge
Incursions are ruining EvE’s market

I hope this helps for future reference.


Slimy worm griefed incursions > Skunkworks was banned from incursion channels >incursion community hires God Squard to dec Skunkworks > Skunkworks unhappy about this > Skunkworks band together to grief incursions > we found it to be extremely easy, lulzy fun > we declare 60bil challenge > we have hit well over 100bil

you forgot that they attacked us :)
Rengas
AQUILA INC
Verge of Collapse
#251 - 2011-11-10 06:48:04 UTC
The thread that keeps on giving <3
disillusional
Autism Cartel
#252 - 2011-11-10 07:50:39 UTC
Gazmin VanBurin wrote:
carmelos53 wrote:
It's pretty funny to me^ that you guys are all tearing because your Corp gets banned from two CHANNELS...now add the fact that you knew exactly what your Corp mate was doing and didn't mind it but still feel hurt that your corps are... Let's just repeat this statement.... --->channel banned<---



I think your misinterpreting an excuse to ruin our good incursioning names and getting amazing kills, for heart filled sorrow.

Trust me, no one in Skunkworks is sad over our faction ship slaughter.



Quoted for glorious truths
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#253 - 2011-11-10 08:01:52 UTC
This thread is amazing. Never stop messing with the forces of ~elite PvE~

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.
JackBlasta
Doomheim
#254 - 2011-11-10 09:30:56 UTC
The best way to get highsec incursion bear tears is for large entity such as goons to form a large fleet, & go around completing the mom sties in each empire incursion as soon as they appear Lol
proxwar
Doomheim
#255 - 2011-11-10 11:31:34 UTC
http://www.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=4787&tid=1


1-0 to the high sec incursionbears.

Love CCP.

Incursion Logi ganking will be getting that little bit tougher from now on Cool
Rythm
True Power Team
#256 - 2011-11-10 11:54:54 UTC
proxwar wrote:
http://www.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=4787&tid=1


1-0 to the high sec incursionbears.

Love CCP.

Incursion Logi ganking will be getting that little bit tougher from now on Cool


Alliance P ....
Psychotic Monk
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#257 - 2011-11-10 15:36:35 UTC
proxwar wrote:
http://www.eveonline.com/news.asp?a=single&nid=4787&tid=1


1-0 to the high sec incursionbears.

Love CCP.

Incursion Logi ganking will be getting that little bit tougher from now on Cool



More like incursionbears: 1 and Skunkworks: 120b.

Also, that kinda sucks for us, but we were doing so well that CCP had to change the whole game for the dozen or so of us.

I wonder if this will effect neutral logi all in all. Nice response time, CCP. I would have left it as ~ emergent gameplay~ until incursions had some sort of other balancing factor, but v0v.

Fellow Skunks, I'd like to reiterate that you've done incredibly good work being so awesome that CCP had to weigh you down Harrison Bergeron-style. I'm incredibly proud of what we've done. Now let's go back to the lab and see what other highly clever **** we can do next.

Belligerent Undesirables Selling Griefer Immunity
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#258 - 2011-11-10 16:07:06 UTC
For those who didn't follow the link

Quote:
A part of the next client update will feature a change to aggression mechanics in high security space.

To benefit the EVE community at large, a small change has been made to game mechanics regarding criminal flags and how they are inherited in high security space. If a pilot is remote repairing, or otherwise assisting, another pilot who commits a criminal act then the repair module will now disengage. In order to continue repairs the module will need to be restarted and a message will appear warning of the criminal flag and possible consequences.


CCP just took the big nerf hammer and smashed Skunkworks and co. down underground.
I am honestly surprised by this Shocked
Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#259 - 2011-11-10 16:14:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Khanh'rhh
Redacted because I can't read.

Also: fail change is fail.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,

Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#260 - 2011-11-10 16:20:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Ammzi
Khanh'rhh wrote:
None of you know the difference between "criminal flagging" and passed on aggression, then?

A while back, CCP made it IMPOSSIBLE to rep someone who was criminally flagged, due to the CONCORDOKKEN greifing in Incursion sites. This ****** up FW and lowsec, since you couldn't rep someone who had a GCC timer (the criminal flag....)

It is now possible to do so again, only now with a warning.

i.e. CCP have fixed the half assed nerf.

What the Skunkworks were doing will still throw up no warning.

EDIT: unless CCP don't know their own terminology, of course. Lazy patch notes.


hang on khan, see my other post.