These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Wormholes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

C5 sporadics

First post
Author
Nutmegpainter
Whale Girth
Touched by the Tism
#1 - 2013-07-06 02:06:09 UTC
So, To all the wormholees in CSM positions, you must know how rage rolling C5 (and C6) chains go how tiring it can become, so, why not have the occasional Sporadic C5 ??

C5s already get Nulls, Lows, Highs, so why cant we get the chance for ADDITIONAL pvp action? That is why we live in Wormholes right? for Pvp?


Anyway hopefully some CSM can make this happen Cool

Maybe it could be called N275 in remembrance of me Cool
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#2 - 2013-07-06 03:25:07 UTC
yup, roaming WH to WH hole in high end wh space would be very nice.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Messoroz
AQUILA INC
#3 - 2013-07-06 03:51:16 UTC
Nutmegpainter wrote:

C5s already get Nulls, Lows, Highs, so why cant we get the chance for ADDITIONAL pvp action? That is why we live in Wormholes right? for Pvp?



LOL
Chitsa Jason
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#4 - 2013-07-07 20:47:26 UTC
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.

Burn the land and boil the sea You can't take the sky from me

Oxandrolone
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2013-07-07 21:16:29 UTC
More connections = more player interaction = more EvE
Lloyd Roses
Artificial Memories
#6 - 2013-07-07 21:34:04 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
First I would like to see C4s with dual statics.


c4s with two wormhole statics? *drool*
1c3crysta1
Silent Majority.
Aspartame.
#7 - 2013-07-07 22:25:06 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.


That'd make them a better version of the C2 because of the better control over incoming holes (which in turn is because that the wandering holes are more of less non-existant there). Not that I would mind Smile
Derath Ellecon
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2013-07-07 22:30:29 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.



Meh,

I don't know that C4's need a dual static. Especially not if one is to empire. It would be nice if it got random WH's like every other class of WH tho.
Casirio
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#9 - 2013-07-08 00:11:38 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.


any status on the Black Hole class and possible effect changes?
Peter Moonlight
Suddenly Carebears
#10 - 2013-07-08 02:22:36 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.

Good point for C4, most of us that live there have acess to highest profit ingame with the lowest risk in there, but PVP in C4 is really really reaaaly rare, as in my WH for example, we roll for bunch of Statics per day, and finding PvP is really hard, i mean they are lonely, sometimes it can happen to find a Venture/Covertor.. Anyway, you can open or not open your static and you just need 1 pair of eyes in most of cases, and in last 4 months only 1-2 C4 WH's opened. Anyway, C4-HIGH could be done, as it would be harder to do PvE in C4, or dual-statics, that would change C4's completely. Or simply make more low class 1-3 or C5's double statics, and add them +1 static C4, just make traffic there.
Nutmegpainter
Whale Girth
Touched by the Tism
#11 - 2013-07-12 21:25:56 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.



ehhhh Opening C4s to dual statics would definitely increase the activity in C4s, but if thats the case i want dual statics for c5s..

You might as well add game features to the places that are active and not try to save the dead strips of wormholes nobody uses IMO

5-5's are where the action is and the ability to use capitals only further escalates the intensity (fun) of wormhole space

case in point where we brought in caps from the null in our static to the fight.. I could never see that happening in c4 space What?
Meytal
Doomheim
#12 - 2013-07-15 12:19:33 UTC
Chitsa Jason wrote:
I would not be so quick to add roaming wh-wh to C5s. First I would like to see C4s with dual statics. In any case idea is sound and I dont have anything against it.

Dual statics would be great. As mentioned before/elsewhere, one to C1-C4 and one to C5-C6 would be ideal.

But beyond that, if any class of w-space doesn't have the random ,roaming connections now, they should get them. As you suggested in your CSM platform, the more opportunities for players to meet, the more there are opportunities for conflict and PvP. Just that would perhaps make the C4-C5-C4-C4-C5-C1 etc nonsense chains more exciting.