These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Jump Freighter Ganking - CCP what you will do against this???

First post
Author
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#321 - 2013-07-04 10:33:44 UTC
Quote:
There is truth in the silly machismo stuff. I have ganked people. Suicided barges. Undocked disco battleship in Jita. Really the only thing I enjoy doing in EvE now is often called griefing. Thing is I do it for my own pleasure not to "harvest tears" or any of the childish prattle that comes from most gankers and or people who seem to want to superimpose their in game actions onto their out of game personality.

That does smack of desperation and a low self esteem.


Idk, people have been harvesting tears since long before EVE came into being. It's just funny, to be honest with you. Especially when you get that special someone who just explodes and pours all the vitriol he can muster at the person who killed his pixels.

Belan the Noble Looter, Angwe of Menethil Harbor, and more. It's been funny to me at least, for a very long time. I enjoy taking someone's unreasonable expectations and dashing them, typically by ganking them, and I know I'm not the only one.

So I'd say that harvesting tears is my pleasure. It's not to inflate my own sense of self esteem, it's because every time somebody just explodes on me for ganking them, I laugh so hard I fall out of my chair.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#322 - 2013-07-04 10:37:50 UTC
Warr Akini wrote:
Let me put it this way:

Ganking a freighter is -by no means- easy. Anyone who truthfully says otherwise has not done what I do. Jump freighters are even harder.

Protecting a freighter is incredibly easy. Jump freighters are even easier to protect, for reasons listed in this hilarious thread, and others.

In short, if you were to place the physical representation of the minuscule amount of effort it requires to protect your gigantic beast of a hauler on one end of a seesaw, then drop the Titanic-equivalent amount of effort it takes to actually coordinate and execute a gank on the other end, it would provide that little speck with enough velocity to escape the Earth's atmosphere.

As to ISK discussions and suggestions about what kind of people gank fools, that can fall to people who care about that kind of thing.


Never tried a jump freighter myself. Never got the chance, they always... jump.

Thanks for the perspective! :)

I had kinda figured that coordinating 30 people plus scouts/scanners plus bumpers, could not possibly be easy. The most I've ever even come close is using Tornados. Catalysts much be a far cry.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#323 - 2013-07-04 11:00:29 UTC
Warr Akini wrote:
Let me put it this way:

Ganking a freighter is -by no means- easy. Anyone who truthfully says otherwise has not done what I do. Jump freighters are even harder.

Protecting a freighter is incredibly easy. Jump freighters are even easier to protect, for reasons listed in this hilarious thread, and others.

In short, if you were to place the physical representation of the minuscule amount of effort it requires to protect your gigantic beast of a hauler on one end of a seesaw, then drop the Titanic-equivalent amount of effort it takes to actually coordinate and execute a gank on the other end, it would provide that little speck with enough velocity to escape the Earth's atmosphere.

As to ISK discussions and suggestions about what kind of people gank fools, that can fall to people who care about that kind of thing.

If ganking a freighter is so difficult Ill make you a bet. If I can't ISBox a 5 man freighter gank Ill give you 20 bill. If I can you give me 20 bill. We'll use Chribba to hold the isk?

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

Gaara's sniper
MLG1337420BlazeIt360TitanNoScopeCorporationSWAG
#324 - 2013-07-04 11:30:33 UTC
Ganking a freighter with 5 guys is so easy.
Even i could do it with just 1.
Suicide ganking is harder.
thou you can try getting 5 faction fitted talos(or 3 faction fitted vindicators) and just gank the first afk autopilot freighter.

But hey, if we can use mittani as 3rd party, i'm willing to bet. It just that i don't trust Chribba :roll: :badtroll:
Infinity Ziona
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#325 - 2013-07-04 12:01:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Infinity Ziona
Gaara's sniper wrote:
Ganking a freighter with 5 guys is so easy.
Even i could do it with just 1.
Suicide ganking is harder.
thou you can try getting 5 faction fitted talos(or 3 faction fitted vindicators) and just gank the first afk autopilot freighter.

But hey, if we can use mittani as 3rd party, i'm willing to bet. It just that i don't trust Chribba :roll: :badtroll:

Never heard of mittani, one of your scamming alts? Chribba will be fine.

CCP Fozzie “We can see how much money people are making in nullsec and it is, a gigantic amount, a shit-ton… in null sec anomalies. “*

Kaalrus pwned..... :)

S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#326 - 2013-07-04 12:05:23 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Never heard of mittani, one of your scamming alts?


I think he's the guy who posts all those LoL reviews.
Jowen Datloran
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#327 - 2013-07-04 12:47:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Jowen Datloran
Regardless of other discussions, I actually think the cost (ISK wise) between a freighter (without cargo) and the ships/equipment you have to buy to suicide gank one is a tad disproportional in favor of the ganker. For industrial and transport ships it feels much better.

Not that I have any hope of any changes in that regard. HTFU and all that jazz.

Mr. Science & Trade Institute, EVE Online Lorebook 

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#328 - 2013-07-04 12:51:31 UTC
Jowen Datloran wrote:
Regardless of other discussions, I actually think the cost (ISK wise) between a freighter (without cargo) and the ships/equipment you have to buy to suicide gank one is a tad disproportional in favor of the ganker. For industrial and transport ships it feels much better.

Not that I have any hope of any changes in that regard. HTFU and all that jazz.


Given enough people you can gank anything for free.
Doc Spectre
Doomheim
#329 - 2013-07-04 12:56:33 UTC
Elder TheRock wrote:
its not about the loss of money....


and i don´t want a discussion about these...

Its only to give CCP a feedback from faithful players


If you buy a ship to transport things from A to B,
but you can´t do this while you where killed, also without cargo(see goon kills),
then something goes wrong, hopefully you will understand this

You've been playing for 8 years and you don't understand how EVE works?

GTFO...whiner...
Mii Kro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#330 - 2013-07-04 15:11:25 UTC
Yummmy Tears !!!
Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#331 - 2013-07-04 15:25:20 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Anna Djan wrote:
Although I see this as a whine post, being able to gank a 7bil ship with 500mil worth in highsec needs looking at.


Or rethink our skill system, because what's the point in leveling these skills, when a 2 week player can destroy what took 3+ months to skill for?

Even WoW rewards hard work better than this.

Put the time in = earned your rewards.


OP hasn't lost skills though?

Should have backup 2bil for buying replacement JF if ganked before he disembarks it from a station.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#332 - 2013-07-04 15:29:23 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:
Nice try but hitting a freighter with light missiles, or even med guns is a certainty.
Missiles, maybe. Medium guns, no. The tracking formula doesn't work that way especially not when bumping is involved (and missiles aren't used because their damage methodology sucks for what's needed). So, probability of kill <1 on the hit mechanics alone, before we even get into all the myriad of other things that can go wrong.

Quote:
And the ship popping and not getting concordekened is a moot point.
No, it isn't. It means probability of loss <1.

This is not semantics. This is to show that even if we apply the incorrect rule that risk = cost × [probability <1], there is still risk. As it happens, it would be a risk regardless, and the fact that the probability is never 1 just further cements this. Since the ignorant and uninformed argument that “there is no risk for the gankers” always come up, it has a fuckton of bearing on the discussion: it shows that people who are complaining about ganking often have no idea how the game works; how ganking works; how risk works; and that their arguments are pretty much completely fallacious in every detail since they are based on misconception, assumption, and ignorance rather than any kind of reality or facts.

Put another way: the moment you say “ganking is risk free” you disqualify yourself from discussing ganking because you don't understand any of the involved mechanics or concepts.

This simple fact is further bolstered by the other fact that freighters are not dying by the droves. If ganking were anywhere near as risk-free as these uniformed whingers suggest, there would be CONCORD clouds on every gate between Amarr/Dodixie/Jita/Rens, and the odds of seeing a freighter on the Jita undock would be absolutely minute. Instead, one undocks every couple of seconds and fly away unasailed, safe in the knowledge that the risk of their getting ganked is so close to zero as to make almost no difference at all.
Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#333 - 2013-07-04 15:30:49 UTC
Thar Saal wrote:
All threads like these show, and for that matter people like Ace demonstrate is that playing the game in a manor that allows for such negligence and carelessness has softened those players to a point where any threat or risk that can hurt their little lively hoods can't be dealt with using the mentality they've grown.

If you can't take the steps to defend yourself in such a hostile environment; around hostile people who are all looking to hurt you, then you deserve whatever losses occur. now post that bullshit kumbaya video nonsense crap to me so i can laugh in your face a second time.

excuse me, there are other crying threads which need my attention



Manner.
Livelihood.
Assorted punctuation issues.

6/10 Tries hard. Could do better.
Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#334 - 2013-07-04 15:37:02 UTC
Infinity Ziona wrote:

I believe that EvE should be a difficult game. It should take effort to kill a multi-billion isk ship. Being able to kill freighters and other high value targets in high sec in seconds, with a bunch of low skilled alts for giggles devalues EvE. Why put in effort and pay 50 - 500 mill wardecs to hunt targets, or pirate in low or null and hunt targets and in turn be hunted when you can just sit safely and immune in high ganking multi billion isk freighters / jump freighters risk free.


WAI. No need for my main to skill much beyond Cats for pvp fun enough from ganking rets in hisec with CCP pats on head all round. Same goes for OP pvp encounter, but loser and victor higher reqs and more at stake than cats/rets.
WAI. CCP say HTFU, no fly with all balls in undocked basket.


Starkiller Lothlorien
Doomheim
#335 - 2013-07-04 15:43:21 UTC
0Lona 0ltor wrote:
Miilla wrote:
Eve, a harsh universe of crime and punishment. Says so on the box.


If you are mad, go out and punish them.



Contrary to common nub belief, there is no ponies in space.


Eve was a harsh universe untill the last miner barge HP buff, now it's just a world of war crack clone. The miner buff was an IQ dumb down enougth. Eve would trully die if they buffed freighter HP or made ganking any harder.


But the tears would then be a veritable niagara.

Question: is origin of tears relevant? Are tears from carebears inherently more valuable than tears from 'no buff hisec AFK hammocks pls!' crowd?

If yes+postulation correct, result: lots of tears but wrong sort oh noes.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#336 - 2013-07-04 15:44:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Uoweme
Starkiller Lothlorien wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Anna Djan wrote:
Although I see this as a whine post, being able to gank a 7bil ship with 500mil worth in highsec needs looking at.


Or rethink our skill system, because what's the point in leveling these skills, when a 2 week player can destroy what took 3+ months to skill for?

Even WoW rewards hard work better than this.

Put the time in = earned your rewards.


OP hasn't lost skills though?

Should have backup 2bil for buying replacement JF if ganked before he disembarks it from a station.


It's not about losing skills, it's about if you trained enough to fly such ships and all associated to fly them, it should reward the benefits for doing so.

Otherwise, why even level to be a freighter pilot?

And if that's so, there's fewer freighters to gank.

Cause and Effect.

Last time players did this with miners, the mining ships were buffed and changed for the better. Want to do the same with freighters?

Nevermind, it's a Goonie project to change EvE into PvE paradise.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Elizabeth Aideron
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#337 - 2013-07-04 15:46:37 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Starkiller Lothlorien wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Anna Djan wrote:
Although I see this as a whine post, being able to gank a 7bil ship with 500mil worth in highsec needs looking at.


Or rethink our skill system, because what's the point in leveling these skills, when a 2 week player can destroy what took 3+ months to skill for?

Even WoW rewards hard work better than this.

Put the time in = earned your rewards.


OP hasn't lost skills though?

Should have backup 2bil for buying replacement JF if ganked before he disembarks it from a station.


It's not about losing skills, it's about if you trained enough to fly such ships and all associated to fly them, it should reward the benefits for doing so.

Otherwise, why even level to be a freighter pilot?

And if that's so, there's fewer freighters to gank.

Cause and Effect.

Last time players did this with miners, the mining ships were buffed and changed for the better. Want to do the same with freighters?

Nevermind, it's a Goonie project to change EvE into PvE paradise.


of course you get a benefit, the benefit of being able to sit in a freighter and move piles of **** around the galaxy. it doesnt grant you invulnerability
S Byerley
The Manhattan Engineer District
#338 - 2013-07-04 16:03:35 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Put another way: the moment you say “ganking is risk free” you disqualify yourself from discussing ganking because you don't understand any of the involved mechanics or concepts.


It's risk-free because the costs are certain and relatively low. You (or at least normal people) don't consider shooting ammo risky because while the payout is uncertain, the cost is consistent and known before you start.

Ganking is not risky in the normal sense because there's no collateral, no shiny ship investment that you might lose if things go horribly wrong.

Tippia wrote:
This simple fact is further bolstered by the other fact that freighters are not dying by the droves.


I'd wager this is part obscurity, part general decency, and part fun factor. Historically, those become non-factors if someone popularizes the act and forces CCP to adjust things. You could argue it's better for CCP to remain reactionary in these areas (it has merit), but we might as well discuss how best to change things when **** does hit the fan.
Callyuk
M1A12 Corp
#339 - 2013-07-04 16:16:16 UTC
Starkiller Lothlorien wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Anna Djan wrote:
Although I see this as a whine post, being able to gank a 7bil ship with 500mil worth in highsec needs looking at.


Or rethink our skill system, because what's the point in leveling these skills, when a 2 week player can destroy what took 3+ months to skill for?

Even WoW rewards hard work better than this.

Put the time in = earned your rewards.


OP hasn't lost skills though?

Should have backup 2bil for buying replacement JF if ganked before he disembarks it from a station.


2 BIL will barely buy you a freighter, it wont touch a Jump freighter
Paul Castrin
Legio XX Valeria Victrix
#340 - 2013-07-04 16:38:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Paul Castrin
Elder TheRock wrote:
NEXT sensless Jumpfreighter was ganked by Goons

Cargovalue: 1.2 bil

CCP you want this kind of "pvp"....if yes, you will lost all old players
which gave your game the chance to grow 10 years ago!


I play now over 8 years Eve....but now its over for me....

and all other players who want to tell me: "why you re so dump and fly in highsec with your Jumpfreighter"

It was not my, it was only a good friend in my corporation....the second one in the last 2 month....

we will quit now....


Ragequit please.

This is how EVE has always been and will always be. It's not save once you un-dock, get over it.

I don't need your stuff .

Signed,
A true faithful player and 9 year veteran.