These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Science & Industry

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Tech II BPO's

Author
Palantine Kaundur
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2011-11-08 02:09:01 UTC
DarthSyl wrote:
I would just stop paying for their service.


I stopped reading the thread after the OP provided a solution.

If you are unhappy because of something that drives less than 1% of the people playing.. then just quit. You won't be missed.
Stella SGP
#42 - 2011-11-08 05:10:22 UTC
DarthSyl wrote:
No thats not my point either. Im not out to sue anyone. I would just stop paying for their service.

Can I have your stuff when you stop paying for their services?
Shayla Sh'inlux
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#43 - 2011-11-08 11:08:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Shayla Sh'inlux
Just here (again) confirming that a t2 BPO doesn't make you insta-rich and that the vast majority of them are rather pointless to have. I owned eight tech II BPO's (including a small arty, a drone and a ship BPO) before I took a 3-year break. I got most of those for naught from R&D agents and bought a few from the auction forum.

Somewhere along the line the account I held them on was stolen from me and because apparently sharing your password with your wife is forbidden, they refuse to give it back to me. As a result, I returned to Eve with 500k isk and zero tech II BPOs instead of some 20 billion and a bunch of tech II prints.

Now, while I still owned those prints, yes, I was making good money. It was, however, not nearly as much isk as I make now from invention. The reason? VOLUME. VOLUME VOLUME. Tech II, especially ships and ammo, take FOREVER to build. HML's II (for example) take about 1,5 hour to build from a BPO. Yes, they take twice that from an ME -4 BPC but you can actually fill as amny factory slots as you have available with them, which increases your volume by so much that the slightly reduced profit per unit becomes a non-issue.

Also, market prices for most items are invention-driven anyway. The demand for mot items can nowhere near be met by production from BPOs, so margins are actually pretty good. Why on earth would I care the guy with the BPO makes more money per run? Most BPO holders would likely be better off just selling their BPOs for tens if not hundreds of billions because that's more isk than they will ever make from that blueprint.

Final example: I (mostly) invent and build Mackinaws. After taking into all the costs to build said ships (including BPCs, Datacores, Decryptor and materials) I make about 24-25 million on a Mack. I build 6-7 of them per day (on average, depending a bit on invention succes rates), so my invention + building makes me about 150-160 million per day. Without a BPO. A BPO owner will be able to build TWO Mackinaws per day. His profit per Mack will be 40% higher because his will be ME 1 or ME 2 while mine is negative (varying on which decryptor gives the best return, which is market dependant and mostly related to the cost of Nanotransistors, but I'm starting to go off-topic now). At 40% higher profit, he will make 80 million a day. That's half what I make.

So ye, sure that takes very little time, no invention, very little effort and only 1 factory slot. However, just selling the BPO for 150 billion or so would actually be a lot better. It would take 5 years for that print to have made 150b isk. I'd rather have 150b NOW than 150b in 5 years.
Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#44 - 2011-11-08 12:34:54 UTC
Oh is it time for this thread again already.

While we're at it, I think all skillpoints should be reset at least once a year, possibly every 6 months. Its unfair that some people have more than me.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#45 - 2011-11-08 13:31:15 UTC
DarthSyl wrote:
I am really curious just how CCP has protected themselves from legal action concerning this.


You are entitled to your opinion like anyone else, but that doesnt stop it from being complete bollocks

T2 BPOs arent the cash cows you think they are, firstly you can make more isk from inventing BPCs, and secondly, if you want one buy one go ahead and waste your money if you want, nobody is stopping you.

Also, your metaphors are crap, im pretty sure CCP dont advertise T2 BPOs as a way of getting new people to sign up to the game.

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Emperor Salazar
Remote Soviet Industries
Insidious Empire
#46 - 2011-11-08 13:48:53 UTC
DarthSyl wrote:


I am really curious just how CCP has protected themselves from legal action concerning this.



Not sure if serious, stupid or epic troll.

You know its their game right? You know they can do whatever they want with it right? Hmm. Maybe you don't.

Lets put it this way, they could reset everyone's skillpoints, standings, sov, remove all assets and more tonight and....all you could really do to "combat" this is unsubscribe.

Legal action? That's pure classy right there bro.
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#47 - 2011-11-08 15:03:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Wyke Mossari
The fairness of T2 BPO has been discussed to death.

However one aspect I think is being over looked, some T2 BPO are commanding prices/valuation that cannot be justified on a purely "return on capital" valuation. That Foxfire Javlin Rocket BPO is essentially worthless for production purposes and the Piranha Fury Light Missile barely profitable.

Instead they seem to be valued as collectors vanity items, almost like works of art in RL.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#48 - 2011-11-08 15:04:56 UTC
Emperor Salazar wrote:

Lets put it this way, they could reset everyone's skillpoints, standings, sov, remove all assets and more tonight and....all you could really do to "combat" this is unsubscribe.



CCP, Please don't do this.
It will make us sad, and we'll have to shoot statues in Jita again.

Thanks,
everyone.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Hoohnzy
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#49 - 2011-11-08 16:38:34 UTC
Shayla Sh'inlux wrote:

Final example: I (mostly) invent and build Mackinaws. After taking into all the costs to build said ships (including BPCs, Datacores, Decryptor and materials) I make about 24-25 million on a Mack. I build 6-7 of them per day (on average, depending a bit on invention succes rates), so my invention + building makes me about 150-160 million per day. Without a BPO. A BPO owner will be able to build TWO Mackinaws per day. His profit per Mack will be 40% higher because his will be ME 1 or ME 2 while mine is negative (varying on which decryptor gives the best return, which is market dependant and mostly related to the cost of Nanotransistors, but I'm starting to go off-topic now). At 40% higher profit, he will make 80 million a day. That's half what I make.

So ye, sure that takes very little time, no invention, very little effort and only 1 factory slot. However, just selling the BPO for 150 billion or so would actually be a lot better. It would take 5 years for that print to have made 150b isk. I'd rather have 150b NOW than 150b in 5 years.


I dont agree with OP, but this final example is not good imo, because as owner I can have more than just one T2 BPO and run 10 slots of different things. Then I can do much more ISK than inventer.


Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?
Velicitia
XS Tech
#50 - 2011-11-08 16:59:42 UTC
Hoohnzy wrote:
Shayla Sh'inlux wrote:

Final example: I (mostly) invent and build Mackinaws. After taking into all the costs to build said ships (including BPCs, Datacores, Decryptor and materials) I make about 24-25 million on a Mack. I build 6-7 of them per day (on average, depending a bit on invention succes rates), so my invention + building makes me about 150-160 million per day. Without a BPO. A BPO owner will be able to build TWO Mackinaws per day. His profit per Mack will be 40% higher because his will be ME 1 or ME 2 while mine is negative (varying on which decryptor gives the best return, which is market dependant and mostly related to the cost of Nanotransistors, but I'm starting to go off-topic now). At 40% higher profit, he will make 80 million a day. That's half what I make.

So ye, sure that takes very little time, no invention, very little effort and only 1 factory slot. However, just selling the BPO for 150 billion or so would actually be a lot better. It would take 5 years for that print to have made 150b isk. I'd rather have 150b NOW than 150b in 5 years.


I dont agree with OP, but this final example is not good imo, because as owner I can have more than just one T2 BPO and run 10 slots of different things. Then I can do much more ISK than inventer.


Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


You do realise that there are like ... MAYBE 10 of any one T2 BPO in the game, right?

If you have 1 trillion ISK to spend on said 10 BPOs (I know, good BPO are a lot more) then yeah ... you deserve a little bit of a break.

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Cyniac
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#51 - 2011-11-08 17:02:44 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
You do realise that there are like ... MAYBE 10 of any one T2 BPO in the game, right?


You keep saying this Velicitia... care to quote your source? I recall seeing a different amount in the past which I cannot quite find at the moment.


Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#52 - 2011-11-08 17:05:46 UTC
Hoohnzy wrote:

Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


Almost of the T2 mining crystals are that way. Mostly because the BPO owners can keep up with demand enough to drive the prices way below what it costs to invent them. Big loss item for an inventor, moderate profit for a BPO owner - and probably too easy to flood the market with over-supply.

Veld - 258k invent 58k sell
Scor - 287k invent 75k sell

Kernite - is the closest to breaking even (410k invent, 404k sell) of the hi-sec crystals. Everything else is 30-70% below invention costs.

Of the low-sec ores, only the Hedb crystal is worth inventing. In the null-sec ores, Spod and Ark.

There's a few low-volume products out there (like T2 mining crystals) where the BPO owners can have an impact. But most other invention stuff is profitable, the BPO owners just have better margins. (In other words... do your homework before you buy BPOs and run off lots of BPCs.)
Hoohnzy
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#53 - 2011-11-08 17:08:16 UTC
Velicitia wrote:
Hoohnzy wrote:
Shayla Sh'inlux wrote:

Final example: I (mostly) invent and build Mackinaws. After taking into all the costs to build said ships (including BPCs, Datacores, Decryptor and materials) I make about 24-25 million on a Mack. I build 6-7 of them per day (on average, depending a bit on invention succes rates), so my invention + building makes me about 150-160 million per day. Without a BPO. A BPO owner will be able to build TWO Mackinaws per day. His profit per Mack will be 40% higher because his will be ME 1 or ME 2 while mine is negative (varying on which decryptor gives the best return, which is market dependant and mostly related to the cost of Nanotransistors, but I'm starting to go off-topic now). At 40% higher profit, he will make 80 million a day. That's half what I make.

So ye, sure that takes very little time, no invention, very little effort and only 1 factory slot. However, just selling the BPO for 150 billion or so would actually be a lot better. It would take 5 years for that print to have made 150b isk. I'd rather have 150b NOW than 150b in 5 years.


I dont agree with OP, but this final example is not good imo, because as owner I can have more than just one T2 BPO and run 10 slots of different things. Then I can do much more ISK than inventer.


Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


You do realise that there are like ... MAYBE 10 of any one T2 BPO in the game, right?

If you have 1 trillion ISK to spend on said 10 BPOs (I know, good BPO are a lot more) then yeah ... you deserve a little bit of a break.


When I said it must be 10 exactly same BPOs? Im sure there are many profitable T2 BPOs :)
Shayla Sh'inlux
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#54 - 2011-11-08 17:12:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Shayla Sh'inlux
Quote:

I dont agree with OP, but this final example is not good imo, because as owner I can have more than just one T2 BPO and run 10 slots of different things. Then I can do much more ISK than inventer.


Yeh. You could theoretically have 10 tech II BPOs, You could also technically have 280 and have 28 characters. That's still besides the point. Yes, winning the lottery, what, FIVE, years ago is making you free isk with little effort. It's still not an awful lot of isk, as tech II BPOs have actually a really bad isk/hour conversion due the the insanely long build times. They might have been amazing when Jita sold, like, 200 Hammerheads II per day and 1 billion isk was A LOT of money, but in a world where thousands of said drones are sold in just one station and Casual-Joe the Mission Runner has 2bil in his wallet it's really not so good anymore.

Yes t2 BPOs obviously have better isk/hr than their invention counterparts, but if you take their auction value into account it´s actually really bad. Really, why do so few people actually understand how this works...
Rhistel Alaice
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#55 - 2011-11-08 17:12:28 UTC
Cyniac wrote:
Too much negativity... how about if CCP Did issue a warning it would read something like this:


ArrowWARNING Shocked

You are about to enter the universe of EVE. As a capsuleer, you may grow to wield awesome power capable of unleashing cataclysmic events.

However, you are not alone in the universe. There are others who have come before you, they have build up empires, plundered worlds, cut swathes of destruction in their way and build up huge industrial complexes in the heart of hostile territory, or learned to push the market forces of entire galaxies in their favour. In so doing they have amassed fortunes beyond reckoning and gathered rare and unique artefacts and knowledge which gives them the power which they now sit on.

Are you strong enough to compete? Know that while you can achieve some measure of success on your own, sooner or later you will come into conflict with your fellows. The fastest path to power is the one in which you steal, buy or destroy the power base of your competitors, and only in this way will you gain some of the power that the ones which have come before you have amassed.

And when you reach the pinnacle of your power, you can rest in the knowledge that right behind you, another generation of power hungry capsuleers is rising... and that they are coveting your wealth with a greed and cunning which may turn out to match your own.

Welcome Capsuleer... and know that once you fly past this point, you will never turn back.

You Have Been Warned.

Pirate



Phenomenal quote! Perfect description of what it's all about.
Hoohnzy
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#56 - 2011-11-08 17:31:15 UTC
Shayla Sh'inlux wrote:
Quote:

I dont agree with OP, but this final example is not good imo, because as owner I can have more than just one T2 BPO and run 10 slots of different things. Then I can do much more ISK than inventer.


Yeh. You could theoretically have 10 tech II BPOs, You could also technically have 280 and have 28 characters. That's still besides the point. Yes, winning the lottery, what, FIVE, years ago is making you free isk with little effort. It's still not an awful lot of isk, as tech II BPOs have actually a really bad isk/hour conversion due the the insanely long build times. They might have been amazing when Jita sold, like, 200 Hammerheads II per day and 1 billion isk was A LOT of money, but in a world where thousands of said drones are sold in just one station and Casual-Joe the Mission Runner has 2bil in his wallet it's really not so good anymore.

Yes t2 BPOs obviously have better isk/hr than their invention counterparts, but if you take their auction value into account it´s actually really bad. Really, why do so few people actually understand how this works...


OMG I have no problem with T2 BPOs. I just said that your example is bad in my opinion, because it havent cleared anything. You just cant compare 1 slot manufactorer and 10 slots manufactorer together. Do compare owner with 1 account and 1 character and inventer with 1 account and 1 character both same skills, station,....
Hoohnzy
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#57 - 2011-11-08 17:47:07 UTC
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
Hoohnzy wrote:

Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


Almost of the T2 mining crystals are that way. Mostly because the BPO owners can keep up with demand enough to drive the prices way below what it costs to invent them. Big loss item for an inventor, moderate profit for a BPO owner - and probably too easy to flood the market with over-supply.


My question should be: Why si the price for veld mining crystal II so low when T2 BPOs have no or very low impact on markets (like ppl mentioned here)?
uff my english is bad sorry Ugh
Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#58 - 2011-11-08 17:55:55 UTC
Hoohnzy wrote:
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
Hoohnzy wrote:

Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


Almost of the T2 mining crystals are that way. Mostly because the BPO owners can keep up with demand enough to drive the prices way below what it costs to invent them. Big loss item for an inventor, moderate profit for a BPO owner - and probably too easy to flood the market with over-supply.


My question should be: Why si the price for veld mining crystal II so low when T2 BPOs have no or very low impact on markets (like ppl mentioned here)?
uff my english is bad sorry Ugh


Because that's one of the markets where demand is low enough that a T2 BPO owner can make enough per week to keep up with demand. (There's not many like that, but where they exist - inventors can't compete - not that there would be much profit anyway.)
Velicitia
XS Tech
#59 - 2011-11-08 17:57:51 UTC
Hoohnzy wrote:
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
Hoohnzy wrote:

Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


Almost of the T2 mining crystals are that way. Mostly because the BPO owners can keep up with demand enough to drive the prices way below what it costs to invent them. Big loss item for an inventor, moderate profit for a BPO owner - and probably too easy to flood the market with over-supply.


My question should be: Why si the price for veld mining crystal II so low when T2 BPOs have no or very low impact on markets (like ppl mentioned here)?
uff my english is bad sorry Ugh



there are a few items that are absolutely rubbish to invent (mostly because margins are slim). Veld mining crystals happen to be one of these items.

Same goes for Drakes or 'Phoons or anything, really -- you may simply find that the market is so cut throat that you can't really break in to it.

Neither of these instances is "unfair" ...

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#60 - 2011-11-08 17:59:28 UTC
Hoohnzy wrote:
Scrapyard Bob wrote:
Hoohnzy wrote:

Another question, why is the price for veld mining crystal II so low?


Almost of the T2 mining crystals are that way. Mostly because the BPO owners can keep up with demand enough to drive the prices way below what it costs to invent them. Big loss item for an inventor, moderate profit for a BPO owner - and probably too easy to flood the market with over-supply.


My question should be: Why si the price for veld mining crystal II so low when T2 BPOs have no or very low impact on markets (like ppl mentioned here)?
uff my english is bad sorry Ugh

because its an exception to the rule, and not a great example of how the t2 BPO/BPC relationship generally works.

look at any item that a manufacturer might be interested in building, if its even moderately used in quantities, odds are the BPOs will not be sufficient enough to keep up with demand, and so the invented BPCs fill the gap. The bigger this gap, the less effect on price a BPO can have.

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION