These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Stabber Needs +0.2 Powergrid

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Freighdee Katt
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2013-06-23 13:50:46 UTC
This fit seems like it should work, but it is too tight on grid by a gnat's ass. EFT says it needs 893.9 and has 893.75 at all5 skills. Pyfa agrees with 893.9 / 893.8. Both reflect the same 715 PG listed for the base hull in-game.

It fits easily if you downgrade one LSE to meta, but this is not an off-the-wall fit, and it seems like it "should" work with everything tech 2.

[Stabber, New Setup 1]
Gyrostabilizer II
Gyrostabilizer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Tracking Enhancer II

Large Shield Extender II
Large Shield Extender II
Faint Warp Disruptor I
Experimental 10MN Microwarpdrive I

220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Republic Fleet Phased Plasma M
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Light Missile
Rapid Light Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Light Missile

Medium Anti-Thermal Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I

EvE is supposed to suck.  Wait . . . what was the question?
Whitehound
#2 - 2013-06-23 14:00:45 UTC
For it to be an "All T2"-fitting do you also need to fit only T2 items, while I can see a T1 Warp Disruptor and a T1 MWD on it.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Bertrand Butler
Cras es Noster
#3 - 2013-06-23 14:44:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Bertrand Butler
Since you are kiting with it, remove one of the TEs for a nano. The speed/agility will serve you well in the role and you wont have to downgrade the LSEs...while you are at it, upgrade the long point to T2, the extra 4km may provide you with some more range buffer while kiting...C:
Freighdee Katt
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2013-06-23 14:54:34 UTC
Whitehound wrote:
For it to be an "All T2"-fitting do you also need to fit only T2 items, while I can see a T1 Warp Disruptor and a T1 MWD on it.

Powergrid need is the same for the T2 versions.

EvE is supposed to suck.  Wait . . . what was the question?
Whitehound
#5 - 2013-06-23 14:56:39 UTC
Freighdee Katt wrote:
Whitehound wrote:
For it to be an "All T2"-fitting do you also need to fit only T2 items, while I can see a T1 Warp Disruptor and a T1 MWD on it.

Powergrid need is the same for the T2 versions.

The T2 MWD needs 15 PG more than the T1.

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Whitehound
#6 - 2013-06-23 15:31:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Whitehound
If you want to see an "All T2" fit for the Stabber:

[Stabber, All T2 and fits like a glove]
Gyrostabilizer II
Gyrostabilizer II
Tracking Enhancer II
Tracking Enhancer II

10MN Microwarpdrive II
Warp Disruptor II
Adaptive Invulnerability Field II
Large Shield Extender II

220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Phased Plasma M
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Phased Plasma M
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Phased Plasma M
220mm Vulcan AutoCannon II, Phased Plasma M
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Heavy Missile
Heavy Missile Launcher II, Caldari Navy Inferno Heavy Missile

Medium Anti-EM Screen Reinforcer I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I
Medium Core Defense Field Extender I

It has got more DPS, a lower signature but about the same eHP as your fit. It is "All T2" and CPU/PG requirement fits like a glove.

Of course, "All T2" here excludes the rigs, but it has got enough calibration points to cover T2 rigs...

Loss is meaningful. Therefore is the loss of meaning likewise meaningful. It is the source of all trolling.
Freighdee Katt
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2013-06-23 16:06:23 UTC
Bertrand Butler wrote:
Since you are kiting with it, remove one of the TEs for a nano. The speed/agility will serve you well in the role and you wont have to downgrade the LSEs...while you are at it, upgrade the long point to T2, the extra 4km may provide you with some more range buffer while kiting...C:

Fair enough.

EvE is supposed to suck.  Wait . . . what was the question?
God's Apples
Wilderness
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII
#8 - 2013-06-24 02:57:43 UTC
Freighdee Katt wrote:
Bertrand Butler wrote:
Since you are kiting with it, remove one of the TEs for a nano. The speed/agility will serve you well in the role and you wont have to downgrade the LSEs...while you are at it, upgrade the long point to T2, the extra 4km may provide you with some more range buffer while kiting...C:

Fair enough.


Stabber is really fast and agile for a cruiser already so it doesn't need a nano. However, you do really need a t2 point.

"Hydra Reloaded are just jealous / butthurt on me / us because we can get tons of PVP action in empire while they aren't good enough to get that." - NightmareX
Caleidascope
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2013-06-24 03:05:04 UTC
t2 drones.

Life is short and dinner time is chancy

Eat dessert first!
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2013-06-24 09:16:30 UTC
Freighdee Katt wrote:
This fit seems like it should work, but it is too tight on grid by a gnat's ass.


Use an Implant?
Muad 'dib
State War Academy
Caldari State
#11 - 2013-06-24 09:47:05 UTC
id down grade the assaults to meta4, its not like its epic dps or t2 ammo is going to swing a fight anyway.

Cosmic signature detected. . . . http://i.imgur.com/Z7NfIS6.jpg I got 99 likes, and this post aint one.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#12 - 2013-06-24 10:13:10 UTC
What's so bad about using 1 meta 4 shield extender?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Syrias Bizniz
some random local shitlords
#13 - 2013-06-24 16:41:05 UTC
Downgrade Rapid Light Launchers to Meta 4, you're not going to use T2 Missiles in most cases anyways.



Also lol @ T2 mwd.
Hakaimono
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2013-06-24 17:42:53 UTC
Drop an extender for an invul. Thats how I got my mods to fit.
The VC's
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2013-06-28 00:00:56 UTC
Genolutions. Ca 1 and ca 2
Liang Nuren
No Salvation
Divine Damnation
#16 - 2013-06-28 02:17:45 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
What's so bad about using 1 meta 4 shield extender?


I'm going with this answer too.

-Liang

I'm an idiot, don't mind me.
Leung Shum
PYRO MANIACS
#17 - 2013-06-28 11:14:10 UTC
When I see a ship without a DC II, I immediately assume you don't know how to play.
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2013-06-28 11:32:01 UTC
Leung Shum wrote:
When I see a ship without a DC II, I immediately assume you don't know how to play.


sorry but i have to disagree. DC II is a pvp mod. If his ship is built for pve its perfectly fine.
Nihassa
RvB Industries
#19 - 2013-06-28 11:39:51 UTC
Bastion Arzi wrote:
Leung Shum wrote:
When I see a ship without a DC II, I immediately assume you don't know how to play.


sorry but i have to disagree. DC II is a pvp mod. If his ship is built for pve its perfectly fine.



Perfectly designed to point those pesky npc's Shocked ( Not sure if troll or serious?)... (its a pvp fit)

Personally I'd always use a suitcase, tho mostly because im useless at pvp and so need the extra tank.
Bastion Arzi
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2013-06-28 12:51:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Bastion Arzi
Nihassa wrote:
Bastion Arzi wrote:
Leung Shum wrote:
When I see a ship without a DC II, I immediately assume you don't know how to play.


sorry but i have to disagree. DC II is a pvp mod. If his ship is built for pve its perfectly fine.



Perfectly designed to point those pesky npc's Shocked ( Not sure if troll or serious?)... (its a pvp fit)

Personally I'd always use a suitcase, tho mostly because im useless at pvp and so need the extra tank.




lol sry your right.

didnt notice the disruptor Roll
12Next page