These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Should remove PLEX as a form of payment... pull the free to play

First post
Author
Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#201 - 2013-06-28 08:15:56 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


So? The very nature of competition is that there will be a winner and a loser, based on their merits as judged by the consumer.

Also, I live in a small rural town, and we have dozens of small vendors that kick our WalMart's ass.


No , there is a winner and everyone else is a loser, including the employees. In my town, there is a walmart and some odds and ends business that covers what walmart just won't sell. So the consumer has little choice (though I do have amazon.com) and that also goes for employment choices. The only thing you can really do is move.

Then if it bothers you that much, move. I fail to see the problem here. Life is full of choices, some more difficult than others.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#202 - 2013-06-28 08:18:20 UTC
Kijo Rikki wrote:
By the way, while you guys are talking about socialism vs capitalism, you should stop by a small country town and see what pure capitalism is, behold Wal-Mart, and nothing else. That is the end result of pure unrestricted capitalism.


Believe it or not, socialism vs. capitalism is a false dichotomy unless one or the other is allowed to prevail to the exclusion of all moderation. Then there is no "vs", there is just the complete enslavement of the population to one extreme or the other - in socialism, it's to the government; in capitalism, it's to the corporations. The enslavement might not be obvious on the surface, but it will exist nonetheless.

However, in moderation, there is nothing wrong with a little capitalism, and there is nothing wrong with a little socialism.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#203 - 2013-06-28 08:20:38 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


So? The very nature of competition is that there will be a winner and a loser, based on their merits as judged by the consumer.

Also, I live in a small rural town, and we have dozens of small vendors that kick our WalMart's ass.


No , there is a winner and everyone else is a loser, including the employees. In my town, there is a walmart and some odds and ends business that covers what walmart just won't sell. So the consumer has little choice (though I do have amazon.com) and that also goes for employment choices. The only thing you can really do is move.

Then if it bothers you that much, move. I fail to see the problem here. Life is full of choices, some more difficult than others.


For some people, especially those with limited employment options, simply moving is not always financially viable.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#204 - 2013-06-28 08:29:07 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


So? The very nature of competition is that there will be a winner and a loser, based on their merits as judged by the consumer.

Also, I live in a small rural town, and we have dozens of small vendors that kick our WalMart's ass.


No , there is a winner and everyone else is a loser, including the employees. In my town, there is a walmart and some odds and ends business that covers what walmart just won't sell. So the consumer has little choice (though I do have amazon.com) and that also goes for employment choices. The only thing you can really do is move.


Move is still a choice. Amazon is still a choice. You don't literally have to work there, either. (people lived there in the first place for reasons besides WalMart, so unless WalMart killed the town's fundamental basis for existing, it's still there)

Or are you saying that you'd really rather have the old "Mom and Pop" 15% mark up for goods and services?


That's just it, in alot of these small towns, they did kill the fundamental base for existing. Mom and pop stores may have been more expensive, but there was an entire localized supply chain that created better paying jobs than what walmart offers. While it is the local people's fault for supporting it in the first place, I don't think people realized they were slitting their own throats until it was too late. Walmart pretty much squeezes local and nationwide vendors to sell their products for mere pennies or they simply wont carry it, they pay their workers jack and they sell their stuff incredibly cheap because of it. Once its in and they crush all the local markets (including suppliers), everyone has no place to shop but walmart, and really they're too poor to shop anywhere else, and its the only place to work, unless you like driving 50 miles to the nearest city just to get to work.

Moving is an option, but its pretty crappy to tell people who've lived somewhere all their lives if they don't like it they can pack up their stuff and move. I guess its ok though, the more people that get into the city, the less influence the red states have.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#205 - 2013-06-28 08:29:38 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:

For some people, especially those with limited employment options, simply moving is not always financially viable.

A problem not worth solving, is a problem not worth complaining about. Once upon a time, I went for a bit over a week without food to get myself out of a place I didn't want to be in anymore. I don't do well with excuses.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#206 - 2013-06-28 08:35:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

For some people, especially those with limited employment options, simply moving is not always financially viable.

A problem not worth solving, is a problem not worth complaining about. Once upon a time, I went for a bit over a week without food to get myself out of a place I didn't want to be in anymore. I don't do well with excuses.


It was your own choice to starve yourself. No one should be expected to follow that kind of example. And who are you that anyone should care what you categorise as an 'excuse' anyway? The problem may not be yours to solve or even care about, but nor is it up to you to simply disregard it as not worth it. That's what makes you part of the problem to begin with, so it's little wonder you're not interested in being part of the solution.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#207 - 2013-06-28 08:36:01 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
By the way, while you guys are talking about socialism vs capitalism, you should stop by a small country town and see what pure capitalism is, behold Wal-Mart, and nothing else. That is the end result of pure unrestricted capitalism.


Believe it or not, socialism vs. capitalism is a false dichotomy unless one or the other is allowed to prevail to the exclusion of all moderation. Then there is no "vs", there is just the complete enslavement of the population to one extreme or the other - in socialism, it's to the government; in capitalism, it's to the corporations. The enslavement might not be obvious on the surface, but it will exist nonetheless.

However, in moderation, there is nothing wrong with a little capitalism, and there is nothing wrong with a little socialism.


Oh, I know. I didn't mean to make it sound like a vs thing, that's why I said pure, unrestricted capitalism. I should have added that the two need each other and that's why the society works like it does. Every now and then the balance shifts too far one way and it needs to be fixed.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#208 - 2013-06-28 08:38:32 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

For some people, especially those with limited employment options, simply moving is not always financially viable.

A problem not worth solving, is a problem not worth complaining about. Once upon a time, I went for a bit over a week without food to get myself out of a place I didn't want to be in anymore. I don't do well with excuses.


It was your own choice to starve yourself. No one should be expected to follow that kind of example. And who are you that anyone should care what you categorise as an 'excuse' anyway?

I am me, and therefore, my opinion is the only one that matters to me. I don't exactly have a strong sense of empathy, and quite frankly, I find those that do to be rather pitiful.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#209 - 2013-06-28 08:41:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

For some people, especially those with limited employment options, simply moving is not always financially viable.

A problem not worth solving, is a problem not worth complaining about. Once upon a time, I went for a bit over a week without food to get myself out of a place I didn't want to be in anymore. I don't do well with excuses.


It was your own choice to starve yourself. No one should be expected to follow that kind of example. And who are you that anyone should care what you categorise as an 'excuse' anyway?

I am me, and therefore, my opinion is the only one that matters to me. I don't exactly have a strong sense of empathy, and quite frankly, I find those that do to be rather pitiful.


It doesn't take empathy, just a little decency. If you want to ostracize yourself, go ahead, that's your own problem and nobody else's. But as soon as you start making it someone else's problem, don't complain when they find a solution.

I don't care what you consider to be pitiful anymore than I care what you consider to be valid reasoning. What matters is what is, not your opinion of it. Your opinion might matter to you, but if you can't value anyone else's then what makes you think they should value yours?

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#210 - 2013-06-28 08:43:28 UTC
Quote:
That's just it, in alot of these small towns, they did kill the fundamental base for existing. Mom and pop stores may have been more expensive, but there was an entire localized supply chain that created better paying jobs than what walmart offers. While it is the local people's fault for supporting it in the first place, I don't think people realized they were slitting their own throats until it was too late. Walmart pretty much squeezes local and nationwide vendors to sell their products for mere pennies or they simply wont carry it, they pay their workers jack and they sell their stuff incredibly cheap because of it. Once its in and they crush all the local markets (including suppliers), everyone has no place to shop but walmart, and really they're too poor to shop anywhere else, and its the only place to work, unless you like driving 50 miles to the nearest city just to get to work.


Too much South Park tinfoil hat, man. WalMart doesn't just exist to self perpetuate and destroy the host like a virus.

Small towns have a reason they exist, otherwise they become what I call dots. (dot on the map)

Things like a packing plant, a historical battlefield site, a national park, a large amount of farmland, a manufacturing center, a nearby military base, etc, etc.

WalMart goes to places like that because there are people, and a profit to be made. If the only reason the town had for existing was the Mom and Pop stores in the first place, they were well on their way to becoming dots anyway.

Once a town loses the reason that people started living there in the first place, then it quickly becomes a dot, like hundreds of tiny little burgs in Kansas, for example. Drive through Kansas, just straight through, and you will run into dozens of tiny little villages that consist of about a dozen houses. They are lucky if there a gas station within 20 miles. There is literally no reason for it to exist anymore (there was a case a while back where everyone in one of the little backwater areas died, and no one knew because no one cared. Only when a state surveyor got lost on his way to somewhere else did he find the town full of dead people).

WalMart doesn't go to places that have no reason to exist, because those places don't have an economy. It only goes to places with an actual economy.

It takes over your overpriced, inefficient stores, and replaces them. The only people who lose their jobs were the people parasitically preying on the town through their own previously existing monopoly of goods and/or services. Whether you liked the people who owned the Mom and Pop stores or not, the fact remains that they were taking advantage of the lack of competition caused by being in a remote location to gouge you.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Gallowmere Rorschach
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#211 - 2013-06-28 08:44:33 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:

It doesn't take empathy, just a little decency. If you want to ostracize yourself, go ahead, that's your own problem and nobody else's. But as soon as you start making it someone else's problem, don't complain when they find a solution.

As a matter of general day to day practice, I actually go out of my way to avoid imposing myself on others in any way. It's a shame that most people don't share this trait.
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#212 - 2013-06-28 08:46:54 UTC
Gallowmere Rorschach wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:

It doesn't take empathy, just a little decency. If you want to ostracize yourself, go ahead, that's your own problem and nobody else's. But as soon as you start making it someone else's problem, don't complain when they find a solution.

As a matter of general day to day practice, I actually go out of my way to avoid imposing myself on others in any way. It's a shame that most people don't share this trait.


It seems more like you go out of your way to avoid doing anything about the less fortunate. This wouldn't be such a problem if you also didn't seem to be going out of your way to blame the victims.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#213 - 2013-06-28 08:49:50 UTC
Quote:
It seems more like you go out of your way to avoid doing anything about the less fortunate. This wouldn't be such a problem if you also didn't seem to be going out of your way to blame the victims.


Coming from my own point of view (I also have an almost pathological lack of human empathy), it's less of a "blame", and more of a "I refuse to take responsibility for someone else's failure".

They're not my victims. I did not convince them to fall for a Ponzi scheme, nor did I swoop in and take away all the jobs from their geographical area, or whatever else the root cause of their destitution may be. And I utterly refuse to feel guilty for my own success.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#214 - 2013-06-28 08:56:19 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
It seems more like you go out of your way to avoid doing anything about the less fortunate. This wouldn't be such a problem if you also didn't seem to be going out of your way to blame the victims.


Coming from my own point of view (I also have an almost pathological lack of human empathy), it's less of a "blame", and more of a "I refuse to take responsibility for someone else's failure".

They're not my victims. I did not convince them to fall for a Ponzi scheme, nor did I swoop in and take away all the jobs from their geographical area, or whatever else the root cause of their destitution may be. And I utterly refuse to feel guilty for my own success.


Now you're sounding like you think it's all about you. You don't have to care, it's not your problem, in which case you don't comment on it, you just stay out of it and go about your own business. It would be less effort for you, I think. Whatever their problems are though, they are not about you in any way. Unless you become part of the problem.

Also, tell me more about pathology. As a certified pathological sociopathic autistic person myself, I can tell you now you're not even solving your own problems. Go check out cognitive behavioural therapy.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#215 - 2013-06-28 09:02:14 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:


Too much South Park tinfoil hat, man. WalMart doesn't just exist to self perpetuate and destroy the host like a virus.

Small towns have a reason they exist, otherwise they become what I call dots. (dot on the map)

Things like a packing plant, a historical battlefield site, a national park, a large amount of farmland, a manufacturing center, a nearby military base, etc, etc.

WalMart goes to places like that because there are people, and a profit to be made. If the only reason the town had for existing was the Mom and Pop stores in the first place, they were well on their way to becoming dots anyway.

Once a town loses the reason that people started living there in the first place, then it quickly becomes a dot, like hundreds of tiny little burgs in Kansas, for example. Drive through Kansas, just straight through, and you will run into dozens of tiny little villages that consist of about a dozen houses. They are lucky if there a gas station within 20 miles. There is literally no reason for it to exist anymore (there was a case a while back where everyone in one of the little backwater areas died, and no one knew because no one cared. Only when a state surveyor got lost on his way to somewhere else did he find the town full of dead people).

WalMart doesn't go to places that have no reason to exist, because those places don't have an economy. It only goes to places with an actual economy.

It takes over your overpriced, inefficient stores, and replaces them. The only people who lose their jobs were the people parasitically preying on the town through their own previously existing monopoly of goods and/or services. Whether you liked the people who owned the Mom and Pop stores or not, the fact remains that they were taking advantage of the lack of competition caused by being in a remote location to gouge you.


I've seen them go into towns that had established k-mart's and U-saves and push them out. But more to the point, I know for a fact they strong-arm local farmers and other goods suppliers once they are the only game in town. You sell us your products for 10 cent profit or we don't sell it. They have no choice, but the end result is everyone on that big farmland suffers, people other than mom and pop stores lose their jobs. I know you make the mom and pop store sound evil by labeling them as gougers but they aren't some mega-conglomerate that can dictate what prices they will pay for goods to resell, they certainly wouldn't strongarm their suppliers into selling their goods at minimal profit. Just like agro-business killed the farmer, I'm sure that guy wasn't just trying ot make a living, he was gouging the crap out of the local population.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#216 - 2013-06-28 09:05:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Kaarous Aldurald
Quote:
Now you're sounding like you think it's all about you.


You have it backwards. It's not about me. That's basically the whole point.

You were saying "if we want ostracize ourselves", or something to that extent, because someone else said he doesn't have a lot of empathy, especially not for someone who could solve their own problem, but won't because they can't handle how far they have to go to do it.

But it's not about me. And I truly couldn't care. If they wish to elevate themselves, the means exist to do so. If they cannot stomach the means, then they ***** about WalMart as though it's at fault for all the ills in their lives. It's not, but like the Goons, WalMart makes a convenient scapegoat for the have-nots to use as a target.

Other reply:

Quote:
They have no choice, but the end result is everyone on that big farmland suffers, people other than mom and pop stores lose their jobs.


I live NECK deep in farmland right now, most of my friends and drinking buddies that aren't work related, are farmers. They export nationally, through the same shipping company that their parents used. They don't sell to WalMart, they sell to their retailer.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Freakdevil
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#217 - 2013-06-28 09:07:49 UTC
Given a choice between the PLEX and OP. I choose PLEX.

OP: You have been voted off the island. GOODBYE!
Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#218 - 2013-06-28 09:13:45 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
Now you're sounding like you think it's all about you.


You have it backwards. It's not about me. That's basically the whole point.

You were saying "if we want ostracize ourselves", or something to that extent, because someone else said he doesn't have a lot of empathy, especially not for someone who could solve their own problem, but won't because they can't handle how far they have to go to do it.

But it's not about me. And I truly couldn't care. If they wish to elevate themselves, the means exist to do so. If they cannot stomach the means, then they ***** about WalMart as though it's at fault for all the ills in their lives. It's not, but like the Goons, WalMart makes a convenient scapegoat for the have-nots to use as a target.

Other reply:

Quote:
They have no choice, but the end result is everyone on that big farmland suffers, people other than mom and pop stores lose their jobs.


I live NECK deep in farmland right now, most of my friends and drinking buddies that aren't work related, are farmers. They export nationally, through the same shipping company that their parents used. They don't sell to WalMart, they sell to their retailer.


Walmart may not be the problem, but denying that there is a problem in the US that causes such a high rate of "have nots", or blaming the have-nots in any way, is simple naivety. If that problem didn't exist, then sure, maybe then you could say, "if you want more than you have, stop complaining about walmart and get a job, or move". Because you can actually say that in Australia. The number of bogans around that could easily get a local fruit picking job of some kind where I live is ridiculous. But in the US, you cannot blame the have nots when the haves have virtually everything.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#219 - 2013-06-28 09:15:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Ace Uoweme
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
By the way, while you guys are talking about socialism vs capitalism, you should stop by a small country town and see what pure capitalism is, behold Wal-Mart, and nothing else. That is the end result of pure unrestricted capitalism.


Believe it or not, socialism vs. capitalism is a false dichotomy unless one or the other is allowed to prevail to the exclusion of all moderation. Then there is no "vs", there is just the complete enslavement of the population to one extreme or the other - in socialism, it's to the government; in capitalism, it's to the corporations. The enslavement might not be obvious on the surface, but it will exist nonetheless.

However, in moderation, there is nothing wrong with a little capitalism, and there is nothing wrong with a little socialism.


It exists because humans are essentially herd animals. They need to be controlled, and even seek to be controlled. And why? Because it offers safety, order and efficiency. This is how Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and whatever turd in world history managed to have power, stay in power and murder their own to abandon...all under the eyes of the very people they terrorized.

Take a look at EvE even. Why is Caldari the #1 faction? You would think a sandbox game would promote the Gallente Federation above all. It didn't. People gravitated to Caldari by default as it mimics RL the most. It's something humans understand well, and it's a comfort zone.

Socialism as a concept is wonderful on paper (even capitalists will admit it). But in practice it doesn't work beyond state borders. The USSR was a combination of Communism and Socialism, but it showed that beyond the individual states the system doesn't perform well. The USSR disintegrated from inside out. The US didn't destroy it directly, it went bankrupt.

Just like the other socialist dominating countries in Europe on the Euro are facing.

As the USSR downfall shown you can't spend what doesn't exist. That's the hardest thing socialists have understanding...governments don't make money, they just print it. Tax folks to over half their income, where's the disposable income? And if people don't have disposable incomes how can they play games? How can they also be non-dependent on the State for the very services they payout for (rat chasing his tail...)?

Capitalism is not a fair system in contrast. It doesn't operate on being fair or even just. But it plays to what humans also know, greed. And with that carrot, things happen. It's a personal incentive system to work harder (socialism robs you of self-worth, and also reflects the quality of goods -- that Yugo would not compare to even a Volkswagon in quality). Reward a person with trinkets for working harder is the grease that keeps capitalism going.

And that's why Capitalism wins out, for again people are valued and rewarded for what they do. On the ground level (those 3 meals before a Revolution) capitalism offers more for the person and doesn't rob him of his self-esteem. It's why Americans appear so cocky and confident, it's because we're feel appreciated (and this is before even the US became a world leader). Can't say the same of that factory worker in Moscow, or that French street sweeper with his 30hr work weeks. They're fed; they have a roof over their heads; they have "free" healthcare; they can even goto school for "free", but they're cogs in the wheel and feel it (and as grumpy for it too). The American isn't. Even if he works for IBM, Microsoft or Google, he's an individual first despite the corporate culture. An individual that's appreciated.

Because of the individualism, we won't join an universal currency. That even has Socialist overtones (like the UN).

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#220 - 2013-06-28 09:19:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Kijo Rikki wrote:
By the way, while you guys are talking about socialism vs capitalism, you should stop by a small country town and see what pure capitalism is, behold Wal-Mart, and nothing else. That is the end result of pure unrestricted capitalism.


Believe it or not, socialism vs. capitalism is a false dichotomy unless one or the other is allowed to prevail to the exclusion of all moderation. Then there is no "vs", there is just the complete enslavement of the population to one extreme or the other - in socialism, it's to the government; in capitalism, it's to the corporations. The enslavement might not be obvious on the surface, but it will exist nonetheless.

However, in moderation, there is nothing wrong with a little capitalism, and there is nothing wrong with a little socialism.


It exists because humans are essentially herd animals. They need to be controlled, and even seek to be controlled. And why? Because it offers safety, order and efficiency. This is how Stalin, ******, Pol Pot and whatever turd in world history managed to have power, stay in power and murder their own to abandon...all under the eyes of the very people they terrorized.

Take a look at EvE even. Why is Caldari the #1 faction? You would think a sandbox game would promote the Gallente Federation above all. It didn't. People gravitated to Caldari by default as it mimics RL the most. It's something humans understand well, and it's a comfort zone.

Socialism as a concept is wonderful on paper (even capitalists will admit it). But in practice it doesn't work beyond state borders. The USSR was a combination of Communism and Socialism, but it showed that beyond the individual states the system doesn't perform well. The USSR disintegrated from inside out. The US didn't destroy it directly, it went bankrupt.

Just like the other socialist dominating countries in Europe on the Euro are facing.

As the USSR downfall shown you can't spend what doesn't exist. That's the hardest thing socialists have understanding...governments don't make money, they just print it. Tax folks to over half their income, where's the disposable income? And if people don't have disposable incomes how can they play games? How can they also be non-dependent on the State for the very services they payout for (rat chasing his tail...)?

Capitalism is not a fair system in contrast. It doesn't operate on being fair or even just. But it plays to what humans also know, greed. And with that carrot, things happen. It's a personal incentive system to work harder (socialism robs you of self-worth, and also reflects the quality of goods -- that Yugo would not compare to even a Volkswagon in quality). Reward a person with trinkets for working harder is the grease that keeps capitalism going.

And that's why Capitalism wins out, for again people are valued and rewarded for what they do. On the ground level (those 3 meals before a Revolution) capitalism offers more for the person and doesn't rob him of his self-esteem. It's why Americans appear so cocky and confident, it's because we're feel appreciated (and this is before even the US became a world leader). Can't say the same of that factory worker in Moscow, or that French street sweeper with his 30hr work weeks. They're fed; they have a roof over their heads; they have "free" healthcare; they can even goto school for "free", but they're cogs in the wheel and feel it (and as grumpy for it too). The American isn't. Even if he works for IBM, Microsoft or Google, he's an individual first despite the corporate culture. An individual that appreciated.

Because of the individualism, we won't join an universal currency. That even has Socialist overtones (like the UN).



Actually, most people choose caldari because it's the default that the game gives you. You have to change it to be another race. People who are new to the game generally know very little about the lore itself. CCP promote all the races almost equally, especially in trailers. Just look at the Odyssey trailer with the Nemesis going out to explore, or the one with the Thorax that sorta phases between different places in EVE space.

I know what you're saying, but there is a big difference between competitive, sustainable growth, and absolute capitalism.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104