These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Test Server Feedback

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Where is the new Paladin?

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Arline Kley
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2013-06-25 13:36:34 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Shinzhi Xadi wrote:
I don't think any of us expected the Paladin changes to take this long. I was thinking it would be like the Vargur or Kronos, just a small tweak somewhere to give it a bit of a different look. Now that its taking ages, I'm wondering if its a totally different design than the Apocalypse?

I guess all us fans can do is wait patiently for our new Über Paladin Of Doom.



lets just say i had to remodel 60% of the ship


Does it have some spinning bits? Twisty bits? Fractal designs so that it is infact infinitely sized?


"For it was said they had become like those peculiar demons, which dwell in matter but in whom no light may be found." - Father Grigori, Ravens 3:57
Aghira
Systech Astromantics Shipyard Inc.
#22 - 2013-06-25 14:19:42 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Shinzhi Xadi wrote:
I don't think any of us expected the Paladin changes to take this long. I was thinking it would be like the Vargur or Kronos, just a small tweak somewhere to give it a bit of a different look. Now that its taking ages, I'm wondering if its a totally different design than the Apocalypse?

I guess all us fans can do is wait patiently for our new Über Paladin Of Doom.



lets just say i had to remodel 60% of the ship


So you're done? Can we see it? Blink

Es wird niemals so viel gelogen wie vor der Wahl, während des Krieges und nach der Jagd. (Otto von Bismarck)

english is not my native language.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#23 - 2013-06-25 14:24:34 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
lets just say i had to remodel 60% of the ship

Wow, 60%? That's quite a lot of remodeling. I anticipate the Paladin being quite the sexy, beastly-looking.. well.. beast. Is it unreasonable to hope it hits SiSi in the next few weeks?

CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
one ship at a time :)

In very very very old threads from around the time of Retribution being on Singularity or so, I seem to recall you saying you wanted to remodel the Moa. Or was it the Blackbird? Anyway, you mentioned there being multiple "ugly ships" you wanted to redesign. Have you been able to work on any of them? No details needed, just a vague yes or no will do.

Last question: Is the Golem next?
CCP BunnyVirus
C C P
C C P Alliance
#24 - 2013-06-25 15:03:56 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP BunnyVirus
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
lets just say i had to remodel 60% of the ship

Wow, 60%? That's quite a lot of remodeling. I anticipate the Paladin being quite the sexy, beastly-looking.. well.. beast. Is it unreasonable to hope it hits SiSi in the next few weeks?

CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
one ship at a time :)

In very very very old threads from around the time of Retribution being on Singularity or so, I seem to recall you saying you wanted to remodel the Moa. Or was it the Blackbird? Anyway, you mentioned there being multiple "ugly ships" you wanted to redesign. Have you been able to work on any of them? No details needed, just a vague yes or no will do.

Last question: Is the Golem next?



Yes and maybe

3D Artist
SMT008
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#25 - 2013-06-25 15:20:56 UTC
Moas and Typhoons are to be remodeled next. This isn't even negotiable.

They have become USABLE with the last updates (Hybrid/T1cruiser update for the Moa, Battleship/Cruisemissile update for the Typhoon). Now they just need to look like they come from a 2010+ game Sad
Raven Solaris
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-06-25 15:54:32 UTC
SMT008 wrote:
Moas and Typhoons are to be remodeled next. This isn't even negotiable.

They have become USABLE with the last updates (Hybrid/T1cruiser update for the Moa, Battleship/Cruisemissile update for the Typhoon). Now they just need to look like they come from a 2010+ game Sad


Both are fine.
Travasty Space
Pilots of Epic
#27 - 2013-06-25 16:07:04 UTC
If you change the Typhoon much there with be mobs, <3 the the flying trashcan.
Roweship
Doomheim
#28 - 2013-06-25 16:59:06 UTC
This thread is about the Super Paladin

After this long I expect nothing less than Tempest hull sections welded to the front and sides.
Shinzhi Xadi
Doomheim
#29 - 2013-06-25 17:46:43 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
[quote=CCP BunnyVirus]

Last question: Is the Golem next?



Yes and maybe


Hm, I refused to fly the golem or raven variants because that silly lop-sided asymmetrical shape gives me a headache. If you look closely, the golem doesn't even fly straight, its center of rotation is off to the right side. I like the golem, but omg, can't stand to look at it. Make it symmetrical, and you will hear a cheer from me!

Mac Pro dual 6-core Xeon 3.06ghz, 24gig ecc ram, EVGA GTX 680 Mac Edition, Intel SSD, OS X Yosemite and Windows 8.1 Pro.
Shinzhi Xadi
Doomheim
#30 - 2013-06-25 17:48:08 UTC
Travasty Space wrote:
If you change the Typhoon much there with be mobs, <3 the the flying trashcan.


OMG, its not a trashcan! Go watch old Star Trek, the episode called "Doomsday Machine". That's all I see when I look at the Typhoon.

Mac Pro dual 6-core Xeon 3.06ghz, 24gig ecc ram, EVGA GTX 680 Mac Edition, Intel SSD, OS X Yosemite and Windows 8.1 Pro.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#31 - 2013-06-25 17:57:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
So upon asking him if it's possible to see the Paladin on SiSi in mid-July, our revered CCP BunnyVirus replied:

CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
no


I suppose it's fair to say I expected that.

Another CCP then chimed in with a comment about "summer vocotions" which quickly devolved into discussing vacations and vocations and busman's holidays.
Omnathious Deninard
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2013-06-25 18:13:07 UTC
Please, is the Sin model up for review?

If you don't follow the rules, neither will I.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#33 - 2013-06-25 18:18:47 UTC
Omnathious Deninard wrote:
Please, is the Sin model up for review?


If the Sin looks identical to the dominix with the exception of coloration, then it's safe to assume they're going to at least tweak it to differ from its T1 counterpart... at some point.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2013-06-26 05:59:51 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
If the Sin looks identical to the dominix with the exception of coloration, then it's safe to assume they're going to at least tweak it to differ from its T1 counterpart... at some point.

It was the same with all T2 ships. They broke the trend when they released the new stealth bomber models in Inferno.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#35 - 2013-06-26 14:12:37 UTC
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
If the Sin looks identical to the dominix with the exception of coloration, then it's safe to assume they're going to at least tweak it to differ from its T1 counterpart... at some point.

It was the same with all T2 ships. They broke the trend when they released the new stealth bomber models in Inferno.

Go back and look at the AFs though. Those differ from their T1 versions. My Cheetah looks different from my Probe.
James Amril-Kesh
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#36 - 2013-06-26 14:54:30 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
If the Sin looks identical to the dominix with the exception of coloration, then it's safe to assume they're going to at least tweak it to differ from its T1 counterpart... at some point.

It was the same with all T2 ships. They broke the trend when they released the new stealth bomber models in Inferno.

Go back and look at the AFs though. Those differ from their T1 versions. My Cheetah looks different from my Probe.

You're right about the AFs, I forgot about those. And yeah, the Cheetah is a slightly different model from the Probe. The interceptors are different too. I think for the rest of the T2 ships this does hold true though.

Enjoying the rain today? ;)
Eptesicus Nilssoni
Untied Dysleckticks
#37 - 2013-06-26 17:55:36 UTC
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
Alvatore DiMarco wrote:
If the Sin looks identical to the dominix with the exception of coloration, then it's safe to assume they're going to at least tweak it to differ from its T1 counterpart... at some point.

It was the same with all T2 ships. They broke the trend when they released the new stealth bomber models in Inferno.

Go back and look at the AFs though. Those differ from their T1 versions. My Cheetah looks different from my Probe.


Actually Cheetah is a covert ops, just like the bombers, and not an AF.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#38 - 2013-06-27 10:33:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
Eptesicus Nilssoni wrote:
Actually Cheetah is a covert ops, just like the bombers, and not an AF.


Did anyone say that the Cheetah is an AF? Also, the Stealth Bombers are quite distinct from CovOps ships, and were dramatically remodeled only because of the torpedo launchers getting models that wouldn't fit on the old SB hulls.
Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#39 - 2013-06-27 11:12:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Alvatore DiMarco
James Amril-Kesh wrote:
You're right about the AFs, I forgot about those. And yeah, the Cheetah is a slightly different model from the Probe. The interceptors are different too. I think for the rest of the T2 ships this does hold true though.


I just now finished a sweep of all the ships in the game. There are ships in every size classification (except BC) that look different when compared to their T1 versions. However, there are also a lot that look identical except for paint.
Alexila Quant
Versatility Production Corporation' LLC
#40 - 2013-06-27 18:43:48 UTC
CCP BunnyVirus wrote:
Hannott Thanos wrote:
How about you remodel the Thorax a bit? As much as i love to f*** over people in New Eden, I think it's abit literal don't you?



one ship at a time :)

If you remodel my thorax I will unsub.

#madbro
Previous page123Next page