These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Righteousness of Vitoc

Author
Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#161 - 2011-11-07 19:26:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Kithrus
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Arkady Sadik wrote:
What amuses me is that the Amarr proclaim to try and bring their faith to others, but when others start to discuss the basis of their faith, all that happens is that they tell those others that they have no right to discuss the faith.

When the only people who actually do discuss the meaning of the Scriptures are a Blood Raider and a Republic loyalist, you can get a pretty concrete idea about how much of the current Empire is about Faith. May your God have mercy with you.


Debating the basis of Amarrian faith isn't just throwing in some ragtag interpretation of Scripture. There are standards of interpretation and exegesis one would have to adhere to, to engage into any serious discussion.

So you've maybe a discussion about meaning but not a meaningful discussion.


That really just reads as "You aren't considered "qualified" to talk about the Scriptures unless you've demonstrated that your thought process is along the same lines as ours. Should you deviate from this we'll denounce you a heretic, gotta keep the masses in check and all..."


Well let us take a few steps back for a moment and look at it this way.

If the scriptures are true anyone who is deviating from them would be spreading lies and causing decent. Therefor stopping this would be the best course of action.

Maybe you should walk a mile in Amarrian shoes and see the burden of truth many of us carry before you look at it only from your perspective.

More importantly there's no where in scripture that says you HAVE to use one method or another to keep your charges. As long as your following the scriptures those things are tools at your disposal to use for your work. I personally find it distasteful and point less but that is my choice as a holder Lord. As long as I do my duty within God grace that's what matters.

If you want to argue Vitoc argue the merits and flaws of Vitoc don't make this about our faith making us use it because it doesn't. It was a tool created to help with the work. If you want it stopped create a better solution and argue to its flaws or merits. It is just one method out of many to keep slaves in line.

Now I'm completely aware of you saying 'Well then just end slavery so you don't have to use it.' There will always be criminals and like in the Empire who will be enslaved for their crimes. As for your people again I turn your attention to the wisdom of the Empress.

I shouldn't have to explain to any of the the logic of realities. You can't join an argument and say, 'well simply do this' unless it really is that simple to like throwing a switch. Such statements are a flawed premise based on the illusion of perspective and colored by propaganda which do not take into account simple physics.

Change doesn't happen over night in the way you want it to. Sure you can apply overwhelming force to an object it hopes of changing it but the act of doing so may brake it resulting in a lengthily clean up and redistribution. Then you have naysayers who are tired of waiting after the promised clean world they wanted is taking to long to come about and you have a new rebellion.

Argue Vitoc if you must, argue the scriptures if you must in fact I encourage you to do so if only so you think about what your asking but for the love of God just think! Don't give into propaganda and false whispers. Those are only spreading hear-say to topple someone because they are either jealous or want power for themselves. Such people don't care about the truth and they care even less about you if you were the person in charge.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#162 - 2011-11-07 22:15:54 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:
You appear to be saying that in your view it's acceptable to wipe out a culture if it threatens other cultures.


Your culture has already destroyed, at the very least, six other cultures (Ealur, Ni-Kunni, unnamed tribe who shared the Ni-Kunni homeworld, Khanid, Udor, and the Starkmanir tribe) and conducted genocidal campaigns of ethnic cleansing against two of those groups. You have further attempted campaigns of cultural and ethnic destruction against no less than six other cultures (Sebiestor, Brutor, Krusual, Thukker, Nefantar and Vherokior) and have very clearly- and remorselessly-stated designs on doing it to at least the various cultures of the Federation as well.

You are a rabid dog, and rabid dogs get put down, like any violent, diseased animal.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#163 - 2011-11-07 22:35:13 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:
You appear to be saying that in your view it's acceptable to wipe out a culture if it threatens other cultures.


Your culture has already destroyed, at the very least, six other cultures (Ealur, Ni-Kunni, unnamed tribe who shared the Ni-Kunni homeworld, Khanid, Udor, and the Starkmanir tribe) and conducted genocidal campaigns of ethnic cleansing against two of those groups. You have further attempted campaigns of cultural and ethnic destruction against no less than six other cultures (Sebiestor, Brutor, Krusual, Thukker, Nefantar and Vherokior) and have very clearly- and remorselessly-stated designs on doing it to at least the various cultures of the Federation as well.

You are a rabid dog, and rabid dogs get put down, like any violent, diseased animal.


Khanid still have our art and out own language, that I can attest to. The Ni-Kunni still have theirs as well. As for that incident with the Starkmanir that was done because of the death of an heir at the hands of a member of the race not because it was on the original agenda of the day.

as for the rest of randomly naming races we have interacted with it shows just by those three examples right there the Amarr don't care for cultural differences. You only get half an argument with the Starkmanir and even then its flimsy at best if you even read the story.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#164 - 2011-11-07 22:53:45 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
Khanid still have our art and out own language, that I can attest to. The Ni-Kunni still have theirs as well.


There's almost no evidence of any Ni-Kunni culture divorced from Amarrian culture anywhere - Archbishop, the poster child for Stockholm Syndrome, spoke specifically of how good it was that Ni-Kunni had abandoned it. I also notice you've just completely ignored the cases of the Ealur, the Udor and the unnamed second tribe of Mishi IV. The Udor have had their culture completely destroyed and are now integrated into Amarr society so closely that almost no-one except the most stringent geneologists can even tell the difference. The Ealur are a destitute serf race ground underneath the boot of the Amarr. But both of these societies got pretty lucky in the grand scheme of things - no-one even remembers what the lost tribe of Mishi IV was named.

Nice work there, murderers.

Kithrus wrote:
As for that incident with the Starkmanir that was done because of the death of an heir at the hands of a member of the race not because it was on the original agenda of the day.


He was killed by a few Starkmanir in response to the unwanted and unlawful occupation of their homeworld, enslavement of their people and slow dismantling of their culture. He did not die at the hands of the entire race. You committed genocidal mass murder to avenge the death of a single man - one single man - an act so pathetic and cowardly it would seem almost comical if it weren't so tragic.

The Starkmanir race survived, after a fashion. The Starkmanir cultue, however, died that day. Their homeworld was burnt to cinders and all their history and traditions went into the fire with it. The few survivors the Elder Fleet rescued have no idea who they are or what their history is.

Kithrus wrote:
as for the rest of randomly naming races we have interacted with it shows just by those three examples right there the Amarr don't care for cultural differences.


Well at least you're being honest.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#165 - 2011-11-07 23:08:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicoletta Mithra
Caellach Marellus wrote:
That really just reads as "You aren't considered "qualified" to talk about the Scriptures unless you've demonstrated that your thought process is along the same lines as ours. Should you deviate from this we'll denounce you a heretic, gotta keep the masses in check and all..."


Well, there's a difference between 'qualified to talk about Scripture' and 'qualified to talk about Scripture as the basis of Amarrian religion'. While you might be qualified to do the former without taking the exegetical tradition of Amarr into consideration, it's not the basis of the Amarrian religion you're discussing then. To discuss the Scripture as basis of the Amarrian religion you need indeed be able to have thought processes 'along the same lines as ours'. Because the basis of Amarrian religion is Scripture as interpreted along these lines.

It's a quite trivial fact that the basis of Amarrian religion isn't the Scriptures interpreted along the lines of thought of a Federal or Republician. Go figure.
Not taking that into consideration - the fact that Scripture has been written for reading it from an Amarrian perspective and with a certain exegetical tradition in mind - leads to something which one can hardly understand as 'thoughtful analysis of Scripture'. It's not that heathens or heretics try to analyize it, it's their disregard for the exegetical tradition that makes their attempts doomed to failure from the start.

And no, you're not a heretic. You're an uneducated heathen, Cpt. Marellus.
Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#166 - 2011-11-08 05:33:06 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

Well at least you're being honest.


I'm always honest, makes for better pr.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Anabella Rella
Gradient
Electus Matari
#167 - 2011-11-08 06:29:38 UTC
Are you guys still trying to debate with these delusional slavers? You realize that you'd have better success talking to a wall, right? At least the wall would have the decency to remain silent and not keep spouting the same crap over and over.

When the world is running down, you make the best of what's still around.

Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#168 - 2011-11-08 06:49:52 UTC
Anabella Rella wrote:
Are you guys still trying to debate with these delusional slavers? You realize that you'd have better success talking to a wall, right? At least the wall would have the decency to remain silent and not keep spouting the same crap over and over.



Slavers are people who enslave persons. I do not raid planets as that is not my occupation in life. if your going accuse me of something please use the correct word to fit that 'crime'.

I am a reasonable person and I can understand the Matari anger. What is important is to communicate civilly.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#169 - 2011-11-08 06:52:04 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
Slavers are people who enslave persons.
Actually, it mainly refers to people who trade in slaves. I think the common usage on this fine forum has extended to include those who own slaves, too. (And, for some, to those who simply support those who own slaves; I'm not sure that's a useful extension of the term, though.)
Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#170 - 2011-11-08 06:56:55 UTC
Arkady Sadik wrote:
Kithrus wrote:
Slavers are people who enslave persons.
Actually, it mainly refers to people who trade in slaves. I think the common usage on this fine forum has extended to include those who own slaves, too. (And, for some, to those who simply support those who own slaves; I'm not sure that's a useful extension of the term, though.)


I'll agree with half of that but the last part is where I draw exception so I agree its not a useful extension of the Term.

Not all Amarrians can afford slaves and not all Amarrians trade slaves for money or raid places to acquire them.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#171 - 2011-11-08 08:09:22 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
I'm always honest, makes for better pr.


So you concede, by refusing to address any of my other points, that they are true and valid?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#172 - 2011-11-08 08:14:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Kithrus
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Kithrus wrote:
I'm always honest, makes for better pr.


So you concede, by refusing to address any of my other points, that they are true and valid?


Not in the way your painting it. Personal culture providing it doesn't morally degrade society doesn't effect Amarr. Khanids for instance have always been into widely different clothing the rest of the Empire by own own style. After we left the Empire it became more so. Since our return no one has demanded we dress like 'Gold Amarrians'.

I don't know where you get the idea.

When you have a vast Empire be it Amarr, Gallente, Caldari or Matari who do all have many smaller factions within them as they have grown as a group together there will always be some melting pot. I won't pretend there isn't and maybe I will gant you in Amarr its easier because everyone for the most part shares the same belief system but it is not by design, not by a long shot.

I'm a reasonable man so I'll give you that much but not to the extreme levels you'd have everyone think.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#173 - 2011-11-08 08:25:08 UTC
Kithrus wrote:
Not in the way your painting it. Personal culture providing it doesn't morally degrade society doesn't effect Amarr. Khanids for instance have always been into widely different clothing the rest of the Empire and after we left it it became more so. since our return no one has demanded we dress like 'Gold Amarrians'.


The Khanid have some minor differences by dint of having isolated themselves from the rest of the Empire for a time. This does not invalidate my point about what was done to the various other cultures. I have never seen unique Ni-Kunni clothing, or tasted unique Ealur cuisine, or heard unique Udor music. A vast amount of Minmatar technology and culture was lost during the Empire's illegal occupation of their planets and enslavement of their people. That, in addition, was only one of the points that I made.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Arkady Sadik
Gradient
Electus Matari
#174 - 2011-11-08 08:44:39 UTC
I'm always a bit confused by the absolutes every discussion devolves into.

It's not helpful to claim that the Empire eradicates every culture they come into contact with. And Andreus didn't claim so, either - trying to push him into that corner and proving that wrong is a strawman.

Likewise, claiming that the Empire does not eradicate cultures they come into contact is equally (and obviously) wrong.

Now, the question is what "eradicate" here means. When two cultures meet, they influence each other. Neither culture will come out of it unchanged. The Amarr do likewise; you can witness this from the rapid technological advancements the Empire gained from having Minmatar engineers and scientists in their ranks, after having been very stagnant for a while before that.

The real issue is that the Empire influences how their cultures affects another culture, and how another culture influences theirs, by extreme force and - as is the topic of this threat - by forced use of mind-altering substances. While other cultures do this to some degree as well, the Empire does this to an extremely large degree, and in this, only surpassed by Nation.

The question of this thread is of theological nature. It's a question of "righteousness" as per the Scriptures (or whichever part of the Scriptures your current sect considers to be Scripture). As such, it's a question completely within the (wider) Amarrian culture. The question as to how this affects other cultures - a "meta-cultural question", basically - is on a very different level.

I'm not sure how useful ethical considerations are for that. Practical considerations are quite relevant: By using Vitoc, the Empire has created more enemies (and stronger convinced enemies) of their culture than before, requiring more use of methods such as Vitoc to achieve the same goal. This kind of negative self-reinforcement should strike the Amarr as highly inefficient.
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#175 - 2011-11-08 17:58:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Caellach Marellus
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
And no, you're not a heretic. You're an uneducated heathen, Cpt. Marellus.


That's the nicest thing anyone's called me all week. Though my heretic comment was aimed at people who have been deemed "qualified" who suddenly start having an opinion of their own and are swiftly denounced.

Also on a side note I'd say it's more the fact that I am educated that makes me a heathen by choice, but I digress.

My point still stands, the only people the Theology Council deem suitable to discuss scripture are those who agree to their never-changing point of view. Any attempt to question or offer an alternative is seen as a threat to the system. If the Amarrian Empire wasn't a Theocracy that is so damn dependant on people's unquestioning faith in a select committee's definition of old pieces of text then alternative theories might be more acceptable. As it stands any slight change may cause people to question the faith, but more importantly the system that it's protecting.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Kithrus
Brave Newbies Inc.
Brave Collective
#176 - 2011-11-08 18:49:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Kithrus
Arkady Sadik wrote:
I'm always a bit confused by the absolutes every discussion devolves into.

It's not helpful to claim that the Empire eradicates every culture they come into contact with. And Andreus didn't claim so, either - trying to push him into that corner and proving that wrong is a strawman.


I respect you ability to argue but in this you are wrong, he brought this point up completely on his own in one of his many extreme accusations when addressing Admiral Blake.

Al he ever points to is what feels are the flaws of the empire in a never ending spew fest. Sometimes I'll grant you he gets close to the truth but for every time he takes a step forward his 'charm' causes an argument to take two steps back.

He would get much more done if he was calling for reformation as opposed to war. I say this because I have him on record saying the Amarr Empire needs to be destroyed.

I will not say the Amarr Empire is perfect, I will say that the forces of Evil try all the harder to topple God's work. We are his messengers and our duty is divine. We are however not beyond being reasoned with and you know that. If anything I am proof of this as is our Empress who despite seeing Amarr invaded on the Eve of her returned was content to shove your fleet aside and send you back home. There was no brutal retaliation she made her point.

I understand you people are angry and what they want from us however people like Andreus doesn't help your cause much when he's a believer in open war with the intention to wiping the Amarr people off the face of new Eden.

Darkness is more then absence of light, it is ignorance and corruption. I will be the Bulwark from such things that you may live in the light. Pray so my arms do not grow weary and my footing remain sure.

If you are brave, join me in the dark.

Ran'shad
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#177 - 2011-11-08 19:02:48 UTC
Valerie Valate wrote:

It Is Written:
"In the beginning all things were as one.
God parted them and breathed life into his creation
Divided the parts and gave each its place
And unto each, bestowed purpose"

"And the Lord spake, and said, Lo, my people,
Witness, for I have made the worlds of Heaven;
And these worlds I give to you, My Chosen,
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens.

None shall stand higher than you save the Sefrim,
Who serve Me as others shall serve you,
For all things under Me serve one higher;
So Amarr shall rule the worlds of the Heavens."

"Only through many hardships
Is a man stripped to his very foundations
And in such a state
Devoid of distractions
Is his soul free to soar
And in this
He is closest to God"

These three passages are the ones that are used to declare that the Vitoc Method is Righteous, stating that the subject persons Divine Purpose is to Serve, and that the discomforts involved in the Method is in fact a means to allow the subject persons soul to soar.

Thus, Vitoc is Righteous.


To refocus this debate back to the original question of whether or not the Scripture gives the use of Vitoc it's blessing. If you re-read the original section of scripture used to declare Vitoc to be righteous, there is no specific method described. Apart from the part outlining that to become closer to God we must go forward with stripping man to his foundations and removing distractions, there is little to point to specific methodology; and definately no specific mention of biochemicals used. There is little doubt that this section does clearly identify that the Amarr shall rule over all other peoples in a natrual order, however the use of drugs such as Vitoc, or other methods is not specifically identified.

I would suggest that Vitoc is just one method of the Amarr race carrying forward that which is clearly identified in scripture, that we shall rule the heavens. So long as that end is met, the means to acheive it is left to the discretion of the chosen people, our religious leaders and how we interpret the scripture.

High Lord Ran'Shad CEO Imperial Manufacturing and Engineering Regiment Elemental Tide Alliance

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#178 - 2011-11-08 20:06:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
Arkady Sadik wrote:
What amuses me is that the Amarr proclaim to try and bring their faith to others, but when others start to discuss the basis of their faith, all that happens is that they tell those others that they have no right to discuss the faith.

When the only people who actually do discuss the meaning of the Scriptures are a Blood Raider and a Republic loyalist, you can get a pretty concrete idea about how much of the current Empire is about Faith. May your God have mercy with you.


Debating the basis of Amarrian faith isn't just throwing in some ragtag interpretation of Scripture. There are standards of interpretation and exegesis one would have to adhere to, to engage into any serious discussion.

So you've maybe a discussion about meaning but not a meaningful discussion.


That really just reads as "You aren't considered "qualified" to talk about the Scriptures unless you've demonstrated that your thought process is along the same lines as ours. Should you deviate from this we'll denounce you a heretic, gotta keep the masses in check and all..."


I do not know if this reads as such, but it definitly is how ignorant Amarrians react. And I am not refering to Ms Mithra of course, but to a certain kind of people.

Caellach Marellus wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
And no, you're not a heretic. You're an uneducated heathen, Cpt. Marellus.


That's the nicest thing anyone's called me all week. Though my heretic comment was aimed at people who have been deemed "qualified" who suddenly start having an opinion of their own and are swiftly denounced.

Also on a side note I'd say it's more the fact that I am educated that makes me a heathen by choice, but I digress.

My point still stands, the only people the Theology Council deem suitable to discuss scripture are those who agree to their never-changing point of view. Any attempt to question or offer an alternative is seen as a threat to the system. If the Amarrian Empire wasn't a Theocracy that is so damn dependant on people's unquestioning faith in a select committee's definition of old pieces of text then alternative theories might be more acceptable. As it stands any slight change may cause people to question the faith, but more importantly the system that it's protecting.


This is what regimes based on religious doctrines are about (Theological Empire). This is also what regimes based on age are about (Tribal Republic), this is what regimes based on duty are about (Nationalistic State), this what regimes based on mass public opinion are about (Democratic Federation), and we could carry on endlessly. It is usually very hard to find true examples of societies where there is no prevalent moral code nor "poltically correct".
Caellach Marellus
Stormcrows
#179 - 2011-11-08 20:13:45 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
This is what regimes based on religious doctrines are about (Theological Empire). This is also what regimes based on age are about (Tribal Republic), this is what regimes based on duty are about (Nationalistic State), this what regimes based on mass public opinion are about (Democratic Federation), and we could carry on endlessly. It is usually very hard to find true examples of societies where there is no prevalent moral code nor "poltically correct".


The others adapt and evolve with the times, the Republic, State and Federation have all undergone significant change in recent years. Yet there is no modernising or alternative to adapt stance when it comes to the Theology Council. When something is wrong in the other Empires change has come about, when something is wrong in the Amarrian Empire it is merely ignored and to complain is going against the faith.

Stubborn, I believe is the word.

When your gut instincts tell you something is wrong, trust them. When your heart tells you something is right, ignore it, check with your brain first. Accept nothing, challenge everything.

Nicoletta Mithra
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#180 - 2011-11-09 00:02:10 UTC
Caellach Marellus wrote:
Nicoletta Mithra wrote:
And no, you're not a heretic. You're an uneducated heathen, Cpt. Marellus.


That's the nicest thing anyone's called me all week. Though my heretic comment was aimed at people who have been deemed "qualified" who suddenly start having an opinion of their own and are swiftly denounced.

Also on a side note I'd say it's more the fact that I am educated that makes me a heathen by choice, but I digress.

My point still stands, the only people the Theology Council deem suitable to discuss scripture are those who agree to their never-changing point of view. Any attempt to question or offer an alternative is seen as a threat to the system. If the Amarrian Empire wasn't a Theocracy that is so damn dependant on people's unquestioning faith in a select committee's definition of old pieces of text then alternative theories might be more acceptable. As it stands any slight change may cause people to question the faith, but more importantly the system that it's protecting.


Oh, by calling you an uneducated heathen I don't mean that you're uneducated in general: I'm merely pointing out that you're uneducated in the matters of Amarrian religion. And unless I'm mistaken your point was that you read what I wrote as "You aren't considered "qualified" to talk about the Scriptures unless you've demonstrated that your thought process is along the same lines as ours. Should you deviate from this we'll denounce you a heretic, gotta keep the masses in check and all...".

But then, I think the Theology Council would as well appreciate the attempts at discussing Scripture - which was intended to be read with an Amarrian mindset and in the Amarrian exegetical tradition - of heathens and heretics more if those would stick to taking into consideration the intended audience.