These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

'Local' is a problem? Why is that? (further study on AFK cloaking subject)

First post
Author
Pr1ncess Alia
Doomheim
#341 - 2013-06-21 13:56:17 UTC
I'm on the fence on this, I don't think local is something that must go but I also would love to see what would happen if it did.

I see no reason for CCP not to break it down by 0.0/LS/HS and WH space. Always liked that idea.

Add a sov feature in for people that want it or don't where they own space. Delayed? Whatever, I'm sure they can do something interesting with it.

Or it will stay this way forever, both work.
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#342 - 2013-06-21 14:38:19 UTC
Victoria Sin wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:

For a start, the ships that fit cloaks inherently have weaker tanks, and lower dps. That's an inbuilt counter to the benefits provided by cloaking.


I think the word "counter" has a very specific meaning that you're not understanding here.


Well then I have another word for you: Balance.

Cloaks don't need to have something that will directly negate what they do or turn them off when you consider all the actual balanced trade offs already in place.
Sarcasim
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#343 - 2013-06-21 15:18:22 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Victoria Sin wrote:
TheGunslinger42 wrote:
Victoria Sin wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:

In what respect does psyops warfare disrupt your gameplay?


You're calling it "psyops warfare" in an effort to give it legitimacy, when really what you mean is "trolling local".


You call it "trolling" in an effort to smear and discredit, when really what you mean is "someone is playing in a way that I don't want them to"

hope this helps m8


OK, let me put it another way: If you were designing a brand new game, call it Evelyn 2020 and you introduced a cloaking mechanism, would you or would you not also introduce a counter mechanism? If you say you wouldn't, then I would simply ask you to not tie yourself in knots arguing your point just for the e-peen; I won't think any less of you.


"Captain, the Romulans have engaged their cloaking device!"

"Damn! Mr. Worf! Post another whine about cloaks on the forums, maybe the devs will nerf it!"

What part of "No", do you not understand?

Cloaks already have a significant set of drawbacks, drawbacks that render all but unusable apart from some clever ship fitting and cloak specific platforms.

So there are plenty of "counters", or drawbacks to cloaking.

Let me put it to you this way. If you were to design a game a certain way, would you bend over backwards to accomodate the people who insist on playing the game wrong? Especially when their arguments have been repeatedly refuted, and they've demonstrated they are only interested in continuing to whine against the parts of your game they don't like?

Exactly how would pressing a button every 15-30 minuets to remain cloaked put the cloaked at any greater disadvantage... Correct it doesnt
TheGunslinger42
All Web Investigations
#344 - 2013-06-21 15:32:20 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:
Exactly how would pressing a button every 15-30 minuets to remain cloaked put the cloaked at any greater disadvantage... Correct it doesnt


It puts them at a disadvantage in a number of ways, actually.

Firstly, it's introduced unnecessary extra mouse clicks. Suggesting that a user must mash a button or mouse click arbitrarily in order to sit and do nothing is just horrible horrible design.

Secondly, it provides even more intel and reduces the unknown quantities in nullsec. By the very nature of my ship still being cloaked, you know I'm sitting at the keyboard, ready to press buttons and do things.

As I said earlier in this topic, these whine threads are always, ALWAYS about one thing: People who cannot handle the fact that a cloaked player is an unknown quantity. If you force me to press a button every 15 minutes to stay cloaked, then there is no longer an unknown quantity to cloaked players. That's a bad thing, and serves only the terrible idea that in EVE, in nullsec of all places, you should have absolute, perfect intel and know everything. That's bad. It's wrong. Biomass yourself.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#345 - 2013-06-21 15:35:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Sarcasim wrote:
Exactly how would pressing a button every 15-30 minuets to remain cloaked put the cloaked at any greater disadvantage...
Already answered: it provides others with even more free intel on top of the free intel they've already not done anything to earn.
You can keep asking the same question, but the answer won't change, and your answer will remain wrong.

…oh, and in which world does it make sense that you have to keep pushing buttons to do nothing? Ugh
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#346 - 2013-06-21 15:39:30 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:

Exactly how would pressing a button every 15-30 minuets to remain cloaked put the cloaked at any greater disadvantage... Correct it doesnt


Well if I were out in my cloakie and I needed to go afk in a hostile system without any POS or Station to go safely to, and I have an aggression timer so logofski isn't a viable option for the next 15 minutes, well...I guess I'm boned.

But since I know what it is you are really looking for, let me pose the counter-question: Exactly how would having anyone who hasn't spoken in local chat in 15-30 minutes disappearing off the local window going to change your gameplay?

Scary thought, isn't it? But that's why you don't like the afk cloaker, because it ruins your perfect security blanket that is local intel. Perhaps if you worked on championing a solution to that problem you might get CCP to look inot solving your own personal problems, because it's not a problem to the rest of us.

Source: I rat in 0.0 and dgaf if there is a hostile in local, cloaked or otherwise.

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Sarcasim
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#347 - 2013-06-21 15:48:00 UTC
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.

FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#348 - 2013-06-21 15:51:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Sarcasim wrote:
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min
So it's more free intel. What have they done to deserve that?

Also, if that's the kind of intel you want, why not solve it like Kijo suggested: after 15 minutes of inactivity, you're removed from all chat lists?

Quote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.
Why not? Why are you to decide what other players should or should not do in-game?
Mag's
Azn Empire
#349 - 2013-06-21 15:53:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Sarcasim wrote:
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.

FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling
Of course it's free intel. If this idea is in place and you keep pressing the button, they know you are at the keyboard. That's free intel.

Why should you get even more intel, on top of the already powerful local intel tool?

Oh and it's my account, I'll do whatever I wish with it thanks. (within the EULA)

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#350 - 2013-06-21 15:58:16 UTC
Victoria Sin wrote:

In what respect does using autopilot disrupt someone else's game-play?


Sometimes people accidentally expose their real motivation, this eems like one of those times. The problem is AFKing or cloaking or local, it's the fact that people respond poorly to people in the systems they use to make isk in.

I respond properly, by preparing for them, ignoring them, evading them, countering their possoble threat by fitting in creative ways, and (rarely) killing them when they aren't "bluffing". And because I do this, i understand that what they are doing (cloaking, even cloaking and going afk) isn't the problem some of you want it to be.

No, the problem is people too risk-averse to be in null sec (or playing EVE in general) being someplace other than high sec. The problem is people wanting to have their cake (being in null sec making piles of isk) while eating it too (high sec style safety, notice no one complains of cloaking in high sec lol).

The problems are mental weakness, laziness and a feeling of entitlement (to null sec income without having to deal with those pesky null sec issues like blowing up).

It would be different if i was a cloaker, but Im not, im their TARGET, but I take pride in being a Smart-HARD target with a 5 year flawless record of "no candy for you cloak-whore".

It's a shame that some grown folks are just bad at the game while blaming that failure on the game itself. If that last sentence hurts someones feelings, it means you're one of them lol.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#351 - 2013-06-21 15:59:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#352 - 2013-06-21 16:00:03 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.

FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling


Sooo....it tells you that after 30 minutes that the guy in local that you still can't find is an actual active threat, I don't see how that gives one side an advantage at all....I am stumped. Lol

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 

Sarcasim
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#353 - 2013-06-21 16:00:45 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.

Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are.
Mag's
Azn Empire
#354 - 2013-06-21 16:01:38 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.

Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are.
'You're'

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#355 - 2013-06-21 16:02:16 UTC
Mag's wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.

Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are.
'You're'


luls
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#356 - 2013-06-21 16:03:06 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.

Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are.


I accept your surrender. Are you French perchance?
Sarcasim
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#357 - 2013-06-21 16:03:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Sarcasim
Mag's wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.

FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling
Of course it's free intel. If this idea is in place and you keep pressing the button, they know you are at the keyboard. That's free intel.

Why should you get even more intel, on top of the already powerful local intel tool?

Oh and it's my account, I'll do whatever I wish with it thanks. (within the EULA)

I guess for the same reason a person should be able to be cloaked up while sleeping in bed forcing others to adapt to their presence in system.

Same thing afk ice miners said until they changed it Big smile
Mag's
Azn Empire
#358 - 2013-06-21 16:06:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Mag's
Sarcasim wrote:
Mag's wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
It doesn't give free intel other than to show the person has been at their kb in the last 30 min..seems fair to me. He'll make it 45 min. If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.

FYI your replies to the question where so inane I thought you were trolling
Of course it's free intel. If this idea is in place and you keep pressing the button, they know you are at the keyboard. That's free intel.

Why should you get even more intel, on top of the already powerful local intel tool?

Oh and it's my account, I'll do whatever I wish with it thanks. (within the EULA)

I guess for the same reason a person should be able to be cloaked up while sleeping in bed forcing others to adapt to their presence in system.
Prey tell how does someone AFK cloaked in bed asleep, force you to do anything? Isn't it merely prudent to take precautions with an enemy in the system? You are after all in null. What relevance does them being AFK have to taking those steps?

Oh and the whole AFK ice mining argument has already been debunked.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.

Sarcasim
HOW to PEG SAFETY
#359 - 2013-06-21 16:06:25 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.

Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are.


I accept your surrender. Are you French perchance?

Is this where the grammer and spelling trolling starts until you get the thread locked because you dont like the subject and have no valid reason to allow afk cloaking?
Mag's
Azn Empire
#360 - 2013-06-21 16:08:31 UTC
Sarcasim wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
Sarcasim wrote:
If you can't be at the on playing the game then you shouldn't be in the game.


So you agree that autopiloting in high sec should require fuel or automatically log people off after 2 jumps.

Stop trying to prove your the idiot that you are.


I accept your surrender. Are you French perchance?

Is this where the grammer and spelling trolling starts until you get the thread locked because you dont like the subject and have no valid reason to allow afk cloaking?
It only arose due to a personal attack. It's just funny and ironic to highlight such things in those circumstances.

Destination SkillQueue:- It's like assuming the Lions will ignore you in the Savannah, if you're small, fat and look helpless.