These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Is Incarna worth pursuing, and what does it need to succeed?

Author
Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#41 - 2013-06-17 00:57:17 UTC
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Xavier Liche wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Xavier Liche wrote:
lol, the backlash, you want to know what really went wrong? A lot of vain kiddies could not afford a monocle....


Yeah, I'm sure CCP wanting to sell ammo & ships for real money with OP advantages had nothing to do with it.


There was none of that, but there was a lot of bs drama queens, like this.


Obviously, you weren't even there. The biggest backlash came against the direction that CCP was going in for EVE regarding microtransactions. When CCP Helmar himself comes out and admits to, and apologises for, the faults of Incarna, you can't call the players who created the backlash "bs drama queens" anymore. Instead, you call them "right" and get down on your knees and beg their forgiveness for being so obnoxiously wrong.


If that was all there was, I would agree with you. But between the calls for free game time and complete expansion reversions and calling for people to quit, etc, etc, etc ....

Drama. Way too much of it was unnecessary. The NEX store was worth griping over, in my book. But it's since spawned a cycle of 'let's protest everything'.

I'm glad they backed up on the NEX store, but in the same breath, I lost respect for CCP because they didn't stick to their guns. And it seems they threw out the baby with the bath water, which really yanks my beard.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?

Black Dranzer
#42 - 2013-06-17 01:01:05 UTC
Ruze wrote:
Drama. Way too much of it was unnecessary. The NEX store was worth griping over, in my book. But it's since spawned a cycle of 'let's protest everything'.

You have to remember that, at the time, Incarna was hyped to ****. It wasn't just the execution that caused outrage, it was the giant buildup leading to that execution.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#43 - 2013-06-17 01:02:45 UTC
Quote:
I'm glad they backed up on the NEX store, but in the same breath, I lost respect for CCP because they didn't stick to their guns. And it seems they threw out the baby with the bath water, which really yanks my beard.


It takes an adult to admit a mistake. I give props for that.

They have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, because it's such a touchy issue, no matter which direction you approach it from, some section or other of the playerbase will get pissed off about it.

Like I said earlier, gradual improvements to immersion? Just fine with me.

Lumping together a bunch of half baked ideas, cramming in a ludicrous cash shop and calling it an expac? Hell no.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

JAG Fox
GunStars
#44 - 2013-06-17 01:06:28 UTC
I don't think the focus should ever move away from FiS or the empire building/exploration stuff.. but EVE definitely needs Incarna game play experience if EVE is ever going to appeal to a larger crowd than nerdy boys blowing stuff up. There are a lot of people like myself that don't want to be staring at a spaceship 24/7. More subscribers appealing to different game play modes means more money for CCP to be used for FiS and Incarna improvements.

I think the biggest issue was that it was pretty clear that CCP was neglecting the FiS part of EVE to work on Incarna - despite what they said about having separate development teams for it. The removal of ship spinning and the NeX store pricing just compounded the crap storm unfortunately..

I think Dust 514 has proven that an alternative game mode within the EVE universe is a viable business opportunity that people will pay for. So of course continuing Incarna development would be a good thing. Appealing to a wider group of gamers is always a good thing.

 Fox Pin-up

Kisses!Foxie.

Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#45 - 2013-06-17 01:06:54 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
I'm glad they backed up on the NEX store, but in the same breath, I lost respect for CCP because they didn't stick to their guns. And it seems they threw out the baby with the bath water, which really yanks my beard.


It takes an adult to admit a mistake. I give props for that.

They have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, because it's such a touchy issue, no matter which direction you approach it from, some section or other of the playerbase will get pissed off about it.

Like I said earlier, gradual improvements to immersion? Just fine with me.

Lumping together a bunch of half baked ideas, cramming in a ludicrous cash shop and calling it an expac? Hell no.


Agreed. The expansion was a fail. They should have kept WiS until they at LEAST had all the CQ's available. And many of us said exactly that before and after the release.

Glad they admitted fault. Also loved most of the expansions since, because up until Odyssey, they've been very rich and full of content.

But it's time to make WiS something worthwhile. Gradual improvements. You don't have to dedicate a whole expansion to it, just add piece by piece on the side.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?

Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#46 - 2013-06-17 01:09:43 UTC
JAG Fox wrote:
I don't think the focus should ever move away from FiS or the empire building/exploration stuff.. but EVE definitely needs Incarna game play experience if EVE is ever going to appeal to a larger crowd than nerdy boys blowing stuff up. There are a lot of people like myself that don't want to be staring at a spaceship 24/7. More subscribers appealing to different game play modes means more money for CCP to be used for FiS and Incarna improvements.

I think the biggest issue was that it was pretty clear that CCP was neglecting the FiS part of EVE to work on Incarna - despite what they said about having separate development teams for it. The removal of ship spinning and the NeX store pricing just compounded the crap storm unfortunately..

I think Dust 514 has proven that an alternative game mode within the EVE universe is a viable business opportunity that people will pay for. So of course continuing Incarna development would be a good thing. Appealing to a wider group of gamers is always a good thing.


Hell, they had really been neglecting FiS for two years up until Incarna. We got graphics improvements, but no new ships, no new mechanics, and a lot of broken stuff. That expansion, and the NEX store, was the straw that broke the camels back.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?

Heinel Coventina
Doomheim
#47 - 2013-06-17 01:13:18 UTC
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
I'm glad they backed up on the NEX store, but in the same breath, I lost respect for CCP because they didn't stick to their guns. And it seems they threw out the baby with the bath water, which really yanks my beard.


It takes an adult to admit a mistake. I give props for that.

They have thrown the baby out with the bathwater, because it's such a touchy issue, no matter which direction you approach it from, some section or other of the playerbase will get pissed off about it.

Like I said earlier, gradual improvements to immersion? Just fine with me.

Lumping together a bunch of half baked ideas, cramming in a ludicrous cash shop and calling it an expac? Hell no.


If you're worry about "touchy issues" and you cannot please everybody, you wouldn't even start making an MMO to begin with. It was never a goal to please anyone, and no expansion to date has ever pleased everyone.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#48 - 2013-06-17 01:15:28 UTC
What WiS needs is (more) pretty things to wear, and a shared space to emote at each other in where we can show off the 75k Aurum boots.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#49 - 2013-06-17 01:26:37 UTC
Quote:
If you're worry about "touchy issues" and you cannot please everybody, you wouldn't even start making an MMO to begin with. It was never a goal to please anyone, and no expansion to date has ever pleased everyone


True. But only one expansion to date has ever pissed off EVERYONE.

And that's the one we're talking about bring back. Yeah, ok.

Quote:
Agreed. The expansion was a fail. They should have kept WiS until they at LEAST had all the CQ's available. And many of us said exactly that before and after the release.

Glad they admitted fault. Also loved most of the expansions since, because up until Odyssey, they've been very rich and full of content.

But it's time to make WiS something worthwhile. Gradual improvements. You don't have to dedicate a whole expansion to it, just add piece by piece on the side.


Eh, I like Odyssey in comparison to Retri, because at the time I was heavily invested in FW, and Retri promised to fix issues that it in fact exacerbated. I also am completely in love with new exploration.

But then, I am a pretty laid back guy as far as getting my content goes. There's so damn much to do in EVE, if you ever get bored you can pack up and move, and try your hand at something else.

But I think almost everyone can agree that a few gradual improvements to WiS, as a portion of overall immersion improvement, would be acceptable. So yeah, I can get behind that.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Heinel Coventina
Doomheim
#50 - 2013-06-17 01:33:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Heinel Coventina
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
If you're worry about "touchy issues" and you cannot please everybody, you wouldn't even start making an MMO to begin with. It was never a goal to please anyone, and no expansion to date has ever pleased everyone


True. But only one expansion to date has ever pissed off EVERYONE.

And that's the one we're talking about bring back. Yeah, ok.


Predictable response. It is a common fallacy to assume that just because something has happened, it will happen again. How or why Incarna fell out of expectations has been discussed at length and, contrary to your claims, most people thought those problems can be overcome.

It's not atypical for people to fear change of any sort, and especially with eve, the community was cultivated to expect "more-of-the-same" type of expansions for a whole decade. As such, I expect WiS will be a challenge to implement. However, to give up the whole idea, just because of some vocal risk-averse individuals in the community, does not help CCP's reputation. That much is certain.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#51 - 2013-06-17 01:44:40 UTC
Heinel Coventina wrote:
Kaarous Aldurald wrote:
Quote:
If you're worry about "touchy issues" and you cannot please everybody, you wouldn't even start making an MMO to begin with. It was never a goal to please anyone, and no expansion to date has ever pleased everyone


True. But only one expansion to date has ever pissed off EVERYONE.

And that's the one we're talking about bring back. Yeah, ok.


Predictable response. It is a common fallacy to assume that just because something has happened, it will happen again. How or why Incarna fell out of expectations has been discussed at length and, contrary to your claims, most people thought those problems can be overcome.

It's not atypical for people to fear change of any sort, and especially with eve, the community was cultivated to expect "more-of-the-same" type of expansions for a whole decade. As such, I expect WiS will be a challenge to implement. However, to give up the whole idea, just because of some vocal risk-averse individuals in the community, does not help CCP's reputation. That much is certain.


Missed the point completely. I am trying to tell you why it makes sense for CCP to want to tread carefully about this, because they got burned so hard with it last time.

It only makes sense, you think Coca Cola would be stupid enough to re-introduce New Coke after what happened the first time?

"most people thought problems can be overcome"? Ah, so you have some survey data for me, then? Or are you just projecting your own biased opinion and bolstering it by making the mental leap that you are in the majority?

By the way, I am fully aware you have no data to back up that claim.

To back up my claim, I have the Jita Monument. Big smile

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Rynn Vendran
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2013-06-17 01:49:17 UTC
Catching up on this thread... I can respect the various opinions that I've read, but I don't understand why there is so much aversion to what would amount to basically adding another layer to this game? If a player (bittervet or otherwise) doesn't want to participate in station-based content, they certainly don't have to and they shouldn't get penalized for it. I think it's safe to assume that CCP wouldn't replace anything they already have in place as far as FiS goes, so expanding on WiS would be pure bonus content. Why the aversion to it? Would it really ruin the EVE experience? Not trying to be sarcastic here, as I know that there are those among us who have been with EVE since the beginning and have seen the game grow and evolve, but speaking as a newb, wouldn't more EVE content inline with the original experience be a good thing?

_Hey now, hey now now, sing this corrosion to me... _

Yazzinra
Scorpion Ventures
#53 - 2013-06-17 01:52:03 UTC
id like to see a corp/alliance hall of sorts. boardroom, whatever.

release the rest of the NEX store items. I really want that purple camo shirt, and a cat.

all I was looking forward to was Slay. internet spaceships and sorta Battletech in one amazing package? yes please!
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#54 - 2013-06-17 01:56:08 UTC
Mara Rinn wrote:
What WiS needs is (more) pretty things to wear, and a shared space to emote at each other in where we can show off the 75k Aurum boots.


Malibu Dream House would be an awesome place to share cocktails and footwear.
Kaarous Aldurald
Black Hydra Consortium.
#55 - 2013-06-17 01:57:34 UTC
Quote:
If a player (bittervet or otherwise) doesn't want to participate in station-based content, they certainly don't have to and they shouldn't get penalized for it.


In which case, it adds nothing useful to the game, and people will hate on it for not bringing functionality and not adding anything to the actual game, it will be labeled a minigame.

But if it does have a concrete benefit for it's use, then the people who hate it because it's not FiS will hate on it because they are being forced into it for in game benefits.

See what I mean now?

CCP loses no matter what they do with it. That's why they have chosen to ignore it for as long as they have.

"Verily, I have often laughed at the weaklings who thought themselves good because they had no claws."

One of ours, ten of theirs.

Best Meltdown Ever.

Rynn Vendran
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#56 - 2013-06-17 02:03:47 UTC  |  Edited by: Rynn Vendran
Quote:


In which case, it adds nothing useful to the game, and people will hate on it for not bringing functionality and not adding anything to the actual game, it will be labeled a minigame.

But if it does have a concrete benefit for it's use, then the people who hate it because it's not FiS will hate on it because they are being forced into it for in game benefits.

See what I mean now?

CCP loses no matter what they do with it. That's why they have chosen to ignore it for as long as they have.


That is a very good point. Damned if they do and damned if they don't. Though I suppose if they had to do something with it, moving forward with more content would be the way to go. I think in the long run if the WiS content had the "right" kind of impact on the game and didn't dilute the core essence of EVE, it would most likely lure in new subscribers more that it would drive away current players and/or maybe even win over its most vocal opponents.

Guess we wait and see...

Smile

_Hey now, hey now now, sing this corrosion to me... _

Steve Ronuken
Fuzzwork Enterprises
Vote Steve Ronuken for CSM
#57 - 2013-06-17 02:07:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Steve Ronuken
Black Dranzer wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
The problem is: Incarna was WiS /and/ the NeX.

WiS could quite happily exist without any microtransactions.

Just a tip: The forum supports italic tags. i and /i in square brackets. Same for bold and underline.

The NeX really didn't help things, I'll give you that, but I still think Incarna had plenty of god-awful design decisions even without the NeX.



I know it does Smile I've just spent too much time on IRC, that the // for italics, and ** for bold have become engrained. By the time I've realised what I've done, I can't be bothered going back for a minor adjustment to clarity.


WiS wasn't handled well in Incarna. I'll give you that. The whole release of that expansion was handled, umm, badly.

WiS was a pointless addition, adding no content. And had the spectre of microtransactions hanging over it. If they'd added some content along with it (play Slay with a single friend!) that might have been enough to save it. Assuming more was coming.

Woo! CSM XI!

Fuzzwork Enterprises

Twitter: @fuzzysteve on Twitter

Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#58 - 2013-06-17 02:17:51 UTC
Rynn Vendran wrote:
Quote:


In which case, it adds nothing useful to the game, and people will hate on it for not bringing functionality and not adding anything to the actual game, it will be labeled a minigame.

But if it does have a concrete benefit for it's use, then the people who hate it because it's not FiS will hate on it because they are being forced into it for in game benefits.

See what I mean now?

CCP loses no matter what they do with it. That's why they have chosen to ignore it for as long as they have.


That is a very good point. Damned if they do and damned if they don't. Though I suppose if they had to do something with it, moving forward with more content would be the way to go. I think in the long run if the WiS content had the "right" kind of impact on the game and didn't dilute the core essence of EVE, it would most likely lure in new subscribers more that it would drive away current players and/or maybe even win over its most vocal opponents.

Guess we wait and see...

Smile


Here's the other moral quandry that many older, veteran players might be facing:

More players doesn't mean better.

If you take just 40,000 active players for a years worth of subscriptions paying at $15 a month, the company is making 7.2 mil a year. Obviously, this isn't everybody. And it's a broad, off the calc.exe guess estimate. But that's quite a bit of money for our little game.

Of course, CCP hires all these assets, coders and managers and artists and pr guys and producers, etc, etc. But in 10 years, you realize that just growing for the sake of growing doesn't give you a benefit. Money spent into CCP, and CCP develops other things along with EvE ... not just EvE like I may want.

Put more money in their pocket, and that doesn't mean EvE gets better. More honestly, that probably means EvE VR and EvE Dust and EvE PI on your Android. For a lot of vets, I understand that WiS was another part of this (and since it was before any practical show of WoD or Dust or anything else besides a card game), it had a bad impact. We realized that us spending more ... doesn't necessarily benefit us.



Then lets take the psychological issues. If you love the cold, harsh universe ... you have to defend it. You really have to fight off every horrible 'make hisec safe' and 'lets have multiple server' idea. They break what you love. So you attack any move in that direction.

If we bring in too many players, the chances of these newer types being more in that same train of thought (which many of us old bitter vets have had when we were new, before we appreciated the scale of this universe), can we fight all of them off? Or does CCP buckle?

It's a scary thought. You either don't get the attention you feel you deserve, or the thing you love gets taken from you for the sake of 'growth'.

Once your in that position looking at it, it's hard not to react irrationally.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?

Remiel Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2013-06-17 02:21:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Remiel Pollard
Ruze wrote:
Remiel Pollard wrote:
Xavier Liche wrote:
Mallak Azaria wrote:
Xavier Liche wrote:
lol, the backlash, you want to know what really went wrong? A lot of vain kiddies could not afford a monocle....


Yeah, I'm sure CCP wanting to sell ammo & ships for real money with OP advantages had nothing to do with it.


There was none of that, but there was a lot of bs drama queens, like this.


Obviously, you weren't even there. The biggest backlash came against the direction that CCP was going in for EVE regarding microtransactions. When CCP Helmar himself comes out and admits to, and apologises for, the faults of Incarna, you can't call the players who created the backlash "bs drama queens" anymore. Instead, you call them "right" and get down on your knees and beg their forgiveness for being so obnoxiously wrong.


If that was all there was, I would agree with you. But between the calls for free game time and complete expansion reversions and calling for people to quit, etc, etc, etc ....

Drama. Way too much of it was unnecessary. The NEX store was worth griping over, in my book. But it's since spawned a cycle of 'let's protest everything'.

I'm glad they backed up on the NEX store, but in the same breath, I lost respect for CCP because they didn't stick to their guns. And it seems they threw out the baby with the bath water, which really yanks my beard.


Oh I know this. The keyword in what I said was 'biggest', ie 'the biggest backlash'. Note that I didn't say 'the only backlash'.

As an aside, I can also understand completely the reasons people might have for low respect of CCP regarding Incarna, however, for me personally, while much respect was lost, much has been restored since, and the reasons to not like them are far outweighed by the reasons I have to respect them, especially when CCP are stood beside other big-name developers. As far as I'm concerned, mistakes aside, their ability to fix them and maintain strong community relations have made CCP an example for other developers to look to, even if they don't.

“Some capsuleers claim that ECM is 'dishonorable' and 'unfair'. Jam those ones first, and kill them last.” - Jirai 'Fatal' Laitanen, Pithum Nullifier Training Manual c. YC104

Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#60 - 2013-06-17 02:23:00 UTC
Domanique Altares wrote:
Mara Rinn wrote:
What WiS needs is (more) pretty things to wear, and a shared space to emote at each other in where we can show off the 75k Aurum boots.


Malibu Dream House would be an awesome place to share cocktails and footwear.


Rather than Malibu Dream House, I would settle for Gallente Pleasure Hub complete with mild-high billboards and the ginormous Quafe Girl hologram by the landing pad.