These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

Window snap distance option

Author
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#1 - 2013-06-14 10:02:32 UTC
I'll just leave this here.
Window snap distance in options.
You removed it.
Bring it back, it was useful.

Do it, soon please?

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#2 - 2013-06-14 20:40:35 UTC
y u do dis

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Wiu Ming
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2013-06-16 21:38:59 UTC
Arya Regnar wrote:
I'll just leave this here.
Window snap distance in options.
You removed it.
Bring it back, it was useful.

Do it, soon please?



^^this. don't understand why they have to screw with things that were helpful and/or working just fine, such as having a snap-to distance option as well as removing the Undock button from the Neocom.
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#4 - 2013-06-17 01:37:34 UTC
They also removed a number of options like occlusion of sun but that doesn't disturb nearly as much. The problem with snapping is that now I get glued window drags because they touch, before I had snap to minimum so I could prevent that.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Aijle Mijleroff
Infernal Laboratory
Infernal Octopus
#5 - 2013-06-20 19:06:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Aijle Mijleroff
YES! Return window snap distance option in client settings back!
I say about this screenshot !

Why you CCP destroy this function? This work many years, but some "very smart"Ugh DEV delete this! Absolutely stupid decision or someone who is very lazy and not may write some lines of client-code!

I wrote petition about this but not see effect

I am very angry!
Maximus Aerelius
PROPHET OF ENIGMA
#6 - 2013-06-20 20:26:14 UTC
+1 and fully supported.

@CCP: Stop taking away the damn options FFS!
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#7 - 2013-06-21 01:38:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Arya Regnar
Aijle Mijleroff wrote:
YES! Return window snap distance option in client settings back!
I say about this http://clip2net.com/clip/m117948/1371754816-clip-27kb.png !

Why you CCP destroy this function? This work many years, but some "very smart"Ugh DEV delete this! Absolutely stupid decision or someone who is very lazy and not may write some lines of client-code!

I wrote petition about this but not see effect

I am very angry!

I guess we could call this *puts glasses on* Cool DEVastation

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Alvatore DiMarco
Capricious Endeavours Ltd
#8 - 2013-06-21 02:34:11 UTC
Arya Regnar wrote:

I guess we could call this *puts glasses on* Cool DEVastation


*lobs a tomato*

...

But really, they got rid of the option for "sun is occluded by ships"?
Aijle Mijleroff
Infernal Laboratory
Infernal Octopus
#9 - 2013-06-27 18:39:47 UTC
I can not play a game in which the interface is not controlled by me Cry

People, how you may play in this?
Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#10 - 2013-06-27 20:37:08 UTC
Well the trend is apparent.
Dumbing things down and whatnot.
Lets hope this stops somewhere yeah?

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Billy Kid
#11 - 2013-06-28 21:48:53 UTC
Signed..

Why have you removed this usefull option from the game ?

Im looking forward to see this option back in one of the next 2 patches.

Thank you..
Penny Ibramovic
Wormhole Engineers
#12 - 2013-06-29 18:11:24 UTC
Hi. I've been looking for this option in the menus on and off for a while now. I didn't realise it had been removed.

Please return the option. If I'm adjusting a window, it is really frustrating for it to snap back to where it was. I then either need to move it more than I need, or not at all.

Yeah, it may sound minor, but it's surprising even to me how often I'm being affected by the windows snapping in ways I do not desire.
Billy Kid
#13 - 2013-07-02 13:17:02 UTC
Im pretty dissapointed. Why cant I see this option after todays patch.. ?
De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2013-07-02 13:49:52 UTC
CCP - put this back. There was no real reason to remove it, and I really despise the default snap to behavior of the client windows.

Please. Put it back.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

De'Veldrin
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#15 - 2013-07-02 14:03:24 UTC
I actually went ahead and filed a bug report on this. I assume it had to be an oversight when the UI was compiled. I'm probably wrong, and they will come back with a working as intended, but...meh, worth a try I s'pose.

De'Veldrin's Corollary (to Malcanis' Law): Any idea that seeks to limit the ability of a large nullsec bloc to do something in the name of allowing more small groups into sov null will inevitably make it that much harder for small groups to enter sov null.

Arya Regnar
Darwins Right Hand
#16 - 2013-07-02 15:53:58 UTC
De'Veldrin wrote:
I actually went ahead and filed a bug report on this. I assume it had to be an oversight when the UI was compiled. I'm probably wrong, and they will come back with a working as intended, but...meh, worth a try I s'pose.

Let me know how that goes, I never actually petitioned it and I never got any kind of response from officials.

EvE-Mail me if you need anything.

Bela Lugosuolu
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#17 - 2013-07-04 16:33:43 UTC
Bu-Bump
Stop Looking
Nefarious Activities
#18 - 2013-07-04 21:58:18 UTC
Please just do this. Pretty Please?
Billy Kid
#19 - 2013-07-06 18:32:06 UTC
Devs, wake up.. This is important..
Domanique Altares
Rifterlings
#20 - 2013-07-06 19:40:19 UTC
Sorry, OP. CCP is in the middle of a campaign to remove options and functionality from the client settings. I really wish I had saved the quote from one of the pre-Odyssey test server feedback threads, but it's safe to say that CCP wants to give you less custom configuration options, so that they can continue ramming one-size-fits-all client and graphical changes down the pike.
123Next page