These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[DUTY] Divestment of Pyre Falcon Defence and Security shares

Author
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2013-06-13 20:07:43 UTC
Desiderya wrote:
POWs are going to be kept according to State laws, including the duration of their detention.
As you might be aware, with the lack of any finalized contracts, there's no clear outline regarding the circumstances of the detention facility in question, as this largely depends on what can be offered. However, I want to both repeat and stress my earlier point that Pyre Falcon Defence Combine is not going to engage in the slave trade.

Then why have you abandoned your policy of returning POWs to their native sovereignties - and why are you outsourcing the construction of these detention facilities to the Khanid Kingdom?

I'm looking at something with hard, orange webbed feet, a big yellow beak and a pair of wings. It flaps around in the sky for a bit but it spends most of its time sitting on the water, and occasionally it makes a sound somewhere along the lines of "quack, quack, quack." I think it's a duck. I think it's a duck because it flies like a duck, it sounds like a duck, and it sure as hell looks like a duck. What you're trying to do is tell me it's a tortoise because part of it's green.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
#22 - 2013-06-13 20:20:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Aidan Brooder
Just my two ISK:

From the perspective of Caldari law, selling POWs into slavery would be an obvious breach of the laws and it doesn't matter if slavery is partly accepted in the Khanid Kingdoms, as the principal office of Pyre is located & legally registered in Caldari Space, namely Nonni, meaning they are considered a legal entity subject to the laws of the State. In which all forms of slavery are forbidden.

Any misconduct against State law - no matter where it was committed - as part of common corporation ethics, would fall under statutes of said law as can be expected for any other civilized nation and prosecuted if sufficient evidence of a: intention or b: facts can be delivered.

However, before the exact details of the proposed deal are not clearly stated, there is neither reason to flame a respectable Caldari corporation ... nor is it too late to approach the approriate committees to evaluate this deal for its legality.

Once again, even though corporations are usually bound with their local representations by local laws, their principal is bound to State law, no matter where. (Though we of course all know some transgressions are harder to prove in some systems than in others...)

Respecting Pyre as a fellow corporation of our great state, I'm pretty sure they know all this and have taken it into account or... eh.. sub-contracted the whole operation to an entity better aware of the legalities with no affiliation to/stock owned by Pyre itself.

Blog: http://aidanbrooder.wordpress.com My EVE Playlist on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSNuHY7z8n1q1BdLvW2verIfH8vvWtz_x

Coyote Torres
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#23 - 2013-06-13 20:24:32 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Some Stuff


Did you even get to fifteen?

Did you even get to ten?
Desiderya
Blue Canary
Watch This
#24 - 2013-06-13 20:24:35 UTC
Coyote Torres wrote:

Detention facilities I can understand. Is anybody from Pyre able to explain what is meant by 'processing facilities' ?

A further question since I'm at it, what is the proposed process from the moment an enemy combatant is taken into custody, to the time when they're considered for exchange or repatriation?


Pyre Falcon Defence Combine does - at this point - not own sufficient detention facilities that go beyond locking POWs away. Any suitable facility within the Kingdom would have to offer both the necessary security as well as opportunities for the detainees. Some guidelines would be, despite detention, receiving suitable wages for the work done. The duration of the detention depends on the duration of the war, as is common practice with POWs.
Furthermore, the detainees will not be someone's property, nor are they sold.

Ruthlessness is the kindness of the wise.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#25 - 2013-06-13 20:32:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

There should never be a circumstance in which I, an Intaki Federal citizen, am forced to instruct a citizen of the State how to be Caldari. The fact that you leave me no choice is disgraceful. Members of Pyre Falcon: the State does not keep slaves. Citizens of the State do not do trade in human lives. If you are doing this at all, and particularly if you are doing this in the name of the State, you are failing at being a Caldari, and you are dishonouring the memory of the Raata.


In the more civilized age of the Raata it was a small mercy to spare a defeated foe to live in dishonour and disgrace by spilling their blood upon the snow.

However, I do not think you would enjoy me behaving as I should in more civilized times, Mr. Ixiris, and commit the enemy combatants that fall under the corporate jurisdiction of the Pyre Falcon Defence Combine to the embrace of Cold Wind.

What I see here is nothing more than impotent outrage over a program that violates no laws of either the Caldari State and constituent regulatory authorities or those of the Khanid Kingdom, the same. The enemy combatants that will be transferred to the Khanid Kingdom will do so as prisoners, and will be treated as such. They will be paid a fair wage under the laws of the Khanid Kingdom for their work from which will be extracted the debts associated with the running and operations of the facilities in which they are to be detained. They will be treated humanely under the laws of the Khanid Kingdom in the facilities in which they are detained and will not be classified as the property of the Holders upon which it is only the territory they are housed.

At no point is there a transaction made in the entire process of the program in which the prisoners are treated as the property of a Holder - as such legally no slavery or any act related to such has occurred either in the State or the Kingdom.

It is with the greatest disappointment that just because the program involves the Khanid Kingdom, that such unfounded and spurious allegations of slavery are made when in fact, when with but a brief moment spared from moral outrage and the requirements of prejudice and slander it becomes simple to understand the actual legal process involved in the program that has nothing to do with slavery in the slightest.

Once armed conflict ceases between the Caldari State and the Federation and Republic, then of course the initiative will be re-assessed in order to fulfill the requirements of repatriating armed combatants to their homelands.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#26 - 2013-06-13 20:45:59 UTC
Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
The enemy combatants that will be transferred to the Khanid Kingdom will do so as prisoners, and will be treated as such. They will be paid a fair wage under the laws of the Khanid Kingdom for their work from which will be extracted the debts associated with the running and operations of the facilities in which they are to be detained.

Expenses, I reiterate, that would not exist in the first place if you were following your previous scheme of repatriation.

Veikitamo Gesakaarin wrote:
At no point is there a transaction made in the entire process of the program in which the prisoners are treated as the property of a Holder - as such legally no slavery or any act related to such has occurred either in the State or the Kingdom.

Why do these detention centres need to be placed in the Khanid Kingdom anyway? Why would you bother weathering the obvious suspicion that you must have known building them in the Khanid Kingdom would bring - and please don't pretend you're surprised that people are suspicious, because I credit you with a little more intelligence than could successfully harbour such obliviousness. The State is not precisely choked for space in either hi-sec or low-sec in which you could have built these facilities.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#27 - 2013-06-13 20:47:05 UTC
Coyote Torres wrote:
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Some Stuff


Did you even get to fifteen?

Did you even get to ten?

I take it you have no counterargument, then?

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Coyote Torres
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#28 - 2013-06-13 21:25:31 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

I take it you have no counterargument, then?


I didn't see you make an argument. You made some noise about True Slave Foundations? Whatever they have to do with anything, other than you saying that you wouldn't really like to work with them? That's nice. Uhh...don't work with them, then? Oh, and you mentioned "comedy" too. That was about it.

Your straw man is in no way a parallel to co-operation between a State corporation and a Khanid contractor. The State and the Kingdom are long standing allies. The Kingdom is a Yulai signatory. If you want to have the slavery debate, pick someone that advocates it and buy them dinner.

I think that Gesakaarin hit the nail on the head when she raises the issue of attitudes to the Kingdom, because that's the axe you've got to grind here. Frankly, I don't care if you don't like the Kingdom much, that's entirely you're prerogative. Why you're getting up in Pyre's face over it, when all they're trying to do is find a better solution for the people they take prisoner, only the ancestors themselves know.
Andreus Ixiris
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2013-06-13 21:37:59 UTC
Coyote Torres wrote:
I didn't see you make an argument.

My point was that hiding a morally reprehensible action behind reader-friendly buzzwords does not excuse or alter the deed. The fact that you decided to feign stupidity or incomprehension (I mean, I assume you were merely feigning, although I've often been wrong in such charitable assumptions) is not my concern.

Andreus Ixiris > A Civire without a chin is barely a Civire at all.

Pieter Tuulinen > He'd be Civirely disadvantaged, Andreus.

Andreus Ixiris > ...

Andreus Ixiris > This is why we're at war.

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
#30 - 2013-06-13 21:51:25 UTC
Obviously you are not taking the right action in insulting Pyre officials, Ixiris.

In essence you can either try to appeal to the authorities to check the legality of the venture they are planning.

Or you could check out the conditions of the proposed POW detention camps yourself.
The mere fact that they are out-sourcing into space not part of the State is not a proof.

Blog: http://aidanbrooder.wordpress.com My EVE Playlist on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSNuHY7z8n1q1BdLvW2verIfH8vvWtz_x

Coyote Torres
Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#31 - 2013-06-13 22:09:57 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

morally reprehensible action

Andreus Ixiris wrote:

the deed.


And there you go again, letting your prejudice and your imagination elope together. You're lazy, Ixiris, you have no impulse control. Again, if you want to debate slavery, go find someone that supports it.

You're cheapening the debate on slavery by dropping the word and the accusation where it doesn't belong, in an effort to browbeat people. Its precisely this kind of conduct that puts people off having the real debates on slavery that actually matter. Every single time you pull a little stunt like this to feed your ego, there's someone else that reaches saturation point, another person that groans "not this **** again" and turns apathetic.

Pyre have already explicitly stated that these people are prisoners of war, and not slaves. They have also stated that these people will not become slaves, and that they're not being sold to anybody.

I'm inclined to believe them, you're not. Nobody is going to need treatment for shock over that particular revelation.
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#32 - 2013-06-13 22:25:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Makkal Hanaya
There's a shocking level of ignorance as regards to Kingdom laws being shown in this thread. I suspect many of you are simply conjuring up some Dark Amarr boogeyman complete with bald head, pointy goatee, and cackling laugh.

The Kingdom has signed a mutual defense pact with the Empire. A person considered a POW by Imperial standards is considered a POW by Royal standards.

A POW is not the same legal entity as a regular criminal.

While we're at it, not all criminals in the Kingdom are collared.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.

Aidan Brooder
Dynasphere Ltd.
#33 - 2013-06-13 22:31:24 UTC
I am indeed not very familiar with the Khanid Kingdom and it's laws, but I'm always willing to learn.

Blog: http://aidanbrooder.wordpress.com My EVE Playlist on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLSNuHY7z8n1q1BdLvW2verIfH8vvWtz_x

Vispellio
Hakkaisuo Corporation
#34 - 2013-06-13 23:07:09 UTC
I believe the actions of Pyre to be in their prisoners best interests, Although I do believe they could have been allocated to more appropriate use within Empire space.
Pieter Tuulinen
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#35 - 2013-06-13 23:08:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Pieter Tuulinen
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Coyote Torres wrote:
I didn't see you make an argument.

My point was that hiding a morally reprehensible action behind reader-friendly buzzwords does not excuse or alter the deed. The fact that you decided to feign stupidity or incomprehension (I mean, I assume you were merely feigning, although I've often been wrong in such charitable assumptions) is not my concern.


I've already stated my intention to tour these Detention Centers in person before allowing POWs I take to be assigned there. Until that time I will be repatriating POWS I take in the former way.

For the record, I believe accusations of Slavery to be unfounded. The announcement clearly states that the prisoners are POWs and are protected according to the usages of arms and Caldari State Law. They cannot be detained on the basis of 'cost incurred' beyond their legal detainment. They cannot be sold on into Slavery.

For the first time since I started the conversation, he looks me dead in the eye. In his gaze are steel jackhammers, quiet vengeance, a hundred thousand orbital bombs frozen in still life.

Svetlana Scarlet
Caldari Independent Navy Reserve
Curatores Veritatis Alliance
#36 - 2013-06-13 23:36:12 UTC
There is a significant difference between prison labor and slavery -- as far as I am aware, the Federation uses the former on a regular basis as well still, and sentences of hard labor are fairly common in the State. I have to admit I am not sure why Pyre would outsource such things to the Kingdom, since there are plenty of facilities within the State itself which could house these prisoners, but the principle is sound.

I assume that when hostilities have ended that said prisoners will be turned back over to their respective governments. It is Pyre's obligation to ensure that the conditions they are kept in meet the stipulations of the various treaties governing the treatment of prisoners that the State and Kingdom have both signed under the Yulai accords.

I have to admit I find it rather odd that Pyre would extend preferential hiring to foreign interests, while not doing so for other State interests. While I personally have nothing against House Tash-Murkon or the Royal Khanid Navy, it seems odd to extend them courtesy while denying such to the other five megacorporations of the State. Surely this is an oversight?
Tiberious Thessalonia
True Slave Foundations
#37 - 2013-06-13 23:47:30 UTC
Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Coyote Torres wrote:
Lets not forget that these are enemy combatatants. As long as they're treated decently, and their rights are respected according to State and Kingdom law, I don't see that Pyre has any obligation to throw extra isk their way for creature comforts. They can earn their keep like anybody else.

Alright. OK. Let's hypothesise for a moment. Let's say I go back to the FDU at some point, and wind up with a whole bunch of survivors from State Protectorate ships I kill. I decide I can't deal with them, so I look for some form of humanitarian organisation.

Oh, look, the True Slave Foundation say they're humanitarians. Hey, you know what, they rescue people without even being asked to! They clearly have the neccessary qualifications to look after my vast horde of Caldari POWs! Oh boy, TSF, you literally can't get those transports over here fast enough!

Now of course I trust TSF implicitly and without question (for any of you watching at home, the rhetorical tactic I'm currently employing is an obscure and little-used art known as "sarcasm," in which a person states something insincere for illustrative or comedic effect), and I can give you my assurance that their rights will be respected according to Federation and Nation law.

Colluding with cyborg zombies, you say? Perish the thought!


1) We are humanitarians.
2) We do rescue people from wrecks whenever possible, even ones we don't kill. This is clearly better then letting them die in the cold of space. We even sometimes run events where we rescue as many people as possible out of the markets. We aren't the people selling other human beings on every market in new eden, after all. That's on your guys heads.
3) We actually do have the provisions, resources, the space, and every requirement of human life in order to provide a decent living to a very large number of POW's. Not only that, but we can provide purpose and belonging, both of which are things that no other Nation in New Eden can do

So kindly leave us out of your little slapfight. You are trying to use sarcasm, but the problem here is that you are bad at it.
Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Doomheim
#38 - 2013-06-14 05:02:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Veikitamo Gesakaarin
Andreus Ixiris wrote:

Expenses, I reiterate, that would not exist in the first place if you were following your previous scheme of repatriation.


I implemented the previous policy of POW repatriation in good faith, in the earnest hopes that the offer would be reciprocated by the Federation. In the months since all that has occurred is disinterest by parties representing the Federation and the Republic, forcing me into a situation where Pyre Falcon Defence Combine was left with a large number of captured enemy combatants rescued during the course of post-engagement search and rescue operations without the appropriate facilities to exercise the legal obligations and duty of care required for their safety, health and well being.

Andreus Ixiris wrote:
Why do these detention centres need to be placed in the Khanid Kingdom anyway? Why would you bother weathering the obvious suspicion that you must have known building them in the Khanid Kingdom would bring - and please don't pretend you're surprised that people are suspicious, because I credit you with a little more intelligence than could successfully harbour such obliviousness. The State is not precisely choked for space in either hi-sec or low-sec in which you could have built these facilities.


It is fundamentally a question of the duty of care I feel I am obligated to fulfill to the prisoners currently under the corporate jurisdiction of Pyre Falcon Defence Combine. Given the current political instability in the Caldari State and the nature of the origins of the prisoners in question, I cannot in good conscience hand them over to be detained in corporate facilities in the State at this point in time for there is not sufficient guarantee in my mind that their safety can be assured.

Additionally, corporate detainment facilities in the Caldari State in general are designed with the containment of criminals and internal security threats. As a fellow soldier, I do not believe that these facilities are adequate in detaining fellow men and women whose only crime was to undertake their patriotic duties to their nations. It would be a shameful act to treat them with the same standards afforded to criminals, terrorists and violent dissidents.

The Khanid Kingdom offered the best solution at present to ensure that these brave and women who served their nations proudly with dignity and honour but whose war is now over, to be maintained in facilities befitting their status congruent with the regard and respect in which I hold and extend to fellow soldiers.

Svetlana Scarlet wrote:

I have to admit I find it rather odd that Pyre would extend preferential hiring to foreign interests, while not doing so for other State interests. While I personally have nothing against House Tash-Murkon or the Royal Khanid Navy, it seems odd to extend them courtesy while denying such to the other five megacorporations of the State. Surely this is an oversight?


The shareholders of Pyre Falcon Defence Combine solely represent Kaalakiota, Wiyrkomi and Lai Dai. The nature of the services to be rendered by the corporate military assets of the Combine make permitting the provision of contracts to interests not aligned with Kaalakiota, Wiyrkomi or Lai Dai inimical with the desire to promote long term relationships premised upon a close client-provider relationship within the domestic market of the Caldari State.

Kurilaivonen|Concern

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#39 - 2013-06-14 10:26:17 UTC
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
There's a shocking level of ignorance as regards to Kingdom laws being shown in this thread. I suspect many of you are simply conjuring up some Dark Amarr boogeyman complete with bald head, pointy goatee, and cackling laugh.

The Kingdom has signed a mutual defense pact with the Empire. A person considered a POW by Imperial standards is considered a POW by Royal standards.


Are you sure ? If so, the Kingdom would already be involved in the proxy war.

Which does not seem to be the case.

Svetlana Scarlet wrote:
There is a significant difference between prison labor and slavery


Oh ?
Makkal Hanaya
Revenent Defence Corperation
#40 - 2013-06-14 11:35:46 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Makkal Hanaya wrote:
There's a shocking level of ignorance as regards to Kingdom laws being shown in this thread. I suspect many of you are simply conjuring up some Dark Amarr boogeyman complete with bald head, pointy goatee, and cackling laugh.

The Kingdom has signed a mutual defense pact with the Empire. A person considered a POW by Imperial standards is considered a POW by Royal standards.


Are you sure ? If so, the Kingdom would already be involved in the proxy war.

Which does not seem to be the case.


Yes, I am sure there is a mutual defense pact.

CONCORD designated contested low security as milita 'warzones.' As far as I know, the only entity to have ever contested Kingdom space is the Empire, and the pact was part of a larger political treaty that involved the Empress acknowledging the sovereignty of the Kingdom.

While we retain our independence, we are a military vassal of the Empire and so are obligated to send requested military aid. As I see Khanid warships only within the Kingdom, I assume that the channeling of Kingdom born capsuleers to Imperial schools sufficiently meets that obligation at this time.

A POW's status is determined by the nation they find themselves in, not the loyalties of whoever captured them. If the Kingdom didn't also consider these combatants captured enemies, they'd lose their POW status the moment they were transported into Kingdom territory.

Render unto Khanid the things which are Khanid's; and unto God the things that are God's.