These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Hindsight: CCP's best troll ever.

Author
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#21 - 2011-11-06 22:03:05 UTC
Written Word wrote:
EVE will only get more and more safe as time goes on

Deal wit it.


wait what? Thats like a Goon sayin that.... and makes as much sense

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

Trainwreck McGee
Doomheim
#22 - 2011-11-06 22:05:01 UTC
nobody cares that you cant kill carebears anymore...maybe now i can find some baddies to kill in real pvp once your bored of missions.

CCP Trainwreck - Weekend Custodial Engineer / CCP Necrogoats foot stool

non judgement
Without Fear
Flying Burning Ships Alliance
#23 - 2011-11-06 23:18:13 UTC  |  Edited by: non judgement
There are places for people who don't like concord. Low security space and also nullsec ring any bells? I thought someone used to be in a pirate corp and wanted low sec space fixed. Why focus on high security space? Have you given up on lowsec? Weren't you meant to represent lowsec players and fix lowsec or something? It's obviously crap, if you have to come to highsec to look for fights.
Solstice Project
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#24 - 2011-11-06 23:19:12 UTC
Oblo Vissisuan wrote:
What you are erroneously concluding is that inexperience is the same thing as inability to understand, or stupidity, as you so elegantly put it. Loopholes in game mechanics do not constitute a game...but problems that must be fixed.

Also, your comparison of Eve to real life in your argument for putting it all on the shoulders of "personal responsibility" rather than having a fair playing field that is built into the system exactly describes what has caused the global financial meltdown.

In that, there can be no denial...regardless of how much the very people who caused the meltdown try to put out misinformation about it through the media that they control.



Please don't quote me and post crap like this, thanks.


It is ALL about personal responsibility. That's what this game is all about.
Watch your back or you get ******* killed.


It is MEANT to hurt. It is MEANT to be dangerous.


And congratulations for making a stupidly wrong connection between the economic crisis
and what's going on in EvE.


If ANYTHING, what happened happened because of a LACK of RESPONSIBILITY,
maddoff selling debt over and over again in new packages
without anybody knowing what's really going on anymore.


What is needed is a way to teach noobs how to look after themselves
and not making the game easier for them !
Doing that supports stupidity !

That's what's going on in the world right now, at least in many places !
Making stuff "more secure" instead of teaching people how to watch for themselves.

"This superman-dress does not enable your kid to fly!"
"Attention ! Coffee is hot !"


If you want to level the playground and having it built into the system,
then find a ******* way to EDUCATE THE NOOBS how to watch out for themselves,
instead of making the game easier !

Making it easier just supports their arrogance, ignorance and stupidity !

Just because they believe the world is unfair, doesn't mean it really is unfair !

It's their OWN damn fault !


You seem to represent proof and reason of my point ...

Congratulations !



Azelor Delaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#25 - 2011-11-07 00:51:19 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
How is limiting/changing 2 obviously flawed systems "dumbing down Eve". Now if they REMOVED the ability to Pvp in High-sec then I would agree. Now high-sec warriors might actually have to grow some balls and go into low-sec/null to get fights instead of playing it safe in High-sec and trying to gank haulers outside Jita 4-4. Oh the shame.


I never get tired of the "HIG HSEC PVP IS NOT PVP" scrubs. Please, keep your terrible posts coming.
Cozmik R5
Chez Stan
#26 - 2011-11-07 00:54:05 UTC
That short video from the last FanFest... the one about delivering stuff...

Try not. Do. Or do not. There is no try.

Oblo Vissisuan
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2011-11-07 01:01:54 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:
Oblo Vissisuan wrote:
What you are erroneously concluding is that inexperience is the same thing as inability to understand, or stupidity, as you so elegantly put it. Loopholes in game mechanics do not constitute a game...but problems that must be fixed.

Also, your comparison of Eve to real life in your argument for putting it all on the shoulders of "personal responsibility" rather than having a fair playing field that is built into the system exactly describes what has caused the global financial meltdown.

In that, there can be no denial...regardless of how much the very people who caused the meltdown try to put out misinformation about it through the media that they control.



Please don't quote me and post crap like this, thanks.


It is ALL about personal responsibility. That's what this game is all about.
Watch your back or you get ******* killed.


It is MEANT to hurt. It is MEANT to be dangerous.


And congratulations for making a stupidly wrong connection between the economic crisis
and what's going on in EvE.


If ANYTHING, what happened happened because of a LACK of RESPONSIBILITY,
maddoff selling debt over and over again in new packages
without anybody knowing what's really going on anymore.


What is needed is a way to teach noobs how to look after themselves
and not making the game easier for them !
Doing that supports stupidity !

That's what's going on in the world right now, at least in many places !
Making stuff "more secure" instead of teaching people how to watch for themselves.

"This superman-dress does not enable your kid to fly!"
"Attention ! Coffee is hot !"


If you want to level the playground and having it built into the system,
then find a ******* way to EDUCATE THE NOOBS how to watch out for themselves,
instead of making the game easier !

Making it easier just supports their arrogance, ignorance and stupidity !

Just because they believe the world is unfair, doesn't mean it really is unfair !

It's their OWN damn fault !


You seem to represent proof and reason of my point ...

Congratulations !





You see, what you describe would be perfectly fine if everywhere was null sec. However, the game has had high sec, low sec, and null sec since the beginning. It was designed that way from the start.

Apparently, what you are pissed about is high sec actually having the broken parts of the game mechanics fixed so that it is what it was intended to be (war dec issues notwithstanding). What you claim, in order for your reasoning to stand, is to want for there to be no high sec at all. In which case I wouldn't have a problem with your argument, because then everyone would know what they were in for.

However, unless high sec is removed from the game then what you are rallying for is the ability to gank players who are inexperienced and could not possibly know about all the holes in the game design. You really think that people are supposed to just know, through osmosis, that some people with criminal minds have found a way to subvert the game design in order to destroy their ships...which being a new player means they now have to start over from the beginning. Now to be clear, I am talking specifically about new players...and the game's seeming inability to keep them playing. Gank all the bots you want, I'm all for it.

Your Neanderthal type of thinking is counterproductive at best. If the world worked according to your philosophy we would have never gotten out of the stone ages. And by the way, you are the one who started the comparison with Eve and the real world, although I admit I misunderstood the point you were making. Now that I do understand it though, you need to understand that the world view that you are promulgating is the same as trickle down, supply side economics...the "every man for himself looking after his own best interest" Ayn Rand bullshit philosophy that has destroyed the global economy. This is a proven FACT. The evidence is all around you. "Personal Responsibility" is a term best used when describing people who make the tough decision to "do the right thing" in the face of personal sacrifice, not when it is used as a mask to hide the nefarious goals of attempting to fulfill a never ending greed that some people never seem to be able to fill, regardless of how many people suffer at their hands through their scams and other nefarious activities. I know people are getting tired of it, but once again, you, sir, have a problem that you need to have a better understanding of...Sociopathy.
Richard Hammond II
Doomheim
#28 - 2011-11-07 01:50:13 UTC
Solstice Project wrote:



It is ALL about gankers fapping as CONCORD approaches, after the kill of someone defenseless. That's what this game is all about.

Goons; infiltration at its best - first bob... now ccp itself. They dont realize you guys dot take this as "just a game". Bring it down guys, we're rooting for you.

Chelone
Outside The Asylum
#29 - 2011-11-07 02:43:20 UTC
Mmmmmmmmmm.

Griefer tears are the tastiest of all.
Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#30 - 2011-11-07 04:33:32 UTC
Azelor Delaria wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
How is limiting/changing 2 obviously flawed systems "dumbing down Eve". Now if they REMOVED the ability to Pvp in High-sec then I would agree. Now high-sec warriors might actually have to grow some balls and go into low-sec/null to get fights instead of playing it safe in High-sec and trying to gank haulers outside Jita 4-4. Oh the shame.


I never get tired of the "HIG HSEC PVP IS NOT PVP" scrubs. Please, keep your terrible posts coming.


Never said it wasn't Pvp. In fact I actually said that they SHOULDN'T remove High-Sec Pvp.

Then again I do find it funny hearing those who think they are |33t Pvpers because all they do is gank miners/haulers and war dec PVE corps. Pretty much try to attack anyone who won't/can't fight back.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

nakKEDK
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2011-11-07 05:02:49 UTC
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
Azelor Delaria wrote:
Brooks Puuntai wrote:
How is limiting/changing 2 obviously flawed systems "dumbing down Eve". Now if they REMOVED the ability to Pvp in High-sec then I would agree. Now high-sec warriors might actually have to grow some balls and go into low-sec/null to get fights instead of playing it safe in High-sec and trying to gank haulers outside Jita 4-4. Oh the shame.


I never get tired of the "HIG HSEC PVP IS NOT PVP" scrubs. Please, keep your terrible posts coming.


Never said it wasn't Pvp. In fact I actually said that they SHOULDN'T remove High-Sec Pvp.

Then again I do find it funny hearing those who think they are |33t Pvpers because all they do is gank miners/haulers and war dec PVE corps. Pretty much try to attack anyone who won't/can't fight back.


How is that related to the fact that the mechanics are broken.
Not to mention that some people dont have time, or doesnt find lowsec or 0,0 fun. Both parts apply for me.

All the "arguments" are basically DEAL WITH IT.
Nyla Skin
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#32 - 2011-11-07 05:23:33 UTC
I wouldnt mind pink ships. Im sure countless people would want to kill it. Makes a great bait Twisted

In after the lock :P   - CCP Falcon www.nizkor.org/features/fallacies

Brooks Puuntai
Solar Nexus.
#33 - 2011-11-07 06:05:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Brooks Puuntai
nakKEDK wrote:


How is that related to the fact that the mechanics are broken.
Not to mention that some people dont have time, or doesnt find lowsec or 0,0 fun. Both parts apply for me.

All the "arguments" are basically DEAL WITH IT.


Again never said they where broken I said they where flawed. In actuality my only issue was with Insurance on concord deaths, which personally I believed was a flawed system. The changes they made allowing "Dec Shields" I actually think is a bad choice, but then again the whole war dec system is crap.

While the reasons for people choosing High-Sec Pvp over Low or 0.0 is their own and some are valid. However that doesn't mean Highsec should be left open for easy Pvp. If anything it should be harder to Pvp and yield a lot higher consequences then anywhere else. Currently this is not really the case. Ganking is more prevalent now then ever because of having insurance to fall back, on as well as even the -10 aspect isn't really a issue due to SS Orca providing ships and alt ship swaping. War Decs are a joke in the fact that cost is laughable and restrictions are almost non existent.

Curious on what your reasons for saying lowsec isn't fun in comparison to high sec? From a Pvpers standpoint.

CCP's Motto: If it isn't broken, break it. If it is broken, ignore it. Improving NPE / Dynamic New Eden

Pok Nibin
Doomheim
#34 - 2011-11-07 06:33:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Pok Nibin
I'm going to guess. The purpose of this post is to....ah....mmm.....well....
What is the purpose of this post?

The right to free speech doesn't automatically carry with it the right to be taken seriously.

Previous page12