These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

"ICE" is gone!!! for the Mom and POP..... Walmart has taken over!

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#121 - 2013-06-12 07:53:00 UTC
Robert Saint wrote:


That's a fair comment, yet I really don't understand the nature of Low Sec and Null Sec players being angry at players who prefer High Sec game play.


We don't mind people playing in high sec at all. We don't want them getting the same level of reward for it though.
Dave Stark
#122 - 2013-06-12 08:11:33 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Robert Saint wrote:


That's a fair comment, yet I really don't understand the nature of Low Sec and Null Sec players being angry at players who prefer High Sec game play.


We don't mind people playing in high sec at all. We don't want them getting the same level of reward for it though.


you must really hate incursions then.
Silvetica Dian
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#123 - 2013-06-12 12:05:55 UTC
My ice miner would like me to confirm that mining ice is now pointless. Fields vanish in less than 5 minutes and there is only one system that has ice in it anyway.
All the other ice miners should do something else now.
2 secs his ore hold is full need to go dock up and unload brb.

Money at its root is a form of rationing. When the richest 85 people have as much wealth as the poorest 3.5 billion (50% of humanity) it is clear where the source of poverty is. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jan/20/trickle-down-economics-broken-promise-richest-85
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#124 - 2013-06-12 12:28:08 UTC
Nitko Koraka wrote:
Every ice anomaly I've visited in lowsec has had plenty to mine. Maybe set up shop there?


I heard that in 1980 there was plenty of space for new jewelries in Bronx. How dumb they were not flocking in there.

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#125 - 2013-06-12 12:33:15 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Robert Saint wrote:


That's a fair comment, yet I really don't understand the nature of Low Sec and Null Sec players being angry at players who prefer High Sec game play.


We don't mind people playing in high sec at all. We don't want them getting the same level of reward for it though.


Whole alliances made of tail riders and blobbers should not have any increased reward at all. Only their officers and those who actually work their butts to make them go ahead.

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#126 - 2013-06-12 12:42:01 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
Robert Saint wrote:


That's a fair comment, yet I really don't understand the nature of Low Sec and Null Sec players being angry at players who prefer High Sec game play.


We don't mind people playing in high sec at all. We don't want them getting the same level of reward for it though.

show me ONE high-sec alliance which:
- can afford 100+ titans like PL has.
- can afford losing 100-300 battleships in one CTA
- can organize and can support with ISK events like BurnJita, hulkageddon

I guess "reward" is more complex thing than you like to see it

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"
Dave Stark
#127 - 2013-06-12 12:44:47 UTC
March rabbit wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Robert Saint wrote:


That's a fair comment, yet I really don't understand the nature of Low Sec and Null Sec players being angry at players who prefer High Sec game play.


We don't mind people playing in high sec at all. We don't want them getting the same level of reward for it though.

show me ONE high-sec alliance which:
- can afford 100+ titans like PL has.
- can afford losing 100-300 battleships in one CTA
- can organize and can support with ISK events like BurnJita, hulkageddon

I guess "reward" is more complex thing than you like to see it


show me an activity in high sec that is worth forming a corp for.

disclaimer: one man corps to evade npc corp taxes don't count.
Ruze
Next Stage Initiative
#128 - 2013-06-12 16:42:40 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
March rabbit wrote:
baltec1 wrote:
Robert Saint wrote:


That's a fair comment, yet I really don't understand the nature of Low Sec and Null Sec players being angry at players who prefer High Sec game play.


We don't mind people playing in high sec at all. We don't want them getting the same level of reward for it though.

show me ONE high-sec alliance which:
- can afford 100+ titans like PL has.
- can afford losing 100-300 battleships in one CTA
- can organize and can support with ISK events like BurnJita, hulkageddon

I guess "reward" is more complex thing than you like to see it


show me an activity in high sec that is worth forming a corp for.

disclaimer: one man corps to evade npc corp taxes don't count.


Truthfully, hisec mining corps can usually do a bang-up job and be fun to join, especially with proper orca support and POS capabilities in some of the less-used systems. That said, you can stay in an NPC corp are very rarely feel the tax effect, and do the same thing.

Also, Incursion corps work very well. Trust issues taken into consideration, many times it's better to work with corpies and alliance mates who are focused on running incursions than not.

Finally, hauling. Larger hauling corps like 'Red Frog' (do I have the name right?) are doing an awesome job in that market.

If you're driven to threaten others with harm or violence because of what they do in game, you can't separate fantasy from reality. That "griefer/thief" is probably more sane than you are. How screwed up is that?