These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Test space getting invaded by goon blob

First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Amarra Mandalin
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#121 - 2013-06-09 00:52:58 UTC
Erotica 1 wrote:
If only James 315 was here, he could sort out this dispute.

Speaking of, when Test loses all their sov, will they embrace the saviour of high sec? For their sake, I hope they do.

*edit* For those in Test rusty on the rules of high sec, please visit www.minerbumping.com


Hopefully, you don't need James to speak for you.

I didn't know you were aligned with those guys.

I'm just against all the free adverts.

It really degrades the quality of this prestigious forum.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#122 - 2013-06-09 01:04:23 UTC
Nylith Empyreal wrote:
Two alliances, two websites contesting for posting dominance of the forums. Just need a devout 4chan alliance now and one of tumblr so we can start a tournament. Throw in facebook/twitter for the special olympics.


And this shows why I like how Blizzard setup WoW, where no matter how popular a player is or a website can be, it doesn't influence the game itself (they have a peculiar view about players, and probably due to this new Facebook age).

Why this is even allowed is puzzling, but can say it will offer more problems and headaches, and probably resemble the French Revolution and it's aftermath.

Never ever let the mob rule, it's suicide.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
Lady Areola Fappington
#123 - 2013-06-09 01:08:46 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Nylith Empyreal wrote:
Two alliances, two websites contesting for posting dominance of the forums. Just need a devout 4chan alliance now and one of tumblr so we can start a tournament. Throw in facebook/twitter for the special olympics.


And this shows why I like how Blizzard setup WoW, where no matter how popular a player is or a website can be, it doesn't influence the game itself (they have a peculiar view about players, and probably due to this new Facebook age).

Why this is even allowed is puzzling, but can say it will offer more problems and headaches, and probably resemble the French Revolution and it's aftermath.

Never ever let the mob rule, it's suicide.


It's called "the sandbox". We like it that way.

Also, you've never been on SA's claimed WoW servers, have you?

7.2 CAN I AVOID PVP COMPLETELY? No; there are no systems or locations in New Eden where PvP may be completely avoided. --Eve New Player Guide
Not a Penguin
#124 - 2013-06-09 01:10:51 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Nylith Empyreal wrote:
Two alliances, two websites contesting for posting dominance of the forums. Just need a devout 4chan alliance now and one of tumblr so we can start a tournament. Throw in facebook/twitter for the special olympics.


And this shows why I like how Blizzard setup WoW, where no matter how popular a player is or a website can be, it doesn't influence the game itself (they have a peculiar view about players, and probably due to this new Facebook age).

Why this is even allowed is puzzling, but can say it will offer more problems and headaches, and probably resemble the French Revolution and it's aftermath.

Never ever let the mob rule, it's suicide.


I've never seen so my arrogance and white privilege displayed in one post. "mob rule is bad" are you kidding me? So you hate Democracy? Woww..... You are clearly a racist, sexist bigot at the least.

Listen, Reddit is the most important site on the internet, most innovation and humor comes from there precisly for one reason. Mob rule. Now check whatever issues your having and open your eyes. CCP would do well to open a Reddit page and make all their dicisions based on upboats XD lel, pardon my joke but you get the idea.
Hrothgar Nilsson
#125 - 2013-06-09 01:28:56 UTC
What happened to the whole insufferable "trillions of HP to grind through", boycotting sov warfare until CCP fixed it, and that anybody who wanted to do sov warfare was insane?

CCP fix sov warfare with Odyssey?

I've... seen things you people wouldn't believe...

Attack ships on fire off the shoulder of Orion...
Aeral Louana
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#126 - 2013-06-09 01:33:36 UTC
Spiffing!
Neuntausend
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#127 - 2013-06-09 06:26:18 UTC
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:
CCP fix sov warfare with Odyssey?



They didn't, but we can't live without hilariously failfit Machariel reimbursements.
Kijo Rikki
Killboard Padding Services
#128 - 2013-06-09 07:00:18 UTC
Whatever happened to James 315?

You make a valid point, good Sir or Madam. 
Jon Ferguson
JC Ferguson and Son Ltd
Ferguson Alliance
#129 - 2013-06-09 07:03:48 UTC
I don't like big alliances in general, but I like them a lot better when they're actually fighting each other instead of naping all of nullsec while their overlords rmt.
Joan Greywind
The Lazy Crabs
#130 - 2013-06-09 07:12:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Joan Greywind
I don't understand the comments saying that goons are bad because they are attacking test when they are weak. I might be playing another game and might be crazy, but shouldn't you only go to war when you have an advantage? shouldn't you always pick the right moment to strike? This is eve after all and fairness is not the name of the game. Glorious and arena like combat is left for tournaments and dueling, all other form of combat in eve is inherently unfair and one side will almost always have an advantage.

I am glad that finally alliances are actually fighting for an objective that is logical (if there is such a thing in an internet spaceship game), valuable isk and estate, and not fighting for the sake e-honor, holding sov because we are leet, or we dont like you and we are going to take your space. Ideally all wars and combat should be for a good reason, and that reason shouldn't "only" be gud fights. In a war where you have clear materialistic objectives you can easily weigh the cost benefit of such wars and hopefully have a bigger motivation to actually engage in them.

So thanks for CCP for making a small change (long overdue) that makes null more interesting. We might finally have a good war (please test dont fail cascade). Fingers crossed.
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#131 - 2013-06-09 09:30:32 UTC
"Test space getting invaded by goon bob"



What the heck? Lol


Get in closer so I can put some Quake on you with my instacane!!

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne
Sandrestal
Pakistani Taxi Drivers
#132 - 2013-06-09 11:16:59 UTC
MEZZA Creire-Geng wrote:
i see goons mentioned alot but i thought it was the CFC that was invading.. im not one to stir anything but i dont see how the goons dragging the enitre CFC to take space is going to aid the rest of CFC members other than goons Twisted


Alas Razor has not taken up the clarion call and headed to Fountain. Wonder why not. As to aiding Goons, some alliances should remember who was paramount in helping them reclaim their ancestral hunting grounds.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#133 - 2013-06-09 11:32:50 UTC
Hrothgar Nilsson wrote:
What happened to the whole insufferable "trillions of HP to grind through", boycotting sov warfare until CCP fixed it, and that anybody who wanted to do sov warfare was insane?

CCP fix sov warfare with Odyssey?


TEST solved the dilemma by very thoughtfully reducing the structure grind that the CFC faced. They did this by alienating every ally they had except the one that was about to failcascade and drop sov anyway.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#134 - 2013-06-09 11:33:45 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Nylith Empyreal wrote:
Two alliances, two websites contesting for posting dominance of the forums. Just need a devout 4chan alliance now and one of tumblr so we can start a tournament. Throw in facebook/twitter for the special olympics.


And this shows why I like how Blizzard setup WoW, where no matter how popular a player is or a website can be, it doesn't influence the game itself (they have a peculiar view about players, and probably due to this new Facebook age).

Why this is even allowed is puzzling, but can say it will offer more problems and headaches, and probably resemble the French Revolution and it's aftermath.

Never ever let the mob rule, it's suicide.



You don't really like freedom, do you?

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#135 - 2013-06-09 11:43:18 UTC
Lady Areola Fappington wrote:
Also, you've never been on SA's claimed WoW servers, have you?


lol

Can't claim the realms, it's not EvE, nor does the game allow that type of monopoly. Can't block access to instances. Can't control the market. Can't control the resources.

Not even Dream Paragon or Method could, and they're the professionally sponsored WoW players who do the world firsts.

Even if you tried, Blizzard will break it, as that's not how WoW is played.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#136 - 2013-06-09 11:47:50 UTC
Malcanis wrote:

You don't really like freedom, do you?


Freedom isn't anarchy. There's a difference.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
Dave stark
#137 - 2013-06-09 11:49:27 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
as that's not how WoW is played.


no, you log in and do the same quest every day when it resets, then you log out again until blizzard tell you they've made a new dungeon and you log in to find the new epic items all but mailed to you in a neatly wrapped package with a bow.

there's no reason to actually *play* the game, it's actually sad the state WoW has ended up in and it's unsurprising that it's apparently hemorrhaging customers and emailing every one it knows about "reduced price services" to try and claw people back.
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#138 - 2013-06-09 12:08:17 UTC
Dave Stark wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
as that's not how WoW is played.


no, you log in and do the same quest every day when it resets, then you log out again until blizzard tell you they've made a new dungeon and you log in to find the new epic items all but mailed to you in a neatly wrapped package with a bow.


Meanwhile, you can't P2W in WoW. Or control any territory even on PvP realms.

Deflated enough?

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#139 - 2013-06-09 12:09:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Malcanis
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

You don't really like freedom, do you?


Freedom isn't anarchy. There's a difference.


Ah, your idea of freedom is that people should be allowed to do whatever you approve of?

EDIT: And "anarchy" means "without a ruler". That seems an odd way to characterise your objection to player ruled gamespace. I guess the problem is that it's not being run the way you want it to be.


See that's the problem with freedom. You give it to people and they just start doing whatever they like.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016
Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#140 - 2013-06-09 12:12:33 UTC
Malcanis wrote:
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Malcanis wrote:

You don't really like freedom, do you?


Freedom isn't anarchy. There's a difference.


Ah, your idea of freedom is that people should be allowed to do whatever you approve of?


Or your approval?

Anarchy =/= freedom.

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell