These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

So I've been playing on the market today...

Author
Taedrin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2011-11-06 17:40:06 UTC
And either I've found a couple of market bots, or people REALLY want their buy order to be "on top".
HalfArse
Wixo Trading Co.
#2 - 2011-11-06 17:45:54 UTC
new to the market?
Leonard Dukes
Arbitrage Holdings Corporation
#3 - 2011-11-06 17:46:12 UTC
Yes, and yes.
Tekota
The Freighter Factory
#4 - 2011-11-06 17:49:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Tekota
Must be a bot then....

Sorry if that sounds a bit snide, but one thing we can be sure of is that there are *a lot* of people who will obsess for hours on end on a market. BTW - THAT'S MY MARKET, MY MARKET YOU HEAR? I WILL *DESTROY* THIS MARKET FOR WEEKS BEFORE ALLOWING ANY OF YOU LOT A SINGLE SALE. Ahem, well, that is the sort of obsessive personality that is common in, well, all MMOs to be honest.

Whilst there exists a non-tinfoil explanation I'm generally more inclined to think that is at play than the tinfoil variant.

Now none of this is to deny the presence of bots, I personally tend to think their number and their impact on the markets is less than feared but I have no doubt they exist, and that their presence on any scale harms the game. If you suspect one, report it - only CCP have the logs to know one way or another, but obsessive order maintenance hour after hour is (unfortunately for the health of our species) not necessarily a bot indicator.
Taedrin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2011-11-06 17:59:57 UTC
Tekota wrote:
Must be a bot then....

Sorry if that sounds a bit snide, but one thing we can be sure of this that there are *a lot* of people who will obsess for hours on end on a market. BTW - THAT'S MY MARKET, MY MARKET YOU HEAR? I WILL *DESTROY* THIS MARKET FOR WEEKS BEFORE ALLOWING ANY OF YOU LOT A SINGLE SALE. Ahem, well, that is the sort of obsessive personality that is common in, well, all MMOs to be honest.

Whilst there exists a non-tinfoil explanation I'm generally more inclined to think that is at play than the tinfoil variant.

Now none of this is to deny the presence of bots, I personally tend to think their number and their impact on the markets is less than feared but I have no doubt they exist, and that their presence on any scale harms the game. If you suspect one, report it - only CCP have the logs to know one way or another, but obsessive order maintenance hour after hour is (unfortunately for the health of our species) not necessarily a bot indicator.


I would be tempted to believe that humans obsessing over their orders would prefer to allow a relatively small order to stay on top instead of mindlessly following it until you nuke your order on the sell orders. Repeatedly.

And someone just cleared out his order, which cost him an extra 100m over what he started with. Sure 100m isn't that much - but that's like me killing a T2 fit T1 Battleship with a T2 fit T1 cruiser.
Mantra Achura
Stammtisch
#6 - 2011-11-06 18:13:54 UTC
If people really want to be on the top of orders, they will achieve it.

Just a single player could update his orders of a single item in less than 5 minutes by splitting those into several small orders and updating each in a row.

Now imagine Jita with hundreds of players updating orders regularly... If a market is hot, much effort has to be spent to get a piece of the cake.
Kandreath
De Re Metallica
#7 - 2011-11-06 20:29:19 UTC
Keeping your order in pole position is one of the most important thing in market PVP. ( as long as you are buying low and selling high!Lol)

I tried it for a few weeks, (with success I might add), but was bored stupid doing it. Then after a forum post I realised I didn't need to be in pole ALL the time.Shocked Fluctuations meant if you left the order for a little while, (and this helped cool the item), you'd get to pole eventually, (if the bidding war ended that is).Lol

More importantly, backing it off a little allowed me to really think about market strategy. Single-mindedly 0.01 isking all orders just added fuel to the fire when a bidding war started. Now I make a judgement by thinking about the volume that has to move before I potentially get pole. If it's bugger-all (in terms of daily volumes), I usually leave it.

I also see players who'd rather stuff the prices for weeks on an item then let any of the other children play. I guess it's PVP but it seems a little dumb if you ask me.
Adunh Slavy
#8 - 2011-11-06 20:32:34 UTC
Kandreath wrote:

I tried it for a few weeks, (with success I might add), but was bored stupid doing it. Then after a forum post I realised I didn't need to be in pole ALL the time.Shocked Fluctuations meant if you left the order for a little while, (and this helped cool the item), you'd get to pole eventually, (if the bidding war ended that is).Lol



Welcome to knowing how to trade and not being one of the sheep. :)

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#9 - 2011-11-06 21:29:56 UTC
One of these days, CCP is going to say "100 ISK" is not enough to pay for the server load and change it so that changing an order costs you 0.01% of the total value (about 10,000 ISK on a 100M ISK order).

The tears will flow that day.
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#10 - 2011-11-07 09:00:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Kara Books
accidentally quoted myself...
sorry, didnt mean to double post.
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#11 - 2011-11-07 09:07:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Kara Books
Kara Books wrote:
dont cry wolf if you dont know what the hell it is your talking about.


Took me 2 months to learn how to tell the difference between a bot and a human.

You gotta be more specific, What item or items and what station.

Market bots dont sleep and they almost always have a patarn to them, be it .04 markups every 30 min or 1 item at a time updating itself in less then 5 min of the item is beaten.


I also think it would be nice if CCP implemented a report bot function right into the market, I.E. any one can rightclick on an order and report bot.


also about the post above me.

a .01 % markup... Hmm..

Maybe that could be a good idea, but wouldnt it in theory chase away people from playing an aspect of the game called trader?

It would also play right into the hands of Market bots.

If you want to STOP the constant penny wars, and actually attract new paying customers, Dont only crack down on the BOTS, I mean hammer them as publicly and openly as possible, that way new players see that "your on their side"
you want to keep the costs low so they can have "more fun"


I left another game to play the market game in eve.. If "tears" will flow then I will be leaving the game to for any next up and coming game with a market system of any sort.. or no games at all.

thats my peace for that matter.
Cyniac
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2011-11-07 10:19:36 UTC
Taedrin wrote:
[quote=Tekota]I would be tempted to believe that humans obsessing over their orders would prefer to allow a relatively small order to stay on top instead of mindlessly following it until you nuke your order on the sell orders. Repeatedly.

And someone just cleared out his order, which cost him an extra 100m over what he started with. Sure 100m isn't that much - but that's like me killing a T2 fit T1 Battleship with a T2 fit T1 cruiser.


You'd be amazed at the things some humans obsess over...

And congrats on your market kill Twisted
Scrapyard Bob
EVE University
Ivy League
#13 - 2011-11-07 14:01:13 UTC
If the fee charged to change a price was a percentage of total order value rather then a flat 100 ISK, you would see fewer but more meaningful price changes rather then the 0.01 ISK game.

If the fee was 0.01%, you probably wouldn't risk it on a price change of less then 0.20%. For a 100M sell order of 100 items @ 1M each, you'd wait for the price to be at least 2000 ISK higher/lower before paying the 10,000 ISK fee. Rather then nudging it 0.01 ISK up/down every 5 minutes.

It might encourage speculative trading in smaller lot sizes, which would tie up more buy/sell slots, which would result in more alts needing to be created, which might translate into more accounts for CCP.

Much lower then 0.01% (like 0.001%) and it might not have the desired effect, much higher (above 0.1%) and it would probably kill market trading.
Plato Idari
SoE Roughriders
Electus Matari
#14 - 2011-11-07 20:57:26 UTC
I will concede that I .01 isk on occasion, but if someone starts doing it to me I usually start with big jumps and get bigger till they're gone or the opportunity I saw is gone. Its not worth my time to sit around and fight over .01 isk. Even if the quantity in question is large.