These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

t3 locked out of 4/10 site

First post
Author
Dersen Lowery
The Scope
#61 - 2013-06-07 03:33:01 UTC
One of our relative newbies ran a 3/10 in a Vexor with T1 drones. Why the hell do you need a T3?

Proud founder and member of the Belligerent Desirables.

I voted in CSM X!

Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#62 - 2013-06-07 03:49:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Amarra Mandalin
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Amarra Mandalin wrote:

Hotdropping a lone battlecruiser in low sec is overkill too, so what's your point? (The guy beat you to the goodies because you couldn't be bothered to ship up?)


Wrong attitude if EvE ever wants to break 1mil players (and not over half extra alt accounts).

High sec is for new players. It's not designed for those with the skills to use it as a safe zone to play for usually low/null players.

Until CCP changes EvE to be a more PvE game, PvPers with OP ships in high sec sites designed for lowbies will chase those lowbies right out of the game.

"Time is money, friend" and they're not going to pay to not even play the game.

There's no excuse for you to not take your T3 and put it in the environment it was designed for...and that's low/null.

Time to leave home and grow those wings.


LOL -- my "wings" have taken me through more bubbles and gate camps than I can recall (intermittently) during the last 3 years.

Still, your whining -- as the OPs post was referred to -- is a bit hypocritical.

And while T3s are overpowered for these sites, like you said time is money.

I used to run C2s in a drake and SB and it wasn't time efficient, and was in a wormhole in month two, so I'm not risk adverse.

The Tengu has long been deemed to be the premiere PVE ship. Google "best PVE ship" + eve. Now people want to delegate it to a combat ship role even though history shows otherwise.

Besides, I'm more interested in T3s being blocked from 4/10s or combat sites in low sec and can see why people are unhappy about it.

(Though I may be fuzzy on that, what I ran couldn't be done in an Omen -- I thought some of these were 4/10s)

That said, I agree about the 3/10s and new players.

It just seems there are plenty of controls for high sec dwellers, be it war decs, ganking or otherwise.

Adapting is not always the best answer. That's one reason so much stuff in America is made in China ...but I digress.

I'm for people having a good time. It's a game and I don't agree with all the changes in the last year that have catered to this or that crowd. That you do, or at least this one, is fine with me.

I just tend to feel the OP's complaint is as valid as most the counters to it. It was his/her dime and time to train the ship for the use deemed appropriate for the subscriber - one-that fit the paradigm until recently. That the person wasn't taking advantage of the ship's capability is irrelevant.
412nv Yaken
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#63 - 2013-06-07 03:58:34 UTC
nat longshot wrote:
Ok over a year ago i got my Loki for ded 4/10 site and now there locked out of them WTF.

T3 are ship to explore and you lock them out of 4/10's i understand 3/10 site but 4/10's.

If t2 command ships can enter 4/10 sites why cant t3's hell any battlecruiser can enter them.

So what the point of having a ship that made to explore when you lock out 4/10s and stick them to only 5/10 and up?

WTF CCP.



I can solo 4/10 in a drake, though a loki? Dude come to low sec, its where exploring is at.

A True Champion of High Security Space

Ace Uoweme
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#64 - 2013-06-07 04:07:00 UTC
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
LOL -- my "wings" have taken me through more bubbles and gate camps than I can recall (intermittently) during the last 3 years.


Yet, you're hanging around :cough: with babies?

ShockedUghSad

_"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." _ ~George Orwell

Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#65 - 2013-06-07 04:11:28 UTC
Ace Uoweme wrote:
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
LOL -- my "wings" have taken me through more bubbles and gate camps than I can recall (intermittently) during the last 3 years.


Yet, you're hanging around :cough: with babies?

ShockedUghSad


Babies are cute and don't cry as much.
Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#66 - 2013-06-07 12:20:13 UTC
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
The Tengu has long been deemed to be the premiere PVE ship. Google "best PVE ship" + eve. Now people want to delegate it to a combat ship role even though history shows otherwise.


In fact this legend became one because of very little factors most people don't want to think about and instead criticize it generally.

First question you ask yourself when playing some game is:"wth can offer me the best compromise as a all-in-one thing so I'm not stuck with for a simple task?"

In eve this answer is quite obvious, but not that obvious after all. If I tell you the absolute all-in-one OP machine is a faction fitted Machariel most people laugh and look at Tengus, that's because they have no clue what they're talking about.
Non the less, faction fitted Machariels and Vindicators and as long as you zombifie yourself doing this the industrial way can easily give you "ticks" of 50M isk

Try that with a Tengu, anoms, and then you'll see at best you can push at 30 with a very expensive faction fit ans zombie is just the first name.

To summarize, most people don't have a clue at all what they're talking about, they read some crap, they saw some stupid video with a guy using full officer/faction fitted Tengu forgetting to add the obvious faction fitted/implanted off grid booster al etc etc and then claim 'Tengus are op".
Well they're never seen what a 500K EHP 1300DPS with point at over 30km Proteus can do, they actually find few or probably any of these in their eve career and there's a reason for this, it's easier in Eve to forget and discuss the real reasons and just brag about legends.

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Inxentas Ultramar
Ultramar Independent Contracting
#67 - 2013-06-07 14:40:41 UTC
Sentamon
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#68 - 2013-06-07 16:02:15 UTC
nat longshot wrote:
Ok over a year ago i got my Loki for ded 4/10 site and now there locked out of them WTF.

T3 are ship to explore and you lock them out of 4/10's i understand 3/10 site but 4/10's.

If t2 command ships can enter 4/10 sites why cant t3's hell any battlecruiser can enter them.

So what the point of having a ship that made to explore when you lock out 4/10s and stick them to only 5/10 and up?

WTF CCP.



You're bad and you should feel bad.

~ Professional Forum Alt  ~

Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#69 - 2013-06-07 16:08:49 UTC
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
The Tengu has long been deemed to be the premiere PVE ship. Google "best PVE ship" + eve. Now people want to delegate it to a combat ship role even though history shows otherwise.


Amarra Mandalin wrote:
The Tengu has long been deemed to be the premiere PVE ship.Google "best PVE ship" + eve.


Amarra Mandalin wrote:
premiere PVE ship. .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1Jqu70c6XE








BEST SHIP IS FRIENDSHIP

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Amarra Mandalin
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#70 - 2013-06-07 16:39:02 UTC
Ramona McCandless wrote:
Amarra Mandalin wrote:
The Tengu has long been deemed to be the premiere PVE ship. Google "best PVE ship" + eve. Now people want to delegate it to a combat ship role even though history shows otherwise.


Amarra Mandalin wrote:
The Tengu has long been deemed to be the premiere PVE ship.Google "best PVE ship" + eve.


Amarra Mandalin wrote:
premiere PVE ship. .


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G1Jqu70c6XE


LOL


[quote]
BEST SHIP IS FRIENDSHIP


Kinda depends on the ship and the friends though, no? :D
Ramona McCandless
Silent Vale
LinkNet
#71 - 2013-06-07 16:40:36 UTC
Amarra Mandalin wrote:


Kinda depends on the ship and the friends though, no? :D


Das ist der troof sista

"Yea, some dude came in and was normal for first couple months, so I gave him director." - Sean Dunaway

"A singular character could be hired to penetrate another corps space... using gorilla like tactics..." - Chane Morgann

Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#72 - 2013-06-07 16:49:28 UTC
412nv Yaken wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
Ok over a year ago i got my Loki for ded 4/10 site and now there locked out of them WTF.

T3 are ship to explore and you lock them out of 4/10's i understand 3/10 site but 4/10's.

If t2 command ships can enter 4/10 sites why cant t3's hell any battlecruiser can enter them.

So what the point of having a ship that made to explore when you lock out 4/10s and stick them to only 5/10 and up?

WTF CCP.



I can solo 4/10 in a drake, though a loki? Dude come to low sec, its where exploring is at.




I can solo a 4/10 in a (old layout) Cyclone with 3 missile launchers, probe launcher, drone module, and cloak in the high rack, one extender for tank with hack and arch mod in mids, and 5 hobgoblins

Took a long time to kill the boss though. Yeah the exploration ship was all I had at that moment.


So to see people running them in T3 says pathetic.


Bring back DEEEEP Space!

Sergeant Acht Scultz
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#73 - 2013-06-07 23:43:30 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
So to see people running them in T3 says pathetic.



The most pathetic in your case is that you talk and whine about something you have no clue about it.

removed inappropriate ASCII art signature - CCP Eterne

Nostradamouse Riraille
S.M.U.G.G.L.E.
#74 - 2013-06-08 00:23:11 UTC
I'm suddenly happy I kept my gila...
Herzog Wolfhammer
Sigma Special Tactics Group
#75 - 2013-06-08 00:33:30 UTC
Sergeant Acht Scultz wrote:
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
So to see people running them in T3 says pathetic.



The most pathetic in your case is that you talk and whine about something you have no clue about it.




I have enough clue to survive in nullsec alone and unsupported in that fit I described and still come back with a hold full of loot. It never saw a gate camp either.


And that's much more than the highsec 3-4/10 Tengue Blitzers are doing. I suppose if I hug Jita with a glitterboat I too could look like I knew something.

Oh well. Troll harder, it goes with your avatar.

Bring back DEEEEP Space!

SFM Hobb3s
Perkone
Caldari State
#76 - 2013-06-08 02:39:28 UTC
I'm certainly guilty of jacking many 4/10's from hisec inhabitants...I have a pile of over 60 8th tier effects from the three weeks prior to odyssey when I resubbed (was about 18bil in revenue if your curious).

I'm actually going to flip the coin and say I approve of CCP blocking t3 in 4/10's. I only looked for these sites for a couple days when Odyssey launched, and there was some rather varied PVP happening in half the sites I went in. It was risky, and it was fun.

I just wish that the presence of signatures was not made so obvious to EVERYONE in the system. Makes it even worse in Null as now all you have to do is d-scan in the narrow direction of a sig and you know EXACTLY what someone is doing lol.
ISD Tyrozan
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#77 - 2013-06-08 16:54:54 UTC
A sexist personal attack post has been deleted.

RULE: 4. Personal attacks are prohibited.
RULE: 6. Racism and discrimination are prohibited.

ISD Tyrozan

Captain

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

@ISDTyrozan | @ISD_CCL

Destination SkillQueue
Doomheim
#78 - 2013-06-08 17:09:09 UTC
Herzog Wolfhammer wrote:
412nv Yaken wrote:
nat longshot wrote:
Ok over a year ago i got my Loki for ded 4/10 site and now there locked out of them WTF.

T3 are ship to explore and you lock them out of 4/10's i understand 3/10 site but 4/10's.

If t2 command ships can enter 4/10 sites why cant t3's hell any battlecruiser can enter them.

So what the point of having a ship that made to explore when you lock out 4/10s and stick them to only 5/10 and up?

WTF CCP.



I can solo 4/10 in a drake, though a loki? Dude come to low sec, its where exploring is at.




I can solo a 4/10 in a (old layout) Cyclone with 3 missile launchers, probe launcher, drone module, and cloak in the high rack, one extender for tank with hack and arch mod in mids, and 5 hobgoblins

Took a long time to kill the boss though. Yeah the exploration ship was all I had at that moment.


So to see people running them in T3 says pathetic.




To me it says they're out to win and/or want to do as wide variety of sites as possible. Exploration is pretty populated in some areas, so it's not uncommon to see 2-3 groups landing on a 4/10 at the same time and 2 groups competing for them is the norm. The people who went with the minimalist/cheap options are almost without fail the ones who are the losers of such races and in general their performace is slower and less efficient, meaning less income and increased chance of getting interrupted and losing the site. Since in this particular race speed and efficiency are the deciding factors in success, it only makes sense to use the best tools available to get an advantage over the competition.